Is Jamal Murray washed?

Moderators: Domejandro, ken6199, Dirk, infinite11285, Clav, bwgood77, bisme37, zimpy27, KingDavid, cupcakesnake

dhsilv2
RealGM
Posts: 51,080
And1: 27,552
Joined: Oct 04, 2015

Re: Is Jamal Murray washed? 

Post#221 » by dhsilv2 » Wed Dec 4, 2024 4:31 pm

zero rings wrote:
dhsilv2 wrote:
zero rings wrote:
If Booth called up Phoenix and offered Murray for Beal straight up, they would laugh and hang up the phone.

That’s how bad Murray has been.


I'd still keep Murray, at his worst he is still the better defender.


At least Beal is a legit NBA athlete. He could average an efficient 20 ppg just cutting and playing off of Jokic.

Murray can’t even do that. He was never all that fast to begin with, and now it looks like he’s playing with concrete sneakers. He looks physically overmatched even against scrubs.


Murray is a better athlete...
GeorgeSears
Lead Assistant
Posts: 5,659
And1: 6,096
Joined: Feb 10, 2021
 

Re: Is Jamal Murray washed? 

Post#222 » by GeorgeSears » Wed Dec 4, 2024 4:50 pm

It's clear to anyone who has been watching Murray the last several years that he appears to have a lost a step this season.

The reason his shooting splits are so low this year is because he can't create separation, either off the dribble or off the ball, which means more of his shots are contested.

What the Nuggets are hoping for is that he regains some of that explosiveness as the year progresses. There's no confidence that's going to happen.
zero rings
Sixth Man
Posts: 1,584
And1: 2,728
Joined: Aug 10, 2023

Re: Is Jamal Murray washed? 

Post#223 » by zero rings » Wed Dec 4, 2024 4:54 pm

dhsilv2 wrote:
zero rings wrote:
dhsilv2 wrote:
I'd still keep Murray, at his worst he is still the better defender.


At least Beal is a legit NBA athlete. He could average an efficient 20 ppg just cutting and playing off of Jokic.

Murray can’t even do that. He was never all that fast to begin with, and now it looks like he’s playing with concrete sneakers. He looks physically overmatched even against scrubs.


Murray is a better athlete...


Beal is actually solid at getting into the paint and finishing, something Murray has never been good at.

Murray puts zero pressure on the rim, despite playing with the best playmaking big in history. I have no doubt Beal would much more efficient in this role.
dhsilv2
RealGM
Posts: 51,080
And1: 27,552
Joined: Oct 04, 2015

Re: Is Jamal Murray washed? 

Post#224 » by dhsilv2 » Wed Dec 4, 2024 5:16 pm

zero rings wrote:
dhsilv2 wrote:
zero rings wrote:
At least Beal is a legit NBA athlete. He could average an efficient 20 ppg just cutting and playing off of Jokic.

Murray can’t even do that. He was never all that fast to begin with, and now it looks like he’s playing with concrete sneakers. He looks physically overmatched even against scrubs.


Murray is a better athlete...


Beal is actually solid at getting into the paint and finishing, something Murray has never been good at.

Murray puts zero pressure on the rim, despite playing with the best playmaking big in history. I have no doubt Beal would much more efficient in this role.


Beal's just too weak physically to play defense at any level, which is compounded in the playoffs when a bit more contact is allowed and the game slows. Offense isn't the issue with Beal. And I say this as someone who thinks Murray is a bad defender. Beal's just worse.
zero rings
Sixth Man
Posts: 1,584
And1: 2,728
Joined: Aug 10, 2023

Re: Is Jamal Murray washed? 

Post#225 » by zero rings » Wed Dec 4, 2024 5:49 pm

dhsilv2 wrote:
zero rings wrote:
dhsilv2 wrote:
Murray is a better athlete...


Beal is actually solid at getting into the paint and finishing, something Murray has never been good at.

Murray puts zero pressure on the rim, despite playing with the best playmaking big in history. I have no doubt Beal would much more efficient in this role.


Beal's just too weak physically to play defense at any level, which is compounded in the playoffs when a bit more contact is allowed and the game slows. Offense isn't the issue with Beal. And I say this as someone who thinks Murray is a bad defender. Beal's just worse.


Maybe so, but Beal is shooting 10% better from the field. Whatever edge Murray has on defense is not making up for that.

I’m confident Beal could give us an efficient 22 ppg as Jokic’s #2. That’s not worth his contract, but it’s still better than whatever the hell Jamal Murray is these days.

Like I said, Phoenix hangs up.
dhsilv2
RealGM
Posts: 51,080
And1: 27,552
Joined: Oct 04, 2015

Re: Is Jamal Murray washed? 

Post#226 » by dhsilv2 » Wed Dec 4, 2024 6:19 pm

zero rings wrote:
dhsilv2 wrote:
zero rings wrote:
Beal is actually solid at getting into the paint and finishing, something Murray has never been good at.

Murray puts zero pressure on the rim, despite playing with the best playmaking big in history. I have no doubt Beal would much more efficient in this role.


Beal's just too weak physically to play defense at any level, which is compounded in the playoffs when a bit more contact is allowed and the game slows. Offense isn't the issue with Beal. And I say this as someone who thinks Murray is a bad defender. Beal's just worse.


Maybe so, but Beal is shooting 10% better from the field. Whatever edge Murray has on defense is not making up for that.

I’m confident Beal could give us an efficient 22 ppg as Jokic’s #2. That’s not worth his contract, but it’s still better than whatever the hell Jamal Murray is these days.

Like I said, Phoenix hangs up.


Make it a efficient 28. I still think they're worse with Beal's defense.
User avatar
Roger Murdock
RealGM
Posts: 12,492
And1: 5,893
Joined: Aug 12, 2008
 

Re: Is Jamal Murray washed? 

Post#227 » by Roger Murdock » Wed Dec 4, 2024 6:22 pm

Murray was like the 40th-50th best player in the league at his peak and is now like the 100th. He's definitely lost a few steps but hes never been an allstar caliber player. At his peak he was a really nice tertiary offensive piece that was inconsistent but capable of having some crazy games.

This board ranked him ahead of Donovan Mitchell 2 years ago which is insane. Hes never been as good as Mitchell was a rookie, let alone an all NBA quality player.
TheFire
Pro Prospect
Posts: 901
And1: 1,292
Joined: Feb 19, 2012

Re: Is Jamal Murray washed? 

Post#228 » by TheFire » Wed Dec 4, 2024 6:40 pm

He probably had his best regular season last year and then looked really washed up as the playoffs came around. He was noticeably a different player in the playoffs than he was in the regular season. I don't know if it was the calf injury that caused it, but that form has carried over into the Olympics and this season. Really odd how he just fell-off a cliff.

I was looking at highlights from his Championship run and he didn't look any more explosive than he is now, so it may just be mental at this point.
User avatar
MarcusBrody
Veteran
Posts: 2,741
And1: 4,436
Joined: May 23, 2013

Re: Is Jamal Murray washed? 

Post#229 » by MarcusBrody » Wed Dec 4, 2024 8:01 pm

Roger Murdock wrote:Murray was like the 40th-50th best player in the league at his peak and is now like the 100th. He's definitely lost a few steps but hes never been an allstar caliber player. At his peak he was a really nice tertiary offensive piece that was inconsistent but capable of having some crazy games.

This board ranked him ahead of Donovan Mitchell 2 years ago which is insane. Hes never been as good as Mitchell was a rookie, let alone an all NBA quality player.


I think if you look back, you'll see that a lot of the people who were Denver fans/watched Denver regularly actually ranked him lower than the consensus. There were genuine concerns about things like his low free throw rate and ability to generate offense when Jokic was off the floor (not even necessarily for himself, but to create for others efficiently without Jokic).

Now, no one was rating him as low as the level he's been playing for the last 8 months, but people already noted the holes in his game that are hurting him now when he isn't able to hit the tough shots that he was good at (but which also led to his high variance even when playing well).
DKB333
Pro Prospect
Posts: 794
And1: 453
Joined: Jul 25, 2024
   

Re: Is Jamal Murray washed? 

Post#230 » by DKB333 » Wed Dec 4, 2024 10:15 pm

dhsilv2 wrote:
zero rings wrote:
dhsilv2 wrote:
I do not want Beal on my team...


If Booth called up Phoenix and offered Murray for Beal straight up, they would laugh and hang up the phone.

That’s how bad Murray has been.


I'd still keep Murray, at his worst he is still the better defender.

Murray is a pretty piss poor defender if we are going to be honest here.
BigGargamel
Lead Assistant
Posts: 5,435
And1: 11,377
Joined: Jan 28, 2020
Contact:
     

Re: Is Jamal Murray washed? 

Post#231 » by BigGargamel » Wed Dec 4, 2024 10:17 pm

GeorgeSears wrote:It's clear to anyone who has been watching Murray the last several years that he appears to have a lost a step this season.

The reason his shooting splits are so low this year is because he can't create separation, either off the dribble or off the ball, which means more of his shots are contested.

What the Nuggets are hoping for is that he regains some of that explosiveness as the year progresses. There's no confidence that's going to happen.


He's been a notoriously slow starter throughout his career. That's the hope, but he just looks slower than usual so far.

Denver really has no choice but to continue to throw him out there and hope he figures it out. They have no chance without him at his best.
The Servant
Bench Warmer
Posts: 1,309
And1: 1,657
Joined: Dec 26, 2022
   

Re: Is Jamal Murray washed? 

Post#232 » by The Servant » Wed Dec 4, 2024 10:24 pm

Giga washed, bruv.
dhsilv2
RealGM
Posts: 51,080
And1: 27,552
Joined: Oct 04, 2015

Re: Is Jamal Murray washed? 

Post#233 » by dhsilv2 » Wed Dec 4, 2024 10:47 pm

DKB333 wrote:
dhsilv2 wrote:
zero rings wrote:
If Booth called up Phoenix and offered Murray for Beal straight up, they would laugh and hang up the phone.

That’s how bad Murray has been.


I'd still keep Murray, at his worst he is still the better defender.

Murray is a pretty piss poor defender if we are going to be honest here.


agree, but beal is exceptionally bad.
Ssj16
Starter
Posts: 2,388
And1: 2,798
Joined: Jun 29, 2021
 

Re: Is Jamal Murray washed? 

Post#234 » by Ssj16 » Wed Dec 4, 2024 11:08 pm

Roger Murdock wrote:Murray was like the 40th-50th best player in the league at his peak and is now like the 100th. He's definitely lost a few steps but hes never been an allstar caliber player. At his peak he was a really nice tertiary offensive piece that was inconsistent but capable of having some crazy games.

This board ranked him ahead of Donovan Mitchell 2 years ago which is insane. Hes never been as good as Mitchell was a rookie, let alone an all NBA quality player.


Even though I will admit that I'm wrong now, I feel justified in the past for putting Murray ahead of Mitchell based on his crazy playoff performances. It's not a given that you will perform in clutch moments, even when playing alongside the best player in the NBA but Murray did that.
GeorgeSears
Lead Assistant
Posts: 5,659
And1: 6,096
Joined: Feb 10, 2021
 

Re: Is Jamal Murray washed? 

Post#235 » by GeorgeSears » Wed Dec 4, 2024 11:40 pm

BigGargamel wrote:
GeorgeSears wrote:It's clear to anyone who has been watching Murray the last several years that he appears to have a lost a step this season.

The reason his shooting splits are so low this year is because he can't create separation, either off the dribble or off the ball, which means more of his shots are contested.

What the Nuggets are hoping for is that he regains some of that explosiveness as the year progresses. There's no confidence that's going to happen.


He's been a notoriously slow starter throughout his career. That's the hope, but he just looks slower than usual so far.


Not necessarily.

When he came back from his year-long recovery from ACL surgery in 2022, he had a rough October for the first 6 games, but then he averaged averaging 20 ppg on 45/40% shooting splits in November. Last season, he got off to a fast start, was injured for a month, then came back and had a dominant December and January.

Slow starts are usually 6 games or so, they're not 20 games long. If someone plays poorly for the first 20 games, they're not going to flip the switch once the grind of the season begins.

It's concerning.
AleksandarN
General Manager
Posts: 9,515
And1: 13,157
Joined: Aug 08, 2002

Re: Is Jamal Murray washed? 

Post#236 » by AleksandarN » Fri Dec 6, 2024 2:56 am

Read on Twitter
guynumber45
Senior
Posts: 559
And1: 864
Joined: Mar 11, 2024

Re: Is Jamal Murray washed? 

Post#237 » by guynumber45 » Fri Dec 6, 2024 3:06 am

AleksandarN wrote:
Read on Twitter


Funny thing is he has been bad against the Lakers too since the 2023 WCF. He hit a few game winners, but he was very inefficient in those games.
mrvioletowl
Sophomore
Posts: 117
And1: 140
Joined: Dec 19, 2022
   

Re: Is Jamal Murray washed? 

Post#238 » by mrvioletowl » Fri Dec 6, 2024 3:28 am

The only players with some value they can trade this season are Porter and Holmes(once he comes back). They should try to trade both to Blazers for Simons, Thybule and Reath. Bolster that bench. Simons can give you easy 20 plus points, if not more playing alongside Jokic. Trade Nnaji for Beasley back.
Or...trade Porter and any picks still left for Brogdon and Valanciunas. Start Brogdon and move Murray to backup SG until next season when you dump him for any two players that can play off Jokic.
Alatan
Lead Assistant
Posts: 4,859
And1: 4,155
Joined: May 06, 2017

Re: Is Jamal Murray washed? 

Post#239 » by Alatan » Fri Dec 6, 2024 12:16 pm

dhsilv2 wrote:
zero rings wrote:
dhsilv2 wrote:
I'd still keep Murray, at his worst he is still the better defender.


At least Beal is a legit NBA athlete. He could average an efficient 20 ppg just cutting and playing off of Jokic.

Murray can’t even do that. He was never all that fast to begin with, and now it looks like he’s playing with concrete sneakers. He looks physically overmatched even against scrubs.


Murray is a better athlete...


Murray is one of the worst athletes at his position.
Alatan
Lead Assistant
Posts: 4,859
And1: 4,155
Joined: May 06, 2017

Re: Is Jamal Murray washed? 

Post#240 » by Alatan » Fri Dec 6, 2024 12:18 pm

dhsilv2 wrote:
zero rings wrote:
dhsilv2 wrote:
Beal's just too weak physically to play defense at any level, which is compounded in the playoffs when a bit more contact is allowed and the game slows. Offense isn't the issue with Beal. And I say this as someone who thinks Murray is a bad defender. Beal's just worse.


Maybe so, but Beal is shooting 10% better from the field. Whatever edge Murray has on defense is not making up for that.

I’m confident Beal could give us an efficient 22 ppg as Jokic’s #2. That’s not worth his contract, but it’s still better than whatever the hell Jamal Murray is these days.

Like I said, Phoenix hangs up.


Make it a efficient 28. I still think they're worse with Beal's defense.


I dont know how can you think that Murray is somehow a better defender. He is a traffic cone out there.

Return to The General Board