Moderators: Clav, Domejandro, ken6199, bisme37, Dirk, KingDavid, cupcakesnake, bwgood77, zimpy27, infinite11285
doogie_hauser wrote:Can't believe fans I have read online are complaining about Haliburton's choke gesture.
It all adds to the theatre and drama of the occasion.
It's honestly great to have a pantomime villian like Hali back in the NBA.
A player who talks the talk and walks the walk.
This was a magnificent underdog performance by the Pacers. Loved it
ArksNetsSince99 wrote:bronxknicksfan1 wrote:Congrats Pacers fans! I’ll take my lumps on this one. I said this about the Knicks tho. They could’ve taken this in 5, but I wouldn’t be surprised if it went 7 because they lose focus. Tonight was a perfect example.
Thank You
But… this is won’t last long
Pacers in 5 maybe 4
Blazing_royale wrote:This was one of those "1 in a million Dr. Strange" chance of Indy winning and they pulled through!
xBulletproof wrote:Pacers ball!
WarriorGM wrote:Steph is the greatest playmaker of all-time.
Doranku wrote:Carlisle has balls of steel to play it out at the end and not foul up 3
The4thHorseman wrote:ImmortalD24 wrote:Brunson is a great young player.. but he works so hard to score points that an overtime game will absolutely do him in. That said I know if I'm a Knicks fan (which I'm not) they're better off losing now than in the Finals because those guys in Oklahoma will give Brunson a lot of trouble.
It's better to NOT play in the Finals? Obviously you don't realize how dumb that sounds.
Iwasawitness wrote:Dude, swap prime LeBron with Mitchell and this would be the best team LeBron ever played on.
ArksNetsSince99 wrote:
Bro like 20 times but I don’t mind , post this one more time
Pacers_Freak wrote:Cardiac Pacers! Big to steal one in the Garden. Even better the Knicks short rotation had to play extra minutes tonight. I still think the Knicks are the better team but now there a good chance we have a helluva series and I think the deeper it goes the more the Indiana depth can pay off.
DaGawd wrote:deflating loss but yeah i’m encouraged by how we played despite the total meltdown
Wolfgang630 wrote:Please no OKC vs Pacers finals. Gonna be boring and the least watched finals since the Detroit vs Spurs days
Doctor MJ wrote:I don't understand why people jump in a thread and say basically, "This thing you're all talking about. I'm too ignorant to know anything about it. Lollerskates!"
bronxknicksfan1 wrote:ArksNetsSince99 wrote:bronxknicksfan1 wrote:Congrats Pacers fans! I’ll take my lumps on this one. I said this about the Knicks tho. They could’ve taken this in 5, but I wouldn’t be surprised if it went 7 because they lose focus. Tonight was a perfect example.
Thank You
But… this is won’t last long
Pacers in 5 maybe 4
You being here is enough for me to believe we’ll come back in a gentleman’s sweep
Nuntius wrote:Doranku wrote:Carlisle has balls of steel to play it out at the end and not foul up 3
Carlisle absolutely has balls of steel.
His in-game adjustmens worked like a charm as well. To bring Ben Sheppard in the game for the first time in the 4th quarter and then to go small against New York's big lineup were two adjustments that worked way better than expected.
Nuntius wrote:Doranku wrote:Carlisle has balls of steel to play it out at the end and not foul up 3
Carlisle absolutely has balls of steel.
His in-game adjustmens worked like a charm as well. To bring Ben Sheppard in the game for the first time in the 4th quarter and then to go small against New York's big lineup were two adjustments that worked way better than expected.
Isn't that stat useless since every team is within 7.9% of each other? Orlando is kind of an outlier. The spread is 5.2 without them. How can you derive any statistical analysis out of a spread that small?Jadoogar wrote:Lol yes there was. Celtics, a really good shooting team all season, were unable to buy a bucket for long stretchs. If they shoot 30% instead of 25%, they win both games easily. For reference, the worst team in the league shot 32% from three.