taikibansei wrote:LibertyPrime wrote:taikibansei wrote:
Except...both Jabari Parker and Zach LaVine put up better numbers than Wiggins on far fewer minutes:
https://www.basketball-reference.com/play-index/pcm_finder.fcgi?request=1&sum=1&player_id1_hint=Andrew+Wiggins&player_id1_select=Andrew+Wiggins&player_id1=wiggian01&idx=players&player_id2_hint=Jabari+Parker&player_id2_select=Jabari+Parker&player_id2=parkeja01&idx=players&player_id3_hint=Zach+LaVine&player_id3_select=Zach+LaVine&player_id3=lavinza01&idx=players
eFG%
1. LaVine .503
2. Jabari .514
3. Wiggins .472
TS%
1. LaVine .548
2. Jabari .546
3. Wiggins .520
BPM
1. LaVine -1.7
2. Jabari -1.6
3. Wiggins -2.5
VORP
1. LaVine 0.6
2. Jabari 0.8
3. Wiggins -1.7
Etc., etc. The only two things Wiggins is "better" at: playing longer minutes and taking more shots. The other two players are better at everything else, including scoring. So, basically, Wiggins is worse than two slightly below-average NBA players...which has been the point of everyone posting here saying he's a bust.
I imply y'all are abnormally obsessed with bashing Wiggins, and you fire back.....with neatly organized stats culled from the nerdier parts of the web, bashing Wiggins. Don't get me wrong, I do appreciate you making my point for me.
Dude, it's called a "discussion," something that happens on a basketball discussion board. You don't like the thread? Don't click on it (and be sure to give your full-size Wiggins poster a big kiss good night...).
I seem to have touched a nerve.














Nostradamus!! 


















