Eyes and regular stats > advanced stats (coming from a stat nerd), IMHO

Moderators: KingDavid, cupcakesnake, Domejandro, ken6199, infinite11285, Clav, Dirk, bwgood77, bisme37, zimpy27

Rubios
Junior
Posts: 317
And1: 194
Joined: Nov 24, 2024

Re: Eyes and regular stats > advanced stats (coming from a stat nerd), IMHO 

Post#21 » by Rubios » Wed Oct 22, 2025 11:37 am

parapooper wrote:
Rubios wrote:(...) Giannis, surrounded by broomsticks, still gives you more points, triple the rebounds, and draws so much defensive attention that he actually assists slightly more than Shai (a PG).

When the gap is that wide, advanced metrics like +/–, RAPTOR, LEBRON, WS, and others that are great for splitting hairs just become noise in the conversation, IMHO.



In PER and BPM (the only advanced stats that make any sense to use in a 5-game playoff sample) Giannis led the NBA last playoffs - so this thread title + OP make less than zero sense


Your sentence is factually correct so you can only be right.
That said: do you really need to look after advanced stats to determine Giannis was far superior than SGA the last playoffs?
Or, dare I say, as a player -barring injuries-?

Jokic
(Some see a big gap here, I don't)
Giannis
(Gap)
SGA
Luka
...in whatever order you want.

I can understand and accept SGA >= Giannis if you believe Giannis is injury prone and have concerns about his availability.
IMHO his absences in the 2023-2024 playoffs were (very) bad luck.
Well, he survived an ugly knee hyperextension in the 2021 Finals. And you know what happened next.
SA37
RealGM
Posts: 18,895
And1: 9,671
Joined: Sep 10, 2002
Location: Basking in the Glory
 

Re: Eyes and regular stats > advanced stats (coming from a stat nerd), IMHO 

Post#22 » by SA37 » Wed Oct 22, 2025 12:41 pm

ryan in Maine wrote:But what if the stats contradict my eyes? My eyes tell me Tatum loves dribbling the air out of the ball, but other Celtics fans are all like nuh uh [stat!!! @ryan] and idk what to believe anymore. Their formulas or my lyin' eyes!? Does Tatum walk up to the three point line and dance with the ball, like, a lot, or does it just feel like it?!


The problem is you have no appreciation for dancing and hi-steppin' when it's gyrating in front of you unless it's in a thong :wink:
User avatar
ryan in Maine
General Manager
Posts: 8,015
And1: 13,790
Joined: Sep 06, 2005
 

Re: Eyes and regular stats > advanced stats (coming from a stat nerd), IMHO 

Post#23 » by ryan in Maine » Wed Oct 22, 2025 1:17 pm

SA37 wrote:
ryan in Maine wrote:But what if the stats contradict my eyes? My eyes tell me Tatum loves dribbling the air out of the ball, but other Celtics fans are all like nuh uh [stat!!! @ryan] and idk what to believe anymore. Their formulas or my lyin' eyes!? Does Tatum walk up to the three point line and dance with the ball, like, a lot, or does it just feel like it?!


The problem is you have no appreciation for dancing and hi-steppin' when it's gyrating in front of you unless it's in a thong :wink:

Lmao this is why we stats!
UNIONIZE! WITH THE EMERGENCY WORKPLACE ORGANIZING COMMITTEE (EWOC)!
dhsilv2
RealGM
Posts: 51,013
And1: 27,513
Joined: Oct 04, 2015

Re: Eyes and regular stats > advanced stats (coming from a stat nerd), IMHO 

Post#24 » by dhsilv2 » Wed Oct 22, 2025 1:44 pm

EmpireFalls wrote:Nah, advanced stats are consistently better predictors than just PRA. Obviously the eye test is king IF you know what you’re talking about and IF you watch enough games. The issue is that stupid and uniformed people each have their own eye tests too.

LEBRON EPM and RAPM are much better descriptors of who the best players are than any other stat I can think of.


This.

The eye test is good if you can see WHY those types of metrics are getting their results. If you can't explain something that's wrong with them, then it's almost assuredly your eyes that are wrong.

That said, nothing wrong with picking Giannis over SGA as they're close enough in the stats. But the idea that there's some massive gap is a bit off. Now if Giannis had more consistency from the line or shooting...now we're talking. Or if he was a better passer...not just getting assists. But making better reads. Then that gap might happen.
dhsilv2
RealGM
Posts: 51,013
And1: 27,513
Joined: Oct 04, 2015

Re: Eyes and regular stats > advanced stats (coming from a stat nerd), IMHO 

Post#25 » by dhsilv2 » Wed Oct 22, 2025 1:48 pm

Old_Blue wrote:Statistics are the lazy slob's crutch. I've lost count of how many times I've read someone write "I didn't watch the game, but according to the stats..." Alternatively, I've heard people claim that - even if they do watch the game - "there's too much going on to tell one player's contribution." To which I've got to ask this - What kind of intellectual damage have we done to an entire generation with early and intense exposure to the internet, social media and now AI that they can't focus on one effing player out of ten on the court? "Make all the players go away! It's too much. I can't handle it. Where is my Ritalin and my stat sheet?" :noway:


So you watch a game 10 times to follow each player individually? That's obviously what coaches are doing. But as much as I enjoy basketball, I'm not replaying the same game 10 times...maybe over a few years. Maybe I rewatch a quarter in the playoffs. But I'm not going to do a film study like the coaches are doing.
dhsilv2
RealGM
Posts: 51,013
And1: 27,513
Joined: Oct 04, 2015

Re: Eyes and regular stats > advanced stats (coming from a stat nerd), IMHO 

Post#26 » by dhsilv2 » Wed Oct 22, 2025 1:51 pm

ryan in Maine wrote:But what if the stats contradict my eyes? My eyes tell me Tatum loves dribbling the air out of the ball, but other Celtics fans are all like nuh uh [stat!!! @ryan] and idk what to believe anymore. Their formulas or my lyin' eyes!? Does Tatum walk up to the three point line and dance with the ball, like, a lot, or does it just feel like it?!


Not to be that guy. But we have literal stats showing how much time a player has the ball.

https://www.nba.com/stats/players/touches?Season=2024-25&TeamID=1610612738&dir=D&sort=TIME_OF_POSS
Doctor MJ
Senior Mod
Senior Mod
Posts: 53,885
And1: 22,822
Joined: Mar 10, 2005
Location: Cali
     

Re: Eyes and regular stats > advanced stats (coming from a stat nerd), IMHO 

Post#27 » by Doctor MJ » Wed Oct 22, 2025 1:55 pm

dremill24 wrote:
Rubios wrote:
But there are things Giannis can do that Shai simply can’t. It’s that simple. I don’t think Giannis is necessarily a “better” player (that would involve skills, “bag,” IQ, talent…), but his frame and athleticism allow him for a much greater impact. That’s why I consider Giannis a much superior player, even if not necessarily better per se. Giannis’ technical skills are heavily underrated, but that’s another topic.


You're not the first to talk about these distinctions but I've just been having a real hard time with them lately lol.

Does there really need to be a functional difference between "better" and "more impactful" (and apparently between "superior" and "better")?

Especially in cases where the argument is as close as in this example, i see no reason why "more impactful" would not be the same as "better." We want to win right? Feels like making up hairs just to split

So I’ll chime in and clarify based on how I and others I tend to talk with define terms;

Impact/lift/value is about what you’re doing for your particular team, whereas a more absolute goodness/better/superior considers a more general shape of your capacity across circumstances.

The distinction is necessary because basketball is an interactive team sport where team context changes role, effectiveness and thus value add.

Of course, this doesn’t agree with Rubios usage, and I don’t have a monopoly on definitions, but to emphasize the contradiction in terms:

He’s emphasizing Giannis with the advantage by impact while being more open about “better”.

I would say Shai has had the clear impact advantage the past two years, and that Giannis hasn’t had MVP level impact since his MVP campaigns more than a half decade ago, but would also be more open about the question of who is better.

He draws a distinction between “better” and “superior” by linking the latter to impact, while I would say that those in my experience have only ever been synonyms in this context, and their shared meaning is separate from impact.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Getting ready for the RealGM 100 on the PC Board

Come join the WNBA Board if you're a fan!
Jailblazers7
Lead Assistant
Posts: 5,565
And1: 6,357
Joined: Oct 23, 2017
     

Re: Eyes and regular stats > advanced stats (coming from a stat nerd), IMHO 

Post#28 » by Jailblazers7 » Wed Oct 22, 2025 1:55 pm

Eye test + tracking data is the move. I tend to ignore all-in impact stats like PER because consolidating total impact into a single number is too difficult.

But watching the game and pairing that up with tracking data to understand points per play as a PnR ball handler, isos, post touches, drives, etc provides very useful insight that lines up with the eye test.
User avatar
Chuck Everett
RealGM
Posts: 19,901
And1: 23,343
Joined: May 28, 2004
Location: Los Angeles
   

Re: Eyes and regular stats > advanced stats (coming from a stat nerd), IMHO 

Post#29 » by Chuck Everett » Wed Oct 22, 2025 2:16 pm

Shai led the youngest team in the league to the chip. That sort of the thing doesn't happen in the NBA. Sorry, if it seems like he is about to go on a historic run, but you may have no choice but to deal with it.
"Kill 'em with Grindness."
Doctor MJ
Senior Mod
Senior Mod
Posts: 53,885
And1: 22,822
Joined: Mar 10, 2005
Location: Cali
     

Re: Eyes and regular stats > advanced stats (coming from a stat nerd), IMHO 

Post#30 » by Doctor MJ » Wed Oct 22, 2025 2:34 pm

Jailblazers7 wrote:Eye test + tracking data is the move. I tend to ignore all-in impact stats like PER because consolidating total impact into a single number is too difficult.


I'll chime in there by emphasizing that in my experience we use "impact stats" to refer to +/- and regression based stats (which can be done really with any more granular base stat), while PER is a "box score all-in-one" or a "production stats".

Also I'd avoid using the term "advanced stats" generally because I associate that term with thought from the '90s that produced stats like PER that were quite problematic, and I'd agree that there's considerably more value in looking to do micro-analyses based on all the small things in the box score (or now tracking data) than in something that mases them altogether like PER.
Getting ready for the RealGM 100 on the PC Board

Come join the WNBA Board if you're a fan!
Rubios
Junior
Posts: 317
And1: 194
Joined: Nov 24, 2024

Re: Eyes and regular stats > advanced stats (coming from a stat nerd), IMHO 

Post#31 » by Rubios » Wed Oct 22, 2025 2:48 pm

I opened this thread in the context of the Shai vs Giannis topic.
Of course, data is useful and, when interpreted properly, offers knowledge.
Because there's more than meets the eye.

My TL;DR point is: do we need an in-depth analysis of advanced metrics in order to figure out Giannis is a level above Shai?
Rubios
Junior
Posts: 317
And1: 194
Joined: Nov 24, 2024

Re: Eyes and regular stats > advanced stats (coming from a stat nerd), IMHO 

Post#32 » by Rubios » Wed Oct 22, 2025 2:59 pm

Sorry, even simpler: like we used to do as kids, two people (not named Nico Harrison) take turns picking a five-man team to play and win today.

I’m convinced that the first pick for each would be Jokic–Giannis, Giannis–Jokic.
Doctor MJ
Senior Mod
Senior Mod
Posts: 53,885
And1: 22,822
Joined: Mar 10, 2005
Location: Cali
     

Re: Eyes and regular stats > advanced stats (coming from a stat nerd), IMHO 

Post#33 » by Doctor MJ » Wed Oct 22, 2025 3:24 pm

Rubios wrote:I opened this thread in the context of the Shai vs Giannis topic.
Of course, data is useful and, when interpreted properly, offers knowledge.
Because there's more than meets the eye.

My TL;DR point is: do we need an in-depth analysis of advanced metrics in order to figure out Giannis is a level above Shai?


Since I think Giannis' impact in recent years has been well below Shai, I'm not sure how to answer that question. It's more like we need to NOT look at stuff to conclude Giannis' impact is a level above Shai, because closer inspection will contradict what we think we know.

I haven't responded to your early posts in this thread because frankly I wasn't looking to force a debate on this, but to try to give some context here that doesn't just rely on sophisticated stats:

Giannis doesn't get assists because he's a good facilitator, he gets them because the team plays with him on-ball because he's never learned how to be useful off-ball like bigs are supposed to do with rolls & runs to the rim and he also isn't a good shooter, which means that if you don't let him keep the ball, the defense doesn't have to prioritize stopping him.

From a scoring perspective what this means is that the team is letting Giannis constantly try to score, and so he racks up scoring volume.

Now, none of this is necessarily a mistake - as you've noted, Giannis scores that volume efficiently - but the metronome of consistency in his box score comes from a simplistic offensive scheme that largely does the same stuff over and over again, and how praise worthy this is thus really just about how effective it is on a team level.

And, to be clear, in general this applies to Shai or any other ball dominant player. These players generally can't be utterly incompetent at their job or they won't get/keep the primacy, and so they put up big box score numbers, but the real question is how effective they make their team's offense when they play like this, and there you need data.

Now, I say all of that with an offensive focus, but it's quite understandable to favor Giannis because of his defense over Shai. I certainly rank Giannis' peak defense ahead of Shai's.

But, Giannis' just really hasn't put in the same kind of defensive effort across the season since he won those MVPs and he hasn't won a playoff series since 2022. This to say, it's been quite a while since we've actually seen Giannis play outstanding defense consistently (by the data) for either a regular season or a successful playoff run.

I'll stop there in part because I don't expect agreement on this.
Getting ready for the RealGM 100 on the PC Board

Come join the WNBA Board if you're a fan!
Special_Puppy
Assistant Coach
Posts: 4,111
And1: 2,747
Joined: Sep 23, 2023

Re: Eyes and regular stats > advanced stats (coming from a stat nerd), IMHO 

Post#34 » by Special_Puppy » Wed Oct 22, 2025 3:28 pm

Chuck Everett wrote:Shai led the youngest team in the league to the chip. That sort of the thing doesn't happen in the NBA.


I don't get calling them the "youngest team in the league" as if to downplay the non-Shai Thunder. Shai arguably had the best supporting cast in the league last year.
Rubios
Junior
Posts: 317
And1: 194
Joined: Nov 24, 2024

Re: Eyes and regular stats > advanced stats (coming from a stat nerd), IMHO 

Post#35 » by Rubios » Wed Oct 22, 2025 4:00 pm

Doctor MJ wrote:
Rubios wrote:I opened this thread in the context of the Shai vs Giannis topic.
Of course, data is useful and, when interpreted properly, offers knowledge.
Because there's more than meets the eye.

My TL;DR point is: do we need an in-depth analysis of advanced metrics in order to figure out Giannis is a level above Shai?


(...)

I'll stop there in part because I don't expect agreement on this.


Actually, I agree with basically all you said.
Safe for that I'm confident Giannis would be an assassin off-ball if some good playmaker threw lobs for him to dunk.
And you didn't address the obvious physical advantages that allow him to catch 3x the rebounds and (even if declining, I agree on this too) being a superior defender.
We can't (and shouldn't) expect that from Shai.

That said, do you agree with me on that, if we take turns picking 5 players to win today, our first picks would be Jokic and Giannis?
Old_Blue
Analyst
Posts: 3,494
And1: 1,245
Joined: Jul 02, 2019
 

Re: Eyes and regular stats > advanced stats (coming from a stat nerd), IMHO 

Post#36 » by Old_Blue » Wed Oct 22, 2025 4:31 pm

Rubios wrote:My TL;DR point is: do we need an in-depth analysis of advanced metrics


That's a great idea. Conduct an advanced metrics analysis of advanced metrics analysis. I won't be part of it. I'll be watching the actual game. But, yeah, great idea. :D

Seriously, you figure out what a player is capable of by watching them. There is no substitute. Particularly when it comes to: (1) what they contribute when they are NOT handling the ball and (2) defense. Take Draymond Green for example, his offensive statistics are those of a middling performer and his career defensive rating ranks him in a tie for #200 in NBA history. Statistics are useless in assessing what he brings to the game. The same case can be made over and over again with countless other players. Watch the games. Watch the individual players. Your love and appreciation for the game will go up a notch. I guarantee it.

Image
Jester_ wrote:(Referring to the practice of butt caning) Yeah that's why we (Singapore) have beautiful streets and safe communities while y'all (San Francisco) live in bum-adled squalor and think it's freedom :lol:
SA37
RealGM
Posts: 18,895
And1: 9,671
Joined: Sep 10, 2002
Location: Basking in the Glory
 

Re: Eyes and regular stats > advanced stats (coming from a stat nerd), IMHO 

Post#37 » by SA37 » Wed Oct 22, 2025 4:31 pm

Chuck Everett wrote:Shai led the youngest team in the league to the chip. That sort of the thing doesn't happen in the NBA. Sorry, if it seems like he is about to go on a historic run, but you may have no choice but to deal with it.


It'll all be fine once voter fatigue sets in :wink:
User avatar
ryan in Maine
General Manager
Posts: 8,015
And1: 13,790
Joined: Sep 06, 2005
 

Re: Eyes and regular stats > advanced stats (coming from a stat nerd), IMHO 

Post#38 » by ryan in Maine » Wed Oct 22, 2025 5:14 pm

dhsilv2 wrote:
ryan in Maine wrote:But what if the stats contradict my eyes? My eyes tell me Tatum loves dribbling the air out of the ball, but other Celtics fans are all like nuh uh [stat!!! @ryan] and idk what to believe anymore. Their formulas or my lyin' eyes!? Does Tatum walk up to the three point line and dance with the ball, like, a lot, or does it just feel like it?!


Not to be that guy. But we have literal stats showing how much time a player has the ball.

https://www.nba.com/stats/players/touches?Season=2024-25&TeamID=1610612738&dir=D&sort=TIME_OF_POSS

Yeah It's a lot of it on the Celtics board. They'll never fail to stat me.

Advanced stats is kinda like GPS—useful when you're not familiar. How often does an advanced statistic genuinely surprise you about a player? Either positively or negatively.

I think they typically align with the eye test. And oftentimes when they don't, there's probably a dispute to be had over methodology and metrics. But usually pretty close.
UNIONIZE! WITH THE EMERGENCY WORKPLACE ORGANIZING COMMITTEE (EWOC)!
og15
Forum Mod - Clippers
Forum Mod - Clippers
Posts: 51,359
And1: 34,249
Joined: Jun 23, 2004
Location: NBA Fan
 

Re: Eyes and regular stats > advanced stats (coming from a stat nerd), IMHO 

Post#39 » by og15 » Wed Oct 22, 2025 5:20 pm

ryan in Maine wrote:
dhsilv2 wrote:
ryan in Maine wrote:But what if the stats contradict my eyes? My eyes tell me Tatum loves dribbling the air out of the ball, but other Celtics fans are all like nuh uh [stat!!! @ryan] and idk what to believe anymore. Their formulas or my lyin' eyes!? Does Tatum walk up to the three point line and dance with the ball, like, a lot, or does it just feel like it?!


Not to be that guy. But we have literal stats showing how much time a player has the ball.

https://www.nba.com/stats/players/touches?Season=2024-25&TeamID=1610612738&dir=D&sort=TIME_OF_POSS

Yeah It's a lot of it on the Celtics board. They'll never fail to stat me.

Advanced stats is kinda like GPS—useful when you're not familiar. How often does an advanced statistic genuinely surprise you about a player? Either positively or negatively.

I think they typically align with the eye test. And oftentimes when they don't, there's probably a dispute to be had over methodology and metrics. But usually pretty close.

Time on ball is not an advanced stat. This is one thing that has been confused. Everything that isn't on the regular box score is now called an advanced stat, but some of this stuff is just tracking, which is all the box score is doing too. Like if someone tracks charges, it's not an advanced stat because the regular box score doesn't show it.

Regardless of what anyone thinks, your brain is not that good at tracking, you can argue all you want about how you're special, but you aren't. So yes, in that instance, a players time on ball being tracked will be more accurate than how I personally feel about his time on ball.

Tracking is not really something people should feel they need to argue about. You can argue about the interpretation of tracking, but arguing that the tracking is wrong and my brain tracking is correct is like arguing that how fast you felt a car was going is more accurate than what the radar shows, it doesn't even make sense to be debating that.
TheGeneral99
Lead Assistant
Posts: 4,923
And1: 6,547
Joined: Mar 11, 2023
   

Re: Eyes and regular stats > advanced stats (coming from a stat nerd), IMHO 

Post#40 » by TheGeneral99 » Wed Oct 22, 2025 5:27 pm

You have to obviously do both.

You can't just rely on advanced stats without watching the game or providing context (strength of teammates, systems, coaching etc.) and vice versa.

Return to The General Board