2023 trade deadline (February 9)

Moderators: Clav, Domejandro, ken6199, bisme37, Dirk, KingDavid, cupcakesnake, bwgood77, zimpy27, infinite11285

jbk1234
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 59,142
And1: 36,185
Joined: Dec 22, 2010
 

Re: 2023 trade deadline 

Post#261 » by jbk1234 » Mon Jan 30, 2023 2:54 am

Tor_Raps wrote:
ILOVEIT wrote:Turner was extended for two years 30 Mil. The article suggestsed that should take him off the trade market.
Anyone know if that is a fact? Because an extension, IMO, might suggest a pending trade with another team with matching 30 mil salary.


It was confirmed by Shams that the extension still allows Turner to be traded anytime. It just increases his value to teams who won't be getting an expiring contract only.


Yeah, but I don't really see the Pacers as motivated to trade him on that contract. At least not before the deadline.
cbosh4mvp wrote:
Jarret Allen isn’t winning you anything. Garland won’t show up in the playoffs. Mobley is a glorified dunk man. Mitchell has some experience but is a liability on defense. To me, the Cavs are a treadmill team.
wolves_89
General Manager
Posts: 8,108
And1: 4,593
Joined: Jul 10, 2012
 

Re: 2023 trade deadline 

Post#262 » by wolves_89 » Mon Jan 30, 2023 3:20 am

Tor_Raps wrote:
ILOVEIT wrote:Turner was extended for two years 30 Mil. The article suggestsed that should take him off the trade market.
Anyone know if that is a fact? Because an extension, IMO, might suggest a pending trade with another team with matching 30 mil salary.


It was confirmed by Shams that the extension still allows Turner to be traded anytime. It just increases his value to teams who won't be getting an expiring contract only.


The extension probably made him more valuable, but it also makes him harder to trade before the deadline. From my understanding he now counts as $35M in salary that would need to be matched in a trade.
Brandon-Clyde
RealGM
Posts: 23,368
And1: 5,791
Joined: May 29, 2008
     

Re: 2023 trade deadline 

Post#263 » by Brandon-Clyde » Mon Jan 30, 2023 5:04 am

UnbelievablyRAW wrote:
Brandon-Clyde wrote:
UnbelievablyRAW wrote:Should be able to get Dame for bench guys because the Blazers suck. Obviously that means Dame isn’t that good and it doesn’t have to do with roster construction with a horrendous bench and no consistent offense outside of him. If he was actually good the Blazers would be in the playoffs amirite?

Dame for Malachi, Fred and protected firsts? Might have to add more than 2 to make it fair /greenfont

The difference is that Blazer fans aren't demanding superstar packages for their second and third best players.


Pretty sure Blazer fans would scoff at a Grant and Simons for WB and 27,29

What superstar does Westbrook and 27, 29 bring in return? And notice that in your trade scenario it doesn't appear to be either Simons or Grant for that return but both Simons and Grant. Would WB and 27,29 bring back any one of OG, Siakam or Barnes?
There are no constraints on the human mind, no walls around the human spirit, no barriers to our progress except those we ourselves erect." -- Ronald Reagan
User avatar
UnbelievablyRAW
Lead Assistant
Posts: 4,726
And1: 4,514
Joined: Oct 29, 2011
     

Re: 2023 trade deadline 

Post#264 » by UnbelievablyRAW » Mon Jan 30, 2023 2:33 pm

Brandon-Clyde wrote:
UnbelievablyRAW wrote:
Brandon-Clyde wrote:The difference is that Blazer fans aren't demanding superstar packages for their second and third best players.


Pretty sure Blazer fans would scoff at a Grant and Simons for WB and 27,29

What superstar does Westbrook and 27, 29 bring in return? And notice that in your trade scenario it doesn't appear to be either Simons or Grant for that return but both Simons and Grant. Would WB and 27,29 bring back any one of OG, Siakam or Barnes?


Whoops replied in this thread instead of another trade deadline mock trade thread where FVV and Trent were offered to the Lakers for WB and the LAL 27 FRP.

My bad
"Above average role player is now being paid like a superstar from one good playoff series. This will end up as one of the worst contracts in the league." paulbball on Pascal Siakam
User avatar
SUPERVILLAIN
Analyst
Posts: 3,252
And1: 12,453
Joined: Apr 08, 2020

Re: 2023 trade deadline 

Post#265 » by SUPERVILLAIN » Mon Jan 30, 2023 6:14 pm

Read on Twitter
?s=46&t=PBvdqc6AIX87CW6NuOd5rg
Young Stapler wrote:Completely off topic but SUPERVILLAIN got a crazy post/And1 ratio O_O

Just an observation. Carry on :usa:

viewtopic.php?f=6&t=2135964&p=94616946#p94616946
Catchall
RealGM
Posts: 20,555
And1: 11,135
Joined: Jul 06, 2008
     

Re: 2023 trade deadline 

Post#266 » by Catchall » Mon Jan 30, 2023 11:12 pm

I do think that Danny Ainge is going to try to gut the roster at the trade deadline and position the Jazz better for the upcoming draft. I think the Jazz want to make sure Lauri gets named an All Star, but after that I don't think the Jazz are going to try to compete past the deadline. Conley, Clarkson, Beasley, Vanderbilt and Olynyk are all possible sell-offs.

Jordan Clarkson has a player option for next season at under $15M. He's going to opt out and aim for another 3 years in the $19 - $20M/year range. Jazz and Clarkson love the fit with one another, but there's no guarantee he re-signs with the Jazz.
rocketsfan100
Assistant Coach
Posts: 3,864
And1: 3,354
Joined: Nov 10, 2017
         

Re: 2023 trade deadline 

Post#267 » by rocketsfan100 » Tue Jan 31, 2023 6:37 am

The Bucks offer of Jordan Nowra, Serge Ibaka, George Hill with multiple second rounders is pretty good for Crowder. Jordan Nowra is a pretty good young player. Serge is better than Biyombo or Landale and Hill is a serviceable backup. Plus you get a few second rounders.
mediocrityrules
Lead Assistant
Posts: 5,789
And1: 5,621
Joined: Nov 27, 2013
 

Re: 2023 trade deadline 

Post#268 » by mediocrityrules » Tue Jan 31, 2023 9:35 am

rocketsfan100 wrote:The Bucks offer of Jordan Nowra, Serge Ibaka, George Hill with multiple second rounders is pretty good for Crowder. Jordan Nowra is a pretty good young player. Serge is better than Biyombo or Landale and Hill is a serviceable backup. Plus you get a few second rounders.


Serge is no longer better than anyone. He's washed. Certainly not better right now than Landale or Biyombo. Hill a very serviceable backup. Nwora is a chucker, and not a great one.
Circling calendars since 2021
SA37
RealGM
Posts: 18,719
And1: 9,402
Joined: Sep 10, 2002
Location: Basking in the Glory
 

Re: 2023 trade deadline 

Post#269 » by SA37 » Tue Jan 31, 2023 10:05 am

I think Ayton and Crowder for Vucevic, P Williams, Jones, and Dragic would make a lot of sense for both the Suns and the Bulls.

I also think this 3-way deal would work, too:

Chicago gets: Ayton and Okongwu

Phoenix gets: Capela and Collins

Atlanta gets: Vucevic, Crowder, and Williams
User avatar
God Squad
RealGM
Posts: 13,343
And1: 11,570
Joined: Feb 22, 2010
Location: Toronto
 

Re: 2023 trade deadline 

Post#270 » by God Squad » Tue Jan 31, 2023 2:51 pm

SA37 wrote:I think Ayton and Crowder for Vucevic, P Williams, Jones, and Dragic would make a lot of sense for both the Suns and the Bulls.

I also think this 3-way deal would work, too:

Chicago gets: Ayton and Okongwu

Phoenix gets: Capela and Collins

Atlanta gets: Vucevic, Crowder, and Williams

Atlanta loses both their front court depth for Pwill and Crowder? I'd pass if I were ATL pretty easily.
Image
ChumboChappati
Pro Prospect
Posts: 913
And1: 547
Joined: Jul 30, 2021

Re: 2023 trade deadline 

Post#271 » by ChumboChappati » Tue Jan 31, 2023 3:16 pm

Raptors Realtor wrote:
ChumboChappati wrote:
Tripod wrote:Nope, just watch 2 weeks.


Tor_Raps wrote:
Harris + Bamba won't get you crap, let alone Fred lol. It's gotta be Suggs + Fillers.


Raptors Realtor wrote:
Image

C'mon now, Bamba who can barely crack the Magic's rotation after 5 years and Harris who's an injury prone one trick pony for a starting calibre pg.

You guys are forgetting that Fred will be an unrestricted free agent at the end of this season and can sign with any team. So Raptors do not have much leverage regarding Fred. Fred is going to demand huge money in the next contract (around 30 million dollars per year). Would Toronto pay that much money to him? Remember Toronto is a lottery team with Fred and has a bleak future. I think Harris + Bamba is a great offer in such a case.


You're forgetting:

1) Raps have his bird rights & can re-sign him if they so choose
2) Raptors have the best record in the eastern conference in the last decade
3) Raptors don't have a bleak future, they have a top 20 player in Siakam, rookie of the year Scottie Barnes, an easy top 5 defensive player in OG who averages 18 pts & leads the league in steals, Gary Trent Jr, Achiuwa and all our picks going forward... All guys & picks they can bring back or deal to reshape the roster.
4) If things don't improve this season, currently in line for a top 6 draft pick
5) Bamba & Harris have very little trade value around the league, Magic would be lucky to get a 2nd round pick for either, so NO we don't have to give Fred away for couple bench pieces from a team who has an even worse record that would have zero impact on our team.

You are sounding like Raptors are one of the best teams in the NBA lol. But the reality is totally opposite. Raptors are currently one of the worst teams in the NBA and their future is also not bright as of now. Magic has a much better future than them.
Raptors need a lot of talent on their roster. I think they should definitely trade Fred and Siakam, be a lottery team for a couple of seasons to replenish talent, and improve their drafting acumen as they have missed out on better players in recent drafts.
ChumboChappati
Pro Prospect
Posts: 913
And1: 547
Joined: Jul 30, 2021

Re: 2023 trade deadline 

Post#272 » by ChumboChappati » Tue Jan 31, 2023 3:23 pm

Tripod wrote:
ChumboChappati wrote:
Tripod wrote:Nope, just watch 2 weeks.


Tor_Raps wrote:
Harris + Bamba won't get you crap, let alone Fred lol. It's gotta be Suggs + Fillers.


Raptors Realtor wrote:
Image

C'mon now, Bamba who can barely crack the Magic's rotation after 5 years and Harris who's an injury prone one trick pony for a starting calibre pg.

You guys are forgetting that Fred will be an unrestricted free agent at the end of this season and can sign with any team. So Raptors do not have much leverage regarding Fred. Fred is going to demand huge money in the next contract (around 30 million dollars per year). Would Toronto pay that much money to him? Remember Toronto is a lottery team with Fred and has a bleak future. I think Harris + Bamba is a great offer in such a case.

True.last time the Raps had a UFA they were forced to do a S&T with Lowry and only got Achiuwa back.

What's that? Achiuwa just posted 27 pts and 13 reb tonight?

Oh the horror.

no problem with S&T; in any case Raptors should trade Fred IMO. I like Achiuwa, but think he is underwhelming for C. 27 pts and 13 reb against a team Portland which is also a lottery team and was missing its C Nurkic, is not something you should boost about.
Raptors Realtor
Analyst
Posts: 3,603
And1: 3,541
Joined: Jul 16, 2009
Location: Toronto, ON
Contact:

Re: 2023 trade deadline 

Post#273 » by Raptors Realtor » Tue Jan 31, 2023 3:31 pm

ChumboChappati wrote:
Raptors Realtor wrote:
ChumboChappati wrote:



You guys are forgetting that Fred will be an unrestricted free agent at the end of this season and can sign with any team. So Raptors do not have much leverage regarding Fred. Fred is going to demand huge money in the next contract (around 30 million dollars per year). Would Toronto pay that much money to him? Remember Toronto is a lottery team with Fred and has a bleak future. I think Harris + Bamba is a great offer in such a case.


You're forgetting:

1) Raps have his bird rights & can re-sign him if they so choose
2) Raptors have the best record in the eastern conference in the last decade
3) Raptors don't have a bleak future, they have a top 20 player in Siakam, rookie of the year Scottie Barnes, an easy top 5 defensive player in OG who averages 18 pts & leads the league in steals, Gary Trent Jr, Achiuwa and all our picks going forward... All guys & picks they can bring back or deal to reshape the roster.
4) If things don't improve this season, currently in line for a top 6 draft pick
5) Bamba & Harris have very little trade value around the league, Magic would be lucky to get a 2nd round pick for either, so NO we don't have to give Fred away for couple bench pieces from a team who has an even worse record that would have zero impact on our team.

You are sounding like Raptors are one of the best teams in the NBA lol. But the reality is totally opposite. Raptors are currently one of the worst teams in the NBA and their future is also not bright as of now. Magic has a much better future than them.
Raptors need a lot of talent on their roster. I think they should definitely trade Fred and Siakam, be a lottery team for a couple of seasons to replenish talent, and improve their drafting acumen as they have missed out on better players in recent drafts.


Dude you're exhausting to debate with. I never said the Raps are one of the best teams this year, it's obvious they're not. It doesn't mean that they don't have solid assets, which I've outlined in my previous post, and that those assets should/will return better then your scrub bench players which you had proposed... maybe try re-reading my post instead of continuing to spew generic drivel with zero substance.
Dacost
Sixth Man
Posts: 1,796
And1: 1,502
Joined: Feb 21, 2017

Re: 2023 trade deadline 

Post#274 » by Dacost » Tue Jan 31, 2023 6:18 pm

Raps fans what do you want for O.G ??

I know keeping him is probably ideal but if he was to be traded what would you want?
Tripod
RealGM
Posts: 12,499
And1: 11,971
Joined: Aug 13, 2021
 

Re: 2023 trade deadline 

Post#275 » by Tripod » Tue Jan 31, 2023 6:59 pm

ChumboChappati wrote:
Tripod wrote:
ChumboChappati wrote:



You guys are forgetting that Fred will be an unrestricted free agent at the end of this season and can sign with any team. So Raptors do not have much leverage regarding Fred. Fred is going to demand huge money in the next contract (around 30 million dollars per year). Would Toronto pay that much money to him? Remember Toronto is a lottery team with Fred and has a bleak future. I think Harris + Bamba is a great offer in such a case.

True.last time the Raps had a UFA they were forced to do a S&T with Lowry and only got Achiuwa back.

What's that? Achiuwa just posted 27 pts and 13 reb tonight?

Oh the horror.

no problem with S&T; in any case Raptors should trade Fred IMO. I like Achiuwa, but think he is underwhelming for C. 27 pts and 13 reb against a team Portland which is also a lottery team and was missing its C Nurkic, is not something you should boost about.

The entire point is that you said the Raps dud not have much leverage on Fred. I disagree.

They hold his bird rights
They have multiple teams that want him
They have shown teams that if they don’t like a deal, they will hold him past the deadline
They have shown even if they do that, they can get a 2w year old former 1st rounder with upside

Your offer is missing the actual good pice to do the deal. You offered the filler....and fwiw I am fine with those 2 filler pieces as I have said having a bench scorer and big C who can stretch the floor are welcomed bench pieces.

But again, you are missing the good piece added to these 2 to entice the Raps to take this deal vs others.
old skool
General Manager
Posts: 7,989
And1: 3,734
Joined: Jul 07, 2005
Location: Chi

Re: 2023 trade deadline 

Post#276 » by old skool » Tue Jan 31, 2023 7:00 pm

Something seems to have gone bad in Toronto. Last year the Raptors were a 48 win team. This year, with the same core roster and coaches, they are on pace to finish in the lottery with 36 wins. That type of downturn screams dissension and conflict that teams would be wise to avoid.

I would expect the Raptors to put the sources of conflict on the trade market, but I would also expect potential trade partners to moderate any offers. No one needs bad apples that can sabotage a winning team.

Sent from my SM-N960U using RealGM mobile app
CIN-C-STAR
General Manager
Posts: 8,419
And1: 18,275
Joined: Dec 17, 2017

Re: 2023 trade deadline 

Post#277 » by CIN-C-STAR » Tue Jan 31, 2023 7:04 pm

Apparently Bones Hyland is likely to get traded according to Marc Stein, and the T'Wolves are interested.
Bones for Slo Mo who says no?
I'd love to see Slo Mo and the Joker on the court together, ploddingly breaking other teams with their BBIQ 8-) :lol:
"I'd rather have Kevin Love spacing out to the three point line than anything (Karl) Malone brings"
:lol: :lol: :lol:
BlazersBroncos
RealGM
Posts: 12,405
And1: 9,946
Joined: Oct 27, 2016

Re: 2023 trade deadline 

Post#278 » by BlazersBroncos » Tue Jan 31, 2023 7:18 pm

Brandon-Clyde wrote:
UnbelievablyRAW wrote:
Brandon-Clyde wrote:The difference is that Blazer fans aren't demanding superstar packages for their second and third best players.


Pretty sure Blazer fans would scoff at a Grant and Simons for WB and 27,29

What superstar does Westbrook and 27, 29 bring in return? And notice that in your trade scenario it doesn't appear to be either Simons or Grant for that return but both Simons and Grant. Would WB and 27,29 bring back any one of OG, Siakam or Barnes?


I would do Grant, Hart, Winslow for WB, 27 UNP, 29 UNP.

Think PDX is in a dangerous spot to overpay both Grant and to a lesser extent Hart and lock this team into a worse treadmill than we currently have. Would cash them now if I ran the show.
Jadoogar
RealGM
Posts: 17,326
And1: 16,964
Joined: May 06, 2010
   

Re: 2023 trade deadline 

Post#279 » by Jadoogar » Tue Jan 31, 2023 8:15 pm

old skool wrote:Something seems to have gone bad in Toronto. Last year the Raptors were a 48 win team. This year, with the same core roster and coaches, they are on pace to finish in the lottery with 36 wins. That type of downturn screams dissension and conflict that teams would be wise to avoid.

I would expect the Raptors to put the sources of conflict on the trade market, but I would also expect potential trade partners to moderate any offers. No one needs bad apples that can sabotage a winning team.

Sent from my SM-N960U using RealGM mobile app


Last season's record was falsely inflated in a way. Teams like the Nets, Sixers and Hawks had weirdly disappointing season and have gotten better in the offseason. Cavs had a better record than toronto for most of the season before falling to injuries.
All of these teams improved this summer while the raptors stayed the same.
liquidswords
Rookie
Posts: 1,239
And1: 1,227
Joined: May 19, 2021
 

Re: 2023 trade deadline 

Post#280 » by liquidswords » Tue Jan 31, 2023 8:18 pm

old skool wrote:Something seems to have gone bad in Toronto. Last year the Raptors were a 48 win team. This year, with the same core roster and coaches, they are on pace to finish in the lottery with 36 wins. That type of downturn screams dissension and conflict that teams would be wise to avoid.

I would expect the Raptors to put the sources of conflict on the trade market, but I would also expect potential trade partners to moderate any offers. No one needs bad apples that can sabotage a winning team.

Sent from my SM-N960U using RealGM mobile app


What I see is a lot of guys who are unsubscribing from their team model because they think they are better than they actually are (e.g. Van Vleet thinking he's worth 30-35M, OG getting talked about as a star)

Now that being said, a contender or fringe contender adding FVV or OG would be huge because they would slot in accordingly (think FVV on the Clippers)

Return to The General Board