The draft lottery involves every team, including teams with owners who are billionaires regardless of the NBA's success of lack thereof and have these teams as a fun side project, outside organizations with worth greater than the NBA who aren't sticking their reputation out to help the NBA rig a lottery for some chump change in comparison to their own company, and media members.Sixers in 4 wrote:SOUL wrote:Sixers in 4 wrote:It's funny because just looking at your post, I can tell your politics. What about if I told you that Walmart had the opportunity to manipulate prices so it would help their bottom line in the same way that the NBA would benefit from manipulating NBA drafts? How would you respond? Would you have unquestioning faith in the fairness of their pricing? Of course not
Yeah, you're right, I live in reality - that's my politicsfeel free to refute any of the criticism of conspiratal points I made in my post.
Not sure how a Walmart example of price manipulation would even work as a 1:1 comparison but I'd like to see it fleshed out. The NBA is making bank from TV deals and sports betting on top of so many other things that you can legitimately say that them helping out any team would help their bottom line by either getting more out of floundering teams/markets and reviving them versus keeping a team like Dallas relevant.
I mean, I could refute every one, but it would derail the thread. I'll just say that the only reason the flat earth theory is even a conspiracy theory today is because someone thought the earth was spherical and decided to challenge the official narrative of the time. Blindly following an official narrative doesn't make you wise and the rest of the world idiots it makes you no different than the flat earthers of the pre-17th century.
Returning to the NBA draft. The NBA has a strong financial incentive to manipulate NBA drafts in order to help struggling NBA teams or big markets. What you're really asking is for the other board members to blindly trust the NBA to act contrary to their own self-interest for the sake of justice, fairness, or whatever. I'm afraid I don't have the same kind of faith in billion-dollar corporations as you do. The NBA had the choice to create a system where they were totally excluded from the process and it was run by a third party, but they chose not to. They had a choice to create a system that wouldn't be easy to manipulate like the lottery but chose not to do so.
As long as the opportunity and profit motive exists there is going to be an open question of whether the NBA is rigging drafts.
The rigging is far more difficult than some people seem to think, and no, the NBA is not convincing all the owners to jump on board with any of this stuff, it's not possible, and they would also have to find a way to silence former owners, which again, not possible.
They could theoretically rig it, of course, but the explanation of "oh all the owners are in on it and doing what's best for the league" is not it. Why would an owner ask his GM to tank all season, suck, lose money when he already knows his team isn't winning the lottery? Or maybe he doesn't yet, when he's now informed, "hey, it's not going to be you". Why would multiple teams be tanking and losing all that revenue if they are all in on it, "for the good of the league", what's the point for your pocket and you as an owner. There are many more reasons why it's just not the argument that holds water.
























