arkuo wrote:I told ya. Negroes should not be allowed to handle that much cash. These slaves earn a couple of bucks and now they think they're somebody. No offense.
I found Sterling's RealGM account.
Moderators: KingDavid, cupcakesnake, Domejandro, ken6199, infinite11285, Clav, Dirk, bwgood77, bisme37, zimpy27
arkuo wrote:I told ya. Negroes should not be allowed to handle that much cash. These slaves earn a couple of bucks and now they think they're somebody. No offense.
arkuo wrote:I told ya. Negroes should not be allowed to handle that much cash. These slaves earn a couple of bucks and now they think they're somebody. No offense.
arkuo wrote:I told ya. Negroes should not be allowed to handle that much cash. These slaves earn a couple of bucks and now they think they're somebody. No offense.
arkuo wrote:I told ya. Negroes should not be allowed to handle that much cash. These slaves earn a couple of bucks and now they think they're somebody. No offense.
arkuo wrote:I told ya. Negroes should not be allowed to handle that much cash. These slaves earn a couple of bucks and now they think they're somebody. No offense.
TheLowlySquire wrote:Wow, Arda! Huge!
Howard Mass wrote:Arda is not a terrorist. Arda is a good person.
arkuo wrote:Serious question over here. But cant owners maximize a loophole in the system? Say an owner pays 5 superstars the minimum amount to have them play together for trophies. Then pay them $100 million dollars annually when they retire at 35 til they're 50. Retirement years arent covered by the NBA.
shawn_hemp wrote: a guy who is far worse than Robert Covington in Brandon Ingram, and a guy who is no better than TJ McConnell or Tony Wroten in D'Angelo Russell.

Mirjalovic wrote:Now i believe Cuban know what the Lakers and their fans feel about CP veto.
Perkele wrote:Mirjalovic wrote:Now i believe Cuban know what the Lakers and their fans feel about CP veto.
It seems some Laker fans simply don't understand. First of all, it wasn't only Cuban. It was also Gilbert. Secondly, Stern vetoed it because he, as the commissioner, owned the Hornets back then and as every owner, he has every right to veto a trade if he thinks his team gets screwed over. Seriously, somehow it feels some Laker fans have the opinion to be entitled to get a superstar player for a bag of chips. Just because they're the Lakers. They royally screwed the league with that Gasol-trade and then they thought they could do the same stuff again with Paul.
And finally, whilst neither DJ not the Clippers did anything wrong legally, ethically it was a complete blow job. And that's the major reason why many basketball fans, not only Mavs-fans, are upset.
Perkele wrote:Mirjalovic wrote:Now i believe Cuban know what the Lakers and their fans feel about CP veto.
It seems some Laker fans simply don't understand. First of all, it wasn't only Cuban. It was also Gilbert. Secondly, Stern vetoed it because he, as the commissioner, owned the Hornets back then and as every owner, he has every right to veto a trade if he thinks his team gets screwed over. Seriously, somehow it feels some Laker fans have the opinion to be entitled to get a superstar player for a bag of chips. Just because they're the Lakers. They royally screwed the league with that Gasol-trade and then they thought they could do the same stuff again with Paul.
And finally, whilst neither DJ not the Clippers did anything wrong legally, ethically it was a complete blow job. And that's the major reason why many basketball fans, not only Mavs-fans, are upset.
jpengland wrote:
Amen.
When will Laker fans finally understand this. The League owned the team and had the right to veto anything they believed to not be in the teams interest.
shawn_hemp wrote: a guy who is far worse than Robert Covington in Brandon Ingram, and a guy who is no better than TJ McConnell or Tony Wroten in D'Angelo Russell.

Mirjalovic wrote:Perkele wrote:Mirjalovic wrote:Now i believe Cuban know what the Lakers and their fans feel about CP veto.
It seems some Laker fans simply don't understand. First of all, it wasn't only Cuban. It was also Gilbert. Secondly, Stern vetoed it because he, as the commissioner, owned the Hornets back then and as every owner, he has every right to veto a trade if he thinks his team gets screwed over. Seriously, somehow it feels some Laker fans have the opinion to be entitled to get a superstar player for a bag of chips. Just because they're the Lakers. They royally screwed the league with that Gasol-trade and then they thought they could do the same stuff again with Paul.
And finally, whilst neither DJ not the Clippers did anything wrong legally, ethically it was a complete blow job. And that's the major reason why many basketball fans, not only Mavs-fans, are upset.
who care dude about what the **** Lakers fans think ? This is nothing against Mavs fans.
as for the bolded part It's still Cuban, and Cuban eat his own medicine.
and lol at Pau trade. Grizz basically got Gasol and Zach from that trade and because of them, Grizzliez still relevant until this day.
Perkele wrote:Mirjalovic wrote:Perkele wrote:
It seems some Laker fans simply don't understand. First of all, it wasn't only Cuban. It was also Gilbert. Secondly, Stern vetoed it because he, as the commissioner, owned the Hornets back then and as every owner, he has every right to veto a trade if he thinks his team gets screwed over. Seriously, somehow it feels some Laker fans have the opinion to be entitled to get a superstar player for a bag of chips. Just because they're the Lakers. They royally screwed the league with that Gasol-trade and then they thought they could do the same stuff again with Paul.
And finally, whilst neither DJ not the Clippers did anything wrong legally, ethically it was a complete blow job. And that's the major reason why many basketball fans, not only Mavs-fans, are upset.
who care dude about what the **** Lakers fans think ? This is nothing against Mavs fans.
as for the bolded part It's still Cuban, and Cuban eat his own medicine.
and lol at Pau trade. Grizz basically got Gasol and Zach from that trade and because of them, Grizzliez still relevant until this day.
Lol, mentioning Marc now is the dumbest excuse ever. It was absolutely unforeseeable how he would develop. Good for the Grizz that he did, but the use this as an argument to justify the Pau-trade in retrospective and pretend that it looks even is beyond silly.
And Cubes got his own medicine? The situation is a complete different one.
shawn_hemp wrote: a guy who is far worse than Robert Covington in Brandon Ingram, and a guy who is no better than TJ McConnell or Tony Wroten in D'Angelo Russell.

Mirjalovic wrote:Perkele wrote:Mirjalovic wrote:who care dude about what the **** Lakers fans think ? This is nothing against Mavs fans.
as for the bolded part It's still Cuban, and Cuban eat his own medicine.
and lol at Pau trade. Grizz basically got Gasol and Zach from that trade and because of them, Grizzliez still relevant until this day.
Lol, mentioning Marc now is the dumbest excuse ever. It was absolutely unforeseeable how he would develop. Good for the Grizz that he did, but the use this as an argument to justify the Pau-trade in retrospective and pretend that it looks even is beyond silly.
And Cubes got his own medicine? The situation is a complete different one.
the implication still same. They failed to get a player that they think 100% would come.
Lakers gave away one of the brightest talent in Spain, and huge expiring in Kwame, then they convert it to get Zach Randolph in free agency. That's not dumb excuse, only haters think so. Grizz treadmilling and Pau got huge and long contract, the logical step was to move him, you can't always get fair trade for star. Love for Wigginz and Bennet only happen once in a bluemoon.
again, it's nothing against Mavs fans, and i hope Cuban can shut his mouth up when another team is in trouble.
Dominater wrote:Mirjalovic wrote:Perkele wrote:
Lol, mentioning Marc now is the dumbest excuse ever. It was absolutely unforeseeable how he would develop. Good for the Grizz that he did, but the use this as an argument to justify the Pau-trade in retrospective and pretend that it looks even is beyond silly.
And Cubes got his own medicine? The situation is a complete different one.
the implication still same. They failed to get a player that they think 100% would come.
Lakers gave away one of the brightest talent in Spain, and huge expiring in Kwame, then they convert it to get Zach Randolph in free agency. That's not dumb excuse, only haters think so. Grizz treadmilling and Pau got huge and long contract, the logical step was to move him, you can't always get fair trade for star. Love for Wigginz and Bennet only happen once in a bluemoon.
again, it's nothing against Mavs fans, and i hope Cuban can shut his mouth up when another team is in trouble.
At the time Marc was fresh off being a 2nd round pick. Pau was a 27 year old bonafide superstar. Name me another trade where a superstar was traded with the other teams main pieces being a guy that was drafted in the 40s 6 months prior, and an expiring
shawn_hemp wrote: a guy who is far worse than Robert Covington in Brandon Ingram, and a guy who is no better than TJ McConnell or Tony Wroten in D'Angelo Russell.
