tamaraw08 wrote:Jcool0 wrote:kiwinbafan05 wrote:Mark Walter is also the majority owner of the Dodgers who are brilliantly run and not afraid to spend.
MLB has no salary cap... NBA does... Ask the Suns how big spending goes...
But managing a team is so much more than signing players though.
Dodgers was the ONLY baseball team that use 2 Airplanes for road trips, let that sink in.
It's no longer a coincidence that they found guys like Edman, Teo etc because of advanced scouting.
What is stopping Walter from making a godfather offer to Sam Presti? or even Masai or Presti's top assistant at least?
I see them also going after OKC's top scouts or Miami's most competent trainers etc.
So they spend even more than the $505 million in direct payroll costs they had last year.
No doubt they spend on the farm system, scouting, including international scouting, etc.
I think a large part of it is that MLB has the smallest national TV contract, so teams don't get the kind of TV money that each NFL and NBA teams receive.
In contrast, baseball teams negotiate their own local TV deals and that is one of the key drivers of imbalance in the sport, which is why the Dodgers can outspend other teams probably by many times, when you consider all these other costs than the official payroll numbers.
Lakers are in a large market, no doubt have a lucrative local TV deal. But fundamentally, the salary cap constrains them from outperforming other teams.
For instance, lets say they have the greatest scouting and they find great role players or even say a max-level player, not necessarily MVP level like Luka but maybe All Star level, which is what Reaves has become.
So the Lakers have benefitted from AR's level of play but now he's going to become very expensive to sign. In the MLB, it wouldn't matter, they could sign him to whatever it takes. In the NBA, sure they could give him a max contract but it may not be the best roster construction, to have a player who's been targeted on defense, take up so much of the cap.