How are people not putting Jokic in their top 15 yet?

Moderators: Clav, Domejandro, ken6199, bisme37, Dirk, KingDavid, cupcakesnake, bwgood77, zimpy27, infinite11285

Saints14
Assistant Coach
Posts: 4,333
And1: 6,137
Joined: Jul 19, 2013
 

Re: How are people not putting Jokic in their top 15 yet? 

Post#261 » by Saints14 » Thu Oct 2, 2025 1:26 am

Top10alltime wrote:I mean genuinely this guy has a case for best player every year from 2021-25 (he is EASILY the best in at least 2 of those years). Stop disrespecting bro he deserves to be put in that top 15 at this point. This is one of the greatest stretches we will ever see from a player ever. Stop disrespecting Jokic' name. For all of the talk about his defense he's still a good PnR defender and still a + at defense (only thing is his bad rim protection).

Now combine that with a top 6-7 offensive player ever (Literally a top 10 scorer and playmaker ever), you have a top 15 player all-time. Stop putting disrespect on Jokic name, he might be top 5 by the time he retires.


I think your notion that Jokic is the best player over a 5 year stretch (which I would agree with) is the strongest argument for having him top 15. There are roughly 15 5 year stretches in league history, so without getting into the actual nuance top 15 is roughly the conversation he should be in
User avatar
CharityStripe34
General Manager
Posts: 9,620
And1: 6,461
Joined: Dec 01, 2014
     

Re: How are people not putting Jokic in their top 15 yet? 

Post#262 » by CharityStripe34 » Thu Oct 2, 2025 1:19 pm

If he's not top 15 yet, which is certainly fine, then he's close. Here's a list of simply the guys in league history who have won multiple MVPs. All of those guys except for maybe Steve Nash were a Top 3-4 player in the league for a period of roughly 5-7 years. Minus Nash, the rest of the names are all solidified, I would think, in the Top 25 best ever at worst. Especially if you tally up their All-NBA selections.

Kareem Abdul-Jabbar: (6)
Michael Jordan: (5)
Bill Russell: (5)
LeBron James: (4)
Wilt Chamberlain: (4)
Larry Bird: (3)
Magic Johnson: (3)
Moses Malone: (3)
Nikola Jokic: (3)
Giannis Antetokounmpo: (2)
Karl Malone: (2)
Stephen Curry: (2)
Tim Duncan: (2)
Steve Nash: (2)
Bob Pettit: (2)
"Wes, Hill, Ibaka, Allen, Nwora, Brook, Pat, Ingles, Khris are all slow-mo, injury prone ... a sandcastle waiting for playoff wave to get wrecked. A castle with no long-range archers... is destined to fall. That is all I have to say."-- FOTIS
EmpireFalls
Lead Assistant
Posts: 5,154
And1: 8,441
Joined: Jun 16, 2015
   

Re: How are people not putting Jokic in their top 15 yet? 

Post#263 » by EmpireFalls » Thu Oct 2, 2025 2:01 pm

Saints14 wrote:
Top10alltime wrote:I mean genuinely this guy has a case for best player every year from 2021-25 (he is EASILY the best in at least 2 of those years). Stop disrespecting bro he deserves to be put in that top 15 at this point. This is one of the greatest stretches we will ever see from a player ever. Stop disrespecting Jokic' name. For all of the talk about his defense he's still a good PnR defender and still a + at defense (only thing is his bad rim protection).

Now combine that with a top 6-7 offensive player ever (Literally a top 10 scorer and playmaker ever), you have a top 15 player all-time. Stop putting disrespect on Jokic name, he might be top 5 by the time he retires.


I think your notion that Jokic is the best player over a 5 year stretch (which I would agree with) is the strongest argument for having him top 15. There are roughly 15 5 year stretches in league history, so without getting into the actual nuance top 15 is roughly the conversation he should be in

Interesting exercise.

2021-25: Jokic
2016-2020: LeBron? Curry/KD also has a great case
2011-2015: LeBron
2006-2010: Kobe I’d think?
2001-2005: Shaq or Duncan? Also close.
1991-2000: Jordan
1986-90: Magic
1981-85: Bird, Moses Malone has a strong case
1976-80: likely Kareem
1971-75: definitely Kareem
1966-70: good argument for Wilt, but likely Russell
1961-65: Russell
1956-1960: good argument for Pettit over Russell
1949-55: Mikan
dhsilv2
RealGM
Posts: 50,550
And1: 27,275
Joined: Oct 04, 2015

Re: How are people not putting Jokic in their top 15 yet? 

Post#264 » by dhsilv2 » Thu Oct 2, 2025 2:37 pm

EmpireFalls wrote:
Saints14 wrote:
Top10alltime wrote:I mean genuinely this guy has a case for best player every year from 2021-25 (he is EASILY the best in at least 2 of those years). Stop disrespecting bro he deserves to be put in that top 15 at this point. This is one of the greatest stretches we will ever see from a player ever. Stop disrespecting Jokic' name. For all of the talk about his defense he's still a good PnR defender and still a + at defense (only thing is his bad rim protection).

Now combine that with a top 6-7 offensive player ever (Literally a top 10 scorer and playmaker ever), you have a top 15 player all-time. Stop putting disrespect on Jokic name, he might be top 5 by the time he retires.


I think your notion that Jokic is the best player over a 5 year stretch (which I would agree with) is the strongest argument for having him top 15. There are roughly 15 5 year stretches in league history, so without getting into the actual nuance top 15 is roughly the conversation he should be in

Interesting exercise.

2021-25: Jokic
2016-2020: LeBron? Curry/KD also has a great case
2011-2015: LeBron
2006-2010: Kobe I’d think?
2001-2005: Shaq or Duncan? Also close.
1991-2000: Jordan
1986-90: Magic
1981-85: Bird, Moses Malone has a strong case
1976-80: likely Kareem
1971-75: definitely Kareem
1966-70: good argument for Wilt, but likely Russell
1961-65: Russell
1956-1960: good argument for Pettit over Russell
1949-55: Mikan


That's a tough one. Dirk and KG were better per game, KG noticeably. But neither had the team success and Kobe's minutes dwarf KG and were above Dirk. The guy we might forget is Wade, who absolutely has a case here. Again way less minutes, but the advanced stats for him are wild.

That said, if you don't require a title. It's Lebron and it's not even close for 2006-2010. Just like if we actually look at 86-90...that was Jordan and again it's not even all that close. Even more wild when we consider Jordan's statistical dominance was done while basically missing a full season in that sample...then again taking him 96-00 means he won in 3 years...and I don't know that you're wrong with that call.
threethehardway
Bench Warmer
Posts: 1,370
And1: 2,123
Joined: May 31, 2021

Re: How are people not putting Jokic in their top 15 yet? 

Post#265 » by threethehardway » Fri Oct 3, 2025 3:08 am

Mephariel wrote:
threethehardway wrote:
Mephariel wrote:
Most All-star GOAT perimeter player are lazy on defense is not a serious argument. Jordan was a 9 time all-defense. So he only tried for 9 years? Is that really your argument? Anybody can make up stuff using unprovable words like "lazy." I can make up stuff too. Kobe was crazy, and he was imaging an alien invasion while playing ball. Besides, why are you limiting this argument to GOATs? By your logic, anyone who averaged 25+ points must be lazy on defense right? Since they need to reserve energy for scoring.

Also, if Jordan was lazy on defense, what does that make Jokic? A corpse? Does that really help your argument? So Giannis is lazy on defense? What does that make Jokic? A lamppost?


Jordan was all defensive team off of reputation and his splash plays

Kobe Bryant was on all defensive teams well into his 30s and he didn't play solid defense since 2003.

Fans don't like to account for the marketing aspect of the NBA.

Jordan was anointed as a GOAT before he even won a championship, you really think they weren't gonna give him All Def-Teams while on the best team that he was the face of?

Plus the competition at SG wasn't that deep. They gonna give 1st Team All Defense to Alvin Robertson over MJ?

LeBron almost got DPOY with his final years with the Cavs simply because his chase down blocks was making Sportscenter Top 10.

And Jokic is lazy on defense and he isn't vertically athletic.

I never said Jokic was good on defense. He's bad. I just don't care that he is that good on offense. He isn't a Tim Duncan level of offensive player. He's LeBron/Shaq/Magic/MJ level.

Only GOAT offensive juggernaut that was legitimately a defensive anchor for a championship team was LeBron with the Heat.

The rest had help and was hidden.

LeBron was the best rim protector and perimeter defender and he stepped up and carried those teams both ways at an ATG level that we will never see again. It won't be appreciated until he retires and weirdos get over the fact he's probably the best player ever.

When he had to, he stepped up.

But yeah, GOAT offensive players aren't great defenders for their entire career, it doesn't happen. The offensive load is too much and on championship squads they get help.

Holding Jokic to the standard of being a great defensive player when Magic wasn't is silly. They are basically the same type of player.


Everything you said about MJ or Lebron is conjecture. You are just making up stuff at this point.

And Magic is held to that standard as well. You don't think if Magic averaged 4 blocks a game like Mutombo and anchored a defense, he wouldn't be ranked higher? Magic is an all-around talent boosted by winning 5 rings. If he was better on offensive or defense, he would be ranked 2nd or challenging MJ. But defense absolutely matters. There is no way around it.


Nothing I say is conjecture, it's reality.

And Eddie Jones was a better defensive player at SG than MJ during the MJs 3 peat and they never gave Eddie Jones a chance at all to make an All-Defensive Team until MJ's last year.


Just like they didn't give Miami LeBron DPOY despite carrying them on defense his entire time there.

Just like they gave Kobe 1st team all defense over Dwade despite Kobe not being a good defender.

Coaches and media like who they they like.

Magic was considered by many, the best player ever during his time and nobody cared Michael Cooper did all defensive heavy lifting on the perimeter.

Nobody watched Magic Johnson be a 6'8 offensive dynamo, making plays nobody has ever seen before and think, "If he only blocked shots like Wilt."

And we still don't.

The idea defense matters when it comes to GOAT offensive dominance is some basketball internet forum nerd stuff that nobody adheres to in real life. In real life, you pay the guy that can run your offense like a well oiled machine or score at will and figure out defense later.

Everyone knows in real life, offensive dominance trumps defense, because nobody says Ben Wallace is a top 10 player ever. Ben Wallace doesn't even rank most people's top 50 players ever. Ben Wallace is probably the best defensive player to ever play and nobody cares. Ben Wallace doesn't even rank amongst GOAT centers.

Nobody cares about Michael Jordan's defense, what put him on is offensive dominance and aesthetics.

Same with Curry.

And it's going to be the same with Jokic, people are gonna look back at the crazy passes, shots and stats and not think about the fact he doesn't jump and block shots.

You rank players according to dominance and how they improve your chances to winning championships. You don't treat them like a basket of skill-sets and attributes and rank them against each other and think like "This one plays defense and this one don't."
Cubbies2120
Head Coach
Posts: 6,369
And1: 9,285
Joined: Apr 20, 2012
Location: MD
 

Re: How are people not putting Jokic in their top 15 yet? 

Post#266 » by Cubbies2120 » Fri Oct 3, 2025 4:28 pm

hardenASG13 wrote:
CharityStripe34 wrote:
hardenASG13 wrote:
I'm 100% not trying to do that. Duncan was first team all NBA in 2012-2013. He was one of the top players in the league from 2003-2013 when Lebron entered the league His teams often made deep playoff runs during that time. Lebron was one of the top players in that period from 07 on, KD was as well by 2010. If I didnt say young KD, on a comprehensive list covering 75 years i appologize. But guys I mentioned were really good, quickly (unlike Jokic, Embiid and Giannis). So yeah, their competition spans to more guys, because they maintained top player in the league status for a long time, achieving top player status earlier, and extending it longer than Jokic has to this point. They are special, all time type of players.

If we're making accusations and conspiracy theories, I'd say youre trying to derail points you don't like by nitpicking somantics, as you've done over and over in this thread. DimesandKnicks has made you look foolish, repeatedly. The list I posted and guys considered the best players during each one's time as one of or best players in the league is accurate. Again though, most of the guys I listed were really good almost immediately, so they were competing with a wider span of players for best in the league. Maybe Jokic does this another 4 or 5 years. I have my doubts, as he looks to be slowing down a lot defensively and i think Jokic led teams will continue to be early outs. Luka is still building his resume, sure. How much does Giannis have left? Embiid is shot. SGA still has time. These are/have been his main competition, no? If your arbitrary "top 2 over a 5 year span" measuring stick is infinitely more important, thats just your opinion. I don't think this last 5 years on NBA basketball has been strong from a superstar or team prospective. Nor do I think having a 5 year run in the conversation of best in the league, with 1 title in a historically weak championship run cements a guy in the top 15. I listed my top 15 when rubios asked for one, and Jokic isn't in it for me to this point, which is the basis of this entire thread. If he does what he's done the last 5 years, and wins a other title, I'd absolutely say he's top 15, which ive stated already in this thread when I made my list Rubios asked for.


Of course we can never know what the future holds. But I'd say Giannis and Jokic have 3-4 prime years left of being elite. If we extrapolate that, both of those guys will likely be All-NBA 1st team for a decade with consistent Top 3 finishes. Same with Luka as he's younger than those guys, as with SGA.

And, to be sure, for any of these guys winning another (or in Luka's case one) championship will go a long way in overall legacy discussion. I'd simply rather enjoy the ride and see what happens. Perhaps Wemby bulldozes everyone out of the way and is the next Kareem/Jordan/LeBron type.


As would I, and I think Wemby does that. I just don't think what Jokic has done in his last 5 years, with those guys as his contemporaries during that time, has solidified him in the top 15 to this point, which is what OP asked and is pushing for.


It's gonna be wild when Jokic wins MVP and another ring that you're gonna be forced to put him from outside top 15 into top 10 in 9 months...

Especially if he does it without another all-star on his team...again...
Jokic 5x MVP train
hardenASG13
Assistant Coach
Posts: 4,264
And1: 1,905
Joined: Mar 03, 2012

Re: How are people not putting Jokic in their top 15 yet? 

Post#267 » by hardenASG13 » Fri Oct 3, 2025 5:18 pm

Cubbies2120 wrote:
hardenASG13 wrote:
CharityStripe34 wrote:
Of course we can never know what the future holds. But I'd say Giannis and Jokic have 3-4 prime years left of being elite. If we extrapolate that, both of those guys will likely be All-NBA 1st team for a decade with consistent Top 3 finishes. Same with Luka as he's younger than those guys, as with SGA.

And, to be sure, for any of these guys winning another (or in Luka's case one) championship will go a long way in overall legacy discussion. I'd simply rather enjoy the ride and see what happens. Perhaps Wemby bulldozes everyone out of the way and is the next Kareem/Jordan/LeBron type.


As would I, and I think Wemby does that. I just don't think what Jokic has done in his last 5 years, with those guys as his contemporaries during that time, has solidified him in the top 15 to this point, which is what OP asked and is pushing for.


It's gonna be wild when Jokic wins MVP and another ring that you're gonna be forced to put him from outside top 15 into top 10 in 9 months...

Especially if he does it without another all-star on his team...again...



He'd need to play 4 terrible teams......again. I don't see that happening, since that almost never happens.
DimesandKnicks
Head Coach
Posts: 6,529
And1: 4,071
Joined: Jun 11, 2009

Re: How are people not putting Jokic in their top 15 yet? 

Post#268 » by DimesandKnicks » Tue Oct 7, 2025 11:39 am

dhsilv2 wrote:
DimesandKnicks wrote:
dhsilv2 wrote:
You keep posting field goal differentials to show Jokic is a bad rim protector. What's complicated about calculating that? It's like you found a post on reddit with stats against Jokic and just re-posted it here without knowing what any of it means.


I don't understand the hesitancy of you calculating something that your saying would take 5 to 10 minutes to calculate when I'm admitting idk how to calculate it.


I went down this path in the last thread and was ignored. The point is for YOU to do it so you can better understand the topic. If you don't understand what the stats you're posting mean in terms of how they impact the final score of a game, then trying to explain why any player is or isn't a good defender is impossible.


In a back and forth that started with you accusing me of not engaging in good faith and lying, your trying to send me a on a dumby missions - to substantiate your argument - in good faith I say sure, tell me how. Your response is to develop my own regression model - a task that according to you should take all of five to ten minutes - instead of providing any type of framework, so I can understand defense better?

Your posturing as authority while providing anything that demonstrates you know what your talking about, outside of an advance metric, that you don't know how to calculate, and who's own enginner admits to overrating Jokic...all with a condescending tone.
GeorgeSears
Lead Assistant
Posts: 5,538
And1: 5,946
Joined: Feb 10, 2021
 

Re: How are people not putting Jokic in their top 15 yet? 

Post#269 » by GeorgeSears » Tue Oct 7, 2025 12:40 pm

After this season, it'll be hard to place him outside the top 10.

4th MVP coming. 2nd Finals MVP. Barring injury, of course.
dhsilv2
RealGM
Posts: 50,550
And1: 27,275
Joined: Oct 04, 2015

Re: How are people not putting Jokic in their top 15 yet? 

Post#270 » by dhsilv2 » Tue Oct 7, 2025 2:39 pm

DimesandKnicks wrote:
dhsilv2 wrote:
DimesandKnicks wrote:
I don't understand the hesitancy of you calculating something that your saying would take 5 to 10 minutes to calculate when I'm admitting idk how to calculate it.


I went down this path in the last thread and was ignored. The point is for YOU to do it so you can better understand the topic. If you don't understand what the stats you're posting mean in terms of how they impact the final score of a game, then trying to explain why any player is or isn't a good defender is impossible.


In a back and forth that started with you accusing me of not engaging in good faith and lying, your trying to send me a on a dumby missions - to substantiate your argument - in good faith I say sure, tell me how. Your response is to develop my own regression model - a task that according to you should take all of five to ten minutes - instead of providing any type of framework, so I can understand defense better?

Your posturing as authority while providing anything that demonstrates you know what your talking about, outside of an advance metric, that you don't know how to calculate, and who's own enginner admits to overrating Jokic...all with a condescending tone.


I was right about what I said. I'm not going to dig up an old thread's talking points. That wasn't the point of my comments. We've already gone through this. I went over why Jokic is an average to good defender. You had nothing of value to counter and here we are. You posting stats and then claiming you have no idea what they mean in the context of actual final score results.
DimesandKnicks
Head Coach
Posts: 6,529
And1: 4,071
Joined: Jun 11, 2009

Re: How are people not putting Jokic in their top 15 yet? 

Post#271 » by DimesandKnicks » Tue Oct 7, 2025 3:15 pm

dhsilv2 wrote:
DimesandKnicks wrote:
dhsilv2 wrote:
I went down this path in the last thread and was ignored. The point is for YOU to do it so you can better understand the topic. If you don't understand what the stats you're posting mean in terms of how they impact the final score of a game, then trying to explain why any player is or isn't a good defender is impossible.


In a back and forth that started with you accusing me of not engaging in good faith and lying, your trying to send me a on a dumby missions - to substantiate your argument - in good faith I say sure, tell me how. Your response is to develop my own regression model - a task that according to you should take all of five to ten minutes - instead of providing any type of framework, so I can understand defense better?

Your posturing as authority while providing anything that demonstrates you know what your talking about, outside of an advance metric, that you don't know how to calculate, and who's own enginner admits to overrating Jokic...all with a condescending tone.


I was right about what I said. I'm not going to dig up an old thread's talking points. That wasn't the point of my comments. We've already gone through this. I went over why Jokic is an average to good defender. You had nothing of value to counter and here we are. You posting stats and then claiming you have no idea what they mean in the context of actual final score results.


You articulated what makes Jokic a “good defender”, your only quantification to substantiate your argument is again, an advanced metric you can’t calculate who’s engineer said overrates Jokic and now your claiming that I have no idea what the stats I’m posting mean in the context of the actual final score result.
dhsilv2
RealGM
Posts: 50,550
And1: 27,275
Joined: Oct 04, 2015

Re: How are people not putting Jokic in their top 15 yet? 

Post#272 » by dhsilv2 » Tue Oct 7, 2025 4:05 pm

DimesandKnicks wrote:
dhsilv2 wrote:
DimesandKnicks wrote:
In a back and forth that started with you accusing me of not engaging in good faith and lying, your trying to send me a on a dumby missions - to substantiate your argument - in good faith I say sure, tell me how. Your response is to develop my own regression model - a task that according to you should take all of five to ten minutes - instead of providing any type of framework, so I can understand defense better?

Your posturing as authority while providing anything that demonstrates you know what your talking about, outside of an advance metric, that you don't know how to calculate, and who's own enginner admits to overrating Jokic...all with a condescending tone.


I was right about what I said. I'm not going to dig up an old thread's talking points. That wasn't the point of my comments. We've already gone through this. I went over why Jokic is an average to good defender. You had nothing of value to counter and here we are. You posting stats and then claiming you have no idea what they mean in the context of actual final score results.


You articulated what makes Jokic a “good defender”, your only quantification to substantiate your argument is again, an advanced metric you can’t calculate who’s engineer said overrates Jokic and now your claiming that I have no idea what the stats I’m posting mean in the context of the actual final score result.


I used film study and numerous stats.
DimesandKnicks
Head Coach
Posts: 6,529
And1: 4,071
Joined: Jun 11, 2009

Re: How are people not putting Jokic in their top 15 yet? 

Post#273 » by DimesandKnicks » Tue Oct 7, 2025 4:47 pm

dhsilv2 wrote:
DimesandKnicks wrote:
dhsilv2 wrote:
I was right about what I said. I'm not going to dig up an old thread's talking points. That wasn't the point of my comments. We've already gone through this. I went over why Jokic is an average to good defender. You had nothing of value to counter and here we are. You posting stats and then claiming you have no idea what they mean in the context of actual final score results.


You articulated what makes Jokic a “good defender”, your only quantification to substantiate your argument is again, an advanced metric you can’t calculate who’s engineer said overrates Jokic and now your claiming that I have no idea what the stats I’m posting mean in the context of the actual final score result.


I used film study and numerous stats.


So did I. Quantify it
dhsilv2
RealGM
Posts: 50,550
And1: 27,275
Joined: Oct 04, 2015

Re: How are people not putting Jokic in their top 15 yet? 

Post#274 » by dhsilv2 » Tue Oct 7, 2025 5:34 pm

DimesandKnicks wrote:
dhsilv2 wrote:
DimesandKnicks wrote:
You articulated what makes Jokic a “good defender”, your only quantification to substantiate your argument is again, an advanced metric you can’t calculate who’s engineer said overrates Jokic and now your claiming that I have no idea what the stats I’m posting mean in the context of the actual final score result.


I used film study and numerous stats.


So did I. Quantify it


You didn't even remotely do that.

You basically repeat what I'm saying and then leave off half of the discussion.

I say Jokic is a poor rim protector. You say Jokic is a poor rim protector. And then act like you've added something.

I say Jokic's defense is overstated by RAPM. You say Jokic's defense is overstated by RAPM. And then act like you've added something.

Point out that the value of a turnover is worth more than a small drop in eFG%. Crickets. I point out that Jokic reduces team's offensive rebound rates. Crickets. I point out that teams shoot less free throws, significantly less, with Jokic on the court. Crickets.

I point out if someone takes 20 shots on you at 5% higher than someone else, that increases a team's scoring by 0.1 points. And a steal reduces a team's scoring by 1.1. Again crickets. I point out that team free throw rates drop drastically and free throws are the worse outcome of a defensive possession. With Jokic on, it's about 6.6 per 100 less over the past 4 seasons. But again...crickets.

And it all comes down to, I'm willing to put actual numbers behind these things to give context. 6 free throws per 100 reduced is about 4.5 less points for the other team. A team as a whole shooting 5% better with jokic on the court would allow them to score about 10 more points per 100 but the difference is about 2% or about 4 points per 100. Every offensive rebound Jokic prevents is roughly 1 point and it's not crazy to look at him leading the league over the past 4 years on contested defensive rebounds or look at the on off and assume that's at least another 1.5 points per 100 in raw impact in favor of the Nuggets.

This is quantifying and what I did in the last thread.

You just posted the same things I've already said with numbers that agree with me. like that Jokic isn't a good rim protector.
DimesandKnicks
Head Coach
Posts: 6,529
And1: 4,071
Joined: Jun 11, 2009

Re: How are people not putting Jokic in their top 15 yet? 

Post#275 » by DimesandKnicks » Tue Oct 7, 2025 5:38 pm

dhsilv2 wrote:
DimesandKnicks wrote:
dhsilv2 wrote:
I used film study and numerous stats.


So did I. Quantify it


You didn't even remotely do that.

You basically repeat what I'm saying and then leave off half of the discussion.

I say Jokic is a poor rim protector. You say Jokic is a poor rim protector. And then act like you've added something.

I say Jokic's defense is overstated by RAPM. You say Jokic's defense is overstated by RAPM. And then act like you've added something.

Point out that the value of a turnover is worth more than a small drop in eFG%. Crickets. I point out that Jokic reduces team's offensive rebound rates. Crickets. I point out that teams shoot less free throws, significantly less, with Jokic on the court. Crickets.

I point out if someone takes 20 shots on you at 5% higher than someone else, that increases a team's scoring by 0.1 points. And a steal reduces a team's scoring by 1.1. Again crickets. I point out that team free throw rates drop drastically and free throws are the worse outcome of a defensive possession. With Jokic on, it's about 6.6 per 100 less over the past 4 seasons. But again...crickets.

And it all comes down to, I'm willing to put actual numbers behind these things to give context. 6 free throws per 100 reduced is about 4.5 less points for the other team. A team as a whole shooting 5% better with jokic on the court would allow them to score about 10 more points per 100 but the difference is about 2% or about 4 points per 100. Every offensive rebound Jokic prevents is roughly 1 point and it's not crazy to look at him leading the league over the past 4 years on contested defensive rebounds or look at the on off and assume that's at least another 1.5 points per 100 in raw impact in favor of the Nuggets.

This is quantifying and what I did in the last thread.

You just posted the same things I've already said with numbers that agree with me. like that Jokic isn't a good rim protector.


Ok, now as you asked me to do, layer in all of those positives with all of the negatives I provided
DimesandKnicks
Head Coach
Posts: 6,529
And1: 4,071
Joined: Jun 11, 2009

Re: How are people not putting Jokic in their top 15 yet? 

Post#276 » by DimesandKnicks » Tue Oct 7, 2025 5:44 pm

dhsilv2 wrote:I point out if someone takes 20 shots on you at 5% higher than someone else, that increases a team's scoring by 0.1 points. And a steal reduces a team's scoring by 1.1.


Can you walk me through how you got 0.1 points from 20 shots at a 5 percent difference?
Because 20 × 5 percent is one extra make — that’s +2 points, not +0.1. What’s your denominator here?
Or is that another one of those questions that frustrates you?
dhsilv2
RealGM
Posts: 50,550
And1: 27,275
Joined: Oct 04, 2015

Re: How are people not putting Jokic in their top 15 yet? 

Post#277 » by dhsilv2 » Tue Oct 7, 2025 5:56 pm

DimesandKnicks wrote:
dhsilv2 wrote:I point out if someone takes 20 shots on you at 5% higher than someone else, that increases a team's scoring by 0.1 points. And a steal reduces a team's scoring by 1.1.


Can you walk me through how you got 0.1 points from 20 shots at a 5 percent difference?
Because 20 × 5 percent is one extra make — that’s +2 points, not +0.1. What’s your denominator here?
Or is that another one of those questions that frustrates you?


Hey, I got you to quantify!!!!!!!!!!!!

Yes it's 2 points!
DimesandKnicks
Head Coach
Posts: 6,529
And1: 4,071
Joined: Jun 11, 2009

Re: How are people not putting Jokic in their top 15 yet? 

Post#278 » by DimesandKnicks » Tue Oct 7, 2025 6:14 pm

dhsilv2 wrote:
DimesandKnicks wrote:
dhsilv2 wrote:I point out if someone takes 20 shots on you at 5% higher than someone else, that increases a team's scoring by 0.1 points. And a steal reduces a team's scoring by 1.1.


Can you walk me through how you got 0.1 points from 20 shots at a 5 percent difference?
Because 20 × 5 percent is one extra make — that’s +2 points, not +0.1. What’s your denominator here?
Or is that another one of those questions that frustrates you?


So let’s ignore for a second, that u actually failed to mention any of this in the last thread, at least not in post I was quoted in, a few questions and comments:

You keep saying you’ve “quantified” Jokic’s defense, but what you’re actually doing is stringing together loosely related numbers under the banner of quantification.

Let’s be specific - 20 shots at 5% higher efficiency equals one extra make, not +0.1 points. So your base arithmetic already doesn’t check out.

Beyond that, every figure you’ve mentioned - the 1.1 per steal, 4.5 points per 100 from free throws, 1.5 from rebounding - are arbitrary, unweighted, and uncited. You’ve never defined a framework for how those interact or offset the defensive liabilities I listed.

So I’ll ask plainly: if you believe your method has merit, layer in the positives you listed with the negatives I provided above. Show your full equation. If it’s as simple as you claim, that should take you less than five minutes.

Hey, I got you to quantify!!!!!!!!!!!!

Yes it's 2 points!


So let’s ignore for a second, that u actually failed to mention any of this in the last thread, at least not in post I was quoted in, a few questions and comments:

You keep saying you’ve “quantified” Jokic’s defense, but what you’re actually doing is stringing together loosely related numbers under the banner of quantification.

Let’s be specific - 20 shots at 5% higher efficiency equals one extra make, not +0.1 points. So your base arithmetic already doesn’t check out.

Beyond that, every figure you’ve mentioned - the 1.1 per steal, 4.5 points per 100 from free throws, 1.5 from rebounding - are arbitrary, unweighted, and uncited. You’ve never defined a framework for how those interact or offset the defensive liabilities I listed.

So I’ll ask plainly: if you believe your method has merit, layer in the positives you listed with the negatives I provided above. Show your full equation. If it’s as simple as you claim, that should take you less than five minutes.
dhsilv2
RealGM
Posts: 50,550
And1: 27,275
Joined: Oct 04, 2015

Re: How are people not putting Jokic in their top 15 yet? 

Post#279 » by dhsilv2 » Tue Oct 7, 2025 6:29 pm

DimesandKnicks wrote:
dhsilv2 wrote:
DimesandKnicks wrote:
Can you walk me through how you got 0.1 points from 20 shots at a 5 percent difference?
Because 20 × 5 percent is one extra make — that’s +2 points, not +0.1. What’s your denominator here?
Or is that another one of those questions that frustrates you?


So let’s ignore for a second, that u actually failed to mention any of this in the last thread, at least not in post I was quoted in, a few questions and comments:

You keep saying you’ve “quantified” Jokic’s defense, but what you’re actually doing is stringing together loosely related numbers under the banner of quantification.

Let’s be specific - 20 shots at 5% higher efficiency equals one extra make, not +0.1 points. So your base arithmetic already doesn’t check out.

Beyond that, every figure you’ve mentioned - the 1.1 per steal, 4.5 points per 100 from free throws, 1.5 from rebounding - are arbitrary, unweighted, and uncited. You’ve never defined a framework for how those interact or offset the defensive liabilities I listed.

So I’ll ask plainly: if you believe your method has merit, layer in the positives you listed with the negatives I provided above. Show your full equation. If it’s as simple as you claim, that should take you less than five minutes.

Hey, I got you to quantify!!!!!!!!!!!!

Yes it's 2 points!


So let’s ignore for a second, that u actually failed to mention any of this in the last thread, at least not in post I was quoted in, a few questions and comments:

You keep saying you’ve “quantified” Jokic’s defense, but what you’re actually doing is stringing together loosely related numbers under the banner of quantification.

Let’s be specific - 20 shots at 5% higher efficiency equals one extra make, not +0.1 points. So your base arithmetic already doesn’t check out.

Beyond that, every figure you’ve mentioned - the 1.1 per steal, 4.5 points per 100 from free throws, 1.5 from rebounding - are arbitrary, unweighted, and uncited. You’ve never defined a framework for how those interact or offset the defensive liabilities I listed.

So I’ll ask plainly: if you believe your method has merit, layer in the positives you listed with the negatives I provided above. Show your full equation. If it’s as simple as you claim, that should take you less than five minutes.


I've never once claimed one can layer all this into a perfect metric. I've wanted you to put numbers behind the never ending mountain of stats you're posting because without that, it's as impossible discussion. I multiple times did this with you make no response related to those stats. I'm not asking you to be flaws. As you noted, I made a mistake in my math just there and you corrected me. No big deal.

The point I've tried to get to is to at least get you to see that you can offset rim protection with defensive rebounds, force turnovers, and reducing the other team's free throw rates. If you can at least see that and understand it. While showing a willingness to engage in a ball park quantification to what the rim shots mean. Then one can have an actual conversation.

Instead you just keep saying, look at the field goal percentages. And i keep loosely saying, cool...teams shoot better on Denver when Jokic is on the court and still score about 5 points per 100 less. And then you just repeat yourself.
RaptorsBrian
Ballboy
Posts: 14
And1: 15
Joined: Feb 03, 2019
       

Re: How are people not putting Jokic in their top 15 yet? 

Post#280 » by RaptorsBrian » Tue Oct 7, 2025 11:41 pm

OK, it's time for me to weigh in. I'm 72 years old (young?) and have been watching the NBA since the days of Russell vs. Wilt. I'm also a Day One Raptors season seat holder. In short, I've seen all the stars (MJ, Kobe, Shaq, King James, Steve Nash, Steph Curry), many in person multiple times.

Nikola Jokic is INDISPUTABLY a Top 15 player, and with three more years at his current pace, will break into my personal Top 10.

I suppose I can't get too upset about recency bias, but you guys really need to consider Jerry West and Oscar Robertson.

Return to The General Board