WC Playoffs: (3) Suns vs. (6) Blazers

stevieloose1 · Post #321 » by **stevieloose1** » Mon Apr 19, 2010 3:29 am

does barbosa remind anybody else of a teenage mutant ninja turtle

maxwellcu · Post #322 » by **maxwellcu** » Mon Apr 19, 2010 3:29 am

The talent difference here is absolutely huge. I can't believe this game is even competitive.

Palmeirense · Post #323 » by **Palmeirense** » Mon Apr 19, 2010 3:31 am

maxwellcu wrote:The talent difference here is absolutely huge. I can't believe this game is even competitive.

Actually it isn't.

The Shiv · Post #324 » by **The Shiv** » Mon Apr 19, 2010 3:32 am

maxwellcu wrote:The talent difference here is absolutely huge. I can't believe this game is even competitive.

talent, pshh people were picking the suns to not even make the playoffs before the season.

deadfeather · Post #325 » by **deadfeather** » Mon Apr 19, 2010 3:34 am

Palmeirense wrote:
maxwellcu wrote:The talent difference here is absolutely huge. I can't believe this game is even competitive.

Actually it isn't.

Pretty much. Phoenix just blowing out Portland here in the first half.

SOUP · Post #326 » by **SOUP** » Mon Apr 19, 2010 3:36 am

Stoudemire working for that 100 mil check.

maxwellcu · Post #327 » by **maxwellcu** » Mon Apr 19, 2010 3:36 am

How is the talent difference not huge? Nash, Amare and roleplayers vs. a team full of roleplayers. I call that a huge difference.

Hangtime84 · Post #328 » by **Hangtime84** » Mon Apr 19, 2010 3:37 am

deadfeather wrote:
Palmeirense wrote:
maxwellcu wrote:The talent difference here is absolutely huge. I can't believe this game is even competitive.

Actually it isn't.

Pretty much. Phoenix just blowing out Portland here in the first half.

35 to 37 blow out by the suns

Durantula35 · Post #329 » by **Durantula35** » Mon Apr 19, 2010 3:39 am

Wow phx might have under 50 pts at the half.

MarJJMar · Post #330 » by **MarJJMar** » Mon Apr 19, 2010 3:42 am

Durantula35 wrote:Wow phx might have under 50 pts at the half.

Doesn't matter as long as Portland has even less.

Just have to knock down the open shots we are getting which we are not so far. Grant Hill alone missed like 4 open jumpers.

deadfeather · Post #331 » by **deadfeather** » Mon Apr 19, 2010 3:42 am

maxwellcu wrote:How is the talent difference not huge? Nash, Amare and roleplayers vs. a team full of roleplayers. I call that a huge difference.

You are saying a team like Portland is a group of role players? Just because Roy is out doesnt mean Portland has nothing left. Educate yourself on what Portland has accomplished with their rash of injuries.

Bullieve · Post #332 » by **Bullieve** » Mon Apr 19, 2010 3:43 am

feafeaf

GnarlesOakley · Post #333 » by **GnarlesOakley** » Mon Apr 19, 2010 3:44 am

Camby is manhandling "Max Contract" Stoudemire

Sedale Threatt · Post #334 » by **Sedale Threatt** » Mon Apr 19, 2010 3:44 am

Role players are looking pretty good so far.

Hangtime84 · Post #335 » by **Hangtime84** » Mon Apr 19, 2010 3:45 am

MarJJMar wrote:
Durantula35 wrote:Wow phx might have under 50 pts at the half.

Doesn't matter as long as Portland has even less.

Just have to knock down the open shots we are getting which we are not so far. Grant Hill alone missed like 4 open jumpers.

yup portland does have less

NoJoyce · Post #336 » by **NoJoyce** » Mon Apr 19, 2010 3:45 am

Our Pace, come on gimme the lead at half time.

Hangtime84 · Post #337 » by **Hangtime84** » Mon Apr 19, 2010 3:45 am

Sedale Threatt wrote:Role players are looking pretty good so far.

because they know their role

Sedale Threatt · Post #338 » by **Sedale Threatt** » Mon Apr 19, 2010 3:47 am

Simple game, isn't it?

SOUP · Post #339 » by **SOUP** » Mon Apr 19, 2010 3:47 am

LMAO @ at the dude booing as the Blazers go to the locker room.

Yangsing · Post #340 » by **Yangsing** » Mon Apr 19, 2010 3:48 am

Nice half for the "role players"

Who will win?