Special_Puppy wrote:Woodsanity wrote:Mavrelous wrote:
Murray Vs Brown
Gordon Vs Marcus Smart
KCP Vs Derrick White
MPJ Vs Al Horford
Bruce Brown Vs Grant Williams
I'd say pretty comparable, I think Nuggets are better FWIW...
That's your opinion, and it's in line with the belittling of the Nuggets player, I just disagree strongly with this sentiment.
Problem with Jamal Murray is you will get 3 different versions of him. He is either out and injured completely. Plays 50% of his normal level and you get Kwamal Murray like he was in 2024 and is worthless on both ends. Plays 120% and you get championship Murray.
At 120% he can match Brown sure but the other times Brown is way better.
Aaron Gordon beats Smart I guess. KCP is nowhere remotely in the same dimension as Derrick White. MPJ is nowhere in the same dimension as Al Horford.
FWIW OP also left off Time Lord. Who was the Celtics 3rd best player that year. Nuggets 7-9th men were also considerably worse too. In general, I'm confused how the 2022's Celtics net rating was like 4 point higher than the 2023 Nuggets if the Nuggets had a better supporting cast. Maybe 2022 Tatum was more valuable than 2023 Nikola Jokic?
So, this data cherry picking is basically my main point of how disingenuous this whole argument is about Jokic supporting cast, 23 Nuggets had better record 22 Celtics, they led comfortably and had really no competition for 1st seed in the west, while Celtics had to fight for PO seeding until the last minute to get HCA, they easily dispached the Heat who beat a better Celtics than 22 Celtics, you argue:
22 Celtics, the 51 wins 2nd seed, tied for 4th in the east, is obviously much better supporting cast than the 23 Nuggets, 53 wins first seed , the comfortable 1st seed in the west, who threw their last few games because they basically had the 1st seed secured, because of the net rating difference.

















