Best GM over the last few years?

Moderators: Domejandro, ken6199, Dirk, infinite11285, Clav, bwgood77, bisme37, zimpy27, KingDavid, cupcakesnake

Rasheeed!!!
Assistant Coach
Posts: 4,393
And1: 1,508
Joined: Apr 29, 2007

 

Post#21 » by Rasheeed!!! » Mon Jun 2, 2008 7:02 am

or ever
User avatar
Vindicater
General Manager
Posts: 7,948
And1: 423
Joined: Apr 11, 2004

 

Post#22 » by Vindicater » Mon Jun 2, 2008 7:29 am

ponder276 wrote:A lot of people have brought up Buford. The guy is a great GM without a doubt, but this thread is about who's been the best GM over the last few years, and Buford really hasn't made any amazing moves over the last 3 or 4 years.


And why does making big earth shaking moves automatically make you great?

Bufords ability to mold and continue his teams dominance is what makes him great.

Just ask Dumars and Riley how hard it is to continue the winning tradtion?
"That's why the last two years weren't guaranteed," Walsh said. "Either way, he knew it could have happened either way."
User avatar
farzi
RealGM
Posts: 12,485
And1: 5
Joined: Dec 20, 2007

 

Post#23 » by farzi » Mon Jun 2, 2008 7:33 am

Mahoney_jr wrote:-= original quote snipped =-



Can any Blazers fan confirm that Pritchard was responsible even though Patterson still was the GM in 2006?

I wouldn't call Pritchard great, because he got lucky in the lottery and has the 2nd most open-handed owner in the league. Currently there's no GM who can act in the way Pritchard is allowed.


Yep. It was leaked that Nash was extremely high on Noah, and was trying to talk him in to coming out so that Portland could take him and build around him. He was also reportedly pretty high on Bargs and the Stache. Seeing as how there were reports Pritchard ran the show, and we have none of the aforementioned players, it looks like thats how it went down.
Buckeye-NBAFan
General Manager
Posts: 8,156
And1: 4,871
Joined: Jun 25, 2004

 

Post#24 » by Buckeye-NBAFan » Mon Jun 2, 2008 7:46 am

walchy wrote:R.C. Buford

/thread


Over the last few years, the guy is responsible for drafting Tiago Splitter, Marcus Williams, Ian Mahinmi, and Beno Udrih (then letting him leave before he came into his own), re-signing Ginobili and Parker (no brainers), and signing Finley, Horry, and a bunch of other old vets who begged to come play for the champs.

And that's the thread? Lol?

The Spurs management hasn't made a game changing move since drafting Ginobili in '00 and Parker in '01. They gave away Scola. Let Hedo walk for the MLE. Signed Malik Rose long term and had to dish out 2 1st rounders to get rid of him, and signed Rasho.

The Spurs are good because of 3 players, all of which were on their roster by 2001. Other than that? Nadda. I guess you can credit them for getting Ginobili and Parker to sign really cheap, long term deals. And not spending any money on anyone else (except Malik Rose and Rasho - which happen to be two big mistakes, so maybe its a good thing they haven't used a lot of money on anyone but the Big 3). That's about it in the last few years.
User avatar
_SRV_
Analyst
Posts: 3,030
And1: 4
Joined: Jun 30, 2005
Location: brew for breakfast

 

Post#25 » by _SRV_ » Mon Jun 2, 2008 10:04 am

RC Buford had the leverage of Duncan, but he knew how to surround him and not waste his ability which puts him at top, Dumars built the team from scratch w/o high draft picks, his main star almost bolted to the Magic but he managed to get Ben Wallace for him, the Pistons might not wow with # of championships, but Dumars build and maintained a relatively cheap contending team by finding diamonds in the rough (Billups, Rasheed, Dyess, Prince as a very late pick, Stucky and Maxiell are looking really good), no one comes close to that.
xx_skaterdude_xx wrote:Kobe gets bailed out more than Wall Street.
Kosar86
Assistant Coach
Posts: 4,225
And1: 33
Joined: Jul 18, 2002

 

Post#26 » by Kosar86 » Mon Jun 2, 2008 10:50 am

edfmx86 wrote:i think making the Jazz get over the Stockton-Malone Era in 3 years with one losing season deserves some recognition, maybe not the best, but Kevin O'Connor should be here


True, but ALOT of that was because Boozer got hurt for a year, the Jazz sucked, and ended up with Deron Williams.

If they win a few more games that year and end up with raymond felton, he isnt looked at as great.


I loved what the seattle gm did in his first year.
Mahoney_jr
Veteran
Posts: 2,523
And1: 1
Joined: Aug 02, 2004
Location: Germany
 

 

Post#27 » by Mahoney_jr » Mon Jun 2, 2008 7:46 pm

Kosar86 wrote:-= original quote snipped =-
I loved what the seattle gm did in his first year.


I liked how they transformed Rashard Lewis into three 1st rounders. But the Kurt Thomas deal isn't possible if Clay Bennett (yeah, the bad guy) wouldn't accept to take on additional salary. That was, regarding the circumstances, a nice move from this ***
Mahoney_jr
Veteran
Posts: 2,523
And1: 1
Joined: Aug 02, 2004
Location: Germany
 

 

Post#28 » by Mahoney_jr » Mon Jun 2, 2008 7:57 pm

farzi wrote:-= original quote snipped =-



Yep. It was leaked that Nash was extremely high on Noah, and was trying to talk him in to coming out so that Portland could take him and build around him. He was also reportedly pretty high on Bargs and the Stache. Seeing as how there were reports Pritchard ran the show, and we have none of the aforementioned players, it looks like thats how it went down.


Thank you for responding.

But don't you think it's kind of obvious to not talk high about the player you want (excluding Billy Knight)? Just as well as Morrison, Brandon Roy is from the North-West. And I would think that the deal for LaFrantz and the pick would have to be arranged by GMs (Ainge / Nash) and completed by the owners (Grousbeck / Allen). Pritchard may have a word to say about his assessment about the possible trade, because the goal was another pick, but I can't give him the credentials. As a scout (or chief scout) you can't work the phones to get a picture about who would like to deal a pick. I can't believe that's the way deals are made. Esp. big deals like this one (+10 million of salary).
Blame Rasho
On Leave
Posts: 42,377
And1: 10,152
Joined: Apr 25, 2002

 

Post#29 » by Blame Rasho » Mon Jun 2, 2008 8:04 pm

Rasheeed!!! wrote:-= original quote snipped =-



Overrated......

Best transaction: Signed guard Emanuel Ginobili on July 19 2002.

Worst transaction: Traded the draft rights to guard Leandrinho Barbosa to the Phoenix Suns for a future first-round pick in 2003.

http://hoopshype.com/general_managers/rc_buford.htm


LOL...Yeah and that pick became Nazr who helped us win a championship. Barbosa was doing nothing in that series...
richboy
RealGM
Posts: 25,424
And1: 2,487
Joined: Sep 01, 2003

 

Post#30 » by richboy » Mon Jun 2, 2008 8:43 pm

Frosty wrote:-= original quote snipped =-



That wasn't his wand. That was Kobe "injecting his DNA into his teamates". Didn't you hear? Sounds a little Colorado'ish to me but at least he didn't give details in the interview.

Gasol was the magic wand

To be honest. Kupchak was pretty much right on the mark when he said he didn't think the team was as far away as people suggested last year.


The Lakers had the best record in the West when Bynum went down. Even I who was very critical of Mitch has to say that he has been vindicated. That a mark of a good GM is recognizing his mistakes and turning them into positives. Mitch blew the Shaq trade at first. Then he blew it some more when he traded Butler for Kwame Brown. He pretty much turned Shaq into Odom and Gasol. Thats not too bad. You add the draft picks and signing Fisher and Vlad to the MLE. Both that I criticized but was proven wrong.

Its weird to say someone that you thought was one of the worst is now one of the best. Fact is the Lakers have went from mediocre to a potential dynasty and the moves that Mitch have done that were so criticized can't be anymore.
User avatar
lukeridenour
Bench Warmer
Posts: 1,263
And1: 1
Joined: May 19, 2007
Location: Los Angeles

 

Post#31 » by lukeridenour » Mon Jun 2, 2008 8:55 pm

Rasheeed!!! wrote:-= original quote snipped =-



Overrated......

Best transaction: Signed guard Emanuel Ginobili on July 19 2002.

Worst transaction: Traded the draft rights to guard Leandrinho Barbosa to the Phoenix Suns for a future first-round pick in 2003.

http://hoopshype.com/general_managers/rc_buford.htm


how can 3 championships in 6 years be overrated?

besides its not just who he signs and trades, we havent/barely paid the luxury tax while maintaining championship contendership.
Manu Ginobili:

* Italian League Championship: 2001
* Italian Cup: 2001, 2002
* Euroleague: 2001
* Americas Championship: 2001
* NBA Championship: 2003, 2005, 2007
* Summer Olympic Games gold medal: 2004
User avatar
Boognish
RealGM
Posts: 45,199
And1: 16,738
Joined: May 02, 2008
Location: Cavs in 7
 

 

Post#32 » by Boognish » Tue Jun 3, 2008 4:34 am

Real GM!
User avatar
Vindicater
General Manager
Posts: 7,948
And1: 423
Joined: Apr 11, 2004

 

Post#33 » by Vindicater » Tue Jun 3, 2008 8:42 am

lukeridenour wrote:-= original quote snipped =-



how can 3 championships in 6 years be overrated?

besides its not just who he signs and trades, we havent/barely paid the luxury tax while maintaining championship contendership.


Agreed, People saying Mitch Kupchak are ridiculous...

*Shaq trade was horrible
*Brown trade was Horrible
*Getting Fisher was extremely lucky
*Getting Gasol was plain ridicolous and the Grizzlies GM should be shot.
"That's why the last two years weren't guaranteed," Walsh said. "Either way, he knew it could have happened either way."
User avatar
Point forward
Head Coach
Posts: 6,200
And1: 285
Joined: May 16, 2007
Location: Eating crow for the rest of my life :D

 

Post#34 » by Point forward » Tue Jun 3, 2008 10:50 am

Guys, it is harder to SUSTAIN excellence rather than REACH it. Therefore, RC Buford. His little tweaking is more effenctive than any earth shaking trade. Spurs won 4 rings PAYING VIRTUALLY ZERO LUXURY TAX!! (Hi Mavs)
Jogi Löw to Mario Götze wrote:Show the world that you are better than Messi.
Hemingway
Banned User
Posts: 3,725
And1: 3
Joined: Jan 11, 2005

 

Post#35 » by Hemingway » Tue Jun 3, 2008 11:58 am

Danny Ainge is my pick.

Danny did a number of good things in advance to make the trades last offseason possible.

1. He made a plan (get chips and trade up) and stuck with it even when injuries struck.

2. He resisted the quick fixes. AI rings a bell, imagine trading AJ for him, it'd be PP and AI not PP RA and KG.

3. He targeted KG an lined up contracts. Yes the 7 pick and lafrenz for Theo and Telfair was a good deal for the blazers but it was great for us in that it gave us a big contract with a year less to match up with KG.

4. Smart decisions. Cash for Rondo, Signing Perk up long term at short money. No bad draft choices.

My point is that Danny worked very hard over the past few seasons to make last offseason possible. Last offseason for hte CEltics has to be looked at as one of the best ever. This seasons turn around is, i think, statisticly the best ever. If the Celtics win the finals, Ainge deserves a LOT of praise around Boston!
Rasheeed!!!
Assistant Coach
Posts: 4,393
And1: 1,508
Joined: Apr 29, 2007

 

Post#36 » by Rasheeed!!! » Tue Jun 3, 2008 12:26 pm

lukeridenour wrote:-= original quote snipped =-



how can 3 championships in 6 years be overrated?

besides its not just who he signs and trades, we havent/barely paid the luxury tax while maintaining championship contendership.


Because people act like he built the team from the ground up. Yes he's made some nice moves to keep them in contention but he's not the best GM.
User avatar
Basileus777
General Manager
Posts: 7,824
And1: 2,051
Joined: Jul 13, 2007
Location: New Jersey
 

 

Post#37 » by Basileus777 » Tue Jun 3, 2008 3:28 pm

Buford blowing first round draft picks on Euros that don't even play for the Spurs is a reason why they got so old. Unlike Dumars, Buford has been unable to acquire young athletic players to complement his stars.

All he has really done is sign veteran role-players, mostly shooters. Its not that difficult to build around a DUncan.Manu-Parker core.
User avatar
Flash3
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 52,635
And1: 404
Joined: Oct 21, 2004
Location: L-I-M-R

 

Post#38 » by Flash3 » Tue Jun 3, 2008 3:33 pm

Basileus777 wrote:Buford blowing first round draft picks on Euros that don't even play for the Spurs is a reason why they got so old. Unlike Dumars, Buford has been unable to acquire young athletic players to complement his stars.

All he has really done is sign veteran role-players, mostly shooters. Its not that difficult to build around a DUncan.Manu-Parker core.
You make it seem as if building a title contending team, and sustaining that team as a title contender year in and year out is something easily done.......
Mars wrote:You can't stop the asterisk... you can only hope to contain it.
User avatar
Basileus777
General Manager
Posts: 7,824
And1: 2,051
Joined: Jul 13, 2007
Location: New Jersey
 

 

Post#39 » by Basileus777 » Tue Jun 3, 2008 3:41 pm

Flash3 wrote:-= original quote snipped =-

You make it seem as if building a title contending team, and sustaining that team as a title contender year in and year out is something easily done.......


I'm not saying that at all. Buford has done a good job of resigning Manu and Parker and acquiring veteran role-players. But acquiring those role-players is much easier once you have your core in place, look how quickly Boston was able to do it after getting Garnett and Allen. And I just think he has made a number of mistakes in the draft and if he hadn't done so the Spurs wouldn't have become so old.
T-dot Raps
Lead Assistant
Posts: 5,550
And1: 258
Joined: Dec 19, 2004
Location: Toronto
 

 

Post#40 » by T-dot Raps » Tue Jun 3, 2008 3:57 pm

Are some people really saying Danny Ainge?

Return to The General Board