Trader_Joe wrote:I_Never Lied wrote:Trader_Joe wrote:His point, which I agree with, is that PGs in general seem to be able to play their peak game longer than other positions. The rules protect them and they generally are not very physical in their games. I agree the most athletic ones would fall off faster, but I think Dragic at 32 will be pretty close to his peak especially because he will have even more intangibles and experience by then to rely on. PG is a very mental position.
But his point is all wrong. Its the other way around. In the last 5 years the only PG's to play at a high level after 32 are...
Chauncey Billups
Steve Nash
Jason Terry
Andre Miller
That is just Four guys in the last 5 years. So yea, this is not common at all and not something to 'expect' out of a guy like Dragic. Especially to pass up on a dynamic young athlete like Bledsoe.
You can't deny history.
PG only became deep again recently with a new influx of young guys.
Also aren't we talking about up to 32 and not after?
BTW where are..
Kidd
Hinrich
Iverson
And I think Paul, Parker, Calderon and others are holding up pretty well as they hit 30.
It will be interesting to see how this next crop does, but I don't think 32 year old Dragic will be noticeably worse than 28,year old Dragic.
Iverson was 32 in 2007, a long time ago, plus he's a HOF'er. I don't consider Dallas Mavs Kidd 'high level'. He was good at 32-24 in New Jersey but goodness that was a decade ago. We are insulting Kidd/Iverson by mentioning Dragic in the same sentence. Hinrich is trash.
I will bump the living hell out of this thread in 2016. I'm confident that even by then, Dragic will have fallen off something serious.
























