infinite11285 wrote:michaelm wrote:zimpy27 wrote:
They are facts that don't really mean anything since they aren't balanced.
Here's an example of your facts about Jordan:
- never won a playoff series without Pippen. Pippen won them without Jordan.
- never won a playoff series without Phil Jackson. Phil won them without Jordan.
- Jordan was shot 30% from 3 when you take out seasons that the 3 line was moved in a couple feet.
- Jordan went to the playoffs as many times as Bill Russell but has about half the championships
- Jordan"s missed 26 game winning shots
It's not telling the full story of the player is it?
That both the Cavs and the Bulls are Cinderella franchises without LeBron and Jordan respectively, and that while LeBron led the Cavs to 1 title Jordan led the Bulls to 6 is fairly factual as far as so can see. Sure other factors are involved, but the fact remains that 6 titles were won by teams built around Jordan, something which has happened with very few other players in history and none which are not favoured FA destinations.
Golden State is a Cinderalla franchise as well. There are a lot of variables that are outside a player's control regarding how teams are built to win. Is it fair to say that James was in the worst situation being drafted by the Cavs? Even still, James ultimately went back to Cleveland and won one a championship for them. In fact, he's won a title for every franchise he's played for. Shouldn't that be as impressive as winning all of one's titles for the same team they were drafted by? For me, it's an apples-to-oranges comparison.
Winning for the franchise that drafted you that never won is impressive not switching teams and winning for franchises that already won and have league and finals mvp winners already.