TMZ: "DeMarcus Cousins Allegedly Threatening to Shoot Baby Mama Before Wedding"

[XxIronChainzxX]

For the people that defend this idiot I guess in your minds he's just the unluckiest guy in the world. It's always someone else's fault.

Face the facts. He has always been a trash person.

Trash defends trash. i saw the same thing from dudes when Bill Cosby was getting locked up. they didn't care that he was a rapist, they were mad that he got held accountable for it.

Same thing here. DeMarcus Cousins is clearly an abusive piece of ****...but they don't care about that, they just care of the how and why he got exposed for it.

Lots of folks telling on themselves in this thread.

How is admitting rape connected to a emotional outburst for a man trying to have his child at his wedding?

An emotional outburst is calling his ex the c-word or some other form of vile profanity. This is a murder threat. It's like I'm on crazy pills here.

[TheNewEra]

More diminishing. A threat of murder is now an emotional outburst.

well ya, it is. Unless he has went through any steps to make it a reality. If he actually has no intention of killing her and said it in a flash of anger, then ofc its an outburst.

It's a crime. People do know they can't threaten to murder someone? Like, it's a real law.

Okay that is true but there is a reason that every time someone threatens another person they don’t instantly go to jail. People are not robots and this isn’t a argument over who left the seat up it’s a argument over his child and one of the biggest days of his life. She even said in the report she’s willing to still let him have visiting opportunities

[RIP Kobe]

demarcus is in the wrong for snapping, but the baby mama is just as in the wrong here and there should be severe consequences for her actions. women do this **** daily and get away with it because of laws favouring women.

unless she can prove to the court that cousins is a bad father, then she should suffer some sort of consequences.

family law aside, the threat needs to be investigated properly by the police to determine if there's an actual threat and lay the appropriate charges if the victim chooses to do so.

odd that she released the tape a few days after the wedding (which will come up in the investigation). she's clearly mad she won't be riding his dick anymore. bitter ass woman be happy with your child support and be civil with your ex. the child suffers most at the end of the day.

don't quote me if you're a female or a beta male.

Strike: Too damn alpha. -Dome

[mademan]

More diminishing. A threat of murder is now an emotional outburst.

well ya, it is. Unless he has went through any steps to make it a reality. If he actually has no intention of killing her and said it in a flash of anger, then ofc its an outburst.

It's a crime. People do know they can't threaten to murder someone? Like, it's a real law.

This aint canada or the UK bruh. It absolutely is not a crime in the US. For it to be a crime, a REASONABLE person would have to believe it is a REAL and SERIOUS communication to inflict the harm the way he said he would do it.

People threaten people with physical harm everyday to the point that phrases like "i will phucking kill you" are more colloquial than literal. Even in a street fight, where physical violence is expected, nobody actually thinks anybody is trying to kill anybody else even with people continuously uttering the phrase "im gonna kill you"

[jamesd]

demarcus is in the wrong for snapping, but the baby mama is just as in the wrong here and there should be severe consequences for her actions. women do this **** daily and get away with it because of laws favouring women.

unless she can prove to the court that cousins is a bad father, then she should suffer some sort of consequences.

don't quote me if you're a female or a beta male.

Alpha here. You're a moron.

[XxIronChainzxX]

demarcus is in the wrong for snapping, but the baby mama is just as in the wrong here and there should be severe consequences for her actions. women do this **** daily and get away with it because of laws favouring women.

unless she can prove to the court that cousins is a bad father, then she should suffer some sort of consequences.

don't quote me if you're a female or a beta male.

There are consequences. Serious ones. The kind of stuff she's accused of here - "weaponizing" her child - is the kind of stuff that can cost her custody of her child. This is why family law can be so toxic. Losing your child is a pretty serious consequence.

If Cousins wanted custody he'd almost certainly be able to get it, especially now that he's married, unless he was abusive. Except for the obvious fact that he's threatened to murder the mother of his child directly or by contract killing (and also allegedly choked her).

[jamesd]

well ya, it is. Unless he has went through any steps to make it a reality. If he actually has no intention of killing her and said it in a flash of anger, then ofc its an outburst.

It's a crime. People do know they can't threaten to murder someone? Like, it's a real law.

This aint canada or the UK bruh. It absolutely is not a crime in the US. For it to be a crime, a REASONABLE person would have to believe it is a REAL and SERIOUS communication to inflict the harm the way he said he would do it.

People threaten people with physical harm everyday. There's a reason the courts arent filled up with this

Holy crap. Spent about .003 seconds googling and using my head. Turns out uttering death threats is a crime.

Also Matlock, they have charges against him. So that means it is a crime. She is required to sign a warrant for them to pursue them.

Love that everyone defending Cousins and vilifying the woman have zero grasp of reality but are so confidently ignorant.

[TheNewEra]

Trash defends trash. i saw the same thing from dudes when Bill Cosby was getting locked up. they didn't care that he was a rapist, they were mad that he got held accountable for it.

Same thing here. DeMarcus Cousins is clearly an abusive piece of ****...but they don't care about that, they just care of the how and why he got exposed for it.

Lots of folks telling on themselves in this thread.

How is admitting rape connected to a emotional outburst for a man trying to have his child at his wedding?

An emotional outburst is calling his ex the c-word or some other form of vile profanity. This is a murder threat. It's like I'm on crazy pills here.

That’s putting on a insane cap on emotional feelings in a tense situation. Cousins is wrong for saying it but threatening violence is not unheard of when in a emotional situation. Even the video starts with him calmly asking her twice can he please have his son at his wedding and she disregarded it with a simple no and he snapped. That’s why he’s wrong no matter what but I would like to know the full context of the discussion leading to this point.

[freethedevil]

don't quote me if you're a female or a beta male.

Flagged.

[RIP Kobe]

demarcus is in the wrong for snapping, but the baby mama is just as in the wrong here and there should be severe consequences for her actions. women do this **** daily and get away with it because of laws favouring women.

unless she can prove to the court that cousins is a bad father, then she should suffer some sort of consequences.

don't quote me if you're a female or a beta male.

There are consequences. Serious ones. The kind of stuff she's accused of here - "weaponizing" her child - is the kind of stuff that can cost her custody of her child. This is why family law can be so toxic. Losing your child is a pretty serious consequence.

If Cousins wanted custody he'd almost certainly be able to get it, especially now that he's married, unless he was abusive.

true. i'm not too familiar with family law.

even though it was likely an empty threat, both sides need to be investigated equally. i feel bad for the cousins.. it's his big day and some hoe won't let him see his kid. sad world we live in.

[RIP Kobe]

demarcus is in the wrong for snapping, but the baby mama is just as in the wrong here and there should be severe consequences for her actions. women do this **** daily and get away with it because of laws favouring women.

unless she can prove to the court that cousins is a bad father, then she should suffer some sort of consequences.

don't quote me if you're a female or a beta male.

Alpha here. You're a moron.

if you have to call yourself an alpha male, you're most definitely not one.

beta man, sit the f down.

[Pelon chingon]

Where is winsome gerbil in these times of crises? He always has the right answers to why DMC does the things he does and makes sure that everyone knows its never his fault.

[mademan]

It's a crime. People do know they can't threaten to murder someone? Like, it's a real law.

This aint canada or the UK bruh. It absolutely is not a crime in the US. For it to be a crime, a REASONABLE person would have to believe it is a REAL and SERIOUS communication to inflict the harm the way he said he would do it.

People threaten people with physical harm everyday. There's a reason the courts arent filled up with this

Holy crap. Spent about .003 seconds googling and using my head. Turns out uttering death threats is a crime.

Also Matlock, they have charges against him. So that means it is a crime. She is required to sign a warrant for them to pursue them.

Love that everyone defending Cousins and vilifying the woman have zero grasp of reality but are so confidently ignorant.

Matlock? lol

Investigating. No charges will be brought unless he has a gun, or has went through any steps to procure one. You are absolutely not right here. Uttering death threats is not a crime unless there was any kind of serious intent behind it.

Seriously dude, do you not realize the amount of times in any given day people threaten each other with death, violence...etc?

[TheNewEra]

It's a crime. People do know they can't threaten to murder someone? Like, it's a real law.

This aint canada or the UK bruh. It absolutely is not a crime in the US. For it to be a crime, a REASONABLE person would have to believe it is a REAL and SERIOUS communication to inflict the harm the way he said he would do it.

People threaten people with physical harm everyday. There's a reason the courts arent filled up with this

Holy crap. Spent about .003 seconds googling and using my head. Turns out uttering death threats is a crime.

Also Matlock, they have charges against him. So that means it is a crime. She is required to sign a warrant for them to pursue them.

Love that everyone defending Cousins and vilifying the woman have zero grasp of reality but are so confidently ignorant.

Most people are admitting both of them are acting like **** in all of this

[jamesd]

demarcus is in the wrong for snapping, but the baby mama is just as in the wrong here and there should be severe consequences for her actions. women do this **** daily and get away with it because of laws favouring women.

unless she can prove to the court that cousins is a bad father, then she should suffer some sort of consequences.

don't quote me if you're a female or a beta male.

Alpha here. You're a moron.

if you have to call yourself an alpha male, you're most definitely not one.

beta man, sit the f down.

Why is she required to prove Cousins is a bad father?
How is that material to the death threats?
How has she already not acquired custody?
Which punitive consequence should a court apply to her and for what reason?

Cool edit. From a guy who said Beta. Yikes.

[freethedevil]

This aint canada or the UK bruh. It absolutely is not a crime in the US. For it to be a crime, a REASONABLE person would have to believe it is a REAL and SERIOUS communication to inflict the harm the way he said he would do it.

People threaten people with physical harm everyday. There's a reason the courts arent filled up with this

Holy crap. Spent about .003 seconds googling and using my head. Turns out uttering death threats is a crime.

Also Matlock, they have charges against him. So that means it is a crime. She is required to sign a warrant for them to pursue them.

Love that everyone defending Cousins and vilifying the woman have zero grasp of reality but are so confidently ignorant.

Most people are admitting both of them are acting like **** in all of this

Why the **** would you admit anything about the woman when you have no proff she's done anything wrong?

There's only one person whose clearly in the wrong

[BetterCallSaul]

demarcus is in the wrong for snapping, but the baby mama is just as in the wrong here and there should be severe consequences for her actions. women do this **** daily and get away with it because of laws favouring women.

unless she can prove to the court that cousins is a bad father, then she should suffer some sort of consequences.

family law aside, the threat needs to be investigated properly by the police to determine if there's an actual threat and lay the appropriate charges if the victim chooses to do so.

odd that she released the tape a few days after the wedding (which will come up in the investigation). she's clearly mad she won't be riding his dick anymore. bitter ass woman be happy with your child support and be civil with your ex. the child suffers most at the end of the day.

don't quote me if you're a female or a beta male.

oops, i quoted you. what are you gonna do about it alpha dog

People like you are the reason disgusting men get away with abuse and rape in this god forsaken culture. I hope one day you manage to look inward at the insecurities you're desperately trying to mask behind your very strong alpha misogynist persona

[freethedevil]

demarcus is in the wrong for snapping, but the baby mama is just as in the wrong here and there should be severe consequences for her actions. women do this **** daily and get away with it because of laws favouring women.

unless she can prove to the court that cousins is a bad father, then she should suffer some sort of consequences.

family law aside, the threat needs to be investigated properly by the police to determine if there's an actual threat and lay the appropriate charges if the victim chooses to do so.

odd that she released the tape a few days after the wedding (which will come up in the investigation). she's clearly mad she won't be riding his dick anymore. bitter ass woman be happy with your child support and be civil with your ex. the child suffers most at the end of the day.

don't quote me if you're a female or a beta male.

oops, i quoted you. what are you gonna do about it alpha dog

People like you are the reason disgusting men get away with abuse and rape in this god forsaken culture. I hope one day you manage to look inward the the insecurities you're desperately trying to ask behind your very strong alpha misogynist persona

Just flag and ignore. He aint' worth the trouble.

[XxIronChainzxX]

How is admitting rape connected to a emotional outburst for a man trying to have his child at his wedding?

An emotional outburst is calling his ex the c-word or some other form of vile profanity. This is a murder threat. It's like I'm on crazy pills here.

That’s putting on a insane cap on emotional feelings in a tense situation. Cousins is wrong for saying it but threatening violence is not unheard of when in a emotional situation. Even the video starts with him calmly asking her twice can he please have his son at his wedding and she disregarded it with a simple no and he snapped. That’s why he’s wrong no matter what but I would like to know the full context of the discussion leading to this point.

Like I said: he threatened to murder her (directly or by contract killing). If he called her a **** it wouldn't be in the hands of the police. That's about as serious a thing as you can say with words.

[XxIronChainzxX]

This aint canada or the UK bruh. It absolutely is not a crime in the US. For it to be a crime, a REASONABLE person would have to believe it is a REAL and SERIOUS communication to inflict the harm the way he said he would do it.

People threaten people with physical harm everyday. There's a reason the courts arent filled up with this

Holy crap. Spent about .003 seconds googling and using my head. Turns out uttering death threats is a crime.

Also Matlock, they have charges against him. So that means it is a crime. She is required to sign a warrant for them to pursue them.

Love that everyone defending Cousins and vilifying the woman have zero grasp of reality but are so confidently ignorant.

Matlock? lol

Investigating. No charges will be brought unless he has a gun, or has went through any steps to procure one. You are absolutely not right here. Uttering death threats is not a crime unless there was any kind of serious intent behind it.

Seriously dude, do you not realize the amount of times in any given day people threaten each other with death, violence...etc?

What the actual ****? I don't think I've ever been threatened with death, or even really violence outside of the **** we'd say to each other as kids on the playground (eg I'm going to kick your ass etc). In what horror show do you live?