Infinite Llamas wrote:Would we really get the “rules are rules” if this was Tomi Lahren in captivity opposed to an anthem-protesting womens basketball star? Or would the same voices that condemned Lebron for “defending” Chinese violations stay consistent and realize that using a human being as a political pawn is one helluva human rights violation?
Of course it would be different.
People will rage against socialism and handouts but the minute you call it a "freedom package" the right will eat it up and take free money and make an excuse about why it's okay to suddenly do it.
The left will freak out about Trump being unhinged and potentially starting world wars but were ready to defend no-fly zones in Ukraine if enacted by Biden and are fine with Pelosi's "stunt" if it starts some crazy **** with China.
Again, it's why it's frustrating to debate in general because people have no morals, just allegiances. When politics become more like sports people will argue against things they'd be for if the shoe was on the other foot.
Griner doesn't deserve 9 years period. It's not a hard thing to accept. Debate what is a worthy "trade", sure. Debate what an idiot she is for it, fine. But anything like "she isn't patriotic so **** her" or "that's nothing because other countries will KILL you" or "it's deserved because it's Russia's laws" are just such disingenuous posts to start off with.
edit: If a Russian person went to prison here for 9 years for something we'd usually give 15 days to a month for, I'd be making the same argument.