Broadcaster wrote:Pointgod wrote:Broadcaster wrote:Do you really think when so much money is to be made that businesses wouldn’t find ways to pull strings to make more?
The first overall pick means more to the individual franchise than the league as a whole. Only an idiot would believe that multiple billion dollar franchises would go along with a process that hurts their own business
I think there’s a chance it doesn’t work that way. The overall bottom line of the league probably helps everybody. I’d even bet the owners care more about the prospective money, like the investment it is, than they do about actually winning a championship. I’m pretty sure I read that all teams split the TV money.
In a certain way these owners aren’t competing. They’re in business together.
They are in business together in some ways, but not in others.
Not all owners are the same, this is the problem with the owners all want to get more money and therefore will compromise their own team success stuff. An owner like Ballmer has a net worth higher than the WHOLE NBA. His whole goal is winning, he doesn't care about revenue sharing or what is going to help another franchise.
The other problem you have is that it would also have to include former owners, yet not even a hint of one of them every suggesting something was off. Even if we say it is just the owners who were involved in this or that trade, there are ones who are former, but nothing.
Any explanation that involves all the owners being in on something like this simply cannot stand up to scrutiny.
So if one has a theory, it's not going to be the, "well they all just want to make more money". Or the, "well billion dollar companies can and are corrupt, therefore they MUST be corrupt in this way". That also doesn't fit into the reactions in real time of the owners and reps when this stuff is happening, unless fans literally believe NBA personnel are better actors than professional actors.