Jadoogar wrote:HotelVitale wrote:Jadoogar wrote:
I'm not sure exactly what the trade would be since i don't know which team will be looking to blow it up. But i can see a team flaming out in the playoffs and pulling a Utah style rebuild. Offering a Gobert level offer (picks based mostly) for an actual star. But what if the Clippers flame out and want to recover some of the picks they gave up?
Gotcha, yeah it’s pretty situational. Not something you can plan around but good idea to stay ready for it.
I’d also add that the Jazz got back a bunch of young players they were interested in—Lauri, Walker Kessler, Agbaji, etc—in addition to the picks. Mavs don’t have that, so gonna have to get lucky on both some teams torpedoing and the competition for their stars being kinda weak.
Definitely, Mavs best young players are Jaden Hardy and Josh Green, not exactly world beaters. But Lauri himself wasn't considered such a hot commodity when that trade happened (and he was part of the Mitchell trade).
Gobert went for Kessler (#22 draft pick), Malik Beasley, Beverley, Bolmaro (idk who this is), Vanderbilt and4 picks, 1 swap. I think the Mavs have similar level of vets as Beasely/Vanderbilt and would just need to pony up the picks. Now they just need to determine who on the market is worth giving up that package for.
Gobert has far less value than KAT, though. Hard to base any trade on that model since it was such a strange overpay for an aging, limited, massively expensive guy. Don’t think it maps on to any DAL trade well. But I do think DAL could have a solid offer with like 3 picks, swap or two, and some mix of youth and medium-sized contracts. (Teams might gamble on the Luka situation falling apart in another 3-4 years.)
Also while I know Lauri didn’t have huge value at trade time, the Jazz liked him and he and other young guys were absolutely key part of the value. The young guys were in my read a solid part of why they felt okay shifting from NYK to CLE, despite the future 1sts being shaky.