slicedbread2 wrote:I will admit that it was a bit disappointing that they didn't keep P.J. Tucker given they had his full bird rights and they could've convinced him to take a lesser deal with a smaller cap hit spread out over 3 years at say 17-20M but I understand the main reason being was that his added salary would've skyrocketed their tax bill. He would've been ideal for soaking up minutes in the regular season but oh well.
I think the main reason they let him go is he is 37.
As for soaking up minutes in the regular season, last year before Divicenzo got injured Tucker was 10th in minutes.
They just had to play him a tonne on the play offs, I don't think they actually wanted to.