Schiltzenberger wrote:jirrit wrote:Huh are the Nets fans taking victory lapses? Why?
![]()
Not at all, we concentrate on all the Nets victories.
7th in the east on 15-13, that's exactly where I predicted them.
Moderators: Clav, bwgood77, bisme37, zimpy27, KingDavid, cupcakesnake, Dirk, Domejandro, ken6199, infinite11285
Schiltzenberger wrote:jirrit wrote:Huh are the Nets fans taking victory lapses? Why?
![]()
Not at all, we concentrate on all the Nets victories.

BKSZN wrote:
And yet here we are.
Our(Nets) first 28 games is better this year than last year, without KD, Kyrie or Caris
And your 76ers healthy are sitting only one spot above us.not to mention the 20 point beating y’all took from us
jirrit wrote:Schiltzenberger wrote:jirrit wrote:Huh are the Nets fans taking victory lapses? Why?
![]()
Not at all, we concentrate on all the Nets victories.
7th in the east on 15-13, that's exactly where I predicted them.

Hello Brooklyn wrote:jirrit wrote:Schiltzenberger wrote:![]()
Not at all, we concentrate on all the Nets victories.
7th in the east on 15-13, that's exactly where I predicted them.
I'm sure you also predicted our two best players would be injured.
As if your prediction means anythings.
Do Celtics fans have to come and invade every Nets related thread?
jirrit wrote:Schiltzenberger wrote:jirrit wrote:Huh are the Nets fans taking victory lapses? Why?
![]()
Not at all, we concentrate on all the Nets victories.
7th in the east on 15-13, that's exactly where I predicted them.
SmartWentCrazy wrote:Hello Brooklyn wrote:jirrit wrote:
7th in the east on 15-13, that's exactly where I predicted them.
I'm sure you also predicted our two best players would be injured.
As if your prediction means anythings.
Do Celtics fans have to come and invade every Nets related thread?
Surely you're not calling LeVert a better player than Dinwiddie.
SmartWentCrazy wrote:BKSZN wrote:
And yet here we are.
Our(Nets) first 28 games is better this year than last year, without KD, Kyrie or Caris
And your 76ers healthy are sitting only one spot above us.not to mention the 20 point beating y’all took from us
Weird chirp— youre closer to missing the playoffs than you are to the Sixers.

Hello Brooklyn wrote:jirrit wrote:Schiltzenberger wrote:![]()
Not at all, we concentrate on all the Nets victories.
7th in the east on 15-13, that's exactly where I predicted them.
I'm sure you also predicted our two best players would be injured.
As if your prediction means anythings.
Do Celtics fans have to come and invade every Nets related thread?

BKSZN wrote:SmartWentCrazy wrote:BKSZN wrote:
And yet here we are.
Our(Nets) first 28 games is better this year than last year, without KD, Kyrie or Caris
And your 76ers healthy are sitting only one spot above us.not to mention the 20 point beating y’all took from us
Weird chirp— youre closer to missing the playoffs than you are to the Sixers.
Why your Media want to trade for dinwiddie?
Hello Brooklyn wrote:SmartWentCrazy wrote:Hello Brooklyn wrote:
I'm sure you also predicted our two best players would be injured.
As if your prediction means anythings.
Do Celtics fans have to come and invade every Nets related thread?
Surely you're not calling LeVert a better player than Dinwiddie.
I think he is.
The gap is closing though.

halfHAVOC wrote:Hello Brooklyn wrote:SmartWentCrazy wrote:
Surely you're not calling LeVert a better player than Dinwiddie.
I think he is.
The gap is closing though.
Lol what?? you can't be serious. Dinwiddie is significantly better than LeVert. Better on both ends of the floor tbh.
SmartWentCrazy wrote:halfHAVOC wrote:Hello Brooklyn wrote:
I think he is.
The gap is closing though.
Lol what?? you can't be serious. Dinwiddie is significantly better than LeVert. Better on both ends of the floor tbh.
Yah, I personally think that Dinwiddie is clearly better than LeVert.
jirrit wrote:Hello Brooklyn wrote:jirrit wrote:
7th in the east on 15-13, that's exactly where I predicted them.
I'm sure you also predicted our two best players would be injured.
As if your prediction means anythings.
Do Celtics fans have to come and invade every Nets related thread?
Wow sensitive much.
I think both fan bases indeed love to bash the other one. I dont see a problem with that. This is a forum and every fan can post here. I was just wondering why you’d get this thread up as a Nets fan since you’re just a bit above average in the ranks at the moment. Barring injuries indeed but we also missed Hayward, Smart, Williams for significant amounts of time.
Dont let it become irrational man. As if there arent many many Nets fans lurking our forums or giving and1s to negative Saltics posts. It is what it is man.
halfHAVOC wrote:SmartWentCrazy wrote:halfHAVOC wrote:
Lol what?? you can't be serious. Dinwiddie is significantly better than LeVert. Better on both ends of the floor tbh.
Yah, I personally think that Dinwiddie is clearly better than LeVert.
I'd take Dinwiddie over Ben Simmons right now to lead a team.
Hello Brooklyn wrote:jirrit wrote:Hello Brooklyn wrote:
I'm sure you also predicted our two best players would be injured.
As if your prediction means anythings.
Do Celtics fans have to come and invade every Nets related thread?
Wow sensitive much.
I think both fan bases indeed love to bash the other one. I dont see a problem with that. This is a forum and every fan can post here. I was just wondering why you’d get this thread up as a Nets fan since you’re just a bit above average in the ranks at the moment. Barring injuries indeed but we also missed Hayward, Smart, Williams for significant amounts of time.
Dont let it become irrational man. As if there arent many many Nets fans lurking our forums or giving and1s to negative Saltics posts. It is what it is man.
Lol to be fair this thread was based on an absurd premise that the Nets role player were worse and that they needed Dudley, Carroll, Davis back. Who have all been awful for their new teams.
I don't think the point of bumping this thread was for Nets fans to gloat.
It was just pointing out an obviously flawed argument based on nonsensical advanced stats.
jirrit wrote:Hello Brooklyn wrote:jirrit wrote:
Wow sensitive much.
I think both fan bases indeed love to bash the other one. I dont see a problem with that. This is a forum and every fan can post here. I was just wondering why you’d get this thread up as a Nets fan since you’re just a bit above average in the ranks at the moment. Barring injuries indeed but we also missed Hayward, Smart, Williams for significant amounts of time.
Dont let it become irrational man. As if there arent many many Nets fans lurking our forums or giving and1s to negative Saltics posts. It is what it is man.
Lol to be fair this thread was based on an absurd premise that the Nets role player were worse and that they needed Dudley, Carroll, Davis back. Who have all been awful for their new teams.
I don't think the point of bumping this thread was for Nets fans to gloat.
It was just pointing out an obviously flawed argument based on nonsensical advanced stats.
Well this was the premise of this thread, I literally copied it:
‘Adding Kevin Durant changes A LOT, obviously, but are the additions of Kyrie/DeAndre/Garrett Temple/Wilson Chandler enough to crack the playoffs in 19-20? Either way, we shouldn't act like they are the same playoff team that upgraded D'Lo to Kyrie. This is a very different team.’
With Kyrie you were 5-5 something if I’m right. Out of that list I’d say, so far, Temple exceeds expectations. The rest? Not there yet. So thats exactly why I stand my point that there’s no reason to bump this yet IMO.
Hello Brooklyn wrote:jirrit wrote:Hello Brooklyn wrote:
Lol to be fair this thread was based on an absurd premise that the Nets role player were worse and that they needed Dudley, Carroll, Davis back. Who have all been awful for their new teams.
I don't think the point of bumping this thread was for Nets fans to gloat.
It was just pointing out an obviously flawed argument based on nonsensical advanced stats.
Well this was the premise of this thread, I literally copied it:
‘Adding Kevin Durant changes A LOT, obviously, but are the additions of Kyrie/DeAndre/Garrett Temple/Wilson Chandler enough to crack the playoffs in 19-20? Either way, we shouldn't act like they are the same playoff team that upgraded D'Lo to Kyrie. This is a very different team.’
With Kyrie you were 5-5 something if I’m right. Out of that list I’d say, so far, Temple exceeds expectations. The rest? Not there yet. So thats exactly why I stand my point that there’s no reason to bump this yet IMO.
Well the idea that were not making the playoffs seems pretty dumb to me so far this season.
Chandler?
Hasn't played
Jordan?
Has been very good by every measure.
Temple?
Excellent
Kyrie?
Was putting up 30 a game before getting hurt.
So what exactly was this thread trying to prove? That we would be worse than last year?
Compare this teams record so far to last years when we started out 8-18. Theres no contest.