Celtics exposed?

Moderators: Clav, Domejandro, ken6199, bisme37, Dirk, KingDavid, cupcakesnake, bwgood77, zimpy27, infinite11285

Gooner
Head Coach
Posts: 6,591
And1: 5,417
Joined: Sep 02, 2018
 

Re: Celtics exposed? 

Post#361 » by Gooner » Tue Oct 15, 2019 1:58 pm

Curmudgeon wrote:
Gooner wrote:
He was willing to take that risk, and you fans were all for it.

Ainge obviously wasn't willing to take the risk. Otherwise Tatum would be a Pelican. Tatum plus the Memphis pick is a better deal by itself than what NO got from the Lakers. What good are a bunch of picks in the mid 20s?

And no, the fans weren't all for it. I wasn't, and neither were many others. The problem is, no one enjoys playing with Kyrie, who is a selfish player and a self-absorbed individual (from all accounts). AD would not have enjoyed playing with him any more than Tatum and Brown did.

I keep telling this to Nets fans, but they won't believe me. They'll understand by mid-January.


And yet, all the Celtics mouthpieces in the media kept saying that Anthony Davis move hinges on Kyrie staying in Boston. Ainge wanted to pair them two together. Once Kyrie left, it was not worth it. I don't remember abotu you specifically, but most of the Celtic fans wer fawning over AD all year. They've acted like he was already their player, it was kinda weird.
Curmudgeon
RealGM
Posts: 42,187
And1: 25,960
Joined: Jan 20, 2004
Location: Boston, MA

Re: Celtics exposed? 

Post#362 » by Curmudgeon » Tue Oct 15, 2019 2:12 pm

Meh, anyone with half a brain knew he was a Laker when he fired his agent and signed with Klutch. There was also the $7.5M mansion he bought in the Westlake Village section of Los Angeles. If certain members of the Boston media refused to read the tea leaves... well, what else is new? Besides, the AD to Boston rumors sold papers and generated clicks.
"Numbers lie alot. Wins and losses don't lie." - Jerry West
"You are what your record says you are."- Bill Parcells
"Offense sells tickets. Defense wins games. Rebounding wins championships." Pat Summit
Gooner
Head Coach
Posts: 6,591
And1: 5,417
Joined: Sep 02, 2018
 

Re: Celtics exposed? 

Post#363 » by Gooner » Tue Oct 15, 2019 2:17 pm

Curmudgeon wrote:Meh, anyone with half a brain knew he was a Laker when he fired his agent and signed with Klutch. There was also the $7.5M mansion he bought in the Westlake Village section of Los Angeles. If certain members of the Boston media refused to read the tea leaves... well, what else is new? Besides, the AD to Boston rumors sold papers and generated clicks.


It's not just the media, it's the fans, and I've seen discussions on celtic board. There were like 10 threads about AD, and people were celebrating when the trade deadline passed and he wasn't traded to the Lakers after his demand. They also celbrated when he said that the Celtics were on his list. He was a priority for Ainge, for tceltic media, and for the fans aswell.
shakes0
Assistant Coach
Posts: 4,434
And1: 5,048
Joined: Jul 14, 2017
Location: Chicago
       

Re: Celtics exposed? 

Post#364 » by shakes0 » Tue Oct 15, 2019 2:55 pm

TheFinishSniper wrote:
shakes0 wrote:Celtics low key had an amazing draft.

Edwards
Williams
Waters
Fall

All 4 of them look great. Haven't seen much from Langford yet and he got hurt yesterday.

It's called preseason. And amazing draft is when you draft a star, not role player who fit with current roster in limited role in limited minutes




No, an amazing draft is when you as good as you can with the picks you have. Celtics weren't in a position to draft a star, but they managed to land good players throughout the entire draft. Only questionable pick at this point is Langford. They hit on 4/5 picks so far, that's definitey an amazing draft.
Curmudgeon
RealGM
Posts: 42,187
And1: 25,960
Joined: Jan 20, 2004
Location: Boston, MA

Re: Celtics exposed? 

Post#365 » by Curmudgeon » Tue Oct 15, 2019 3:07 pm

Gooner wrote:
Curmudgeon wrote:Meh, anyone with half a brain knew he was a Laker when he fired his agent and signed with Klutch. There was also the $7.5M mansion he bought in the Westlake Village section of Los Angeles. If certain members of the Boston media refused to read the tea leaves... well, what else is new? Besides, the AD to Boston rumors sold papers and generated clicks.


It's not just the media, it's the fans, and I've seen discussions on celtic board. There were like 10 threads about AD, and people were celebrating when the trade deadline passed and he wasn't traded to the Lakers after his demand. They also celbrated when he said that the Celtics were on his list. He was a priority for Ainge, for tceltic media, and for the fans aswell.


Well sure. No one claims that Celtics fans as a group are less dumb than the fans of any other NBA team.
"Numbers lie alot. Wins and losses don't lie." - Jerry West

"You are what your record says you are."- Bill Parcells

"Offense sells tickets. Defense wins games. Rebounding wins championships." Pat Summit
The_Hater
GHOAT (Greatest Hater Of All Time)
Posts: 85,319
And1: 40,062
Joined: May 23, 2001
     

Re: Celtics exposed? 

Post#366 » by The_Hater » Tue Oct 15, 2019 5:17 pm

shakes0 wrote:
TheFinishSniper wrote:
shakes0 wrote:Celtics low key had an amazing draft.

Edwards
Williams
Waters
Fall

All 4 of them look great. Haven't seen much from Langford yet and he got hurt yesterday.

It's called preseason. And amazing draft is when you draft a star, not role player who fit with current roster in limited role in limited minutes




No, an amazing draft is when you as good as you can with the picks you have. Celtics weren't in a position to draft a star, but they managed to land good players throughout the entire draft. Only questionable pick at this point is Langford. They hit on 4/5 picks so far, that's definitey an amazing draft.


I think his point is it might be a bit early to hype that draft and claim they’re all ‘hits’. None of them have even played In real games yet. As it is, right now every fan base is excited by their rookies because they actually get to see the floor in the preseason.

Edwards could just end up being an inefficienct chucker who doesn’t pass, as he was in college, and I don’t expect Taco to ever be an NBA rotation player. He just has way too many limitations with both his speed and skill set. That’s why he went undrafted. But he seems to have developed a cult following that has boosted his profile.

If even 2 of those 5 players end up being rotation players over time, that should be considered a huge win for Ainge and the front office.
AthensBucks wrote:Lowry is done.
Nurse is below average at best.
Masai is overrated.
I dont get how so many people believe in the raptors,they have zero to chance to win it all.


April 14th, 2019.
SmartWentCrazy
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 20,749
And1: 34,847
Joined: Dec 29, 2014

Re: Celtics interior defense exposed? 

Post#367 » by SmartWentCrazy » Tue Oct 15, 2019 11:17 pm

Wilfried wrote:
SmartWentCrazy wrote:
LloydFree wrote:They eventually did that anyway, and Kemba isn't as good at shooting as 2016-17 Isaiah Thomas.


Could be worse— look at the deal Tobis Harris just got


You need to overpay if you want to contend.
You don't need too if you're aiming at 3rd seed or something.

Anyways ... Harris is 4 years younger or so. His contract will still be moveable in a couple of years.
Bad comparison it seems


You just re-signed Tobias after he helped play a role in you getting that very 3 seed your crushing. Seems hypocritical.

Also, good luck moving Harris when he’s making 40M+ a year :lol:
LloydFree
RealGM
Posts: 15,840
And1: 11,657
Joined: Aug 20, 2012
Location: Somewhere near the Jersey Turnpike, between exit 4 and 15E

Re: Celtics exposed? 

Post#368 » by LloydFree » Tue Oct 15, 2019 11:52 pm

shakes0 wrote:
TheFinishSniper wrote:
shakes0 wrote:Celtics low key had an amazing draft.

Edwards
Williams
Waters
Fall

All 4 of them look great. Haven't seen much from Langford yet and he got hurt yesterday.

It's called preseason. And amazing draft is when you draft a star, not role player who fit with current roster in limited role in limited minutes




No, an amazing draft is when you as good as you can with the picks you have. Celtics weren't in a position to draft a star, but they managed to land good players throughout the entire draft. Only questionable pick at this point is Langford. They hit on 4/5 picks so far, that's definitey an amazing draft.

Hit on 4 of 5 picks? They drafted a bunch of 10mpg backups. Everybody in the league thinks they killed the draft this time of the year.
Fischella wrote:I think none of you guys that are pro-Embiid no how basketball works today.. is way easier to win it all with Omer Asik than Olajuwon.
Actually if you ask me which Center I want for my perfect championship caliber team, I will chose Asik hands down
ajones9219
Lead Assistant
Posts: 5,232
And1: 6,004
Joined: Apr 15, 2015
   

Re: Celtics exposed? 

Post#369 » by ajones9219 » Wed Oct 16, 2019 12:10 am

LloydFree wrote:
shakes0 wrote:
TheFinishSniper wrote:It's called preseason. And amazing draft is when you draft a star, not role player who fit with current roster in limited role in limited minutes




No, an amazing draft is when you as good as you can with the picks you have. Celtics weren't in a position to draft a star, but they managed to land good players throughout the entire draft. Only questionable pick at this point is Langford. They hit on 4/5 picks so far, that's definitey an amazing draft.

Hit on 4 of 5 picks? They drafted a bunch of 10mpg backups. Everybody in the league thinks they killed the draft this time of the year.


If 4 of your 5 draft picks are immediate contributors you're more than entitled to say you hit on the picks and you had a good draft
ajones9219
Lead Assistant
Posts: 5,232
And1: 6,004
Joined: Apr 15, 2015
   

Re: Celtics exposed? 

Post#370 » by ajones9219 » Wed Oct 16, 2019 12:19 am

lol the takes in this thread are hilarious. Stevens drug a team featuring IT and Sully in the starting lineup to a top 10 defense. Not worried in the slightest
AussieCeltic
RealGM
Posts: 13,019
And1: 24,234
Joined: Jan 02, 2014
 

Re: Celtics exposed? 

Post#371 » by AussieCeltic » Wed Oct 16, 2019 12:36 am

Carson Edwards just dropped 5 threes in 2 and half minutes... He's exposed
LaLover11 wrote:I bet you $100 Mavs beat the Celtics
User avatar
BigTrade92
General Manager
Posts: 9,400
And1: 11,061
Joined: Mar 24, 2011
       

Re: Celtics exposed? 

Post#372 » by BigTrade92 » Wed Oct 16, 2019 12:42 am

How do you get “exposed” before a single in-season game is played?

These constant dumb anti-Celtics takes are a bad look for this board.
itrsteve
Head Coach
Posts: 6,417
And1: 11,004
Joined: Nov 04, 2017
 

Re: Celtics exposed? 

Post#373 » by itrsteve » Wed Oct 16, 2019 12:49 am

Celtics exposed

To be honest, I feel bad for Cleveland. It’s almost unsportsmanlike, but there’s nobody else to play.
[quote=“dkb964”]156-1 Celtics are frauds when pressure is put on them. They would have been toast if Luka was not stupid enough to foul himself out. Enjoy this ONE finals win. There will never be another with the Js and the Celtics cant afford stacked team.[/quote]
Curmudgeon
RealGM
Posts: 42,187
And1: 25,960
Joined: Jan 20, 2004
Location: Boston, MA

Re: Celtics exposed? 

Post#374 » by Curmudgeon » Wed Oct 16, 2019 1:47 am

Those 10 mpg backups (Edwards and Waters) just dropped 52 on Love and the Cavs.
"Numbers lie alot. Wins and losses don't lie." - Jerry West

"You are what your record says you are."- Bill Parcells

"Offense sells tickets. Defense wins games. Rebounding wins championships." Pat Summit
User avatar
durden_tyler
RealGM
Posts: 21,565
And1: 10,818
Joined: Jun 04, 2003
Location: 537 Paper Street, Bradford
   

Re: Celtics exposed? 

Post#375 » by durden_tyler » Wed Oct 16, 2019 1:52 am

BigTrade92 wrote:How do you get “exposed” before a single in-season game is played?

These constant dumb anti-Celtics takes are a bad look for this board.


It's happening every year now, so can't blame them as Celtics have always disappointed.

Now, the Celtics' outlook are not that bad and they are actually a better team when there is lower expectation (like this year, they are expected to battle for a playoff spot but are not really even East contenders)
If there is no basketball in heaven, i am not going.
Feed Your Head
RealGM
Posts: 25,438
And1: 69,469
Joined: Jun 25, 2006
       

Re: Celtics exposed? 

Post#376 » by Feed Your Head » Wed Oct 16, 2019 1:56 am

durden_tyler wrote:
BigTrade92 wrote:How do you get “exposed” before a single in-season game is played?

These constant dumb anti-Celtics takes are a bad look for this board.


It's happening every year now, so can't blame them as Celtics have always disappointed.

Now, the Celtics' outlook are not that bad and they are actually a better team when there is lower expectation (like this year, they are expected to battle for a playoff spot but are not really even East contenders)


What? Happening every year? Which years have they disappointed besides last year?

If you're going to talk ****, do it better.
MagicBagley18
RealGM
Posts: 14,831
And1: 20,333
Joined: Feb 15, 2019
   

Re: Celtics exposed? 

Post#377 » by MagicBagley18 » Wed Oct 16, 2019 1:57 am

So it’s too early to say the Celtics drafted well for where their picks were and the players they took, but not too early to say those players are nothing more than role players at best- sound logic on display here.

Meanwhile Carsen just hit 8 bombs tonight...
User avatar
TheGOATRises007
RealGM
Posts: 21,599
And1: 20,272
Joined: Oct 05, 2013
         

Re: Celtics exposed? 

Post#378 » by TheGOATRises007 » Wed Oct 16, 2019 2:08 am

It's amazing how the Celtics were considered this up and coming dynasty just prior to last season and look at how their outlook has changed in the span of a season.
User avatar
durden_tyler
RealGM
Posts: 21,565
And1: 10,818
Joined: Jun 04, 2003
Location: 537 Paper Street, Bradford
   

Re: Celtics exposed? 

Post#379 » by durden_tyler » Wed Oct 16, 2019 2:26 am

The Comedian wrote:
durden_tyler wrote:
BigTrade92 wrote:How do you get “exposed” before a single in-season game is played?

These constant dumb anti-Celtics takes are a bad look for this board.


It's happening every year now, so can't blame them as Celtics have always disappointed.

Now, the Celtics' outlook are not that bad and they are actually a better team when there is lower expectation (like this year, they are expected to battle for a playoff spot but are not really even East contenders)


What? Happening every year? Which years have they disappointed besides last year?

If you're going to talk ****, do it better.


Aside from not getting over the hump (when LeBron was there) and basically when they should have been on par with the Bucks/Raptors last year (yeah that was the lone clear disappointment), it's also the fact that the Celtics hoarded all the assets but never really flipped it to a real star (to become legit contenders).
If there is no basketball in heaven, i am not going.
itrsteve
Head Coach
Posts: 6,417
And1: 11,004
Joined: Nov 04, 2017
 

Re: Celtics exposed? 

Post#380 » by itrsteve » Wed Oct 16, 2019 2:30 am

Yawn
[quote=“dkb964”]156-1 Celtics are frauds when pressure is put on them. They would have been toast if Luka was not stupid enough to foul himself out. Enjoy this ONE finals win. There will never be another with the Js and the Celtics cant afford stacked team.[/quote]

Return to The General Board