Giannis just made a lot of these nba stars look pathetic

Moderators: Clav, Domejandro, ken6199, bisme37, Dirk, KingDavid, cupcakesnake, bwgood77, zimpy27, infinite11285

User avatar
zimpy27
Forum Mod
Forum Mod
Posts: 45,694
And1: 43,955
Joined: Jul 13, 2014

Re: Giannis just made a lot of these nba stars look pathetic 

Post#221 » by zimpy27 » Wed Jul 21, 2021 6:48 am

SeniorWalker wrote:
zimpy27 wrote:
WeSkrongDen wrote:
You're not a super team with one player who has made an ALL NBA Team and 1 HoFer. Middleton and Holiday are nice players but LeBron has had much, much better wingmen on every championship he has won.


Why you bringing up LeBron? He's been on superteams too. Is your definition of a superteam just any team LeBron was on?

When Jrue joined I think most people pegged them as a superteam, I certainly did in several posts on this forum over the season and I was not alone.

What you are describing is a big 2 or a duo. I mean, you are going to be painting most playoff teams in NBA history with that brush. Raptors in 19 were a supeteam?

Jrue and Holiday are both top 30 players in the league, they are paid as max salary players, they haven't been injured, they are all star level. These were the things people say about LeBrons teams in Miami and Cleveland.

:lol: :lol: :lol: :lol:

Wow. I didn't think people would start calling the bucks a superteam but here we are.

Some of you are really, really young. Like, every title team is a great team for sure but just because you're a great team with a lot of talent doesn't make you a superteam.

The superteams are obvious. LeBron's Heat, KD warriors, blah blah. The ones with the unfair amount of top end talent, multiple guys who could easily be the #1 for another franchise teaming. The Nets just this year.

These bucks are very far from that. You can't be that delusional. They're a well constructed team with one superstar, nothing more.


They are a better team without Giannis than the Heatles without LeBron for 2 of the 4 years of the Heatles.
You started a sentence with the word "Like", so how old are you exactly?

You can have the opinion of a measure of superteam but even LeBron and AD was heavily debated as a superteam at end of last season. People seem to have varying definitions, so I respect that you may have a different definition. You can check my posts and look for others of Bucks superteams back before the playoffs. There were people saying this once they acquired Jrue.
"Let's play some basketball!" - Fergie
WeSkrongDen
Junior
Posts: 304
And1: 184
Joined: Mar 14, 2015

Re: Giannis just made a lot of these nba stars look pathetic 

Post#222 » by WeSkrongDen » Wed Jul 21, 2021 6:50 am

zimpy27 wrote:
thelead wrote:
zimpy27 wrote:
Why you bringing up LeBron? He's been on superteams too. Is your definition of a superteam just any team LeBron was on?

When Jrue joined I think most people pegged them as a superteam, I certainly did in several posts on this forum over the season and I was not alone.

What you are describing is a big 2 or a duo. I mean, you are going to be painting most playoff teams in NBA history with that brush. Raptors in 19 were a supeteam?

Jrue and Holiday are both top 30 players in the league, they are paid as max salary players, they haven't been injured, they are all star level. These were the things people say about LeBrons teams in Miami and Cleveland.

We can agree to disagree but you’re not going to convince most that (subtracting the team’s best player) Khris and Jrue are anywhere near the level of Harden and Kyrie. Not even close.


Agreed. Jrue or Middleton aren't as good as Davis alone. I'd have Jrue and Middleton above Irving and Love but below Wade and Bosh.
There are levels but my original post was to OP that stated it wasn't a superteam. I think even Giannis knows it's a superteam and he backed it once Jrue was acquired. I think he deserves full props for that. But this thread seems to be about taking his great achievement and using it to take a stab at other players.


Jrue and Middleton combined below Davis. Clearly below Love and Irving. Love and Irving are both HoFers lol. You have some crazy takes in this thread.
User avatar
jc23
RealGM
Posts: 27,461
And1: 12,251
Joined: May 31, 2010
Location: 1901 W.Madsion St
     

Re: Giannis just made a lot of these nba stars look pathetic 

Post#223 » by jc23 » Wed Jul 21, 2021 6:50 am

First guy to win a title in this fashion since Dirk. Which maybe tells us something about the mindset of players from the states and players who are not.
"Showing off is the fool's idea of glory"

-Bruce Lee
CircleCitysportsfan
Lead Assistant
Posts: 5,868
And1: 81
Joined: Dec 07, 2004
Location: Hamilton County
Contact:
     

Re: Giannis just made a lot of these nba stars look pathetic 

Post#224 » by CircleCitysportsfan » Wed Jul 21, 2021 6:52 am

zimpy27 wrote:
CircleCitysportsfan wrote:As much as I want to disagree this is true. Giannis took a risk that other players didn't want to take. Lebron didn't want to be 30 with bad knees and no ring. Giannis embraced the risk and took it.


Giannis is under contract from his RFA deal. This season for him is equivalent of 09-10 season for LeBron.
He did sign an extension prior to his UFA this offseason, which you can credit him, but that was signed after they got Jrue, it was delayed until then and we all knew that if Bucks didn't make something like that happen then he was leaving - that's why they gave as much as they did.

The revisionist history here is not necessary, it's a great achievement alone and should be enough to celebrate that.


I can be a revisionist if I want to be champ! Go away
User avatar
draftbarnes
Analyst
Posts: 3,357
And1: 2,023
Joined: Apr 06, 2012

Re: Giannis just made a lot of these nba stars look pathetic 

Post#225 » by draftbarnes » Wed Jul 21, 2021 6:54 am

Jrue holiday part of a super team?

The same jrue holiday who couldn't get to the playoffs with zion amd ingram
On Curry declining

Pharmcat wrote:
Guest202 wrote:Didn't he score 30 two weeks ago on 5 of 10 from three?


you can still have good games in the decline, look at kobe's last game in his career
User avatar
zimpy27
Forum Mod
Forum Mod
Posts: 45,694
And1: 43,955
Joined: Jul 13, 2014

Re: Giannis just made a lot of these nba stars look pathetic 

Post#226 » by zimpy27 » Wed Jul 21, 2021 6:55 am

WeSkrongDen wrote:
zimpy27 wrote:
thelead wrote:We can agree to disagree but you’re not going to convince most that (subtracting the team’s best player) Khris and Jrue are anywhere near the level of Harden and Kyrie. Not even close.


Agreed. Jrue or Middleton aren't as good as Davis alone. I'd have Jrue and Middleton above Irving and Love but below Wade and Bosh.
There are levels but my original post was to OP that stated it wasn't a superteam. I think even Giannis knows it's a superteam and he backed it once Jrue was acquired. I think he deserves full props for that. But this thread seems to be about taking his great achievement and using it to take a stab at other players.


Jrue and Middleton combined below Davis. Clearly below Love and Irving. Love and Irving are both HoFers lol. You have some crazy takes in this thread.


HoFers based on accomplishments of the Cavs team, not before they joined. If Bucks make it to 4 finals then Jrue and Middleton will be. Irving was left at the age of DDV right now, Love was not better than Jrue or Middleton on those teams either.
"Let's play some basketball!" - Fergie
User avatar
SeniorWalker
Lead Assistant
Posts: 5,045
And1: 1,855
Joined: Jan 14, 2009
Location: at the event horizon and well on my way in, but you're wondering when i'll get there

Re: Giannis just made a lot of these nba stars look pathetic 

Post#227 » by SeniorWalker » Wed Jul 21, 2021 6:56 am

zimpy27 wrote:
SeniorWalker wrote:
zimpy27 wrote:
Why you bringing up LeBron? He's been on superteams too. Is your definition of a superteam just any team LeBron was on?

When Jrue joined I think most people pegged them as a superteam, I certainly did in several posts on this forum over the season and I was not alone.

What you are describing is a big 2 or a duo. I mean, you are going to be painting most playoff teams in NBA history with that brush. Raptors in 19 were a supeteam?

Jrue and Holiday are both top 30 players in the league, they are paid as max salary players, they haven't been injured, they are all star level. These were the things people say about LeBrons teams in Miami and Cleveland.

:lol: :lol: :lol: :lol:

Wow. I didn't think people would start calling the bucks a superteam but here we are.

Some of you are really, really young. Like, every title team is a great team for sure but just because you're a great team with a lot of talent doesn't make you a superteam.

The superteams are obvious. LeBron's Heat, KD warriors, blah blah. The ones with the unfair amount of top end talent, multiple guys who could easily be the #1 for another franchise teaming. The Nets just this year.

These bucks are very far from that. You can't be that delusional. They're a well constructed team with one superstar, nothing more.


They are a better team without Giannis than the Heatles without LeBron for atleast 2 of the 4 years of the Heatles.

You started a sentence with the word "Like", so how old are you exactly?

Criticize the content of the post, please. This isn't a grammar forum and using "like" is just a lazy manner of expressing pause in speech.

Again, you are purposefully misrepresenting the common understanding of what a superteam is. Super teams are not necessarily "deep" teams. Like, the 2011 Heat weren't deep with talent. They were stacked at the top end.

Same difference between the 2016 and 2017 warriors. The 16 warriors were not a superteam. They were a very deep team, with one superstar, two All-stars and a lot of great role players. The 17 warriors were a lot thinner, but had two MVP caliber superstar players backed by two All-stars and a thin bench. The latter was a superteam, the former, not, though a very good team. 2019 raptors, not a superteam. 2020 Lakers....not really a superteam.

There have been a lot of teams that are very balanced teams but don't have the top end punch to be a superteam.

Just....come on. This is easy to see.
"And always remember: one fish, two fish, red fish, blue fish, knick knack, paddy whack, give a dog a bone, two thousand, zero, zero, party, oops! Out of time, my bacon smellin' fine."
Free Rider
Veteran
Posts: 2,537
And1: 1,642
Joined: Mar 26, 2009

Re: Giannis just made a lot of these nba stars look pathetic 

Post#228 » by Free Rider » Wed Jul 21, 2021 6:58 am

The ultimate irony of this argument is that there was probably more parity this year than any other year in recent memory. The Nets were the one dominant team that everyone was afraid of and once they succumbed to injuries the league was pretty even between the Bucks, Sixers, Jazz, Lakers, Clippers, and Suns. I’d argue that the league is actually better off in terms of parity now than it’s been in the past 10 to 12 years.
WeSkrongDen
Junior
Posts: 304
And1: 184
Joined: Mar 14, 2015

Re: Giannis just made a lot of these nba stars look pathetic 

Post#229 » by WeSkrongDen » Wed Jul 21, 2021 6:59 am

zimpy27 wrote:
WeSkrongDen wrote:
zimpy27 wrote:
Agreed. Jrue or Middleton aren't as good as Davis alone. I'd have Jrue and Middleton above Irving and Love but below Wade and Bosh.
There are levels but my original post was to OP that stated it wasn't a superteam. I think even Giannis knows it's a superteam and he backed it once Jrue was acquired. I think he deserves full props for that. But this thread seems to be about taking his great achievement and using it to take a stab at other players.


Jrue and Middleton combined below Davis. Clearly below Love and Irving. Love and Irving are both HoFers lol. You have some crazy takes in this thread.


HoFers based on accomplishments of the Cavs team, not before they joined. If Bucks make it to 4 finals then Jrue and Middleton will be. Irving was left at the age of DDV right now, Love was not better than Jrue or Middleton on those teams either.


Love and Irving: 12 All Star teams, 5 All NBA teams
Middleton and Holiday: 3 All Star teams, 0 All NBA teams
Adelheid
RealGM
Posts: 11,746
And1: 7,965
Joined: Jul 10, 2014
 

Re: Giannis just made a lot of these nba stars look pathetic 

Post#230 » by Adelheid » Wed Jul 21, 2021 7:00 am

Best ability is availability, peeps

Big congrats to the bucks and their fans
WeSkrongDen
Junior
Posts: 304
And1: 184
Joined: Mar 14, 2015

Re: Giannis just made a lot of these nba stars look pathetic 

Post#231 » by WeSkrongDen » Wed Jul 21, 2021 7:01 am

Free Rider wrote:The ultimate irony of this argument is that there was probably more parity this year than any other year in recent memory. The Nets were the one dominant team that everyone was afraid of and once they succumbed to injuries the league was pretty even between the Bucks, Sixers, Jazz, Lakers, Clippers, and Suns. I’d argue that the league is actually better off in terms of parity now than it’s been in the past 10 to 12 years.


If healthy the Nets and Clippers should be above everyone else. Kyrie can never stay healthy though.
User avatar
zimpy27
Forum Mod
Forum Mod
Posts: 45,694
And1: 43,955
Joined: Jul 13, 2014

Re: Giannis just made a lot of these nba stars look pathetic 

Post#232 » by zimpy27 » Wed Jul 21, 2021 7:04 am

SeniorWalker wrote:
zimpy27 wrote:
SeniorWalker wrote: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol:

Wow. I didn't think people would start calling the bucks a superteam but here we are.

Some of you are really, really young. Like, every title team is a great team for sure but just because you're a great team with a lot of talent doesn't make you a superteam.

The superteams are obvious. LeBron's Heat, KD warriors, blah blah. The ones with the unfair amount of top end talent, multiple guys who could easily be the #1 for another franchise teaming. The Nets just this year.

These bucks are very far from that. You can't be that delusional. They're a well constructed team with one superstar, nothing more.


They are a better team without Giannis than the Heatles without LeBron for atleast 2 of the 4 years of the Heatles.

You started a sentence with the word "Like", so how old are you exactly?

Criticize the content of the post, please. This isn't a grammar forum and using "like" is just a lazy manner of expressing pause in speech.

Again, you are purposefully misrepresenting the common understanding of what a superteam is. Super teams are not necessarily "deep" teams. Like, the 2011 Heat weren't deep with talent. They were stacked at the top end.

Same difference between the 2016 and 2017 warriors. The 16 warriors were not a superteam. They were a very deep team, with one superstar, two All-stars and a lot of great role players. The 17 warriors were a lot thinner, but had two MVP caliber superstar players backed by two All-stars and a thin bench. The latter was a superteam, the former, not, though a very good team. 2019 raptors, not a superteam. 2020 Lakers....not really a superteam.

There have been a lot of teams that are very balanced teams but don't have the top end punch to be a superteam.

Just....come on. This is easy to see.


Oh I edited the post with more details you may not have seen.
You have a tighter restriction for superteam than I think many. I'd say Heatles weren't really a superteam beyond the first two season since Wade had injury issues and declined but first two years were based on your assessment. I'm guessing 90s Bulls and 80s Lakers were also at points based on your assessment.

I don't mind your description of one at all, mine was always based on it having to be at least 3 players of all star level since it had the "team" in it rather than calling it a duo.

My description is 3 top 30 players, 4 top 40 players, 5 top 50 players. Fulfill any of these categories and you're a superteam IMO.
"Let's play some basketball!" - Fergie
WeSkrongDen
Junior
Posts: 304
And1: 184
Joined: Mar 14, 2015

Re: Giannis just made a lot of these nba stars look pathetic 

Post#233 » by WeSkrongDen » Wed Jul 21, 2021 7:08 am

zimpy27 wrote:
SeniorWalker wrote:
zimpy27 wrote:
They are a better team without Giannis than the Heatles without LeBron for atleast 2 of the 4 years of the Heatles.

You started a sentence with the word "Like", so how old are you exactly?

Criticize the content of the post, please. This isn't a grammar forum and using "like" is just a lazy manner of expressing pause in speech.

Again, you are purposefully misrepresenting the common understanding of what a superteam is. Super teams are not necessarily "deep" teams. Like, the 2011 Heat weren't deep with talent. They were stacked at the top end.

Same difference between the 2016 and 2017 warriors. The 16 warriors were not a superteam. They were a very deep team, with one superstar, two All-stars and a lot of great role players. The 17 warriors were a lot thinner, but had two MVP caliber superstar players backed by two All-stars and a thin bench. The latter was a superteam, the former, not, though a very good team. 2019 raptors, not a superteam. 2020 Lakers....not really a superteam.

There have been a lot of teams that are very balanced teams but don't have the top end punch to be a superteam.

Just....come on. This is easy to see.


Oh I edited the post with more details you may not have seen.
You have a tighter restriction for superteam than I think many. I'd say Heatles weren't really a superteam beyond the first two season since Wade had injury issues and declined but first two years were based on your assessment. I'm guessing 90s Bulls and 80s Lakers were also at points based on your assessment.

I don't mind your description of one at all, mine was always based on it having to be at least 3 players of all star level since it had the "team" in it rather than calling it a duo.

My description is 3 top 30 players, 4 top 40 players, 5 top 50 players. Fulfill any of these categories and you're a superteam IMO.


Not all All Star level pieces are the same. One top 5 teammate is worth more than the 27 and 28 players.
Free Rider
Veteran
Posts: 2,537
And1: 1,642
Joined: Mar 26, 2009

Re: Giannis just made a lot of these nba stars look pathetic 

Post#234 » by Free Rider » Wed Jul 21, 2021 7:11 am

WeSkrongDen wrote:
Free Rider wrote:The ultimate irony of this argument is that there was probably more parity this year than any other year in recent memory. The Nets were the one dominant team that everyone was afraid of and once they succumbed to injuries the league was pretty even between the Bucks, Sixers, Jazz, Lakers, Clippers, and Suns. I’d argue that the league is actually better off in terms of parity now than it’s been in the past 10 to 12 years.


If healthy the Nets and Clippers should be above everyone else. Kyrie can never stay healthy though.


Isn’t Kwahi basically gone until the playoffs next season? If so, they might be a 7th or 8th seed at best
User avatar
ibraheim718
RealGM
Posts: 41,751
And1: 15,280
Joined: Jul 01, 2010

Re: Giannis just made a lot of these nba stars look pathetic 

Post#235 » by ibraheim718 » Wed Jul 21, 2021 7:18 am

Heck of a post game press conference. He said he's going to win 6th man of the year.. hahahaha.
WeSkrongDen
Junior
Posts: 304
And1: 184
Joined: Mar 14, 2015

Re: Giannis just made a lot of these nba stars look pathetic 

Post#236 » by WeSkrongDen » Wed Jul 21, 2021 7:20 am

Free Rider wrote:
WeSkrongDen wrote:
Free Rider wrote:The ultimate irony of this argument is that there was probably more parity this year than any other year in recent memory. The Nets were the one dominant team that everyone was afraid of and once they succumbed to injuries the league was pretty even between the Bucks, Sixers, Jazz, Lakers, Clippers, and Suns. I’d argue that the league is actually better off in terms of parity now than it’s been in the past 10 to 12 years.


If healthy the Nets and Clippers should be above everyone else. Kyrie can never stay healthy though.


Isn’t Kwahi basically gone until the playoffs next season? If so, they might be a 7th or 8th seed at best


He should be back sooner than that, Kawhi is notoriously slow healer though.
Arteezy
Pro Prospect
Posts: 998
And1: 1,424
Joined: Apr 12, 2018

Re: Giannis just made a lot of these nba stars look pathetic 

Post#237 » by Arteezy » Wed Jul 21, 2021 7:24 am

Lebron stans did not go to sleep, long night defending the diva today
User avatar
SeniorWalker
Lead Assistant
Posts: 5,045
And1: 1,855
Joined: Jan 14, 2009
Location: at the event horizon and well on my way in, but you're wondering when i'll get there

Re: Giannis just made a lot of these nba stars look pathetic 

Post#238 » by SeniorWalker » Wed Jul 21, 2021 7:40 am

zimpy27 wrote:
SeniorWalker wrote:
zimpy27 wrote:
They are a better team without Giannis than the Heatles without LeBron for atleast 2 of the 4 years of the Heatles.

You started a sentence with the word "Like", so how old are you exactly?

Criticize the content of the post, please. This isn't a grammar forum and using "like" is just a lazy manner of expressing pause in speech.

Again, you are purposefully misrepresenting the common understanding of what a superteam is. Super teams are not necessarily "deep" teams. Like, the 2011 Heat weren't deep with talent. They were stacked at the top end.

Same difference between the 2016 and 2017 warriors. The 16 warriors were not a superteam. They were a very deep team, with one superstar, two All-stars and a lot of great role players. The 17 warriors were a lot thinner, but had two MVP caliber superstar players backed by two All-stars and a thin bench. The latter was a superteam, the former, not, though a very good team. 2019 raptors, not a superteam. 2020 Lakers....not really a superteam.

There have been a lot of teams that are very balanced teams but don't have the top end punch to be a superteam.

Just....come on. This is easy to see.


Oh I edited the post with more details you may not have seen.
You have a tighter restriction for superteam than I think many. I'd say Heatles weren't really a superteam beyond the first two season since Wade had injury issues and declined but first two years were based on your assessment. I'm guessing 90s Bulls and 80s Lakers were also at points based on your assessment.

I don't mind your description of one at all, mine was always based on it having to be at least 3 players of all star level since it had the "team" in it rather than calling it a duo.

My description is 3 top 30 players, 4 top 40 players, 5 top 50 players. Fulfill any of these categories and you're a superteam IMO.

Thank you for the calm response.

We could probably argue about the details a bit. For me, a superteam is one which has at least two clear superstar/MVP level player in addition to a third star and role players. There have been teams like this across NBA history, but usually only one or two which dominate a decade.

We've seen a lot of teams with 3 All-stars on it, but that's quite different than super teams. Like the 2004-2006 pistons had 4 All-stars, but no one at the time thought they were anywhere near a superteam. Because it was about the level of star, in addition to the number. The parker, Duncan, ginobli spurs were another team with multiple All-stars which no one considered a super team. I've lived through multiple decades of NBA history now and remember well.

The first team which flirted with the superteam label in the last two decades was the 2008 Celtics but I think the designation really became clear when LeBron went to south Beach. We had not seen that degree of elite talent in their prime on the same team before. Wade and Bron are two of the greatest players of the modern era. Wade is easily a top 4 SG to ever play the game, and LeBron is top 3 player ever. Coupled with Bosh who was also a top 10 player in the league coming off a prime 24/11 season, nobody could even fathom that at the time, its why it was such a big deal in the sportsworld. Compare that to this year's bucks.....they're not remotely close. It doesn't have much to do with the rest of the roster construction, just the top options on the roster.

Actually, I don't think any of the 90s bulls teams were superteams. I grew up in Chicago during that time and calling Scottie Pippen an MVP caliber player is very generous to his reputation, to say the least. Damn good player, top 10ish but not throughout his entire career and certainly not on the level of a Wade, Curry, Harden, etc. Just not. If MJ had paired up with Hakeem, Barkley, or Shaq AND added a third top 10-15 caliber star on top of that, that would be comparable to what LeBron and KD did this past decade. This should make my view pretty clear.

Every super team (imo) we've seen has had at least two all-time juggernaut type players, plus other high level players on them. Giannis is the only player on the bucks that even sniffs that comparison, with all due respect to Middleton and jrue. Theyre just very far from that stratosphere.
"And always remember: one fish, two fish, red fish, blue fish, knick knack, paddy whack, give a dog a bone, two thousand, zero, zero, party, oops! Out of time, my bacon smellin' fine."
WeSkrongDen
Junior
Posts: 304
And1: 184
Joined: Mar 14, 2015

Re: Giannis just made a lot of these nba stars look pathetic 

Post#239 » by WeSkrongDen » Wed Jul 21, 2021 8:06 am

SeniorWalker wrote:
zimpy27 wrote:
SeniorWalker wrote:Criticize the content of the post, please. This isn't a grammar forum and using "like" is just a lazy manner of expressing pause in speech.

Again, you are purposefully misrepresenting the common understanding of what a superteam is. Super teams are not necessarily "deep" teams. Like, the 2011 Heat weren't deep with talent. They were stacked at the top end.

Same difference between the 2016 and 2017 warriors. The 16 warriors were not a superteam. They were a very deep team, with one superstar, two All-stars and a lot of great role players. The 17 warriors were a lot thinner, but had two MVP caliber superstar players backed by two All-stars and a thin bench. The latter was a superteam, the former, not, though a very good team. 2019 raptors, not a superteam. 2020 Lakers....not really a superteam.

There have been a lot of teams that are very balanced teams but don't have the top end punch to be a superteam.

Just....come on. This is easy to see.



Oh I edited the post with more details you may not have seen.
You have a tighter restriction for superteam than I think many. I'd say Heatles weren't really a superteam beyond the first two season since Wade had injury issues and declined but first two years were based on your assessment. I'm guessing 90s Bulls and 80s Lakers were also at points based on your assessment.

I don't mind your description of one at all, mine was always based on it having to be at least 3 players of all star level since it had the "team" in it rather than calling it a duo.

My description is 3 top 30 players, 4 top 40 players, 5 top 50 players. Fulfill any of these categories and you're a superteam IMO.

Thank you for the calm response.

We could probably argue about the details a bit. For me, a superteam is one which has at least two clear superstar/MVP level player in addition to a third star and role players. There have been teams like this across NBA history, but usually only one or two which dominate a decade.

We've seen a lot of teams with 3 All-stars on it, but that's quite different than super teams. Like the 2004-2006 pistons had 4 All-stars, but no one at the time thought they were anywhere near a superteam. Because it was about the level of star, in addition to the number. The parker, Duncan, ginobli spurs were another team with multiple All-stars which no one considered a super team. I've lived through multiple decades of NBA history now and remember well.

The first team which flirted with the superteam label in the last two decades was the 2008 Celtics but I think the designation really became clear when LeBron went to south Beach. We had not seen that degree of elite talent in their prime on the same team before. Wade and Bron are two of the greatest players of the modern era. Wade is easily a top 4 SG to ever play the game, and LeBron is top 3 player ever. Coupled with Bosh who was also a top 10 player in the league coming off a prime 24/11 season, nobody could even fathom that at the time, its why it was such a big deal in the sportsworld. Compare that to this year's bucks.....they're not remotely close. It doesn't have much to do with the rest of the roster construction, just the top options on the roster.

Actually, I don't think any of the 90s bulls teams were superteams. I grew up in Chicago during that time and calling Scottie Pippen an MVP caliber player is very generous to his reputation, to say the least. Damn good player, top 10ish but not throughout his entire career and certainly not on the level of a Wade, Curry, Harden, etc. Just not. If MJ had paired up with Hakeem, Barkley, or Shaq AND added a third top 10-15 caliber star on top of that, that would be comparable to what LeBron and KD did this past decade. This should make my view pretty clear.

Every super team (imo) we've seen has had at least two all-time juggernaut type players, plus other high level players on them. Giannis is the only player on the bucks that even sniffs that comparison, with all due respect to Middleton and jrue. Theyre just very far from that stratosphere.


Bulls were definitely a super team. Even with Jordan being the GOAT, you don't dominate the league that hard unless you're a super team. Let's compare them to the Heat. Prime Wade is better than Pippen. Wade started to fall off after the OKC title, so I'd give Wade the edge the first two years than he was worse than Pippen. Horace Grant is extremely underrated. In 91-92 he averaged 14.5 and 10 on 58% shooting. Very comparable player to Bosh. He shot a better percentage and played better defense. Horace Grant is criminally underrated. They won 55 games without the GOAT, that's definitely a superteam with Jordan in the mix.

Then during the second threepeat, they were a unique super team. They had possibly the best collection of roleplayers all time. So they only had 2 stars but I would take their collection of role players over Bosh and the Heat role players. Kukoc was so good, Harper was great, plus Rodman and Kerr. Kukoc was definitely an all star caliber player if he played more minutes. Not sure why they didn't play him more.
TeamTragic
General Manager
Posts: 9,000
And1: 7,028
Joined: Feb 18, 2015
 

Re: Giannis just made a lot of these nba stars look pathetic 

Post#240 » by TeamTragic » Wed Jul 21, 2021 8:14 am

Oscar9992 wrote:Lebron & KD look very weak & pathetic right now. Joining superstars to win the chips. Especially KD who jumped into a team with 73 wins.


I agree that they look weak, pathetic and injured though KD/LBJ both won titles. Not looking like they will ever be the same again.

Does it even matter at this point? Giannis is the future and the Bucks can win it again next season.

Return to The General Board