Lakers no longer require extension from Dwight Howard

Moderators: cupcakesnake, bwgood77, zimpy27, infinite11285, Clav, Domejandro, ken6199, bisme37, Dirk, KingDavid

Shaheen
Banned User
Posts: 2,767
And1: 0
Joined: Jul 01, 2010

Re: Lakers no longer require extension from Dwight Howard 

Post#41 » by Shaheen » Fri Jul 6, 2012 7:14 pm

Zedders wrote:
Shaheen wrote:Yeah just like Houston didn't require the extension and GSW didn't require the extension. Call me when a team actually gives up its main assets for Dwight without an extension.

Cause till then these rumors just sound stupid. Bynum AND Dwight both have to agree to extensions for these deals to work.

Also, for people who say Dwight can't leave. He can easily go to Dallas and Dallas has enough cap space to sign CP3 or another big FA.


Someone is scared.


I just have more faith in your FO than you do. Mitch is a pretty good GM. Hes not stupid enough to trade for Howard when Howard does not want to play in LA.

Do you guys understand how badly Howard does NOT want to be a Laker? He DOESN'T want to be a Laker so badly he opted into another year of his contract just so he could stay off of LA. He would literally do anything not to go to LA.

Thats why I think its absurd to trade for him unless you get an extension. But if LA wants to do it go ahead.
AmerigoCorleone
Banned User
Posts: 304
And1: 0
Joined: Jun 06, 2012
Location: Heaven

Re: Lakers no longer require extension from Dwight Howard 

Post#42 » by AmerigoCorleone » Fri Jul 6, 2012 7:14 pm

Shaheen wrote:Yeah just like Houston didn't require the extension and GSW didn't require the extension. Call me when a team actually gives up its main assets for Dwight without an extension.

Cause till then these rumors just sound stupid. Bynum AND Dwight both have to agree to extensions for these deals to work.

Also, for people who say Dwight can't leave. He can easily go to Dallas and Dallas has enough cap space to sign CP3 or another big FA.


Lol Shaheen. From whom the most biased and emotional posts come.
LeChosen1
Banned User
Posts: 4,547
And1: 67
Joined: Apr 07, 2012

Re: Lakers no longer require extension from Dwight Howard 

Post#43 » by LeChosen1 » Fri Jul 6, 2012 7:17 pm

If Lakers get Dwight, Wow, so much talent only to flail in the might of Durantula
Shaheen
Banned User
Posts: 2,767
And1: 0
Joined: Jul 01, 2010

Re: Lakers no longer require extension from Dwight Howard 

Post#44 » by Shaheen » Fri Jul 6, 2012 7:17 pm

Jazza2319 wrote:
Shaheen wrote:Yeah just like Houston didn't require the extension and GSW didn't require the extension. Call me when a team actually gives up its main assets for Dwight without an extension.

Cause till then these rumors just sound stupid. Bynum AND Dwight both have to agree to extensions for these deals to work.

Also, for people who say Dwight can't leave. He can easily go to Dallas and Dallas has enough cap space to sign CP3 or another big FA.


CP3 isn't going to Dallas, he's staying right in Clipperland. Dwight's only option is Dallas which doesn't look too appealing right now


You don't know that. He could also go to Atlanta. And other teams are going to clear up cap space specifically to get him. You don't realize how valuable he is on the FA market.

And besides the Lakers have a two year window to contend anyway. After two years Kobe and Nash will be done. And Dwight would be wasting his time on a team with no superstars. It seems unappealing for him to resign in LA.

You guys need an extension.
Shaheen
Banned User
Posts: 2,767
And1: 0
Joined: Jul 01, 2010

Re: Lakers no longer require extension from Dwight Howard 

Post#45 » by Shaheen » Fri Jul 6, 2012 7:18 pm

AmerigoCorleone wrote:
Shaheen wrote:Yeah just like Houston didn't require the extension and GSW didn't require the extension. Call me when a team actually gives up its main assets for Dwight without an extension.

Cause till then these rumors just sound stupid. Bynum AND Dwight both have to agree to extensions for these deals to work.

Also, for people who say Dwight can't leave. He can easily go to Dallas and Dallas has enough cap space to sign CP3 or another big FA.


Lol Shaheen. From whom the most biased and emotional posts come.


People usually resort to personal attacks when they can't make a good argument. Good tactic bro. Much respect.
User avatar
red96
Lead Assistant
Posts: 5,226
And1: 2,393
Joined: Oct 09, 2008
Location: Where hope is still alive.

Re: Lakers no longer require extension from Dwight Howard 

Post#46 » by red96 » Fri Jul 6, 2012 7:21 pm

If its all go for LA and ORL, why isn't Howard dealt already? Does any know what the hold up is?
"Morey decided in 2007 that Steve Francis was to be the "franchise player" of the Rockets only to play what... 5 games? Morey didn't think Marc Gasol was worth a look that year,"
-baki "the Rockets fan"
User avatar
Zedders
Sixth Man
Posts: 1,741
And1: 613
Joined: Apr 27, 2012
       

Re: Lakers no longer require extension from Dwight Howard 

Post#47 » by Zedders » Fri Jul 6, 2012 7:21 pm

red96 wrote:If its all go for LA and ORL, why isn't Howard delt already? Does any know what the hold up is?


His back.
MannyRam99
Banned User
Posts: 3,321
And1: 33
Joined: Apr 28, 2012

Re: Lakers no longer require extension from Dwight Howard 

Post#48 » by MannyRam99 » Fri Jul 6, 2012 7:23 pm

Shaheen wrote:
Zedders wrote:
Shaheen wrote:Yeah just like Houston didn't require the extension and GSW didn't require the extension. Call me when a team actually gives up its main assets for Dwight without an extension.

Cause till then these rumors just sound stupid. Bynum AND Dwight both have to agree to extensions for these deals to work.

Also, for people who say Dwight can't leave. He can easily go to Dallas and Dallas has enough cap space to sign CP3 or another big FA.


Someone is scared.


I just have more faith in your FO than you do. Mitch is a pretty good GM. Hes not stupid enough to trade for Howard when Howard does not want to play in LA.

Do you guys understand how badly Howard does NOT want to be a Laker? He DOESN'T want to be a Laker so badly he opted into another year of his contract just so he could stay off of LA. He would literally do anything not to go to LA.

Thats why I think its absurd to trade for him unless you get an extension. But if LA wants to do it go ahead.

He will come to LA and sign the extension, that's all. Kick and scream all you want.
User avatar
red96
Lead Assistant
Posts: 5,226
And1: 2,393
Joined: Oct 09, 2008
Location: Where hope is still alive.

Re: Lakers no longer require extension from Dwight Howard 

Post#49 » by red96 » Fri Jul 6, 2012 7:23 pm

What about it? Isn't he suppose to be ok for the start of the season?
"Morey decided in 2007 that Steve Francis was to be the "franchise player" of the Rockets only to play what... 5 games? Morey didn't think Marc Gasol was worth a look that year,"
-baki "the Rockets fan"
AmerigoCorleone
Banned User
Posts: 304
And1: 0
Joined: Jun 06, 2012
Location: Heaven

Re: Lakers no longer require extension from Dwight Howard 

Post#50 » by AmerigoCorleone » Fri Jul 6, 2012 7:24 pm

Shaheen wrote:People usually resort to personal attacks when they can't make a good argument. Good tactic bro. Much respect.


How have I attacked? It's common knowledge that your posts are filled with bias. You disregard facts, stats and anything that goes against what you want to be true. So people stop responding to you. I mean how many times has someone utterly ripped apart your posts only for you to skim past them (though you were conversing with them) or disregard the obvious truths within them.

Little does little Shaheen know that nobody cares if Dwight goes to Brooklyn. Most of us will laugh at his stupidity in doing so. That team would be the Heat's whipping post.
World Peace
Banned User
Posts: 1,578
And1: 0
Joined: Dec 29, 2011
Location: San Antonio, TX

Re: Lakers no longer require extension from Dwight Howard 

Post#51 » by World Peace » Fri Jul 6, 2012 7:25 pm

red96 wrote:If its all go for LA and ORL, why isn't Howard dealt already? Does any know what the hold up is?

Howard's back. Once it checks out a deal will be made.
User avatar
Jazza2319
Bench Warmer
Posts: 1,387
And1: 128
Joined: Feb 06, 2011

Re: Lakers no longer require extension from Dwight Howard 

Post#52 » by Jazza2319 » Fri Jul 6, 2012 7:25 pm

Shaheen wrote:
Jazza2319 wrote:
Shaheen wrote:Yeah just like Houston didn't require the extension and GSW didn't require the extension. Call me when a team actually gives up its main assets for Dwight without an extension.

Cause till then these rumors just sound stupid. Bynum AND Dwight both have to agree to extensions for these deals to work.

Also, for people who say Dwight can't leave. He can easily go to Dallas and Dallas has enough cap space to sign CP3 or another big FA.


CP3 isn't going to Dallas, he's staying right in Clipperland. Dwight's only option is Dallas which doesn't look too appealing right now


You don't know that. He could also go to Atlanta. And other teams are going to clear up cap space specifically to get him. You don't realize how valuable he is on the FA market.

And besides the Lakers have a two year window to contend anyway. After two years Kobe and Nash will be done. And Dwight would be wasting his time on a team with no superstars. It seems unappealing for him to resign in LA.

You guys need an extension.


2 years being the heavy favorites to win the title vs how long for ATL/ anybody else to build a team around him. You honestly think he's gonna have a better opportunity than this to win a title or two?
Image
LAKESHOW
RealGM
Posts: 18,182
And1: 4,528
Joined: Mar 14, 2002
Location: HOME OF THE 17 TIME WORLD CHAMPIONS!

Re: Lakers no longer require extension from Dwight Howard 

Post#53 » by LAKESHOW » Fri Jul 6, 2012 7:27 pm

Cares wrote:Hell no...sign that extension bitch!
Home of the 17 Time World Champions
User avatar
ShowTimeERA
Assistant Coach
Posts: 3,790
And1: 208
Joined: Feb 15, 2012
 

Re: Lakers no longer require extension from Dwight Howard 

Post#54 » by ShowTimeERA » Fri Jul 6, 2012 7:29 pm

Wade2k6 wrote:This Dwight Howard saga is getting really old. I hope Orlando doesn't trade him and he's forced to play somewhere other than LA and Brooklyn when he becomes a FA.


Of course you would like that. Dwight on the Nets of LA means Miami's road to a title gets much more difficult...
Image
Shaheen
Banned User
Posts: 2,767
And1: 0
Joined: Jul 01, 2010

Re: Lakers no longer require extension from Dwight Howard 

Post#55 » by Shaheen » Fri Jul 6, 2012 7:31 pm

AmerigoCorleone wrote:
Shaheen wrote:People usually resort to personal attacks when they can't make a good argument. Good tactic bro. Much respect.


How have I attacked? It's common knowledge that your posts are filled with bias. You disregard facts, stats and anything that goes against what you want to be true. So people stop responding to you. I mean how many times has someone utterly ripped apart your posts only for you to skim past them (though you were conversing with them) or disregard the obvious truths within them.

Little does little Shaheen know that nobody cares if Dwight goes to Brooklyn. Most of us will laugh at his stupidity in doing so. That team would be the Heat's whipping post.


Its common knowledge to you. That doesn't make it a fact. My posts are not bias. I admit obvious things all the time.

You don't have to personally attack me to prove your point. I use sources to prove my point nearly every time I get into an argument about basketball you don't know what you're talking about. No that did not happen. Provide me the link for that or you're just making it up.


Stop demeaning me and stop demeaning the Nets franchise and stay on topic. Its immature and doesn't belong here.
User avatar
AdamTheGreek
RealGM
Posts: 41,556
And1: 2,649
Joined: Dec 30, 2006
Location: Orlando, FL. Thinking of Greece.
         

Re: Lakers no longer require extension from Dwight Howard 

Post#56 » by AdamTheGreek » Fri Jul 6, 2012 7:31 pm

Most of us Magic fans want this Bynum deal done. It's all about Dwight playing ball and his back being on track.
Bluesky: @adampapageorgiou.bsky.social
Penny & Pops Podcast (Orlando Magic): https://soundcloud.com/137665379
Kobe System
Lead Assistant
Posts: 5,243
And1: 449
Joined: Mar 31, 2010
 

Re: Lakers no longer require extension from Dwight Howard 

Post#57 » by Kobe System » Fri Jul 6, 2012 7:31 pm

Shaheen wrote:Yeah just like Houston didn't require the extension and GSW didn't require the extension. Call me when a team actually gives up its main assets for Dwight without an extension.

Cause till then these rumors just sound stupid. Bynum AND Dwight both have to agree to extensions for these deals to work.

Also, for people who say Dwight can't leave. He can easily go to Dallas and Dallas has enough cap space to sign CP3 or another big FA.


Stop being jealous dude. Just like CP3, Dwight won't leave LA -- because it's LA!
User avatar
jeff1624
RealGM
Posts: 25,127
And1: 1,076
Joined: Jan 19, 2005
Location: NYC
Contact:
   

Re: Lakers no longer require extension from Dwight Howard 

Post#58 » by jeff1624 » Fri Jul 6, 2012 7:31 pm

If this were true they would have traded for Dwight already.
Shaheen
Banned User
Posts: 2,767
And1: 0
Joined: Jul 01, 2010

Re: Lakers no longer require extension from Dwight Howard 

Post#59 » by Shaheen » Fri Jul 6, 2012 7:32 pm

Jazza2319 wrote:
2 years being the heavy favorites to win the title vs how long for ATL/ anybody else to build a team around him. You honestly think he's gonna have a better opportunity than this to win a title or two?


Its not all about winning for Dwight. I will be the first to admit that.

He wants to be the face on the franchise. He can't do that in LA and you know that.
MannyRam99
Banned User
Posts: 3,321
And1: 33
Joined: Apr 28, 2012

Re: Lakers no longer require extension from Dwight Howard 

Post#60 » by MannyRam99 » Fri Jul 6, 2012 7:34 pm

jeff1624 wrote:If this were true they would have traded for Dwight already.

How so ? the information was leaked today, prior to that the wanted the extension, as of today (?) they no longer require that.

I expect something to get going in the next couple days.

Return to The General Board