CoreyGallagher wrote:56% free throw shooting is still 1.12 ppp. Same efficiency as 56% from 2p, and 34% from 3p.
Why drawing fouls is such an invaluable skill.
You're usually suppose to get 2 "free" points from FTs though.
Moderators: Clav, Domejandro, ken6199, bisme37, Dirk, KingDavid, cupcakesnake, bwgood77, zimpy27, infinite11285
CoreyGallagher wrote:56% free throw shooting is still 1.12 ppp. Same efficiency as 56% from 2p, and 34% from 3p.
Why drawing fouls is such an invaluable skill.
Larry Legend 33 wrote:Stribor wrote:LB is the only one that can be in discussion about the goat besides MJ, yet I am frightened of the idea that he comes to Philly. We are playing team first basketball with two young stars and LB has a tendency to do things for himself. I do not want a guy who wil not shoot late secs 3pt, because he cares to much about his stats close to Philly. Ben, Embiid, Fultz, Dario, JJ, Roco all seem more then happy to sacrifice their numbers for team wins and that is the chemistry I do not want destroyed by "me first" superstar...
With everything you have going into the future, I'd be wary of GM Lebron coming in and forcing shortsighted moves that better fit his timeline. I actually think given the skillsets on your roster, you'd be better off with someone like Kawhi (provided his injury checks out), who will also be slightly cheaper.
Feel_the_Heat15 wrote:CoreyGallagher wrote:56% free throw shooting is still 1.12 ppp. Same efficiency as 56% from 2p, and 34% from 3p.
Why drawing fouls is such an invaluable skill.
You're usually suppose to get 2 "free" points from FTs though.
CoreyGallagher wrote:I hope the Cavs don't take Embiid because then we'll take Embiid.
Tabasco wrote:It's getting hard to take sixers fans seriously
Tabasco wrote:It's getting hard to take sixers fans seriously when they're so blinded by their hero worship of Simmons that they try to argue that 56% free throw shooting is in any way good.
It's ok, you can admit that it sucks. It doesn't mean Simmons sucks. I don't think anyone would say that Shaq sucked and he couldnt shoot free throws either. It's honestly embarrassing that anyone would even try to argue this point.
CoreyGallagher wrote:I hope the Cavs don't take Embiid because then we'll take Embiid.
Stanford wrote:Tabasco wrote:It's getting hard to take sixers fans seriously
Good. We don’t give a ****, believe me.
Tabasco wrote:That would explain why 90% of the posts in here are sixers fans trying desperately to convince everyone else that Simmons is the ROY. Because you guys don't care.
Tabasco wrote:Stanford wrote:Tabasco wrote:It's getting hard to take sixers fans seriously
Good. We don’t give a ****, believe me.
Clearly. That would explain why 90% of the posts in here are sixers fans trying desperately to convince everyone else that Simmons is the ROY. Because you guys don't care.
But keep trying to promote the pros of 56% free throw shooting.
Tabasco wrote:Stanford wrote:Tabasco wrote:It's getting hard to take sixers fans seriously
Good. We don’t give a ****, believe me.
Clearly. That would explain why 90% of the posts in here are sixers fans trying desperately to convince everyone else that Simmons is the ROY. Because you guys don't care.
But keep trying to promote the pros of 56% free throw shooting.
Don't mean to be insulting but it should be much more embarrassing to not get a simple pt that's been explained several times. No one said that Simmons is good at FT shooting--he's obviously not--but FTs are a high efficiency way of scoring, so even shooting a weak 56% on them is a good option for an offensive possession. Hence the insult that he's killing your offense by drawing fouls and shooting 56% from the line doesn't land; that's almost the exact same efficiency as Paul George, Brad Beal, Derozan, Oladipo, etc so, unless you think those guys kill their teams' offenses every time they shoot, you're making a foolish point.Tabasco wrote:It's getting hard to take sixers fans seriously when they're so blinded by their hero worship of Simmons that they try to argue that 56% free throw shooting is in any way good. It's ok, you can admit that it sucks. It doesn't mean Simmons sucks. I don't think anyone would say that Shaq sucked and he couldnt shoot free throws either. It's honestly embarrassing that anyone would even try to argue this point.
Devin Booker wrote:Bro.
PockyCandy wrote:Forgive me for interrupting this fascinating discussion about Ben Simmons and Donovan Mitchell, but Kobi "Bryant" Simmons just had an efficient 20 points and 7 assists as the Grizzlies won against the Pistons. He also clearly established himself as the superior Simmons in the ROY race.
In other news, Malik Monk continued his string of good games as everyone wonders why the Hornets didn't give him minutes earlier in the season. Jayson Tatum went for 19 points, John Collins had his usual double-digit scoring performance, and Semi Ojeleye hit THREE 3pointers in a narrow loss to the Hawks. Dennis Smith and Max Kleber had a double doubles for the Mavs. Josh Hart has 15 points and a ****ing great block on Donovan Mitchell where he sent Michell's **** back in his face. Luke Kennard has an efficient 18 in a losing effort for the Pistons. Dillon Brooks had a near triple-double (22-8-8) in a game where he was overshadowed by the Kobi.
I just wanted to remind people that there are, in fact, more than 2 rookies in this year's draft class.
WINNER!zimpy27 wrote:They should just give Ben the ROY trophy from last year and Mitchell the ROY trophy from this year.