litex wrote:D.Brasco wrote:litex wrote:NFL, unless you consider height a component of athleticism, which most people don't. The most athletic guy in the NBA over the last decade was probably Nate Robinson, and there are a lot of NFL players who fit his athletic profile.
The only way the NBA has better athletes is if you consider height a factor. Say you have a 6 ft guy, and a 6'6" guy, and they run the same 40 speed, bench the same amount, have the same vertical, etc. In all ways they are athletically identical, except one is half a foot taller. Is the taller guy a better athlete, purely because he's taller? if you say no, then the NFL has better athletes, if you say yes than the NBA likely does. Personally I say height is not a part of athleticism.
Height does play a part in athleticism let's be real. The average man in america is about 5'9" the average height of athletes in all of the 4 major sports are 6'+. There is a correlation. Longer arms and limbs play a big factor in giving you an athletic edge.
Usain Bolt is a great example of this factor, with his long ass strides to make up for his slow start speed.
Usain Bolt is a great athlete because he's fast, not because he's tall. if he was the same speed but 5'10", he'd be just as good an athlete.
What? you really think if usain bolt was 5'10" he'd be winning all those gold medals? The fact he's 6'5" and takes huge strides is one of the main factors he's been so dominant over his competition and set all these world records. This is a known fact that's often discussed about him.
Measuring 6’5″, Bolt’s height means that he can complete a 100 metre sprint in 41 strides, instead of a more usual 44 for elite sprinters.
http://thenextweb.com/lifehacks/2011/07 ... ble-speed/
Also how many of the top athletes in any of the major 4 sports are 5'10"? It's ridiculous to discount height from athletic ability. Even the just 6' athletes in both NFL and the NBA usually have ridiculously long wingspans compared to the average population at their height.















