PrimeThyme wrote:GrandTheftRondo wrote:PrimeThyme wrote:Then so be it. The fact that other teams would have overpaid this summer as well still doesn't make it a great deal.
So what? The Celtics should just give up on players they draft and believe in long term? What kind of garbage logic is this?
The Celtics aren’t contending while they’ve got the current front court they do so this deal isn’t crippling the franchise if Brown doesn’t improve.
It’s a gamble on a young player with potential for growth at a time when the Celtics have limited options for big improvement. Thanks to what has transpired in the last 18 months Tatum and Brown are their path to contending.
I can see why they felt they needed to bring him back, I'm not arguing at this point that they shouldn't have (though I do think he should have been traded for a star player long ago). I still just think it's an overpay regardless. Using the excuse that other teams would have overpaid more for him this summer doesn't make this a great contract.
All contracts are dictated by the market. So if he's in line for a max, getting him for less than a max is a good deal. No team gives huge contracts for the hell of it because they want to make their players rich. They give huge contracts because the market dictates that if you want that player he will cost you that much.
So the debate is whether the team thinks he will be worth what the market is dictating and whether they want to pay to keep him. Clearly Ainge and the C's made an educated bet that he will be worth that money over the next 4 years and they wanted to keep him.