TMZ: "DeMarcus Cousins Allegedly Threatening to Shoot Baby Mama Before Wedding"

[Maf]

Must admit I had more fun reading this topic then I probably should have.

Might be me being Europian, often doesn't undestand US way of thinking. But when I am reading things like: "Oh, she is such a whore and golddigger because she divorced Cousins!" Well, maybe she found out he **** around with a lot of woman. And I am pretty sure ANY self-respected woman woudn't tolerate that ****.

Or: "Oh, that poor boy really suffers cause she didn't let him to his father's new wedding." Well, I am from divorced family and as a kid... I really didn't want to go celebrate my father is **** another lady than my mother.

Or: "I know a lot of man threatening women like this and never hurt them really." Like really, do you? Are you over 25 yo? I might, might to understand that **** with teenagers and really stupid young people. First, I'd believe to never made threats you're not willing to make. Like if someone say: "I'll punch you in the face" he won't get a chance. That's what my father taught me. Strike first. Second, I am pretty sure if I'd ever said to my wife she would cut me in the sleep.

[jamesd]

"I'm going to make sure to put a bullet into your **** head...."

"even if I don't have to get my hands dirty doing it."

That's two threats of death. Anyone defending him looks ridiculous and clearly has some issues they need to work through.

[mesomorph]

Cousins is such a naive guy if he think he can ask his ex to bring his child to the wedding.
You could read many stories like this on menslavement.com when women use their children against fathers.
This is just 21st centurys reality, that we never hear on the news.

[AbeVigodaLive]

I predict that Clyde gets another 5 pages out of this troll...

He's probably gonna stick to the "but she a ho" angle because it's an easier thing to repeat as new posters who didnt read the thread offer similar retorts to others... but he might be able to push some other macro society narrative to get a second wind.

[RakimAbdulJabar]

Suspending Cousins is pointless, he wasn't going to play this season anyway. The only fair solution is to suspend one of Davis or Lebron for the full season including playoffs (if they make it). It's the only way these guys will learn.

[jamesd]

I am able to multi-task and have low tolerance for more than one thing at a time, I know shocking.

and you don't have to link me to the article, I already read it twice. it says NOTHING about getting the RECORDING from the court (why the **** would the court just give the recording to TMZ if it was part of the investigation)?

The court file is a public record. You could - right now - access any court file that you want. Reporters get access to lots of legal documents from court files. The only way a member of the public would be barred from accessing a court file would be a protective of confidentiality order from a court.

The principle of open courts is a fundamental part of the modern justice system. Anyone - including you - could just walk up to a court house and get any legal document that you want from any case whatsoever, subject to any local laws purporting to restrict this right (and further subject to constitutional / legal challenges to those laws).

It doesn't even make sense for TMZ to pay for what they're reporting. They can get it for free.

I have not heard - nor does it intuitively make sense - that TMZ would be under an obligation to report whenever they don't pay for a story. Or indeed any news agency. They may have an obligation to disclose when they did pay for a story - but I'm honestly sceptical that such a rule would exist.

But let's assume you are right - that the ex sold the court file and the court documents such as the police report to TMZ. She would have done all of this after she actually reported everything to the police. So your condemnation that she went to TMZ first is still a fantasy.

So I come back to my original point: it's telling that you've spent a lot of time defending Cousins threatening to shoot the mother of his child in the head while calling the mother psychotic based - at least in part if not wholly - made up facts and your imagination.

TMZ doesn't have to disclose who/where they're resources are or where they obtain their recordings or vids or anything if they don't have to, and the court doesn't just release pertaining evidence in the midst of an investigation to the public.

and even if she went to the police first, it still doesn't make a difference regarding the overall intention, especially in this filing itself she literally says she's 'fine with her kid seeing Cousins'. she's all over the **** place.

and I'm defending Cousins by providing appropriate context to the situation, in which you and other self-righteous individuals are willing to completely ignore to flex nuts about how much of a white knight you are at the expense of the kid who probably just wants to see his father.

She obviously went to the police because they have a charge and she needs to sign a warrant for them to pursue it. And the records indicated she was open to 'supervised visitations." Your selective editing and conjecture in the face of facts is comical.

[MrDollarBills]

Says volumes about her no matter how much you trying to play Cap'n SAH.....

Grow up, you petulant child.

Right after you stop carrying a flag for women, they are grown and independent; they don't need you screaming your head off in their defense.....

Hey incel...please quote where in this thread have I defended his baby mother's actions.

[Maf]

Suspending Cousins is pointless, he wasn't going to play this season anyway. The only fair solution is to suspend one of Davis or Lebron for the full season including playoffs (if they make it). It's the only way these guys will learn.

Love the way you think.

[MrDollarBills]

"I'm going to make sure to put a bullet into your **** head...."

"even if I don't have to get my hands dirty doing it."

That's two threats of death. Anyone defending him looks ridiculous and clearly has some issues they need to work through.

Wait, where did the second threat occur?

[jamesd]

Cousins is such a naive guy if he think he can ask his ex to bring his child to the wedding.
You could read many stories like this on menslavement.com when women use their children against fathers.
This is just 21st centurys reality, that we never hear on the news.

Sorry, not going to menslavement.com for information.

[clyde21]

The court file is a public record. You could - right now - access any court file that you want. Reporters get access to lots of legal documents from court files. The only way a member of the public would be barred from accessing a court file would be a protective of confidentiality order from a court.

The principle of open courts is a fundamental part of the modern justice system. Anyone - including you - could just walk up to a court house and get any legal document that you want from any case whatsoever, subject to any local laws purporting to restrict this right (and further subject to constitutional / legal challenges to those laws).

It doesn't even make sense for TMZ to pay for what they're reporting. They can get it for free.

I have not heard - nor does it intuitively make sense - that TMZ would be under an obligation to report whenever they don't pay for a story. Or indeed any news agency. They may have an obligation to disclose when they did pay for a story - but I'm honestly sceptical that such a rule would exist.

But let's assume you are right - that the ex sold the court file and the court documents such as the police report to TMZ. She would have done all of this after she actually reported everything to the police. So your condemnation that she went to TMZ first is still a fantasy.

So I come back to my original point: it's telling that you've spent a lot of time defending Cousins threatening to shoot the mother of his child in the head while calling the mother psychotic based - at least in part if not wholly - made up facts and your imagination.

TMZ doesn't have to disclose who/where they're resources are or where they obtain their recordings or vids or anything if they don't have to, and the court doesn't just release pertaining evidence in the midst of an investigation to the public.

and even if she went to the police first, it still doesn't make a difference regarding the overall intention, especially in this filing itself she literally says she's 'fine with her kid seeing Cousins'. she's all over the **** place.

and I'm defending Cousins by providing appropriate context to the situation, in which you and other self-righteous individuals are willing to completely ignore to flex nuts about how much of a white knight you are at the expense of the kid who probably just wants to see his father.

She obviously went to the police because they have a charge and she needs to sign a warrant for them to pursue it. And the records indicated she was open to 'supervised visitations." Your selective editing and conjecture in the face of facts is comical.

i know she said supervised, how the **** is that relevant to the point that she disallowed his kid from going to his fathers wedding and used him as a pawn in all of this? now all of the sudden she's 'open' to visitations, supervised or not?

[ATLTimekeeper]

I am able to multi-task and have low tolerance for more than one thing at a time, I know shocking.

and you don't have to link me to the article, I already read it twice. it says NOTHING about getting the RECORDING from the court (why the **** would the court just give the recording to TMZ if it was part of the investigation)?

The court file is a public record. You could - right now - access any court file that you want. Reporters get access to lots of legal documents from court files. The only way a member of the public would be barred from accessing a court file would be a protective of confidentiality order from a court.

The principle of open courts is a fundamental part of the modern justice system. Anyone - including you - could just walk up to a court house and get any legal document that you want from any case whatsoever, subject to any local laws purporting to restrict this right (and further subject to constitutional / legal challenges to those laws).

It doesn't even make sense for TMZ to pay for what they're reporting. They can get it for free.

I have not heard - nor does it intuitively make sense - that TMZ would be under an obligation to report whenever they don't pay for a story. Or indeed any news agency. They may have an obligation to disclose when they did pay for a story - but I'm honestly sceptical that such a rule would exist.

But let's assume you are right - that the ex sold the court file and the court documents such as the police report to TMZ. She would have done all of this after she actually reported everything to the police. So your condemnation that she went to TMZ first is still a fantasy.

So I come back to my original point: it's telling that you've spent a lot of time defending Cousins threatening to shoot the mother of his child in the head while calling the mother psychotic based - at least in part if not wholly - made up facts and your imagination.

TMZ doesn't have to disclose who/where they're resources are or where they obtain their recordings or vids or anything if they don't have to, and the court doesn't just release pertaining evidence in the midst of an investigation to the public.

and even if she went to the police first, it still doesn't make a difference regarding the overall intention, especially in this filing itself she literally says she's 'fine with her kid seeing Cousins'. she's all over the **** place.

and I'm defending Cousins by providing appropriate context to the situation, in which you and other self-righteous individuals are willing to completely ignore to flex nuts about how much of a white knight you are at the expense of the kid who probably just wants to see his father.

Actually this is what's reported:

She wants officials to keep Cousins away from her and their son -- but she notes she's open to allowing Boogie to have supervised visitation.

Meaning she doesn't trust Cousins alone with her son. There's some context for you.

[jamesd]

"I'm going to make sure to put a bullet into your **** head...."

"even if I don't have to get my hands dirty doing it."

That's two threats of death. Anyone defending him looks ridiculous and clearly has some issues they need to work through.

Wait, where did the second threat occur?

It's in the report.

[clyde21]

"I'm going to make sure to put a bullet into your **** head...."

"even if I don't have to get my hands dirty doing it."

That's two threats of death. Anyone defending him looks ridiculous and clearly has some issues they need to work through.

Wait, where did the second threat occur?

she claimed it happened at another point.

[clyde21]

The court file is a public record. You could - right now - access any court file that you want. Reporters get access to lots of legal documents from court files. The only way a member of the public would be barred from accessing a court file would be a protective of confidentiality order from a court.

The principle of open courts is a fundamental part of the modern justice system. Anyone - including you - could just walk up to a court house and get any legal document that you want from any case whatsoever, subject to any local laws purporting to restrict this right (and further subject to constitutional / legal challenges to those laws).

It doesn't even make sense for TMZ to pay for what they're reporting. They can get it for free.

I have not heard - nor does it intuitively make sense - that TMZ would be under an obligation to report whenever they don't pay for a story. Or indeed any news agency. They may have an obligation to disclose when they did pay for a story - but I'm honestly sceptical that such a rule would exist.

But let's assume you are right - that the ex sold the court file and the court documents such as the police report to TMZ. She would have done all of this after she actually reported everything to the police. So your condemnation that she went to TMZ first is still a fantasy.

So I come back to my original point: it's telling that you've spent a lot of time defending Cousins threatening to shoot the mother of his child in the head while calling the mother psychotic based - at least in part if not wholly - made up facts and your imagination.

TMZ doesn't have to disclose who/where they're resources are or where they obtain their recordings or vids or anything if they don't have to, and the court doesn't just release pertaining evidence in the midst of an investigation to the public.

and even if she went to the police first, it still doesn't make a difference regarding the overall intention, especially in this filing itself she literally says she's 'fine with her kid seeing Cousins'. she's all over the **** place.

and I'm defending Cousins by providing appropriate context to the situation, in which you and other self-righteous individuals are willing to completely ignore to flex nuts about how much of a white knight you are at the expense of the kid who probably just wants to see his father.

Actually this is what's reported:

She wants officials to keep Cousins away from her and their son -- but she notes she's open to allowing Boogie to have supervised visitation.

Meaning she doesn't trust Cousins alone with her son. There's some context for you.

and until the judge/court agrees with her, she has no right to withhold Cousins' son from him, period.

[MrDollarBills]

This is definitely going to need more context. This has to be the perfect wedding gift from her to him. The PR hit from this alone will likely end him and if he has to play through a suspension it won’t be worth the distraction.

This recording was sent to the police before TMZ ever got their hands on it.

[MrDollarBills]

Cousins is such a naive guy if he think he can ask his ex to bring his child to the wedding.
You could read many stories like this on menslavement.com when women use their children against fathers.
This is just 21st centurys reality, that we never hear on the news.

Sorry, not going to menslavement.com for information.

I knew it wouldn't be too long before the redpillers came rolling in here with their bull **** !!!!!!!

[teerfour+40LG]

Custody battles get ugly fast. It's ok to get angry, but threats like this have to be taken seriously.

[jamesd]

TMZ doesn't have to disclose who/where they're resources are or where they obtain their recordings or vids or anything if they don't have to, and the court doesn't just release pertaining evidence in the midst of an investigation to the public.

and even if she went to the police first, it still doesn't make a difference regarding the overall intention, especially in this filing itself she literally says she's 'fine with her kid seeing Cousins'. she's all over the **** place.

and I'm defending Cousins by providing appropriate context to the situation, in which you and other self-righteous individuals are willing to completely ignore to flex nuts about how much of a white knight you are at the expense of the kid who probably just wants to see his father.

She obviously went to the police because they have a charge and she needs to sign a warrant for them to pursue it. And the records indicated she was open to 'supervised visitations." Your selective editing and conjecture in the face of facts is comical.

i know she said supervised, how the **** is that relevant to the point that she disallowed his kid from going to his fathers wedding and used him as a pawn in all of this? now all of the sudden she's 'open' to visitations, supervised or not?

Quit saying pawn. You're manufacturing that. And it's not all of a sudden. She said she wants a restraining order but is open to supervised - an important distinction - visitations. She isn't trying to keep his son from him. She seems to be rightfully concerned for his well-being, hence the supervisions.

[XxIronChainzxX]

TMZ doesn't have to disclose who/where they're resources are or where they obtain their recordings or vids or anything if they don't have to, and the court doesn't just release pertaining evidence in the midst of an investigation to the public.

and even if she went to the police first, it still doesn't make a difference regarding the overall intention, especially in this filing itself she literally says she's 'fine with her kid seeing Cousins'. she's all over the **** place.

and I'm defending Cousins by providing appropriate context to the situation, in which you and other self-righteous individuals are willing to completely ignore to flex nuts about how much of a white knight you are at the expense of the kid who probably just wants to see his father.

Actually this is what's reported:

She wants officials to keep Cousins away from her and their son -- but she notes she's open to allowing Boogie to have supervised visitation.

Meaning she doesn't trust Cousins alone with her son. There's some context for you.

and until the judge/court agrees with her, she has no right to withhold Cousins' son from him, period.

What are you on about? It's the other way around if she has custody of the child and Cousins doesn't: he is only entitled to see his child according to a court ordered visitation schedule. I get you have a big hole to dig yourself out of, but let's cool it with the alternative facts.