Dumont had a negative interaction with Luka that led him to greenlight the trade.

Moderators: Clav, Domejandro, ken6199, bisme37, Dirk, KingDavid, cupcakesnake, bwgood77, zimpy27, infinite11285

Lala870
Veteran
Posts: 2,692
And1: 1,800
Joined: May 29, 2014

Re: dumont had a negative interaction with Luka that lead him to greenlight the trade. 

Post#21 » by Lala870 » Thu Apr 24, 2025 8:58 pm

Anyone who has a functioning brain cell does not believe this.

if you do the WWE is calling you to watch.
Exp0sed
General Manager
Posts: 7,901
And1: 7,354
Joined: Feb 10, 2022

Re: dumont had a negative interaction with Luka that lead him to greenlight the trade. 

Post#22 » by Exp0sed » Thu Apr 24, 2025 8:58 pm

Tracymcgoaty wrote:https://dallashoopsjournal.com/p/nico-harrison-takeover-dallas-mavericks-luka-doncic-trade?utm_source=post-email-title&publication_id=621353&post_id=161812840&utm_campaign=email-post-title&isFreemail=false&r=17lwnj&triedRedirect=true&utm_medium=email



Sources informed DallasHoopsJournal.com that among the factors that led Dumont to provide the green light was an interaction he had with Dončić, focused on addressing perceived conditioning concerns. This occurred before Harrison initiated trade talks for Dončić at his coffee meeting with Pelinka in Dallas before the Mavericks faced the Lakers on Jan. 7. As one might expect, that interaction involving Dončić and Dumont did not go well. Weeks later, Dončić was traded, with a heavy run of media leaks emphasizing conditioning to follow.

The intel provided to Dumont by the Harrison-led basketball operations department enabled Harrison to obtain permission to make the controversial trade to acquire a player he had long sought, Davis. Dumont doubled down on that narrative just days after the trade, further illustrating how effective the Harrison regime’s selling of this problem proved to be. In an interview with The Dallas Morning News, Dumont made his position unmistakably clear. The man who had just authorized the trade of a generational superstar had publicly questioned Dončić’s commitment.



YEAH..It was all NICO! What a joke. That article pretty much goes through everything. Worth a read! Crazy stuff.


"intel" lmfao

the spin machine trying to sell of the dumbest decision in the history of pro sports as something intelligent, which it isn't in any shape or form lol
maverick_41
Senior
Posts: 659
And1: 655
Joined: Apr 04, 2010
     

Re: dumont had a negative interaction with Luka that lead him to greenlight the trade. 

Post#23 » by maverick_41 » Thu Apr 24, 2025 9:06 pm

HotRocks34 wrote:
Calvin Klein wrote:Still doesn’t explain the biggest problem with this trade. Why only the lakers and why such crappy return?


Because Nico was fixated on getting his guy, Anthony Davis.

Why did he want Davis? I don't buy any basketball reasons. AD is yesterday's news.
Maybe Dallas will give him a max extension that the Lakers were reluctant to provide, then Nico will get % of agent's commission in cash from AD's current agent?
User avatar
Tracymcgoaty
RealGM
Posts: 22,479
And1: 20,474
Joined: Dec 21, 2015
   

Re: dumont had a negative interaction with Luka that lead him to greenlight the trade. 

Post#24 » by Tracymcgoaty » Thu Apr 24, 2025 9:12 pm

Lala870 wrote:Anyone who has a functioning brain cell does not believe this.

if you do the WWE is calling you to watch.


Believes what? That Dumont had a part in why Luka being traded?
Raul
“The other day I saw one of his games. He was running with the ball at a hundred per cent full speed, I don’t know how many touches he took, maybe five or six, but the ball was glued to his foot. It’s practically impossible.”
Lala870
Veteran
Posts: 2,692
And1: 1,800
Joined: May 29, 2014

Re: dumont had a negative interaction with Luka that lead him to greenlight the trade. 

Post#25 » by Lala870 » Thu Apr 24, 2025 9:12 pm

Tracymcgoaty wrote:
Lala870 wrote:Anyone who has a functioning brain cell does not believe this.

if you do the WWE is calling you to watch.


Believes what? That Dumont had a part in why Luka being traded?


The entire trade not being rigged for the Lakers.
User avatar
Tracymcgoaty
RealGM
Posts: 22,479
And1: 20,474
Joined: Dec 21, 2015
   

Re: dumont had a negative interaction with Luka that lead him to greenlight the trade. 

Post#26 » by Tracymcgoaty » Thu Apr 24, 2025 9:18 pm

Lala870 wrote:
Tracymcgoaty wrote:
Lala870 wrote:Anyone who has a functioning brain cell does not believe this.

if you do the WWE is calling you to watch.


Believes what? That Dumont had a part in why Luka being traded?


The entire trade not being rigged for the Lakers.


And what part of the functioning brain cells does that have to do with Dumont greenlighting the trade?
Raul
“The other day I saw one of his games. He was running with the ball at a hundred per cent full speed, I don’t know how many touches he took, maybe five or six, but the ball was glued to his foot. It’s practically impossible.”
Lala870
Veteran
Posts: 2,692
And1: 1,800
Joined: May 29, 2014

Re: dumont had a negative interaction with Luka that lead him to greenlight the trade. 

Post#27 » by Lala870 » Thu Apr 24, 2025 9:20 pm

Tracymcgoaty wrote:
Lala870 wrote:
Tracymcgoaty wrote:
Believes what? That Dumont had a part in why Luka being traded?


The entire trade not being rigged for the Lakers.


And what part of the functioning brain cells does that have to do with Dumont greenlighting the trade?


Just to clarify...so you think it was not a rigged trade? You believe the stories coming out of the Mavs FO?
wade44
General Manager
Posts: 8,210
And1: 14,098
Joined: Jun 09, 2018

Re: Dumont had a negative interaction with Luka that lead him to greenlight the trade. 

Post#28 » by wade44 » Thu Apr 24, 2025 9:27 pm

How does this even start to excuse Nico from trading him to the LAKERS for an expired bag of chips?
Lala870
Veteran
Posts: 2,692
And1: 1,800
Joined: May 29, 2014

Re: Dumont had a negative interaction with Luka that lead him to greenlight the trade. 

Post#29 » by Lala870 » Thu Apr 24, 2025 9:29 pm

Johnny Fontane wrote:How does this even start to excuse Nico from trading him to the LAKERS for an old bag of chips?


The NBA wants the Lakers relavent and Luka is the perfect piece.
User avatar
Tracymcgoaty
RealGM
Posts: 22,479
And1: 20,474
Joined: Dec 21, 2015
   

Re: dumont had a negative interaction with Luka that lead him to greenlight the trade. 

Post#30 » by Tracymcgoaty » Thu Apr 24, 2025 9:33 pm

Lala870 wrote:
Tracymcgoaty wrote:
Lala870 wrote:
The entire trade not being rigged for the Lakers.


And what part of the functioning brain cells does that have to do with Dumont greenlighting the trade?


Just to clarify...so you think it was not a rigged trade? You believe the stories coming out of the Mavs FO?


I dont know what to believe i dont have all the facts at hand. Thats why i didn't believe it when they put all the blame on Nico. Again did Dumont greenlit the trade or not? Based on the numerous Dallas journalists reporting on it.
Raul
“The other day I saw one of his games. He was running with the ball at a hundred per cent full speed, I don’t know how many touches he took, maybe five or six, but the ball was glued to his foot. It’s practically impossible.”
Lala870
Veteran
Posts: 2,692
And1: 1,800
Joined: May 29, 2014

Re: dumont had a negative interaction with Luka that lead him to greenlight the trade. 

Post#31 » by Lala870 » Thu Apr 24, 2025 9:35 pm

Tracymcgoaty wrote:
Lala870 wrote:
Tracymcgoaty wrote:
And what part of the functioning brain cells does that have to do with Dumont greenlighting the trade?


Just to clarify...so you think it was not a rigged trade? You believe the stories coming out of the Mavs FO?


I dont know what to believe i dont have all the facts at hand. Thats why i didn't believe it when they put all the blame on Nico. Again did Dumont greenlit the trade or not? Based on the numerous Dallas journalists reporting on it.


I think there was collusion that occurred on this trade relative to the reports coming out at a much higher level.
User avatar
Tracymcgoaty
RealGM
Posts: 22,479
And1: 20,474
Joined: Dec 21, 2015
   

Re: dumont had a negative interaction with Luka that lead him to greenlight the trade. 

Post#32 » by Tracymcgoaty » Thu Apr 24, 2025 9:36 pm

Lala870 wrote:
Tracymcgoaty wrote:
Lala870 wrote:
Just to clarify...so you think it was not a rigged trade? You believe the stories coming out of the Mavs FO?


I dont know what to believe i dont have all the facts at hand. Thats why i didn't believe it when they put all the blame on Nico. Again did Dumont greenlit the trade or not? Based on the numerous Dallas journalists reporting on it.


I think there was collusion that occurred on this trade relative to the reports coming out at a much higher level.


sigh..alright.
Raul
“The other day I saw one of his games. He was running with the ball at a hundred per cent full speed, I don’t know how many touches he took, maybe five or six, but the ball was glued to his foot. It’s practically impossible.”
Sixers in 4
Analyst
Posts: 3,226
And1: 2,654
Joined: Apr 22, 2022
         

Re: Dumont had a negative interaction with Luka that lead him to greenlight the trade. 

Post#33 » by Sixers in 4 » Thu Apr 24, 2025 9:37 pm

More smearing of a guy already out the door.

Why would anyone want to play for that garbage franchise?
User avatar
Tracymcgoaty
RealGM
Posts: 22,479
And1: 20,474
Joined: Dec 21, 2015
   

Re: Dumont had a negative interaction with Luka that lead him to greenlight the trade. 

Post#34 » by Tracymcgoaty » Thu Apr 24, 2025 9:38 pm

Johnny Fontane wrote:How does this even start to excuse Nico from trading him to the LAKERS for an expired bag of chips?


Because it isn't mean't to excuse him from that. It's meant to show that the owners are idiots along with Nico.
Raul
“The other day I saw one of his games. He was running with the ball at a hundred per cent full speed, I don’t know how many touches he took, maybe five or six, but the ball was glued to his foot. It’s practically impossible.”
Lala870
Veteran
Posts: 2,692
And1: 1,800
Joined: May 29, 2014

Re: dumont had a negative interaction with Luka that lead him to greenlight the trade. 

Post#35 » by Lala870 » Thu Apr 24, 2025 9:46 pm

Tracymcgoaty wrote:
Lala870 wrote:
Tracymcgoaty wrote:
I dont know what to believe i dont have all the facts at hand. Thats why i didn't believe it when they put all the blame on Nico. Again did Dumont greenlit the trade or not? Based on the numerous Dallas journalists reporting on it.


I think there was collusion that occurred on this trade relative to the reports coming out at a much higher level.


sigh..alright.


I know its not ideal for Laker fans to hear but the Laker franchise seems like its too big to fail right now as a brand.
Jedi32
General Manager
Posts: 7,767
And1: 6,722
Joined: Oct 30, 2014
Location: Showtime Era
 

Re: dumont had a negative interaction with Luka that lead him to greenlight the trade. 

Post#36 » by Jedi32 » Thu Apr 24, 2025 9:55 pm

Fadeaway_Jumper wrote:
playoffs wrote:I've said this previously but Nico is the fall guy imo. The whole reason there is no chance he gets fired is because he was just doing the owner's bidding. It's Dumont who wanted Luka traded. It doesn't absolve Nico from responsibility - any GM with integrity would've quit if told he has to trade Luka. But it just means the reason ownership won't fire him isn't because they are tolerating this decision, it's because they initiated the decision. I have no proof of this, of course, other than the fact that no other explanation makes sense (again, imho).


No one is quitting a multi million job because your boss told you to fire an employee even if they’re your favorite.

Yes Nico is the fall guy, and to flame the dude for a decision coming from the people that own the team is exactly what the owners want. “Sell the team” should be the chant, not “Fire Nico”

I'll never understand that kind of thinking. Who in their right mind would quit a dream job just because they had to trade a player? Players get traded all the time, sometimes great ones do. It is what it is.
Sixers in 4
Analyst
Posts: 3,226
And1: 2,654
Joined: Apr 22, 2022
         

Re: dumont had a negative interaction with Luka that lead him to greenlight the trade. 

Post#37 » by Sixers in 4 » Thu Apr 24, 2025 9:59 pm

Jedi32 wrote:
Fadeaway_Jumper wrote:
playoffs wrote:I've said this previously but Nico is the fall guy imo. The whole reason there is no chance he gets fired is because he was just doing the owner's bidding. It's Dumont who wanted Luka traded. It doesn't absolve Nico from responsibility - any GM with integrity would've quit if told he has to trade Luka. But it just means the reason ownership won't fire him isn't because they are tolerating this decision, it's because they initiated the decision. I have no proof of this, of course, other than the fact that no other explanation makes sense (again, imho).


No one is quitting a multi million job because your boss told you to fire an employee even if they’re your favorite.

Yes Nico is the fall guy, and to flame the dude for a decision coming from the people that own the team is exactly what the owners want. “Sell the team” should be the chant, not “Fire Nico”

I'll never understand that kind of thinking. Who in their right mind would quit a dream job just because they had to trade a player? Players get traded all the time, sometimes great ones do. It is what it is.


Trading him is one thing the return was trash. The Lakers got better for the future and the present both those things should not happen in a fair deal
ChumboChappati
Pro Prospect
Posts: 913
And1: 545
Joined: Jul 30, 2021

Re: Dumont had a negative interaction with Luka that lead him to greenlight the trade. 

Post#38 » by ChumboChappati » Thu Apr 24, 2025 10:11 pm

I already knew that owners were behind this move. They just don't want to pay that huge amount to Luka when they are not getting their casino from Dallas. If Dallas had given them their casino, then Luka would still be a Mavs. Simple.
Bob8
RealGM
Posts: 10,724
And1: 4,527
Joined: Feb 08, 2017

Re: Dumont had a negative interaction with Luka that lead him to greenlight the trade. 

Post#39 » by Bob8 » Thu Apr 24, 2025 10:14 pm

ChumboChappati wrote:I already knew that owners were behind this move. They just don't want to pay that huge amount to Luka when they are not getting their casino from Dallas. If Dallas had given them their casino, then Luka would still be a Mavs. Simple.


But they are prepared to pay similar money to AD and 1 knee Kyrie?
User avatar
SkyBill40
General Manager
Posts: 7,814
And1: 6,585
Joined: Oct 24, 2014
Location: Phoenix
       

Re: Dumont had a negative interaction with Luka that lead him to greenlight the trade. 

Post#40 » by SkyBill40 » Thu Apr 24, 2025 10:27 pm

I have to liken this, albeit somewhat differently, to Ishbia and James Jones. Ishbia/Dumont are interchangeable here as they're the chainsaw that makes the cut. James Jones/Nico Harrison are also interchangeable as the rope that pulls the saw to life. You can't have one without the other seeing that both are necessary to do the job, but one of those is the actual mechanism that fells the tree even if it shouldn't be toppled. In the case of both franchises, the saw that cut it all down was the owner. This was an abjectly stupid move of the most insane kind.

Both the Mavericks and the Suns are ruined for at least a decade or more. And while the Mavs have resources to somewhat rebuild, the generational talent that is Doncic isn't likely to be replaced anytime soon if ever; the Suns, having traded away nearly everything for two players who haven't accomplished anything, have next to nothing to try and resurrect their franchise. And while I've not been much of a Doncic fan, I did want the Suns to take him rather than Ayton and spoke quite strongly about how we'd regret passing on him. It sucks to be right.

There's been a lot of talk about the ownership group and their machinations to get a casino complex built in Dallas. From what I understand, that process isn't going well and this move doesn't aid their cause unless, quite nefariously, it is to attempt a relocation bid should their efforts fail. It was bad enough seeing my Sonics move to OKC; I don't think the NBA BoG allow such a travesty to take place a second time.
SweaterBae wrote:It's the perfect trade when nobody is happy.

Return to The General Board