How the illegal defense rule made it easier for Jordan to score in the ‘90s

Moderators: Clav, Domejandro, ken6199, bisme37, Dirk, KingDavid, cupcakesnake, bwgood77, zimpy27, infinite11285

Antinomy
Head Coach
Posts: 6,786
And1: 7,618
Joined: Mar 18, 2017

Re: How the illegal defense rule made it easier for Jordan to score in the ‘90s 

Post#41 » by Antinomy » Mon Dec 16, 2019 9:00 am

homecourtloss wrote:
But there was one that might be bothersome, the zone defense. It was the topic du jour at last month's All-Star Game, and Jordan was making an impassioned plea before the competition committee that had gathered to consider rules changes to enliven the NBA game. Jordan spoke passionately. If teams were able to play zone defenses, he said, he never would have had the career he did.


That was Jordan's argument: He believed that allowing any defense, or a zone, enables teams to gang up on the star. Gone will be the highlight-show moves and plays, the ESPN-ization of the game that others contend has been detrimental to sound play.


http://articles.chicagotribune.com/2001-04-01/sports/0104010375_1_defense-recommendations-nba

“I never liked zones," Jordan said. "I felt like that's a lazy way to play defense and with them, you can eliminate a lot of the stars making things happen."


"A couple of times I got in and I just couldn't finish it," said Jordan, who shot 11-for-28.


"There's not anybody on this planet that's going to stop Michael," Charlotte guard Baron Davis said. "So you have to make him make it a team effort. If you can do that, you can win."


http://usatoday30.usatoday.com/sports/nba/games/2001-12-26-wizards-hornets.htm


Thanks, this was the quote I was looking for.
Antinomy
Head Coach
Posts: 6,786
And1: 7,618
Joined: Mar 18, 2017

Re: How the illegal defense rule made it easier for Jordan to score in the ‘90s 

Post#42 » by Antinomy » Mon Dec 16, 2019 9:04 am

70sFan wrote:
Antinomy wrote:
Hornet Mania wrote:Modern spacing is a lot more advantageous to players like Jordan than the illegal defense rule could ever be.

Also for historical reference the league was barely enforcing illegal defense by the 2nd Bulls threepeat. It was officially ended in 01 but was only lightly enforced in the last few years leading up to it being removed from the rule book. This would have helped him in the 80s more than the 90s.


Jordan went on the record saying that he didn’t like playing against zone defenses.

Think about it like this: An ISO scorer like Jordan was highly suited to play in an era where you either had to guard him straight up or send a hard double at him. Keep in mind that you weren’t allowed to just sag off guys like Grant or Rodman if they just so happened to wander around the 3 point line.

Imagine if Durant, for example, was allowed to play under those rules. He’d be unbelievably unstoppable.


When Rodman was around the three point line, his defender had to be around FT line. That's still sagging off. Don't exaggarate illegal defense, nobody run above three point line behind Rodman.


Teams like the Knicks tried playing zone against the Bulls but would get called for illegal defense SEVERAL times per game. I’ve literally seen it. The games aren’t hard to find.
trueballer7
Bench Warmer
Posts: 1,318
And1: 1,198
Joined: Mar 26, 2019
   

Re: How the illegal defense rule made it easier for Jordan to score in the ‘90s 

Post#43 » by trueballer7 » Mon Dec 16, 2019 9:55 am

Barnzy wrote:Michael Jordan is one of the most overrated players ever in the sense of how people hold him in such god like status compared to some players especially current players.

If you transport LeBron back to the 90's he would average 35/10/10 against the weaker competition and defense. He would also win the same or more amount of rings.

He's a superior athlete and player in most ways. Image

Image

Its bye bye for little Lebronie now. That ship has long sailed. Everybody knows little Lelayup Lebronie would get stomped in the 90s. No uncontested lay ups for little Lebronie in the 90s, how is he gonna score? He cant post up. He cant drive past double teams. He shoots 39% 7 ft and further from the basket. He's gonna get slapped around like the poor little Lebronie he is.
70sFan
RealGM
Posts: 30,172
And1: 25,445
Joined: Aug 11, 2015
 

Re: How the illegal defense rule made it easier for Jordan to score in the ‘90s 

Post#44 » by 70sFan » Mon Dec 16, 2019 10:58 am

Antinomy wrote:
70sFan wrote:
Antinomy wrote:
Jordan went on the record saying that he didn’t like playing against zone defenses.

Think about it like this: An ISO scorer like Jordan was highly suited to play in an era where you either had to guard him straight up or send a hard double at him. Keep in mind that you weren’t allowed to just sag off guys like Grant or Rodman if they just so happened to wander around the 3 point line.

Imagine if Durant, for example, was allowed to play under those rules. He’d be unbelievably unstoppable.


When Rodman was around the three point line, his defender had to be around FT line. That's still sagging off. Don't exaggarate illegal defense, nobody run above three point line behind Rodman.


Teams like the Knicks tried playing zone against the Bulls but would get called for illegal defense SEVERAL times per game. I’ve literally seen it. The games aren’t hard to find.

It doesn't change the fact that you didn't have to defend non-shooters at the three point line. It's easy to find as you said, Jordan didn't play one on one basketball.

That said, illega defense is the dumbest rule in NBA history and I love the fact that it's not a rule anymore. 1970s basketball is much more varied and exciting because of that - it didn't have illegal defense while having all positives of 1980s basketball.
Greed
Junior
Posts: 400
And1: 372
Joined: Jul 28, 2016
       

Re: How the illegal defense rule made it easier for Jordan to score in the ‘90s 

Post#45 » by Greed » Mon Dec 16, 2019 11:10 am

homecourtloss wrote:
But there was one that might be bothersome, the zone defense. It was the topic du jour at last month's All-Star Game, and Jordan was making an impassioned plea before the competition committee that had gathered to consider rules changes to enliven the NBA game. Jordan spoke passionately. If teams were able to play zone defenses, he said, he never would have had the career he did.


That was Jordan's argument: He believed that allowing any defense, or a zone, enables teams to gang up on the star. Gone will be the highlight-show moves and plays, the ESPN-ization of the game that others contend has been detrimental to sound play.


http://articles.chicagotribune.com/2001-04-01/sports/0104010375_1_defense-recommendations-nba

“I never liked zones," Jordan said. "I felt like that's a lazy way to play defense and with them, you can eliminate a lot of the stars making things happen."


"A couple of times I got in and I just couldn't finish it," said Jordan, who shot 11-for-28.


"There's not anybody on this planet that's going to stop Michael," Charlotte guard Baron Davis said. "So you have to make him make it a team effort. If you can do that, you can win."


http://usatoday30.usatoday.com/sports/nba/games/2001-12-26-wizards-hornets.htm


It's important to note that Jordan was describing an unrestricted zone when he said if it were allowed he wouldn't have the career he did. Jordan wasn't the only one with these fears. To alleviate these concerns, the NBA instituted Defensive 3 Seconds so that an unrestricted zone can never legally be played. That is still the case today

It was a common fear of what an unrestricted zone would look like in the NBA. Here's an excerpt from an article on defense from back then:
It would be worth the NBA's while, it seems, to experiment for a season, or a preseason, with all-out zone. This would make life easier on the refs and take some of the hypocrisy out of their calls. However, most NBA people absolutely cringe at the suggestion of a legal full-fledged zone because they fear the kind of zone that would be played. They see teams stationing their big men within finger-roll distance of the basket, arms spread, pterodactyl-like, all the way across the floor, discouraging any kind of penetration to the basket.


It never happened that way though. Regardless the article is a good read as it demystifies the illegal defense narrative and shows how misunderstood it was even by the referees who sometimes called it, it accurately predicted the rise of jump shooting in relation to rule changes, it also shed light on just how often psuedo-zones (which is what we have today. Psuedo zones) were played as well as how often switching happened (and yes, people did leave their man).
https://www.si.com/vault/1985/10/28/628680/give-the-dan-a-plus

That article is from 1985
Lockdown504090
RealGM
Posts: 11,850
And1: 12,713
Joined: Nov 24, 2015
         

Re: How the illegal defense rule made it easier for Jordan to score in the ‘90s 

Post#46 » by Lockdown504090 » Mon Dec 16, 2019 11:17 am

1994 three shots awarded for fouls on three pointers, 2001 removal of zone defenses, Hand checking emphasis, 10 seconds as opposed to 8 to get the ball past half court, shot clock resets to 14 on the offensive rebound, modern spacing, spread pick and roll offense, expanded flagrant foul rules. All those things are helping todays players put up absurd numbers. for god sakes, trae young is 4th in the league in scoring in scoring right now on 48% shooting in his second season. in 1993 the fourth leading scorer was hakeem Olajuwon. it might be a little easier to score in today's regular season, just saying.
Greed
Junior
Posts: 400
And1: 372
Joined: Jul 28, 2016
       

Re: How the illegal defense rule made it easier for Jordan to score in the ‘90s 

Post#47 » by Greed » Mon Dec 16, 2019 11:24 am

Antinomy wrote:
70sFan wrote:
Antinomy wrote:
Jordan went on the record saying that he didn’t like playing against zone defenses.

Think about it like this: An ISO scorer like Jordan was highly suited to play in an era where you either had to guard him straight up or send a hard double at him. Keep in mind that you weren’t allowed to just sag off guys like Grant or Rodman if they just so happened to wander around the 3 point line.

Imagine if Durant, for example, was allowed to play under those rules. He’d be unbelievably unstoppable.


When Rodman was around the three point line, his defender had to be around FT line. That's still sagging off. Don't exaggarate illegal defense, nobody run above three point line behind Rodman.


Teams like the Knicks tried playing zone against the Bulls but would get called for illegal defense SEVERAL times per game. I’ve literally seen it. The games aren’t hard to find.


That's similar to saying handchecking now is illegal and because it gets called sometimes it means no one handchecks, even though we know it still happens. By and large illegal defense wasn't called nearly as much as people make it seem nowadays. It was barely understood even by the people who introduced it themselves
https://www.si.com/vault/1985/10/28/628680/give-the-dan-a-plus
A set of illegal defensive guidelines that (theoretically) eliminates the zone takes up nine pages of the 60-page NBA official's manual but still confuses spectators all the time—and coaches and players most of the time, not to mention the refs. Darell Garretson, the NBA's chief of officials, doubts that either Dallas's Dick Motta or San Antonio's Cotton Fitzsimmons fully understands the guidelines, which would not be so bad except that they (along with Milwaukee's Nelson) created them. Pete Newell, Golden State's director of player personnel and one of the most respected minds in the business, says, "There are a lot of people who don't understand the guidelines, and some of them wear whistles.

The final problem, of course, is that illegal defenses, however comprehensible in the rule book, are just plain hard to recognize on the court, even for the zebras. Frequently a violation will be whistled on the possession that immediately follows an assistant coach screaming: "Illegal defense! Illegal defense!"


That said there are numerous occassions where zone was played and nothing was done about it. This part from that same article touches on it:
The Knicks under Hubie Brown constantly press full-court, often with a 1-3-1 zone. "After a made free throw or field goal," says guard Darrell Walker, "we're coming after you." They start it near the end line just after the opposition has taken the ball out of bounds—perfectly legal—and they attempt to force the ball to one outside alley or the other and double-team it in a corner of the court, which is also perfectly legal. It is a zone, pure and simple, but the kind of zone that the rules allow. It was so slick that last season it brought the Knicks the league lead in illegal defenses with 90. Watch complaints about the legality of Hubie's press soar this year when Ewing starts "rotating."

Milwaukee, arguably the best defensive team in the league last season, seems to draw the most fire about its tactics. In Nelson's system defenders switch every time offensive players cross—or anytime a potential pick is set. At all times the Bucks' strategy is to keep their own big men under the basket. Golden State coach John Bach says the Cavs and Celtics are two other teams expert in using partial zone on a switch.

Systems aside, there are teams that rely upon "team defenders." When someone calls an opponent a team defender, he means: "That s.o.b. plays zone 90 percent of the time." The leading team defender, by acclamation, is Larry Bird, who on a remarkable number of occasions has been seen drawing offensive fouls and just plain getting in the way of players who aren't his to guard. Ironically, the cover of this year's official NBA Guide is a perfect illustration—Michael Jordan, openmouthed, is driving to the basket and there is Bird underneath on defense, even though Bird would almost never have the responsibility for checking a speedster like Jordan.


Again, this article is from 1985. So there's obviously no era bias involved

and then there are countless other references and whatnot. Couple more:

What particularly bothers Motta is that many teams try to get away with zone defenses now, content to only be penalized by a technical foul. "Our teams are zoning now. Rule or no rule. We're not allowed to use the word `zone' but it's a zone," Motta said.

-THE NBA HAS THIS RULE ABOUT ILLEGAL DEFENSE, BUT WHO CAN EXPLAIN IT, AND WILL IT EVER GO AWAY? A TWILIGHT ZONE (LA Daily News April 14, 1996 Scott Wolf)

-CLEVELAND LOOKS GOOD FROM INSIDE, Boston Globe/Bob Ryan January 8, 1989

Of course, Don Nelson plays the best zones that are never called. His Warriors have Chris Mullin, Mitch Richmond and a defense that funnels everything in to Manute Bol when he's in the game. And Golden State outrebounded Utah by an average of 51-41 in the four games

-The Teams of the '90s Key Up for a Head Start Washington Post/David Aldridge April 27, 1989

Johnson applauded Riley's switch to a trapping defense in the second half after the Suns led 54-50 at halftime Friday night.

The Suns have been hampered by poor outside shooting throughout the series, and Phoenix coach Cotton Fitzsimmons has complained that the Lakers are playing an illegal zone defense.

Phoenix has shot 51, 42 and 46 percent in the first three games, compared with 60, 45 and 49 percent for Los Angeles.

Suns guard Jeff Hornacek said, "We've been an outside shooting team all year and we expect our outside shooting to take us through it. But when you're not hitting outside shots, their zone looks like it works a lot more.


The Jazz is all about Karl Malone running the floor as well as any big man alive, and Stockton finding the open man as well as any guard alive, and Jeff Malone shooting the jumper as pure as anyone in the game. But they're mainly about zone defense, which is supposed to be illegal in the NBA.

"We come as close as possible" to playing zone, Eaton acknowledges. "You have to have the ability to help and you have to be able to shut down the middle. And to be able to do that, you have to push it to the edge."

Coach Jerry Sloan, who spent a career knocking opposing guards upside the head in Chicago, says this isn't his ideal, only an appreciation of his personnel.
"I like to run as much as anyone else," he said. "When I was in college we used to score 100 points seven or eight times a year. But with Mark Eaton on the floor, we can't run fast. We can't give them 100 {points}, because we probably won't score more than that. That's who we are and that's who we've been for years."

How do they get away with it? It starts with Eaton, who camps out in the lane as long as possible, shaded toward his man, but gets out just before it's too late. Stockton lingers when the ball goes inside, not quite double-teaming, not quite going back to his man. Thus he's able to help in any direction - inside, against people cutting down the lane and against his own man.

"We know the rules," burly forward Mike Brown said. "We take advantage of the 2.9 seconds, going down and coming back. And usually, we don't get too many zone defense calls.

-NOTEBOOK; No Matter What They Call It, Jazz Dials Z for (Illegal) Zone, David Aldridge Washington Post, May 19, 1992


"Utah plays the best zone in basketball. They play a 2-1-2 with five guys with a foot in the paint 90 percent of the time," Karl said in Seattle on the second of three consecutive off days in the Western Conference finals.

-HEY, IT'S GANG UP ON UTAH DAY, The Columbian Vancouver (AP), May 23, 1996


Karl said he will do a lot of double-teaming and triple-teaming, if necessary, to stop Jordan. He even threatened to try an illegal 1-3-1 zone suggested by McMillan.

"We're going to give him many looks," Karl said.

-Running From Cover // Top Defender Payton Won't Be Matched Up Against Jordan, Lacey J. Banks, June, 4 1996


Despite the injuries, the Lakers were hardly playing like a desperate team. Instead, they were relying on the resurgent offense of Abdul-Jabbar and the explosive moves of James Worthy (26). Defensively, LA defied the bylaws of the NBA and stuck with a trapping zone defense to minimize Detroit's quickness.

-PISTONS ROLL TO 3-0 LEAD, Boston Globe Jackie McMullen, June 12, 1989


Etc
Lockdown504090
RealGM
Posts: 11,850
And1: 12,713
Joined: Nov 24, 2015
         

Re: How the illegal defense rule made it easier for Jordan to score in the ‘90s 

Post#48 » by Lockdown504090 » Mon Dec 16, 2019 11:26 am

Barnzy wrote:Michael Jordan is one of the most overrated players ever in the sense of how people hold him in such god like status compared to some players especially current players.

If you transport LeBron back to the 90's he would average 35/10/10 against the weaker competition and defense. He would also win the same or more amount of rings.

He's a superior athlete and player in most ways. Image

Image

Those stats include the ass whoopings that mj gave them btw. nobody is doubting lebrons finals competition, he took teams to the finals that had no business being there. The thread is about which era it was easier to score in though.
Showtime 80
Junior
Posts: 437
And1: 761
Joined: Nov 09, 2019

Re: How the illegal defense rule made it easier for Jordan to score in the ‘90s 

Post#50 » by Showtime 80 » Mon Dec 16, 2019 11:34 am

Great posts Greed and Lockdown! For what it's worth here are MJ stats his final year at UNC playing against REAL ZONE and with no 3 point line to create space:

20ppg on 55% FG, 5rbs, 2assts, 2stls, 1blk playing just 30mpg in a Dean Smith controlled offensive system. College player of the year!

Mike would've shredded real zones, he probably would've scored his 30 points with more mid range than layups or dunks but he would've still been the best player in history. However, like the guys posted above the NBA has never allowed a real zone, they just created their own pseudo version.
Greed
Junior
Posts: 400
And1: 372
Joined: Jul 28, 2016
       

Re: How the illegal defense rule made it easier for Jordan to score in the ‘90s 

Post#51 » by Greed » Mon Dec 16, 2019 11:38 am

Barnzy wrote:Michael Jordan is one of the most overrated players ever in the sense of how people hold him in such god like status compared to some players especially current players.

If you transport LeBron back to the 90's he would average 35/10/10 against the weaker competition and defense. He would also win the same or more amount of rings.

He's a superior athlete and player in most ways. Image

Image


Just to put it into perspective, here's the net efficiency of LeBrons own teams

'17 Cavs - +9.7
'16 Cavs - +9.0
'15 Cavs - +3.6
'14 Heat - +1.8
'13 Heat - +7.9
'12 Heat - +8.4
'11 Heat - +3.6
'07 Cavs - +2.8

Notice the trend that the lowest years are years LeBrons team lost (07,11,14,15) which lowered their net rating. Similarly, you can see the same thing happening for LeBrons opponents. Their Net Rating was lowered in years they lost. The exception being 2017 where the Cavs so thoroughly dominated the East even after losing their Net Rating was still high. Jordans competition would similarly obviously be higher if they actually won, but just like with LeBrons, its lower for them because they lost (Not saying they'd have higher Net eff than all of LeBrons opponents, just that you have to account for them losing in whats displayed)
The4thHorseman
General Manager
Posts: 8,846
And1: 5,477
Joined: Jun 18, 2011

Re: How the illegal defense rule made it easier for Jordan to score in the ‘90s 

Post#52 » by The4thHorseman » Mon Dec 16, 2019 12:48 pm

Lockdown504090 wrote:1994 three shots awarded for fouls on three pointers, 2001 removal of zone defenses, Hand checking emphasis, 10 seconds as opposed to 8 to get the ball past half court, shot clock resets to 14 on the offensive rebound, modern spacing, spread pick and roll offense, expanded flagrant foul rules. All those things are helping todays players put up absurd numbers. for god sakes, trae young is 4th in the league in scoring in scoring right now on 48% shooting in his second season. in 1993 the fourth leading scorer was hakeem Olajuwon. it might be a little easier to score in today's regular season, just saying.

How the hell are those highlighted above, helping players score absurd amounts of points???

I would think that moving the 3pt line closer for 3yrs (like Stern did from 94-97) is by far the biggest change ever made to help players score more. Then once players got used to it by shooting more 3's, he probably figured that just move it back where it was and they'll start hitting from there eventually.
MavsDirk41 wrote:

Utah was a dynasty in the 90s
Blazers had a mini dynasty late 80s early 90s
User avatar
Frosty
RealGM
Posts: 11,200
And1: 16,161
Joined: Nov 06, 2007

Re: How the illegal defense rule made it easier for Jordan to score in the ‘90s 

Post#53 » by Frosty » Mon Dec 16, 2019 12:51 pm

Lockdown504090 wrote:1994 three shots awarded for fouls on three pointers, 2001 removal of zone defenses, Hand checking emphasis, 10 seconds as opposed to 8 to get the ball past half court, shot clock resets to 14 on the offensive rebound, modern spacing, spread pick and roll offense, expanded flagrant foul rules. All those things are helping todays players put up absurd numbers. for god sakes, trae young is 4th in the league in scoring in scoring right now on 48% shooting in his second season. in 1993 the fourth leading scorer was hakeem Olajuwon. it might be a little easier to score in today's regular season, just saying.


The league has made it intentionally easier for perimeter scorers for a couple decades now. Their initial attempts didn't necessarily have a massive effect but their later (2005) changes did and they were compounded by earlier changes. A little talked about changed was the introduction of the restricted area, it had a major impact on the ability of a shot blocker to rotate over and challenge a dunk. That was just a small change but they all added up.

The NBA saw the obvious dilemma of highlighting big men, the fans couldn't always relate and there were few of them compared to shorter guys. They made it clear when changing the rules that they wanted to open the lanes up for penetration and expand the influence of the three pointer. They achieved both.
Atheism is a non-prophet organization
Lockdown504090
RealGM
Posts: 11,850
And1: 12,713
Joined: Nov 24, 2015
         

Re: How the illegal defense rule made it easier for Jordan to score in the ‘90s 

Post#54 » by Lockdown504090 » Mon Dec 16, 2019 12:58 pm

The4thHorseman wrote:
Lockdown504090 wrote:1994 three shots awarded for fouls on three pointers, 2001 removal of zone defenses, Hand checking emphasis, 10 seconds as opposed to 8 to get the ball past half court, shot clock resets to 14 on the offensive rebound, modern spacing, spread pick and roll offense, expanded flagrant foul rules. All those things are helping todays players put up absurd numbers. for god sakes, trae young is 4th in the league in scoring in scoring right now on 48% shooting in his second season. in 1993 the fourth leading scorer was hakeem Olajuwon. it might be a little easier to score in today's regular season, just saying.

How the hell are those highlighted above, helping players score absurd amounts of points???

I would think that moving the 3pt line closer for 3yrs (like Stern did from 94-97) is by far the biggest change ever made to help players score more. Then once players got used to it by shooting more 3's, he probably figured that just move it back where it was and they'll start hitting from there eventually.

increased pace
The4thHorseman
General Manager
Posts: 8,846
And1: 5,477
Joined: Jun 18, 2011

Re: How the illegal defense rule made it easier for Jordan to score in the ‘90s 

Post#55 » by The4thHorseman » Mon Dec 16, 2019 1:14 pm

Lockdown504090 wrote:
The4thHorseman wrote:
Lockdown504090 wrote:1994 three shots awarded for fouls on three pointers, 2001 removal of zone defenses, Hand checking emphasis, 10 seconds as opposed to 8 to get the ball past half court, shot clock resets to 14 on the offensive rebound, modern spacing, spread pick and roll offense, expanded flagrant foul rules. All those things are helping todays players put up absurd numbers. for god sakes, trae young is 4th in the league in scoring in scoring right now on 48% shooting in his second season. in 1993 the fourth leading scorer was hakeem Olajuwon. it might be a little easier to score in today's regular season, just saying.

How the hell are those highlighted above, helping players score absurd amounts of points???

I would think that moving the 3pt line closer for 3yrs (like Stern did from 94-97) is by far the biggest change ever made to help players score more. Then once players got used to it by shooting more 3's, he probably figured that just move it back where it was and they'll start hitting from there eventually.

increased pace

:lol: no

Not when it comes to what I highlighted above, unless you have some factual evidence that the expanded flagrant foul rules makes the pace faster which helps players score much more easily.
MavsDirk41 wrote:

Utah was a dynasty in the 90s
Blazers had a mini dynasty late 80s early 90s
norcocredo
Rookie
Posts: 1,059
And1: 1,442
Joined: Mar 14, 2015

Re: How the illegal defense rule made it easier for Jordan to score in the ‘90s 

Post#56 » by norcocredo » Mon Dec 16, 2019 1:57 pm

Barnzy wrote:Michael Jordan is one of the most overrated players ever in the sense of how people hold him in such god like status compared to some players especially current players.

If you transport LeBron back to the 90's he would average 35/10/10 against the weaker competition and defense. He would also win the same or more amount of rings.

He's a superior athlete and player in most ways. Image

Image

Do that comparison for their 1st, 2nd, & 3rd round opponents.
draftnightsuit
Analyst
Posts: 3,515
And1: 6,590
Joined: Oct 08, 2016

Re: How the illegal defense rule made it easier for Jordan to score in the ‘90s 

Post#57 » by draftnightsuit » Mon Dec 16, 2019 4:08 pm



Here’s an example of what the video in the OP is talking about.

MJ gets shut down 1-on-1 by Muggsy Bogues (LOL), but gets bailed out by illegal defense because Charlotte’s big man sagged off his defender to meet him at the rim.

‘90s defense is a joke, in addition to fact that most of the players look like garbarge men compared to today’s players.
WherePipAt
Sophomore
Posts: 168
And1: 149
Joined: Aug 20, 2010

Re: How the illegal defense rule made it easier for Jordan to score in the ‘90s 

Post#58 » by WherePipAt » Mon Dec 16, 2019 4:51 pm

It's hilarious to me how people always post that Jordan zone quote unironically as a way to make it seem like he'd have a more difficult time in today's game. Every time I see someone mention it, it's completely taken out of context and doesn't take into account the fact that Jordan was talking about fully allowing zones along with all the other old defensive rules which allowed players to be more physical and enable teams to camp big men in the paint on defense. This was before they changed the rules in 2004 to literally make it easier for perimeter players to score.
Hornet Mania
General Manager
Posts: 9,010
And1: 8,496
Joined: Jul 05, 2014
Location: Dornbirn, Austria
     

Re: How the illegal defense rule made it easier for Jordan to score in the ‘90s 

Post#59 » by Hornet Mania » Mon Dec 16, 2019 5:04 pm

draftnightsuit wrote:

Here’s an example of what the video in the OP is talking about.

MJ gets shut down 1-on-1 by Muggsy Bogues (LOL), but gets bailed out by illegal defense because Charlotte’s big man sagged off his defender to meet him at the rim.

‘90s defense is a joke, in addition to fact that most of the players look like garbarge men compared to today’s players.


"Hey guys, here's one play from a game to prove MJ actually sucked and his whole era was trash."

You found a play from MJ's comeback season (notice the 45 jersey) when he was quite clearly not at peak form. To further exaggerate you 'LOL' at Muggsy Bogues defense as if he were some scrub when he was in fact one of the most ferocious perimeter defenders in the league during that period. Well done. Now let's do that with a player from this era using the same in-depth style of analysis.



Here's an example of how modern players have no fundamental skill. Look at this stupidity, the alleged GOAT lets the ball roll right out of bounds trying to save clock just because of pressure from noteworthy perimeter defender Paul Millsap (LOL). The modern era is trash.

I'm not one of those guys who claims the 80s/90s/whenever is clearly superior to today but it's pretty damn obvious that a lot of people have zero respect for any players from eras they did not watch. If you think MJ couldn't score points in the most perimeter-scorer-friendly era EVER than I don't know what to tell you. I'm out of this thread.
User avatar
Joao Saraiva
RealGM
Posts: 13,445
And1: 6,217
Joined: Feb 09, 2011
   

Re: How the illegal defense rule made it easier for Jordan to score in the ‘90s 

Post#60 » by Joao Saraiva » Mon Dec 16, 2019 5:14 pm

Strepbacter wrote:The four/five out spacing and completely WIDE OPEN lanes and no hand-checking of today's game would be far more beneficial to Jordan than the illegal defenses rule. This isn't debatable. He'd average 45+ a game in today's league.


It isn't debatable? Any "he'd" "if" "could" "should" scenario is debatable. There is no proof for it or proof to deny it.

I can say Wilt would average 100 PPG today and it isn't debatable. :dontknow:
“These guys have been criticized the last few years for not getting to where we’re going, but I’ve always said that the most important thing in sports is to keep trying. Let this be an example of what it means to say it’s never over.” - Jerry Sloan

Return to The General Board