Woj: Kanter signing an offer sheet w/Portland

Moderators: Clav, Domejandro, ken6199, bisme37, Dirk, KingDavid, cupcakesnake, bwgood77, zimpy27, infinite11285

User avatar
Takingbaconback
Head Coach
Posts: 6,952
And1: 2,625
Joined: Jun 22, 2013
   

Re: Woj: Kanter signing an offer sheet w/Portland 

Post#261 » by Takingbaconback » Sun Jul 12, 2015 5:51 pm

I hope Thunder don't match it. Saddle Portland with a bad contract for somebody who is going to hinder long term success
Cyrusman122000
Analyst
Posts: 3,600
And1: 2,919
Joined: Jun 21, 2013
   

Re: Woj: Kanter signing an offer sheet w/Portland 

Post#262 » by Cyrusman122000 » Sun Jul 12, 2015 6:16 pm

MoneyTalks41890 wrote:
Takingbaconback wrote:Harden was complete garbage in playoffs though. Maybe if he didn't do so poorly in postseason OKC might have kept him around.


He was pretty bad as the playoffs went on. I still think Artest had a lot to do with that.


actually he flat out killed the Spurs in the conference finals that year. He just stunk it up in the finals
User avatar
bondom34
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 66,716
And1: 50,290
Joined: Mar 01, 2013

Re: Woj: Kanter signing an offer sheet w/Portland 

Post#263 » by bondom34 » Sun Jul 12, 2015 7:01 pm

CBA wrote:
bondom34 wrote:Oh the comparison wasn't a direct thing and I said as much. If you want to troll on that fine, have fun.


No...your previous posts are still available. You yourself said, "if you bash one, bash the other." This is obviously a direct comparison. It's also a dumb one. Lee was old, out of the rotation and overpaid. Harden was a young star player on the verge of becoming a superstar.

You're right that both moves were made for money. The difference is the Lee trade wasn't a horrendous move that could have dire consequences on the franchise. That's why one is bashed and the other isn't.

In the future, it would be smarter not to assume anyone who disagrees with you - in this case, pretty much everyone - is trolling. Maybe you're just wrong?

Welp, admitted it. A few posts above. And the money saving thing for GSW was really what I was trying to get at, but I put it very very poorly.
MyUniBroDavis wrote: he was like YALL PEOPLE WHO DOUBT ME WILL SEE YALLS STATS ARE WRONG I HAVE THE BIG BRAIN PLAYS MUCHO NASTY BIG BRAIN BIG CHUNGUS BRAIN YOU BOYS ON UR BBALL REFERENCE NO UNDERSTANDO
KL78192020
RealGM
Posts: 13,837
And1: 14,775
Joined: Apr 19, 2009

Re: Woj: Kanter signing an offer sheet w/Portland 

Post#264 » by KL78192020 » Mon Jul 13, 2015 1:14 am

looks like they're matching.
User avatar
NWGunner
Sophomore
Posts: 202
And1: 151
Joined: Jul 10, 2005
Location: Oregon
   

Re: Woj: Kanter signing an offer sheet w/Portland 

Post#265 » by NWGunner » Mon Jul 13, 2015 1:18 am

User avatar
RoyalWun
Lead Assistant
Posts: 4,677
And1: 494
Joined: Jul 05, 2009
Location: NY, New York
     

 

Post#266 » by RoyalWun » Mon Jul 13, 2015 1:36 am

Presti: "This was an easy decision"

It was so easy it only took them 3 days.
User avatar
El Turco
GOTB Fantasy Basketball Ultimate 2x Champion
Posts: 54,503
And1: 21,820
Joined: Apr 11, 2007
Location: Frisco
     

Re: Woj: Kanter signing an offer sheet w/Portland 

Post#267 » by El Turco » Mon Jul 13, 2015 1:41 am

that's more to do with gamesmanship, i am guessing they've made the decision months ago
TheLowlySquire wrote:Wow, Arda! Huge!


Howard Mass wrote:Arda is not a terrorist. Arda is a good person.
User avatar
MoneyTalks41890
Forum Mod
Forum Mod
Posts: 32,787
And1: 25,082
Joined: Oct 13, 2009
 

Re: 

Post#268 » by MoneyTalks41890 » Mon Jul 13, 2015 1:53 am

RoyalWun wrote:Presti: "This was an easy decision"

It was so easy it only took them 3 days.


No reason to do it right away. Still ties up Portland's money. He's said since March they were going to match.
xfactor99
Junior
Posts: 433
And1: 403
Joined: Feb 18, 2011
     

Re: Woj: Kanter signing an offer sheet w/Portland 

Post#269 » by xfactor99 » Mon Jul 13, 2015 1:57 am

Now that I think about it more, OKC's big mistake wasn't matching this Kanter contract, it was trading for Kanter and Waiters in the first place. I would want useful, two-way, role players who don't to soak up possessions on offense on my championship contending team. Cleveland got Mozgov, Shumpert - and to a lesser extent JR Smith. OKC got Kanter and Waiters. Ugh.
Slackstring701
Starter
Posts: 2,423
And1: 1,963
Joined: Oct 05, 2012
 

Re: Woj: Kanter signing an offer sheet w/Portland 

Post#270 » by Slackstring701 » Mon Jul 13, 2015 1:59 am

xfactor99 wrote:Now that I think about it more, OKC's big mistake wasn't matching this Kanter contract, it was trading for Kanter and Waiters in the first place. I would want useful, two-way, role players who don't to soak up possessions on offense on my championship contending team. Cleveland got Mozgov, Shumpert - and to a lesser extent JR Smith. OKC got Kanter and Waiters. Ugh.


IMO Kanter was worth the shot.

That Waiters trade was atrocious from day one.
Thunderhead
Senior
Posts: 696
And1: 287
Joined: Sep 11, 2008
   

Re: 

Post#271 » by Thunderhead » Mon Jul 13, 2015 2:16 am

RoyalWun wrote:Presti: "This was an easy decision"

It was so easy it only took them 3 days.


Come on, please be smarter than this ............... you make Portland pay for extending the offer sheet to one of your RFA's.

And then , from now on, it becomes known, that if you make an offer sheet to a Thunder RFA, then you are gonna be tied up for the maximum amount of time.

Some of you fellas, are real simpletons.
RatherUnique
Analyst
Posts: 3,119
And1: 1,474
Joined: Oct 29, 2011

Re: 

Post#272 » by RatherUnique » Mon Jul 13, 2015 3:13 am

RoyalWun wrote:Presti: "This was an easy decision"

It was so easy it only took them 3 days.

Teams almost always wait until the last day to match. You tie up the other teams money as long as possible.
User avatar
John Murdoch
RealGM
Posts: 10,250
And1: 7,720
Joined: Sep 16, 2013
         

Re: 

Post#273 » by John Murdoch » Mon Jul 13, 2015 3:20 am

RoyalWun wrote:Presti: "This was an easy decision"

It was so easy it only took them 3 days.


Thats standard..they do that so that you will miss out on other FA since u went after their RFA
Magic#1 wrote:We have won two playoff games in two years. If we decide to keep this team for the next two years, maybe it will feel like we won a series.

Return to The General Board