XxIronChainzxX wrote:clyde21 wrote:XxIronChainzxX wrote:
We have good reasons right now to believe that she did not provide a copy of the video to TMZ just based on how the situation has developed and based on everything that has been made public about the legal steps taken. This is a far cry from the "context" you repeatedly refered to early in the thread. Contrary to what you said, she went to the police first. Further contrary to what you said, we have good reasons to think that TMZ obtained all of this from a public source.
That said, it's not at all surprising that TMZ would constantly check court files across the country for the names of famous athletes and other people. It's not a secret that Cousins had a family proceeding and this type of click bait is the lifeblood of their entire business. Reputable news organizations send reporters to court all the time to check and see what was filed etc. It would not be a shock that a tabloid rag does the same.
One correction: while it's entirely possible there may be a court website accessible to the public where you can find the recording (I understand the US is modern) the system I am familiar with would require someone to physically go to the courtroom and get a copy of the physical file, which would have a physical disk or USB with the recording to copy.
But as I said it would be public record as to what court Cousins' family proceeding would be located and I expect TMZ would have people periodically check that courtroom's registry.
wrong. we have more reason to believe that this was leaked by her than TMZ getting this from the court room, which, again, would have been nearly impossible for them to do if this video was being treated as evidence by said judge/court room.
so yea, we don't actually know how they got the video, but if I had to guess, is that she leaked the video to them (i also find it odd that TMZ said they obtained the docs, but specifically did NOT mention the video, from the court).
Ah, so now we're back to alternative facts about how courts work. I refer you to my posts above correcting the inaccuracies in your post about typical courtroom process. If you have an actual link to Alabama's Court rules, practice directions, etc., I'd be glad to have a look.
Otherwise, we've got an alternative facts story that you invented to defend a man who you believe threatened to shoot his ex wife in the head. To whit, we've already completely discredited your theory about not going to the police first and we're well on the way to doing the same with the sale to TMZ.
As I said from the start: fascinating that this is the route you'll go. Also fascinating that despite your low tolerance for threats against women you've not answered my post about how cousins should be punished. Let simplify:
1. Criminal sanction.
2. Restraining order.
3. Supervised visitation.
4. Banned from NBA.
5. Sanction by NBA (suspension).
6. Sanctioned by NBA (fine).
7. ________ (fill in the blank).
8. Nothing.
I'm gonna go on a limb here and say you pick 8.
You're the one that doesn't understand that if the video is being treated as evidence the court will NOT just hand it over to TMZ...so the most logical choices are 1) that she leaked the video to TMZ or 2) if TMZ got it from the courts, then it his not being used as evidence in this case.
and I missed your question about how Cousins should be punished...i think a restraining order is perfectly reasonable and 10-20 game suspension from the NBA.
i think he should still continue seeing his boy accordingly without issue until it is proven that he's liability around his kid, which doesn't seem to be the case on any level at this point.