ogmagicfan wrote:I'm not a fan of it whatsoever
The owners arent innocent, they pushed for this new barganing agreement with the aprons and thus leading to tougher decisions to be made when paying players
They can afford any kinda contracts necessary, they just dont want to
Dont push it on the players to be "team players" when it comes to this
Brunson honestly is setting a bad precedent. It's one thing to take a 5-10 mil paycut for the same amount of years. But cutting out 113 million and 1 more yr on a contract is bad business, no other way to split it for a player who is fringe top 10 in the NBA
People talk alot about how certain players shouldnt be maxed out, well Brunson is unquestionably a max player
I'm seriously wondering about this too without trying to be cynical.
A couple of thoughts I have is that my home team (Raptors) gave out contracts that were not deserved. If you are going to get the max, you should prove you already have the potential to be a number 1 or 2 guy on a contender or else you should not be paid the max.
If you do fit this criteria (like Brunson), why should he take a paycut so the owner saves money?
I truly hope there are backdoor deals that will make Brunson whole otherwise it feels like a lot of fans are sympathizing with the owners whose job it is as billionaires is to cut the checks to put out the best team possible.