Post#342 » by tmb3 » Sat Feb 28, 2015 4:43 pm
As a Jazz fan I am admittedly biased here. With that said, in all my years watching the NBA there are not many players that come to mind that have such a dramatic effect on what opposing teams are able to do on offense.
For those that don't have league pass or don't get to watch Gobert, here are some things to note:
*As a starter he averages 4 blocks per game in 32 minutes. As impressive as that stat is, his impact is so much greater than those 4 blocks. As games go on teams go to the basket less and less. If he doesn't block you he will make you shoot a very low percentage shot at the rim because of how much you have to alter the shot to get it over or around him. Guys than normally kill teams by getting into the paint start looking to drive and dish or settle for jumpshots. Lawson, Parker, Ginoboli, Lillard come to mind since they have played in the last 10 days. Because of this the Jazz held the Spurs and Blazers to season lows in points and held the Nuggets to 82 - all within the last week.
*Teams shoot only 37.8% at the rim when he is in the game (6% better than Whiteside, 9% better than Nurkic and Noel ).
*He saves 4.38 points per 36 minutes (1 more than Whiteside, 2.5 more than Nurkic, and nearly 3.5 more than Noel).
*He is very versatile defensively despite what others have said. He has the ability to switch on pick and guard opposing guards. He switched at least 5 times on Lawson last night and Lawson only got 1 good look - and missed a 15 footer.
* He has tremendous BBALL IQ. He has a great understanding of the game which has been apparent the last few months. He never looks lost out on the court and is often correcting teammates and telling them where they were supposed to be.
* He is super competitive and is very intense. He is a leader and has a fire that most players these days lack. This is his most appealing attribute to me, because I think he wants to be the best and has the fire to get there. I don't doubt that Noel, Whiteside, and Nurkic have the talent to be great or even better than Gobert. I do doubt that they have the drive, fire, and competitiveness to actually be better than Gobert (and again this may come from not seeing them play more than a handful of games). Kanter was much more skilled and talented than Gobert without question. But he lacked Gobert's competitiveness and when he knew he had to compete with Gobert for minutes, he asked for a trade. Everyone in the NBA has talent and potential but what separates the good from the great is the mental approach to the game - Gobert has that killer instinct mindset that it takes to be great.
*This isn't to say he is without faults, however. He needs to increase his strength, especially his lower body strength. He struggles keeping physical bigs from establishing position deep in the post. His length helps him recover at times, but also gives up some easy basket due to his lack of strength.
*He is raw offensively. If it's not a dunk, layup, or a 3 foot hook shot he does not even look at the rim. He needs to work on his jumpshot and at least be able to hit a 10 footer with some level of consistency. He may be a couple years away from that, but has great form on his free throws so I think he can get there. But right now with he and Favors the paint can get crowded and the overall spacing can be affected.
With all that being said, I think he has the chance to be a top 3 center in the NBA within the next few years. The impact he has on games will make him a perennial defensive player of the year candidate and will win that award at least once. It will be fun to watch all of these talented young centers and see who winds up being the best. As many have stated it is far too early in their development to know who will be the best, but my money is on Gobert.