BenoUdrihFTL wrote:Can't believe how many people are taking Pharmcat's bait lol
Guy has a bigass "hoodwinked" sig banner ffs
That was related to phil jackson joke of a run as knicks pobo
Moderators: Clav, Domejandro, ken6199, bisme37, Dirk, KingDavid, cupcakesnake, bwgood77, zimpy27, infinite11285
BenoUdrihFTL wrote:Can't believe how many people are taking Pharmcat's bait lol
Guy has a bigass "hoodwinked" sig banner ffs
Trey24 wrote:I'm shocked that House was outed for doing this as the guy that was guarding LeBron this series. Almost like he was switched on hard-core so that the Rockets would be down a man.
MaxwellSmart wrote:I hate to say this, but Go Lakers....
Pharmcat wrote:NyKnicks1714 wrote:Pharmcat wrote:
They can't hang out with their buddies , they are confined and can't leave , their food choices are limited , it's not the most ideal place
Why was this not an issue for the hundreds of other players and coaches?
As I have said previously others are most likely doing it too it's just that they have not been caught (or ratted out)
LAKESHOW wrote:do we have any pics? Or is it just more rumors of big foot sightings
ClipsFanSince98 wrote:Also if she "wasn't authorized to be on the campus" it can't possibly be a COVID tester right? It was likely an outside female? So stupid. He jeopardized his entire team, and the league because he couldn't keep his dick in his pants for a little longer.
stoo wrote:The problem is society teaches us to commit to one partner for sex when humans are obviously polygamists
Pharmcat wrote:NyKnicks1714 wrote:Pharmcat wrote:
As I have said previously others are most likely doing it too it's just that they have not been caught (or ratted out)
Lol, I would talk about how you don't have a shred of evidence to support that but that's kind of your shtick.
I have no direct evidence , that's why I said "most likely"
SF_Warriors wrote:LAKESHOW wrote:do we have any pics? Or is it just more rumors of big foot sightings
Yea because the nba just kicks people out of the bubble with no evidence right?
Harry Garris wrote:homecourtloss wrote:Harry Garris wrote:
Yeah that definitely isnt true bud. Not someone they'd actually want to sleep with.
Have you seen women’s Tinder accounts? A slightly above average woman is like a celebrity and can choose between literally hundreds of men and I’m not exaggerating.
I dont agree with you that the majority of women would want to sleep around with some random guy who only wants them for sex and then is going to leave. This website is like 99% dudes though and probably all assume women are wired the exact same way we are. But they're not.
G35 wrote:Harry Garris wrote:homecourtloss wrote:
Have you seen women’s Tinder accounts? A slightly above average woman is like a celebrity and can choose between literally hundreds of men and I’m not exaggerating.
I dont agree with you that the majority of women would want to sleep around with some random guy who only wants them for sex and then is going to leave. This website is like 99% dudes though and probably all assume women are wired the exact same way we are. But they're not.
Exactly...women are not wired the way men are...they are wired differently.
Women and men are not judged on the same standards. Men are asked to fight fairly...to have honor even under the most extreme circumstances...men are asked to protect the weaker ones in society.
We do not ask women to do those same things. Honor was a vital part of a person's reputation. You are judged by the highest standards.
Do you think that men and women are the same in today's society? There is no such as thing as shame anymore, you can debate the merits of whether that is a positive or negative (I think it has hurt society) but it has changed the way men and women act.
When you see Lizzo at a Lakers game with her ass cheeks out...when the #1 song is WAP...when it is fine to be a side piece to high value men...I think you are being quite naive in how you think young women think and act nowadays......
stoo wrote:leolozon wrote:stoo wrote:The problem is society teaches us to commit to one partner for sex when humans are obviously polygamists
Nope, the problem is you not understanding that the problem with cheating isn’t sex with someone else. It’s lying and not caring about what the other person in the relationship wants. Cheating is being selfish, something that is pretty bad in any relationship.
Having sex with someone else isn’t a problem if both are opened about it and both think that polygamism is the way to go.
But it should be obvious TO ANYONE in a long term relationship, raising children together, why stability and trust is important and why most would decide that it’s better to not start having sex with someone else instead of using that time to take care of your partner and children.
Especially, from a female perspective... someone who has to be pregnant for 9 months and historically had to mostly stay at home with the kids and TRUST that the man is committed 100%.
Your analysis is incredibly superficial.
well, i guess i just have to repeat that the problem is society teaching us to commit to one partner for sex when humans are obviously polygamists. That is the reason why cheating exists.
Trusting that the man or woman is committed 100% is stupid, because polygamy is in our nature. Reason why you do that (trust) is because society teaches you that, and then u and up with more problems than u need to have.
Not accepting human nature and putting your wishes before that is more selfish than ****.
You cannot understand that probably, because you are conditioned since you can remember to think the way you do
so when a person is **** with someone who is not their partner, they have to lie because their partner is conditioned the same way.
G35 wrote:Harry Garris wrote:homecourtloss wrote:
Have you seen women’s Tinder accounts? A slightly above average woman is like a celebrity and can choose between literally hundreds of men and I’m not exaggerating.
I dont agree with you that the majority of women would want to sleep around with some random guy who only wants them for sex and then is going to leave. This website is like 99% dudes though and probably all assume women are wired the exact same way we are. But they're not.
Exactly...women are not wired the way men are...they are wired differently.
Women and men are not judged on the same standards. Men are asked to fight fairly...to have honor even under the most extreme circumstances...men are asked to protect the weaker ones in society.
We do not ask women to do those same things. Honor was a vital part of a person's reputation. You are judged by the highest standards.
Do you think that men and women are the same in today's society? There is no such as thing as shame anymore, you can debate the merits of whether that is a positive or negative (I think it has hurt society) but it has changed the way men and women act.
When you see Lizzo at a Lakers game with her ass cheeks out...when the #1 song is WAP...when it is fine to be a side piece to high value men...I think you are being quite naive in how you think young women think and act nowadays......
SalmonsSuperfan wrote:G35 wrote:Harry Garris wrote:
I dont agree with you that the majority of women would want to sleep around with some random guy who only wants them for sex and then is going to leave. This website is like 99% dudes though and probably all assume women are wired the exact same way we are. But they're not.
Exactly...women are not wired the way men are...they are wired differently.
Women and men are not judged on the same standards. Men are asked to fight fairly...to have honor even under the most extreme circumstances...men are asked to protect the weaker ones in society.
We do not ask women to do those same things. Honor was a vital part of a person's reputation. You are judged by the highest standards.
Do you think that men and women are the same in today's society? There is no such as thing as shame anymore, you can debate the merits of whether that is a positive or negative (I think it has hurt society) but it has changed the way men and women act.
When you see Lizzo at a Lakers game with her ass cheeks out...when the #1 song is WAP...when it is fine to be a side piece to high value men...I think you are being quite naive in how you think young women think and act nowadays......
Antinomy wrote:og15 wrote:Antinomy wrote:
There is no stability in marriage. With a baby mama, you stand to lose money in child support. In marriage, you stand to lose money in child support, alimony, future earnings, your house, etc. Marriage at its core is relationship insurance for partner who makes less.
You are making definite general statements about something that has a lot of diversity in how it plays out. Yes, there's lots of stability in marriages and in marriage, lol, but that doesn't mean there's 100% stability. Anecdotal examples of people who have cheated or have been cheated on doesn't mean that it is what happens to everyone just like good and lasting marriages don't mean that is everyone's experience.
Having baby mama's when you want to have more than one child can mean having children with multiple women. You'd might be surprised that some people don't desire that. Children having two parents in their lives and in the home is on average the best situation for their social, emotional and financial development, and just like marriage, that's not a 100% thing, but in general it is true, so some people desire to have that situation in the lives of their children.
If one is worried about the money issue, have a prenup in place.
We can agree to disagree but the statistics on marriage are not in your favor.
I’m not denying the positive effect of having a 2 parent household for a child. I’m denying the idea that just because you’re married to someone means that they are 100% committed to you forever, they would never lie to you & would never betray you. There is no actual stability because you can never know or control what your partner is doing or thinking. Nothing you do could actually stop your partner from stepping out on you.
My parents have been married for 30+ years, I’ve seen it all. I also know & have known plenty of married couples. I don’t know a single one where they aren’t miserable or atleast one partner isn’t cheating. That’s if they aren’t already divorced. Most just stay for the kids or sunk costs. Legally binding yourself to another person will never make sense to me. It makes even LESS sense when you are worth millions & your partner doesn’t work.
If you impregnate a woman, the worst that can happen to you is you pay child support. At least you have the option of walking away & not having to deal with her unless it involves the child, while somewhat mitigating the damage to your finances.
If you’re married to a woman, the worst that can happen is paternity fraud, child support, spousal support, alimony, losing half (or more) of your stuff, never seeing your kids, etc. You could literally end up paying your ex-wife to live in your house with her new boyfriend.
Marriage sounds like a great idea but the laws surrounding it are archaic. Btw, prenups are thrown out all the time. Especially if you have kids or they can claim they were “under duress“ when signing.
SF_Warriors wrote:LAKESHOW wrote:do we have any pics? Or is it just more rumors of big foot sightings
Yea because the nba just kicks people out of the bubble with no evidence right?
Slava wrote:scrabbarista wrote:According to The Launch Pad Podcast posted 13 hours ago (I don't have more recent news - I haven't read any of the thread):
1. The only evidence the league had, by their own admission, was that House's door opened at the same time the woman entered the hotel. That's it. The NBA said it may have happened.
2. A Twitter personality ("@cuffslegend," I think) who has consistently broken stories related to LeBron and is believed to have a personal relationship with LeBron posted a tweet saying something like, "lol, Daniel [sic] House should know better than that" around the same time that the Rockets' coaches were informed by the league that House would be unavailable for Game 3 - several hours before any journalist broke the story. The implication is that LeBron knew before the Rockets' coaches did.
3. The NBA said that several times throughout the bubble, people have called the "snitch hotline" (which is how the NBA learned of the alleged incident) on the Rockets, but the NBA repeatedly believed the allegations to be unfounded. This was the first time the NBA took action on an allegation, in spite of the tenuous, circumstantial evidence.
4. The NBA has done an atrocious job of releasing information about the story, especially in light of the fact that House has a wife and children who may be in school.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
None of this is from me. It's just what I'm hearing on this podcast. I don't know how or if the story has changed since the pod was posted, but it certainly seems like a bad look all around for the league.
Here's the link if anyone wants to listen: https://player.fm/series/the-launch-pad-podcast-a-houston-rockets-basketball-podcast/lack-of-house-means-lack-of-wins-rockets-game-4-vs-lakers-and-series-discussion
I think you need to listen to better podcast sources man.
NBA would have covered its ass for legal liability to high heavens before they hand out any discipline in such a case. If any of the punishment is based on circumstantial evidence alone, House, being a married man and a father of three, with an NBA career and earnings that will be effected by such an incident would have both personal and professional causes to sue the league.