SuperDario wrote:supremacy wrote:downtownpie wrote:sixer shot terrible in their only loss to Miami. tonight they shot 19% from 3.
Boston made 12 more 3 pointers shooting 48%.
can Boston do that all series and will the sixers shoot that bad again?
no and no.
Boston is set to get back one of their best defenders and a 20ppg scorer. The Sixers had one job - steal an “easy” game one without Bostons starting SG. Not only do they lose, but they **** the bed. We won’t need to shoot 48% from downtown.
If both teams shot league average from 3 tonight with all else being the same, the Sixers would have won by double digits.
Are you serious.
?
We’re sticking to “ifs”, now? If Saric played “slightly” worse than what Hayward is capable of, I’m sure the Sixers win, too. But he didn’t. Because he’s not.
The Celtics are better coached, a much better defensive team, and are finding their stride(Rozier and Tatum especially). Let’s not rely on “ifs” or pretend as if the Sixers are on some elite level and the Celtics were lucky to win tonight. This, for the most part, is the same Celtics team that finished #2 in the east. Anybody that’s expecting this to end in 4 or 5 either way is in for a rude awakening.
The Celtics did what they needed to with Brown out - outshoot the Sixers. With Brown back, they won’t need to rely as heavily as they did on a shooting disparity.






























