Magic Under Fire For Donation Which Opposes Gay Marriage

Moderators: Clav, Domejandro, ken6199, bisme37, Dirk, KingDavid, cupcakesnake, bwgood77, zimpy27, infinite11285

lakerz12
Head Coach
Posts: 7,496
And1: 9,060
Joined: Jan 29, 2006
Contact:
     

Re: Magic Under Fire For Donation Which Opposes Gay Marriage 

Post#381 » by lakerz12 » Tue Aug 7, 2012 6:13 am

Ayt wrote:
lakerz12 wrote:
Ayt wrote:
Nope, I don't think you understand what we're saying. And, you're attributing ideas to us that we never stated.

Scientists agree the universe had a beginning.

If it were not created by an outside source, please explain to me scientifically how it began?


I don't know and neither do you. It is absurd to jump to the "god" conclusion when you don't know the answer to a question. It is like being a snot nosed 8 year old and stating that your super smart imaginary pet monkey Gyro does everything you can't explain.

Why did we get the bad storm on Tuesday?!?!? Because Gyro had a tummy ache!


Wrong, I do know. The only logical explanation for the creation of the universe is an outside, independent, self-sustaining source.

According to the first law of thermodynamics, energy cannot be created or destroyed, only transferred.

Therefore, if the universe had a beginning (which we all agree), it would require a superNATURAL source capable of creating the energy.

Taking more steps and reaching "god" or "God" is another story. Don't project your fears of a creator and biases against religions onto this discussion.

What, besides an outside, self sustaining source, could have created the universe/energy?
L3GEND4RY
Lead Assistant
Posts: 5,436
And1: 3,188
Joined: Nov 30, 2011
   

Re: Magic Under Fire For Donation Which Opposes Gay Marriage 

Post#382 » by L3GEND4RY » Tue Aug 7, 2012 6:13 am

mjba wrote:
StrengthNHonor wrote:
AVolumeScorer wrote:True, I've seen the word f@ggot been used more for people who do something dumb instead of being gay nowadays.

I'd say Banks is a homophobe because if let's say 50 Cent was gay you could bet that he would leave g unit and start dissing him. Why do you think it's a big no no to be gay in order be considered "real" in hip hop? You're probably right though in saying that I'm not, though.


The reason people use homosexual slurs is simple.

Man is born with testosterone. Man is born to fight and protect woman and family. The warriors of the tribe, the hunters. Fact. When man has sex, he penetrates woman. He "invades". He conquers. Same as war. A man who is a champion, a man who does not submit to anyone, is well respect and honored among men.


However... a homosexual willingly gets on his knees in front of another man and sucks him off and gets treated like a woman during sex. He gets invaded. He gets conquered. He behaves like a woman instead of a man.

It goes against who we are as normal functioning men. Only women are subdued and love it (ask any woman how much they love to be man handled by a strong man during sex.. they get wet just thinking about it)....... but not men.

This is why it is easy to insult people with homosexual slurs. Because they behave like wimps and women.

i'm going to ignore the factual inaccuracies in this post and pose a simple question; if i like to be **** aggressively (or conquered) by a chick, does that make me gay or a female?


it makes you a nancy. do you want to be a nancy?
User avatar
AVolumeScorer
Sixth Man
Posts: 1,929
And1: 18
Joined: Jun 24, 2012
Location: New York

Re: Magic Under Fire For Donation Which Opposes Gay Marriage 

Post#383 » by AVolumeScorer » Tue Aug 7, 2012 6:14 am

JunkYardSubs wrote:StrengthNHonorNMisogyny

:lol:
albo23 wrote:"Why did the Magic..."

The answer is always who the F knows.
User avatar
JunkYardSubs
General Manager
Posts: 9,814
And1: 149
Joined: Apr 24, 2011

Re: Magic Under Fire For Donation Which Opposes Gay Marriage 

Post#384 » by JunkYardSubs » Tue Aug 7, 2012 6:14 am

Honestly if you see any sense in StrengthNHonors posts you either:

a) Hate Women
b) Hate Women
User avatar
Grumpy Heat Fan
General Manager
Posts: 8,667
And1: 9,179
Joined: Dec 09, 2011
Location: Miami, Florida
     

Re: Magic Under Fire For Donation Which Opposes Gay Marriage 

Post#385 » by Grumpy Heat Fan » Tue Aug 7, 2012 6:14 am

Inigo_Montoya wrote:Note to young kids on Real GM: All women do not respond to domination.


Mostly all women love a strong man in bed. You used the word "domination", which would imply something more severe than what I was getting at. But anyway, if you don't agree, you just don't know :D

Inigo_Montoya wrote:Men aren't all aroused by forcing others to submit.

I don't know about being "aroused".... but men do submit others. It is who we are, we fight and conquer.

The successful, high testosterone males do, anyway :) I'm glad LeBron made the Celtics and the Thunder and the entire NBA, SUBMIT to his dominance.

It is what we do as men. ALPHA MALE MENTALITY.

Inigo_Montoya wrote: Gay men aren't all submissive.

Someone is getting penetrated in the anus. Someone is getting treated like a bitch in bed. That is the type of gay man who people use as a reference when insulting someone with a homosexual slur. The "other type" of gay man, as American Dad put it - the "power top" :lol:, is still doing feminine things, though the insult is not about this type of gay man.
"As for me personally, I don't truly care how much I make these days, my main focus is on playing for a winner." - Dirk Nowitzki, July 2016
User avatar
Grumpy Heat Fan
General Manager
Posts: 8,667
And1: 9,179
Joined: Dec 09, 2011
Location: Miami, Florida
     

Re: Magic Under Fire For Donation Which Opposes Gay Marriage 

Post#386 » by Grumpy Heat Fan » Tue Aug 7, 2012 6:15 am

JunkYardSubs wrote:Honestly if you see any sense in StrengthNHonors posts you etiher:

a) Hate Women
b) Hate Women


Work on your reading comprehension. A lot of people have problems with that, seeing things that aren't there. It's quite the opposite. Women are my top 2 favorite thing on this earth.
User avatar
AVolumeScorer
Sixth Man
Posts: 1,929
And1: 18
Joined: Jun 24, 2012
Location: New York

Re: Magic Under Fire For Donation Which Opposes Gay Marriage 

Post#387 » by AVolumeScorer » Tue Aug 7, 2012 6:16 am

StrengthNHonor wrote:The successful, high testosterone males do, anyway :) I'm glad LeBron made the Celtics and the Thunder and the entire NBA, SUBMIT to his dominance.

It is what we do as men. ALPHA MALE MENTALITY.

WTF :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol:
albo23 wrote:"Why did the Magic..."

The answer is always who the F knows.
mjba
Analyst
Posts: 3,002
And1: 121
Joined: Jul 19, 2009

Re: Magic Under Fire For Donation Which Opposes Gay Marriage 

Post#388 » by mjba » Tue Aug 7, 2012 6:16 am

wow
MannyRam99
Banned User
Posts: 3,321
And1: 33
Joined: Apr 28, 2012

Re: Magic Under Fire For Donation Which Opposes Gay Marriage 

Post#389 » by MannyRam99 » Tue Aug 7, 2012 6:16 am

JunkYardSubs wrote:Honestly if you see any sense in StrengthNHonors posts you etiher:

a) Hate Women
b) Hate Women

I thought he was trolling at first ... heck I still think he's trolling, and he's very good at it.

(He's a LeBron homer, afterall)
Inigo_Montoya
Pro Prospect
Posts: 865
And1: 42
Joined: Jun 07, 2012
Location: Sacramento, CA

Re: Magic Under Fire For Donation Which Opposes Gay Marriage 

Post#390 » by Inigo_Montoya » Tue Aug 7, 2012 6:16 am

StrengthNHonor wrote:
Inigo_Montoya wrote:Note to young kids on Real GM: All women do not respond to domination.


Mostly all women love a strong man in bed. You used the word "domination", which would imply something more severe than what I was getting at. But anyway, if you don't agree, you just don't know :D

Inigo_Montoya wrote:Men aren't all aroused by forcing others to submit.

I don't know about being "aroused".... but men do submit others. It is who we are, we fight and conquer.

The successful, high testosterone males do, anyway :) I'm glad LeBron made the Celtics and the Thunder and the entire NBA, SUBMIT to his dominance.

It is what we do as men. ALPHA MALE MENTALITY.

Inigo_Montoya wrote: Gay men aren't all submissive.

Someone is getting penetrated in the anus. Someone is getting treated like a bitch in bed. That is the type of gay man who people use as a reference when insulting someone with a homosexual slur. The "other type" of gay man, as American Dad put it - the "power top" :lol:, is still doing feminine things, though the insult is not about this type of gay man.

wow. Have you actually researched any of the nonsense that you post?
mjba
Analyst
Posts: 3,002
And1: 121
Joined: Jul 19, 2009

Re: Magic Under Fire For Donation Which Opposes Gay Marriage 

Post#391 » by mjba » Tue Aug 7, 2012 6:16 am

StrengthNHonor wrote:
JunkYardSubs wrote:Honestly if you see any sense in StrengthNHonors posts you etiher:

a) Hate Women
b) Hate Women


Work on your reading comprehension. A lot of people have problems with that, seeing things that aren't there. It's quite the opposite. Women are my top 2 favorite thing on this earth.

together w/ d-bol?
Miamis3rdRing
Banned User
Posts: 10,050
And1: 131
Joined: Apr 08, 2010
Location: L.A.

Re: Magic Under Fire For Donation Which Opposes Gay Marriage 

Post#392 » by Miamis3rdRing » Tue Aug 7, 2012 6:17 am

Kobe Bryant > Your god

Proof?
[youtube]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iY9HjNWbJvA[/youtube]

Edit:
I disagree (strongly) with StrengthNHonor on this subject but that line on LeBron made me LOL :lol:
User avatar
JunkYardSubs
General Manager
Posts: 9,814
And1: 149
Joined: Apr 24, 2011

Re: Magic Under Fire For Donation Which Opposes Gay Marriage 

Post#393 » by JunkYardSubs » Tue Aug 7, 2012 6:18 am

GUYS -

GO OUT AND DOMINATE AND MAKE BANK AND RUN DOWN A WOMAN

THEY LIKE IT LIKE THAT!


WOMEN -

GET READY!
Image
User avatar
AVolumeScorer
Sixth Man
Posts: 1,929
And1: 18
Joined: Jun 24, 2012
Location: New York

Re: Magic Under Fire For Donation Which Opposes Gay Marriage 

Post#394 » by AVolumeScorer » Tue Aug 7, 2012 6:18 am

I still can't stop laughing at the LeBron comparison, **** A+ comedy :lol:
albo23 wrote:"Why did the Magic..."

The answer is always who the F knows.
Ayt
RealGM
Posts: 59,293
And1: 15,111
Joined: Jun 27, 2005

Re: Magic Under Fire For Donation Which Opposes Gay Marriage 

Post#395 » by Ayt » Tue Aug 7, 2012 6:19 am

lakerz12 wrote:Wrong, I do know. The only logical explanation for the creation of the universe is an outside, independent, self-sustaining source.

According to the first law of thermodynamics, energy cannot be created or destroyed, only transferred.

Therefore, if the universe had a beginning (which we all agree), it would require a superNATURAL source capable of creating the energy.

Taking more steps and reaching "god" or "God" is another story. Don't project your fears of a creator and biases against religions onto this discussion.

What, besides an outside, self sustaining source, could have created the universe/energy?


How do you know an outside source is even needed? What makes you think the universe isn't self-contained?

Regardless, go and collect your Nobel prize. Your arguments are on a level no scientist has considered in the last 50 years.
User avatar
LOJ
Banned User
Posts: 5,514
And1: 7
Joined: Feb 03, 2011
Location: Santo Domingo, Rep

Re: Magic Under Fire For Donation Which Opposes Gay Marriage 

Post#396 » by LOJ » Tue Aug 7, 2012 6:21 am

Ayt wrote:
lakerz12 wrote:Wrong, I do know. The only logical explanation for the creation of the universe is an outside, independent, self-sustaining source.

According to the first law of thermodynamics, energy cannot be created or destroyed, only transferred.

Therefore, if the universe had a beginning (which we all agree), it would require a superNATURAL source capable of creating the energy.

Taking more steps and reaching "god" or "God" is another story. Don't project your fears of a creator and biases against religions onto this discussion.

What, besides an outside, self sustaining source, could have created the universe/energy?


How do you know an outside source is even needed? What makes you think the universe isn't self-contained?

Regardless, go and collect your Nobel prize. Your arguments are on a level no scientist has considered in the last 50 years.


:lol:
Dennis 37
RealGM
Posts: 15,791
And1: 18,518
Joined: Feb 24, 2007
Location: Ontario, Canada
 

Magic Under Fire For Donation Which Opposes Gay Marriage 

Post#397 » by Dennis 37 » Tue Aug 7, 2012 6:22 am

lakerz12 wrote:
Dennis 37 wrote:
Wone wrote:Whatever is an atrocity to God I'm against.


Let me star by saying I believe in Jesus. The Jewish religious leaders of the time, basing their opinion on old testament writings, criticized much of what Jesus did as an atrocity to God.

Do you realize that the book of Leviticus was handed down orally for centuries before being written down in ancient Hebrew. Even if the final text didn't vary from the original, which is highly unlikely, it would have been effected by cultural bias and poor transcription. Then there is the translation difficulties. Just google alternate Leviticus translations and you will discover enough to create doubt in your mind about the intended direction of that Leviticus passage, not to mention that the old Hebrew text made no mention of women. So lesbians aren't even in the conversation.


What about 1 Cor. 6:9-10 and Rom 1:26-28?

1 Cor. 6:9-10, "Or do you not know that the unrighteous shall not inherit the kingdom of God? Do not be deceived; neither fornicators, nor idolaters, nor adulterers, nor effeminate, nor homosexuals, 10nor thieves, nor the covetous, nor drunkards, nor revilers, nor swindlers, shall inherit the kingdom of God."

Rom. 1:26-28, "For this reason God gave them over to degrading passions; for their women exchanged the natural function for that which is unnatural, 27and in the same way also the men abandoned the natural function of the woman and burned in their desire toward one another, men with men committing indecent acts and receiving in their own persons the due penalty of their error. 28And just as they did not see fit to acknowledge God any longer, God gave them over to a depraved mind, to do those things which are not proper."



I'll start with effeminate which is often highlighted as a type of gay person. The rest you can google yourself, or I'll get back to you tomorrow as it is late here in the east.

Keep in mind this is originally a Greek text. The Greek word translated “effeminate” in verse 9 is quite broad. The word is malakoi, and it literally means “soft.” So Paul is saying “soft people” will not inherit the kingdom of God.

Dale B. Martin, Arsenokoitês and Malakos: Meaning and Consequences (Source: Biblical Ethics and Homosexuality: Listening to Scripture edited by Robert L. Brawley; Westminster John Knox Press, Louisville Kentucky, 1996), page 124. Nissinen also offers “frailty of body or character, illness, sentimentality, or moral weakness” as other possibilities for the meaning of this word in other contexts (page 117).
This common Greek word had different connotations depending on the context in which it was used. In terms of morality, it generally referred to something like laziness, degeneracy, decadence, or lack of courage. (See note 2.) The connotation was of being “soft like a woman” or like the delicate expensive fabrics worn by rich men. In the patriarchal culture of the time, women were thought to be weaker than men, more fearful, more vulnerable, and more vain. Thus, men who ate too much, liked expensive things, were lazy, or liked to dress well were considered “soft like a woman.” Although this type of misogynistic thinking is intolerable in our modern society, it was common in ancient times and explains why the King James Version translated malakoi as “effeminate."

While I will get to the other points tomorrow, the point is that the translators of the Greek to King James version were no more tolerant of gays than the translators of the ancient Hebrew to Leviticus were.

What I do know is in no translation of the four most important books of the bible does Jesus say anything about homosexuality. Nothing.

One should be able to identify a Christian through his compassion and charity, not by what he says.
Maxpainmedia:
"NYC has the **** most Two Faced fans, but we ALL loved IQ,, and that is super rare, I've been a Knicks fan for 37 years, this kid is a star and he will snap in Toronto"
lakerz12
Head Coach
Posts: 7,496
And1: 9,060
Joined: Jan 29, 2006
Contact:
     

Re: Magic Under Fire For Donation Which Opposes Gay Marriage 

Post#398 » by lakerz12 » Tue Aug 7, 2012 6:22 am

Ayt wrote:
lakerz12 wrote:Wrong, I do know. The only logical explanation for the creation of the universe is an outside, independent, self-sustaining source.

According to the first law of thermodynamics, energy cannot be created or destroyed, only transferred.

Therefore, if the universe had a beginning (which we all agree), it would require a superNATURAL source capable of creating the energy.

Taking more steps and reaching "god" or "God" is another story. Don't project your fears of a creator and biases against religions onto this discussion.

What, besides an outside, self sustaining source, could have created the universe/energy?


How do you know an outside source is even needed?

Regardless, go and collect your Nobel prize. Your arguments are on a level no scientist has considered in the last 50 years.


So you admit you have no answer to my question?

How do I know an outside source is even needed--

The only alternative is the creation of something from nothing.

Is something coming from nothing logical?

Collect a nobel prize?

Actually, thousands of scientists have already stated the same thing for centuries.

http://plato.stanford.edu/entries/cosmo ... -argument/
User avatar
JunkYardSubs
General Manager
Posts: 9,814
And1: 149
Joined: Apr 24, 2011

Re: Magic Under Fire For Donation Which Opposes Gay Marriage 

Post#399 » by JunkYardSubs » Tue Aug 7, 2012 6:23 am

Ayt wrote:
lakerz12 wrote:Wrong, I do know. The only logical explanation for the creation of the universe is an outside, independent, self-sustaining source.

According to the first law of thermodynamics, energy cannot be created or destroyed, only transferred.

Therefore, if the universe had a beginning (which we all agree), it would require a superNATURAL source capable of creating the energy.

Taking more steps and reaching "god" or "God" is another story. Don't project your fears of a creator and biases against religions onto this discussion.

What, besides an outside, self sustaining source, could have created the universe/energy?


How do you know an outside source is even needed? What makes you think the universe isn't self-contained?

Regardless, go and collect your Nobel prize. Your arguments are on a level no scientist has considered in the last 50 years.

Come on man, you know we need a superNATURAL element to explain it!

He got you with science!Image
Image
rottenzombie
Lead Assistant
Posts: 4,529
And1: 505
Joined: Jan 10, 2008

Re: Magic Under Fire For Donation Which Opposes Gay Marriage 

Post#400 » by rottenzombie » Tue Aug 7, 2012 6:23 am

Damn how did I miss such great late night entertainment for so long?

This is just too good, please keep it up.

Return to The General Board