Cubbies2120 wrote:hardenASG13 wrote:Cubbies2120 wrote: I take it this is your first year watching him?
Reading this the fingers are being pointed at his supporting cast. However this is a 3x MVP, in his prime, showing poor leadership and underperforming massively with his passive play. Putting up solid stats, not dominating games at all. This is your GOAT peak? I'm not sure how'd anyone with eyes and who cares so much about basketball can keep going along with this.
Poor leadership = showing energy in the huddles, not coddling teammates who are underperforming, etc.?
"He has shown in previous playoffs he can": against mid or bad teams, yes. Amazing!
"Hes one of the best screen setters etc..."
Yep, he's really big and moves slightly/elbows when he screens. He is effective at it though, no argument there. But that action isn't that hard for a decent team to neutralize in a playoff series, seeing it night after night. It's not as effective as a guy who can penetrate and collapse a defense though, that gets the whole defense off balance/in rotation.
"The Nuggets can't afford him in foul trouble". He hasn't been in foul trouble, or close to it the last two games. When you're not in foul trouble you can challenge plays. Really, it's true. There are many bigs who regularly contest shots at the rim. And you know what? They somehow manage to not foul out of every game, or many games at all!
Re 3 point percentage: 47% that's great! He's shooting standstill and open 3s, that helps percentages. It's also not the same as a guy who is creating his own 3s and making them, for a superstar player. Thats when the other team is in trouble. His shooting isn't causing a problem for the Clippers in the slightest.
"Is this your first year watching him?": No, I've been saying this stuff for years, and getting attacked for it by posters like you as you know (good to have you back after that Minnesota series last year. That was.....bad for you).
"Poor leadership is showing energy in huddles and not coddling teammates ": No, poor leadership is body language galloping down the court, making almost 0 hustle plays, standing there when guys go in for layups/being flat footed on any remotely long rebound, turning it over in clutch situations, missing big FTs, deferring to Westbrook in games 1 and 2. This a 3x MVP, billed as the best player in the world. He hasn't dominated a single stretch of any game and we're 3 games in. His team is begging for him to take over, and he's playing his normal, efficient, triple double friendly game. That doesn't get it done vs a quality opponent. Their waiting for for the "GOAT peak" teammate to set the tone and play like. He hasn't wanted any part of that or shown the ability to do so.
Did Jokic play up to your standard today?
Yes, Finally! How'd he do it? By being a more aggressive scorer than the previous 3 games, and playing more inside instead of spamming that top of the key DHO/pitchback stuff, which is exactly what I've said after each of the first 3 games. It opened things up for everyone, and raised the energy and confidence of his team. LA couldn't stop him when he put his head down and looked to score.
This is precisely why I criticized him the first 3 games. He's capable of this but hadn't even tried to do this until game 4. The Clippers (who maybe aren't the super team many are trying to make them out to be) cant stop him and aren't doubling, keep going to work.













