Castle Black wrote:Career-high 50 burger for SGA but on 35 shots, including 18 FT attempts. He's never beating the "FT merchant" allegations.
63% True Shooting is really good for that amount of volume scoring
Moderators: Clav, Domejandro, ken6199, bisme37, Dirk, KingDavid, cupcakesnake, bwgood77, zimpy27, infinite11285
Castle Black wrote:Career-high 50 burger for SGA but on 35 shots, including 18 FT attempts. He's never beating the "FT merchant" allegations.
Special_Puppy wrote:Castle Black wrote:Career-high 50 burger for SGA but on 35 shots, including 18 FT attempts. He's never beating the "FT merchant" allegations.
63% True Shooting is really good for that amount of volume scoring

scrabbarista wrote:Jokic is now on pace for the highest PER in history, the highest BPM in history, and the second highest WS/48, second only to peak Kareem Abdul-Jabbar.
Nooooooooooooooooo.
How is this possible.
My mind is exploding.
Goodbye, sweet world.


Rdude22 wrote:Some of yall still miserable talkin about "Jokic will get robbed"??![]()
Tatum and Luka out the paint, so now Jokic is all yall got left against "Embiid point guard"??![]()
Lol just enjoy both of them, keep your blood pressures low.
Meanwhile, edit - 48% (17-35) from the field for 54/8/5 vs Utah in a random night in January isn't the be-all-end-all, but it was a fantastic MVP performance in a proverbial trap game for a short-handed team.
lobosloboslobos wrote:How do people take
32/5.4/6.1/2.1/1.1 on 53/35/90 shooting
over
30/13.2/9.9/1.9/0.6 on 62/44/83 shooting
?

Special_Puppy wrote:While SGA would have a *very* strong case for MVP regardless and I'm overall agnostic on who's the most deserving, I'm still a bit uncomfortable with the fact that team record has become the SGA's trump card over Jokic. Especially since basically everyone acknowledges that the vast majority of the gap (but not necessarily all I'm still undecided) is due to the difference in supporting casts

lobosloboslobos wrote:How do people take
32/5.4/6.1/2.1/1.1 on 53/35/90 shooting
over
30/13.2/9.9/1.9/0.6 on 62/44/83 shooting
?
Doctor MJ wrote:Special_Puppy wrote:While SGA would have a *very* strong case for MVP regardless and I'm overall agnostic on who's the most deserving, I'm still a bit uncomfortable with the fact that team record has become the SGA's trump card over Jokic. Especially since basically everyone acknowledges that the vast majority of the gap (but not necessarily all I'm still undecided) is due to the difference in supporting casts
So just looking at this stuff from first-pass simple stuff, I tend to see a combination of the On numbers and On-Off numbers to be the best proxy for value added, because in the NBA it's about being the champ rather than merely being good, and it's harder and harder to reach those super-elevated states compared to what it takes to just be better than the riff raff.
Shai's got a +18.7 On with a +18.6 On-Off.
Jokic's got a +13.1 On with a +22.2 On-Off.
Knowing nothing else about the players, I'd consider Shai's to be the greater outlier.
Similarly if we look at raw cume +/- of these players relative to their closest teammate:
Shai +557, OKC 2nd (Dort) +325, Difference: +232
Jokic +384, DEN 2nd (Porter) +257, Difference: +127
Shai's a much bigger outlier here - and this is a freaking crazy difference for the #1 guy in the NBA relative to his top teammate this early in the year.
None of this means Jokic doesn't have a case, or even a case based on +/-, but in terms of Shai's ability to separate himself from his teammates, Jokic doesn't have a clear cut lead to me to this point.
Now, if Denver keeps dominating like they've been recently, all that can of course change - and the same holds true if Shai slumps - but right now, Shai's impact indicators are pretty insane.
lobosloboslobos wrote:How do people take
32/5.4/6.1/2.1/1.1 on 53/35/90 shooting
over
30/13.2/9.9/1.9/0.6 on 62/44/83 shooting
?

BigGargamel wrote:lobosloboslobos wrote:How do people take
32/5.4/6.1/2.1/1.1 on 53/35/90 shooting
over
30/13.2/9.9/1.9/0.6 on 62/44/83 shooting
?
Team record, and people wanting someone other than Jokic to win MVP. That's it. Those are the two reasons SGA will probably win MVP. Which is fine, but don't act like it's not that.
People saying SGA is having a comparable statistical season....they're just lying to themselves. Cherry pick whatever nerd stats you want, and bring up defense. It's just not true.