Kampuchea wrote:Damn, looking bad for the Nets. I’m betting the under as well.
what's the O/U on the Knicks this season? I haven't bothered to check.
Moderators: Domejandro, ken6199, Dirk, infinite11285, Clav, bwgood77, bisme37, zimpy27, KingDavid, cupcakesnake
Kampuchea wrote:Damn, looking bad for the Nets. I’m betting the under as well.
DarkXaero wrote:Temple isn't better than Crabbe, and Claxton isn't comparable to RHJ, until he proves otherwise. Agreed with the rest tho. I'll add that Nwaba is better than Graham, who was trash, and had a positive net rating this seasonNot2BeBothered wrote:But
Kyrie > Dlo
Temple > Crabbe
Prince > Carrol
DJ > Davis
Injured KD > Graham
Chandler > Dudley
Claxton >/= RHJ
Chemistry and health will always be a factor but I find it hard to believe that a team that is better across the board is projected to win 4 fewer games
MrDollarBills wrote:Kampuchea wrote:Damn, looking bad for the Nets. I’m betting the under as well.
what's the O/U on the Knicks this season? I haven't bothered to check.
Crabbe might not be an elite shooter, but defenses still give him a lot of respect. Temple is nowhere near the same caliber of shooter as Crabbe. He's a better defender than Crabbe though. I think Claxton is at least a season away from contributing meaningful minutes in the NBA but I do love his upside though.Not2BeBothered wrote:DarkXaero wrote:Temple isn't better than Crabbe, and Claxton isn't comparable to RHJ, until he proves otherwise. Agreed with the rest tho. I'll add that Nwaba is better than Graham, who was trash, and had a positive net rating this seasonNot2BeBothered wrote:But
Kyrie > Dlo
Temple > Crabbe
Prince > Carrol
DJ > Davis
Injured KD > Graham
Chandler > Dudley
Claxton >/= RHJ
Chemistry and health will always be a factor but I find it hard to believe that a team that is better across the board is projected to win 4 fewer games
Temple is better than crabbe especially in the nets offense because he’s a better defender and low maintenance which would allow him to be a prototypical “3 & D” wing that the nets can utilize. Claxton is going to most likely spend majority of his time in the g league but RHJ was used as a 4/5 last season who used his athleticism and speed to be effective. Claxton brings that same energy and athleticism in a 6-11 frame so I think it’s fair to say their games are “comparable”
Trader_Joe wrote:GeorgeMarcus wrote:I already placed my bet for under 47.5. Let the games begin.TheBrooklynKidd wrote: If you're a betting man, you should take the over in regards to their record, I know I will be.
Decent bet. As a Nets fan, I'm not sold on the team THIS season, but not for those reasons. Marks has continuously shown he can get the players that Kenny can salvage or elevate.
Magic#1 wrote:We have won two playoff games in two years. If we decide to keep this team for the next two years, maybe it will feel like we won a series.
Paradise wrote:VERY, very awkward thread considering Napier, Graham, RHJ, Carroll we’re borderline useless towards the end of the season after the Nets ran with a rotation of Russell, LeVert, Allen, Harris, Dinwiddie, Kurucs, Davis, Dudley...
The majority are returning and Carroll gets swapped for a 25 year old Taurean Prince and aging Dudley gets swapped for a solid Wilson Chandler, backup Ed Davis (love him) gets swapped for a (recently) former all-star big in Jordan.
The sky is falling...
MrDollarBills wrote:Kampuchea wrote:Damn, looking bad for the Nets. I’m betting the under as well.
what's the O/U on the Knicks this season? I haven't bothered to check.
Paradise wrote:VERY, very awkward thread considering Napier, Graham, RHJ, Carroll we’re borderline useless towards the end of the season after the Nets ran with a rotation of Russell, LeVert, Allen, Harris, Dinwiddie, Kurucs, Davis, Dudley...
The majority are returning and Carroll gets swapped for a 25 year old Taurean Prince and aging Dudley gets swapped for a solid Wilson Chandler, backup Ed Davis (love him) gets swapped for a (recently) former all-star big in Jordan.
The sky is falling...
gh123 wrote:Levert is back and their young guys will take a step forward, they'll make it, the East is still trash.

MrDollarBills wrote:Paradise wrote:VERY, very awkward thread considering Napier, Graham, RHJ, Carroll we’re borderline useless towards the end of the season after the Nets ran with a rotation of Russell, LeVert, Allen, Harris, Dinwiddie, Kurucs, Davis, Dudley...
The majority are returning and Carroll gets swapped for a 25 year old Taurean Prince and aging Dudley gets swapped for a solid Wilson Chandler, backup Ed Davis (love him) gets swapped for a (recently) former all-star big in Jordan.
The sky is falling...
It's a blatant troll thread.
These dudes troll us hard af and yet they'll be the first one hitting that report button the moment Nets fans start dogging out their teams. Pathetic.

Rockice_24 wrote:OPs post was pretty terrible in terms of trying to predict the Nets team this year. Only guys on that list that played consistent minutes were Davis and Russell. RHJ played mostly garbage time. Napier, Carroll, and Dudley were all in and out of the lineup.
Rodi and Allen were 20 years old.
The Nets are clearly better from a talent standpoint anyone suggesting otherwise doesnt know basketball.
Davis was a great bench rebounder. Jordan is better. Russell was a pleasent surprise, kyrie is better.
The young players will be the same or better. The bench is better.
The Nets are better. I could see them anywhere from 3-6 in the standings. They are one of the teams along with Indy I think could knock off one of the top 2 in the East.
GeorgeMarcus wrote:MrDollarBills wrote:Paradise wrote:VERY, very awkward thread considering Napier, Graham, RHJ, Carroll we’re borderline useless towards the end of the season after the Nets ran with a rotation of Russell, LeVert, Allen, Harris, Dinwiddie, Kurucs, Davis, Dudley...
The majority are returning and Carroll gets swapped for a 25 year old Taurean Prince and aging Dudley gets swapped for a solid Wilson Chandler, backup Ed Davis (love him) gets swapped for a (recently) former all-star big in Jordan.
The sky is falling...
It's a blatant troll thread.
These dudes troll us hard af and yet they'll be the first one hitting that report button the moment Nets fans start dogging out their teams. Pathetic.
I ain’t “these dudes” son. My post was a little cheeky and shamelessly so. That doesn’t change the point that I was driving home: the Nets did not add Kyrie/Jordan to a 42 win team. This team is completely different and “talent math” doesn’t count for ****. Does it mean they won’t succeed? Nope, not necessarily, but I reckon Nets fans will miss some of those vets whose roles they’ve undermined.