Post#23 » by Mallie » Mon Apr 7, 2025 11:34 am
Well it's all fairly simple - boils down to target audience and to whom something is catered.
I'd go out on a limb and say that people on these boards are squarly outside of the target range for most podcast, much less TV shows. As someone mentioned earlier ITT, we all either now, or can google in seconds someone's shooting splits or defensive rating. So all that is left is either really deep dive analysis (which is not conducive to mainstrem TV) or personal opinions. And personal opinions generate more engagement the more they're egregious and out there. Hence, the hot take culture.
Basically, only way to make a basketball related podcast captivating is to make it deeply detailed and analytic (for us basketball nerds) or to be as candid as possible. The latter won't happen since it's all about not messing the bag for the next man down the line and to maintain relationships, while the former is really niche and won't have that much of an audience to begin with.
Saying that about candidness, there isn't really much left to talk about. Someone said it here, too - another story about a guy who worked hard, showed off in the right moment, had his welcome to the league moment, grueling travel schedule, few censored tidbits about some funny encounter or an anecdote, yes, blessed with this opportunity, yadda yadda yadda. It's hard to sit through one, much less dozens each week.
There ARE some interesting analytic podcasts out there, but we'll limit it only to "former players' podcasts". Basically, there are none. The JJ/LeBron podcast was interesting, but it doesn't delve deep enough, which is understandable since 95+ percent of the audience wouldn't get it, while it's also not all that smart to go so deep as to reveal your plans live on video (usually at least the guest is still an active player/coach).
All that is left, then, is to be at least engaing and fun. It's kinda harsh, but - if you cannot teach me anything or shed light on something I was wondering about for years, then at least entertain me. Teague excels on that account and that's what separates him from the pack. That, plus the fact that he actually DOES follow the game and understands it, but I doubt he'll go deeper into it on camera since it's not that type of podcast and he seems to have some coaching ambitions. Goes without saying that it's all enjoyable and manageable for an hou or so once a week. Not if bombarded with daily multiple hour uploads.
PS - don't get the Inside the NBA hate. I mean, sure, it hugely contributed to dumbing down of sports media and it's probably ran its' course years ago, but if you tune in to watch prime time mainstream sports show - you don't expect Xs and Os and pensive takes. You tune in to hear Chuck talking about them big ol' women down in SA, eating churros double handed and getting bracelets in the steam room. You don't tune in to see Two and a Half Men, watch it, and then go "Well, that wasn't Tarkovskiy, I'll tell you that".