It's been 5 yrs. Can we now say Andrew Wiggins is a Bust?

Moderators: Clav, Domejandro, ken6199, bisme37, Dirk, KingDavid, cupcakesnake, bwgood77, zimpy27, infinite11285

LibertyPrime
Starter
Posts: 2,314
And1: 1,972
Joined: Dec 08, 2013
 

Re: It's been 5 yrs. Can we now say Andrew Wiggins is a Bust? 

Post#241 » by LibertyPrime » Fri Feb 15, 2019 10:18 pm

taikibansei wrote:
LibertyPrime wrote:
taikibansei wrote:
Except...both Jabari Parker and Zach LaVine put up better numbers than Wiggins on far fewer minutes:

https://www.basketball-reference.com/play-index/pcm_finder.fcgi?request=1&sum=1&player_id1_hint=Andrew+Wiggins&player_id1_select=Andrew+Wiggins&player_id1=wiggian01&idx=players&player_id2_hint=Jabari+Parker&player_id2_select=Jabari+Parker&player_id2=parkeja01&idx=players&player_id3_hint=Zach+LaVine&player_id3_select=Zach+LaVine&player_id3=lavinza01&idx=players

eFG%
1. LaVine .503
2. Jabari .514
3. Wiggins .472

TS%
1. LaVine .548
2. Jabari .546
3. Wiggins .520

BPM
1. LaVine -1.7
2. Jabari -1.6
3. Wiggins -2.5

VORP
1. LaVine 0.6
2. Jabari 0.8
3. Wiggins -1.7

Etc., etc. The only two things Wiggins is "better" at: playing longer minutes and taking more shots. The other two players are better at everything else, including scoring. So, basically, Wiggins is worse than two slightly below-average NBA players...which has been the point of everyone posting here saying he's a bust.


I imply y'all are abnormally obsessed with bashing Wiggins, and you fire back.....with neatly organized stats culled from the nerdier parts of the web, bashing Wiggins. Don't get me wrong, I do appreciate you making my point for me.


Dude, it's called a "discussion," something that happens on a basketball discussion board. You don't like the thread? Don't click on it (and be sure to give your full-size Wiggins poster a big kiss good night...).


I seem to have touched a nerve.
"The last domino falls here!"
Yoshun
Lead Assistant
Posts: 5,939
And1: 5,580
Joined: Dec 24, 2012
       

Re: It's been 5 yrs. Can we now say Andrew Wiggins is a Bust? 

Post#242 » by Yoshun » Fri Feb 15, 2019 10:30 pm

Should we bump one of those "Who won the trade?" threads?
LibertyPrime
Starter
Posts: 2,314
And1: 1,972
Joined: Dec 08, 2013
 

Re: It's been 5 yrs. Can we now say Andrew Wiggins is a Bust? 

Post#243 » by LibertyPrime » Fri Feb 15, 2019 10:43 pm

Yoshun wrote:Should we bump one of those "Who won the trade?" threads?


Why not? Since everything in this thread has been done to death, like, a dozen times, we might as well make it Golden Oldies Day here on RealGM.
"The last domino falls here!"
pcbothwel
Head Coach
Posts: 6,221
And1: 2,784
Joined: Jun 12, 2010
     

Re: It's been 5 yrs. Can we now say Andrew Wiggins is a Bust? 

Post#244 » by pcbothwel » Fri Feb 15, 2019 11:01 pm

Ayt wrote:
SecondTake wrote:Again, he's a bust for the money he's making. No one considers an average or below average NBA player a bust unless he's making max money. If Wiggings had Lavines contract, you reigned in his minutes and benched him when he sucked, his efficiency numbers would likely improve to be comparable to those guys.


But this thread is about Wiggins, who isn't an average or below average player. He's a terrible player that makes his team worse on both ends of the court.


Dear god...thank you.
Can some people name some of these Bench players that Wiggins is better than? Im talking 15-20+ MPG players... Anyone?

Lets take out the 5 Best and 5 worst teams in the NBA... So remove Bucks, Nuggets, GSW, Raptors ... along with NYK, Hawks, Suns, Cavs, and Bulls... Now lets look as some rotation players on the other teams to get a real look at the common NBA caliber 6th-8th man.
Loul Deng, DeMarre Carroll, Kurucs, Galloway, Stanley Johnson, Glenn Robinson, Wayne Ellington, Terrance Ross, Abrines, Layman, Hood, Crowder, Royce ONeal, Exum, Temple, Bogdan, Justin Jackson, Stephenson, Gerald Green, Bellinelli, Bertans, Finney-SMith, Dekker, Jeff Green....

These are all wing players on the Non-Elite/Non-Tanking teams.
Wiggins IS NOT AS GOOD as 80% of the players listed...
SO really, he is a 9th man on a middling team... In a league built for athletic wings, the most hyped athletic wing in a generation becoming a 9th man on a .500 team after 5 years of support with no injury history is beyond a Bust.

Again, he wasnt some overhyped dinosaur like Jahlil Okafor, Thomas Robinson, or Thabeet
He wasnt a propped up prospect due to lack of surrounding talent like Derrick Williams or Anthony Bennett
And he wasnt derailed by injuries like Greg Oden and Jay Williams .

Instead, he didnt have the IQ or work ethic to succeed. OJ Freaking Mayo's first 5 years were FAR better than what Wiggins has put together.
He is Michael Beasley/ Jonathan Bender on a max contract...
In fact, Im willing to bet that in 2 years a 30 y/o John Wall making 40M per year will be better value than whatever the hell Wiggins is.
Ice Man
Forum Mod - Bulls
Forum Mod - Bulls
Posts: 27,024
And1: 16,062
Joined: Apr 19, 2011

Re: It's been 5 yrs. Can we now say Andrew Wiggins is a Bust? 

Post#245 » by Ice Man » Fri Feb 15, 2019 11:06 pm

Ummm, yeah we can say he's a bust. He's a flat-out bad player who only starts because Minnesota is too embarrassed not to start him. He's an inefficient volume chucker who doesn't rebound well for his position, or pass, or defend. He remains deeply overrated, because he really shouldn't be discussed any more than, say, David Nwaba (who is a better player, actually).
mannyd7
Freshman
Posts: 52
And1: 46
Joined: Jul 12, 2018
     

Re: It's been 5 yrs. Can we now say Andrew Wiggins is a Bust? 

Post#246 » by mannyd7 » Fri Feb 15, 2019 11:11 pm

Andrew Wiggins is straight up bad....I wouldn't even want him as a volume bench scorer... Jordan Clarkson is a much better volume scorer and his basketball iq is almost non-existent.

To be fair...he is 23 years old. But 5 years of NBA miles is a lot. He should have shown growth of some kind
Quentin
Sixth Man
Posts: 1,596
And1: 1,317
Joined: Dec 18, 2006
 

Re: It's been 5 yrs. Can we now say Andrew Wiggins is a Bust? 

Post#247 » by Quentin » Fri Feb 15, 2019 11:22 pm

mplsfonz23 wrote:
Quentin wrote:
mplsfonz23 wrote:
And you are and idiot that can't read. I suggest you go troll somewhere else. I'm done.


Thank you! Obvious typo on my part which you proved. Should have said would've which is what you said. All arguments remain the same.

Especially the idiot part..... :lol:


Agreed! You're an idiot for saying he would have received the max from another team. :lol: :crazy: Nostradamus!! :lol:
User avatar
DreDay
General Manager
Posts: 8,040
And1: 3,213
Joined: May 30, 2011
   

Re: It's been 5 yrs. Can we now say Andrew Wiggins is a Bust? 

Post#248 » by DreDay » Fri Feb 15, 2019 11:39 pm

Fun exercise comparing Wiggins to a range of players people claim as busts.

PER - 10.3/14.6/14.4/12.3/15.7
WS/48 - .099/.046/.057/.040/.054
TS% - 58.7/52.0/53.1/48.1/52.0
BPM - -1.4/-2.5/-2.2/-1.6/-3.2

Guess which one is Wiggins...or whether it even matters looking at the comparisons.

It's all hype, athleticism and empty volume stats that sees him even today avoid legitimate criticism.
Image
User avatar
BR0D1E86
RealGM
Posts: 17,759
And1: 2,292
Joined: Jul 18, 2002
       

Re: It's been 5 yrs. Can we now say Andrew Wiggins is a Bust? 

Post#249 » by BR0D1E86 » Sat Feb 16, 2019 12:21 am

SecondTake wrote:
taikibansei wrote:
LibertyPrime wrote:
This is closer to the truth. Heck, if Wiggins was making Jabari Parker or Zach Lavine money then we don't see these threads (again, and again, and again, and again......)

Well, see you all again in two weeks when someone else remakes this exact thread for the thirtieth time!


Except...both Jabari Parker and Zach LaVine put up better numbers than Wiggins on far fewer minutes:

https://www.basketball-reference.com/play-index/pcm_finder.fcgi?request=1&sum=1&player_id1_hint=Andrew+Wiggins&player_id1_select=Andrew+Wiggins&player_id1=wiggian01&idx=players&player_id2_hint=Jabari+Parker&player_id2_select=Jabari+Parker&player_id2=parkeja01&idx=players&player_id3_hint=Zach+LaVine&player_id3_select=Zach+LaVine&player_id3=lavinza01&idx=players

eFG%
1. LaVine .503
2. Jabari .514
3. Wiggins .472

TS%
1. LaVine .548
2. Jabari .546
3. Wiggins .520

BPM
1. LaVine -1.7
2. Jabari -1.6
3. Wiggins -2.5

VORP
1. LaVine 0.6
2. Jabari 0.8
3. Wiggins -1.7

Etc., etc. The only two things Wiggins is "better" at: playing longer minutes and taking more shots. The other two players are better at everything else, including scoring. So, basically, Wiggins is worse than two slightly below-average NBA players...which has been the point of everyone posting here saying he's a bust.


Again, he's a bust for the money he's making. No one considers an average or below average NBA player a bust unless he's making max money. If Wiggings had Lavines contract, you reigned in his minutes and benched him when he sucked, his efficiency numbers would likely improve to be comparable to those guys.

If you benched him when he sucked, he’d never play. He’d be horrifically overpaid at Lavine’s salary.

He’s performed like a guy who barely belongs in the league but has been given an unlimited green light. It’s entirely in spite of his performance, which has been at the level of one of the worst players in the league for five consecutive seasons now.
SF_Warriors
General Manager
Posts: 7,507
And1: 3,795
Joined: Jul 12, 2012

Re: It's been 5 yrs. Can we now say Andrew Wiggins is a Bust? 

Post#250 » by SF_Warriors » Sat Feb 16, 2019 2:01 am

OrangeBlueSkies wrote:
SF_Warriors wrote:
upriser7 wrote:Clubbing Wiggins with KAT when it comes to effort, drive etc is just stupid...if KAT didn't put in effort or didn't have drive, then Wolves would be having a record like 15-16 wins right now instead of 27 wins


Also want to point out that love was a 2x all star in minny by the time he was wiggins age



Wiggins has been a disappointment for sure ... it sucks all that money and talent and the Wolves are still on the outside looking in... how long before we here rumblings of KAT wanting out?


I would say within a couple of years if the wolves are not able to continue building around him.
User avatar
Trippinskarlo
Rookie
Posts: 1,079
And1: 1,326
Joined: Jul 04, 2014
   

Re: It's been 5 yrs. Can we now say Andrew Wiggins is a Bust? 

Post#251 » by Trippinskarlo » Sat Feb 16, 2019 3:23 am

UKClipperfan wrote:Busts cant put up 20ppg

Every single player in the NBA is capable of averaging 20 ppg
life_saver
General Manager
Posts: 9,324
And1: 6,814
Joined: Nov 08, 2017

Re: It's been 5 yrs. Can we now say Andrew Wiggins is a Bust? 

Post#252 » by life_saver » Sat Feb 16, 2019 11:17 am

Just look at Wiggins impact on the team this season lol

Read on Twitter


Read on Twitter
spicy6
Starter
Posts: 2,003
And1: 1,841
Joined: Apr 21, 2017
 

Re: It's been 5 yrs. Can we now say Andrew Wiggins is a Bust? 

Post#253 » by spicy6 » Sat Feb 16, 2019 11:25 am

You really dont know what a bust is. Anybody that gives you 20 a night isnt a bust no matter how hollow at times they may be. A bust is a guy like bennet, noel, flynn, thabeet, etc...
User avatar
Sign5
Head Coach
Posts: 7,173
And1: 10,543
Joined: Sep 27, 2011

Re: It's been 5 yrs. Can we now say Andrew Wiggins is a Bust? 

Post#254 » by Sign5 » Sat Feb 16, 2019 11:29 am

Yes but he's getting PAID.
Michael Jordan
Lead Assistant
Posts: 5,949
And1: 8,827
Joined: Jul 15, 2009

Re: It's been 5 yrs. Can we now say Andrew Wiggins is a Bust? 

Post#255 » by Michael Jordan » Tue Feb 19, 2019 3:05 pm

Raps in 4 wrote:
Michael Jordan wrote:A bust isn't capable of putting up 20PPG over 5 seasons. Wiggins is just criminally overpaid.


Anyone can put up 20 PPG with enough shots. Dude is averaging 18 points on 17 shots this year. He's beyond awful.

Can you put up 20 PPG?
thinktank
Assistant Coach
Posts: 4,302
And1: 2,641
Joined: Jul 02, 2010
Location: Mpls

Re: It's been 5 yrs. Can we now say Andrew Wiggins is a Bust? 

Post#256 » by thinktank » Tue Feb 19, 2019 3:10 pm

upriser7 wrote:Just look at Wiggins impact on the team this season lol

Read on Twitter


Read on Twitter



What is the definition of “Total Points Added”, “Defensive Points Saved”, and “Offensive Points Added”, etc.?

Usually math-oriented websites disclose their equations used, definitions, etc.

Without knowing this, the creator of these charts could have plotted these face icons per his/her whim.

NBA Math doesn’t seem very “mathy”.

Just sayin’.
User avatar
clyde21
RealGM
Posts: 64,084
And1: 70,251
Joined: Aug 20, 2014
     

Re: It's been 5 yrs. Can we now say Andrew Wiggins is a Bust? 

Post#257 » by clyde21 » Tue Feb 19, 2019 3:13 pm

Minny is is so dumb giving this guy the max after showing no improvement his first three years in the league
جُنْد فِلَسْطِيْن
skones
RealGM
Posts: 37,108
And1: 17,267
Joined: Jul 20, 2004

Re: It's been 5 yrs. Can we now say Andrew Wiggins is a Bust? 

Post#258 » by skones » Tue Feb 19, 2019 3:22 pm

spicy6 wrote:You really dont know what a bust is. Anybody that gives you 20 a night isnt a bust no matter how hollow at times they may be. A bust is a guy like bennet, noel, flynn, thabeet, etc...


Michael Beasley put up 19 a night for a season. He ended up having to go to China before he was able to resume his NBA career. Andrea Bargnani averaged 21 a night for a season and was long a laughing stock as a player.

Nerlens Noel is a better player than Wiggins because he actually does positive things for his team on the floor, but he's a bust and Wiggins is not?
User avatar
Ron Swanson
RealGM
Posts: 25,937
And1: 29,861
Joined: May 15, 2013

Re: It's been 5 yrs. Can we now say Andrew Wiggins is a Bust? 

Post#259 » by Ron Swanson » Tue Feb 19, 2019 3:23 pm

No, not "every" NBA player can put up 20 PPG. Yes, Wiggins is a bust.

It really is a shame given that the dude has all the physical tools and freakish athletic ability to be a superstar in this league. But this is what people are talking about when they say that a guy lacks that "killer instinct" and/or "alpha dog mentality". I don't use those cliche words per say, but so much of being an elite athlete is the mental side of things. The competitiveness and desire to improve just don't seem to be there with him. He's just comfortable "getting his" and getting paid.
User avatar
yannisk
Lead Assistant
Posts: 4,982
And1: 3,930
Joined: Jul 14, 2013

Re: It's been 5 yrs. Can we now say Andrew Wiggins is a Bust? 

Post#260 » by yannisk » Tue Feb 19, 2019 3:27 pm

pcbothwel wrote:He is Michael Beasley/ Jonathan Bender on a max contract...


Unfair to Beasley imo if Beasley is given the minutes he will score more, more efficiently, rebound more etc

Return to The General Board