LofJ wrote:I wonder if he read the Ringer article that was recently published about him? It made a pretty good case that he's being underutilized.
he did. they read everything.
Moderators: bwgood77, bisme37, zimpy27, KingDavid, cupcakesnake, Domejandro, ken6199, infinite11285, Clav, Dirk
LofJ wrote:I wonder if he read the Ringer article that was recently published about him? It made a pretty good case that he's being underutilized.
SunsLyf3 wrote:Blazers needs to find a way to get Simmons and Turner. Their defense would complement Lillard perfectly.
nate33 wrote:Turner to Golden State for Wiseman, Looney and Moody makes too much sense not to happen.

eminence wrote:The-Power wrote:nate33 wrote:Turner to Golden State for Wiseman, Looney and Moody makes too much sense not to happen.
Aside from debates about value, how does Turner make sense for GSW when he specifically wants to leave to be more than a ‘role player’ (to use his words). It's not like it's easier to have touches and get shots up in Golden State than in Indiana. Our Centers have notoriously been reduced to smaller roles in the past and it was a key argument in favor of Turner that he can play effectively in a small offensive role.
Also, why would Indiana take two Centers back – both of whom aren't known to be shooters – when they have Sabonis and the thought process behind most draft proposals was to move on from Turner to get a non-big in return.
Winning solves a lot of ‘role’ questions.
I think the offer would be something more like Wiseman/Kuminga with a pick back to GS, Wiseman to OKC for picks and Kuminga/pick to IND.

TheNewEra wrote:Feel like the Hornets would be the best fit. They could increase his role with LaMelo
Bad-Thoma wrote:Turner always sounds good on paper but every time I see him play...
celtics543 wrote:But that's what he is though. He's a role player not a star. If he wants a situation where he's the featured guy then that's a team that will lose a lot of games.
draftnightsuit wrote:I remember Turner facing up in his first couple season. He probably wants to be a scorer, but that’s not his best role. He’d probably accept his current role if he were on a winning team.
He’s basically a carbon copy of Raef LaFrentz; he protects the rum and spreads the floor. There are a bunch of teams that could use him.

jamaalstar21 wrote:I know most fans see Turner as the ultimate puzzle piece to change their team: the 3&D center.
I'm constantly underwhelmed by Turner when he does anything besides protect the rim (which he's amazing at). He can shoot, but the release isn't quick. He has a high center of gravity and weak, inflexible legs, so he gets knocked around the paint. He very much is a role player. A valuable role player yes, but I'm not sure what Turner thinks he could do on another roster.

jamaalstar21 wrote:I know most fans see Turner as the ultimate puzzle piece to change their team: the 3&D center.
I'm constantly underwhelmed by Turner when he does anything besides protect the rim (which he's amazing at). He can shoot, but the release isn't quick. He has a high center of gravity and weak, inflexible legs, so he gets knocked around the paint. He very much is a role player. A valuable role player yes, but I'm not sure what Turner thinks he could do on another roster.
ThunderBolt wrote:I’m going to let some of you in on a little secret I learned on realgm. If you don’t like a thread, not only do you not have to comment but you don’t even have to open it and read it. You’re welcome.
jamaalstar21 wrote:I know most fans see Turner as the ultimate puzzle piece to change their team: the 3&D center.
I'm constantly underwhelmed by Turner when he does anything besides protect the rim (which he's amazing at). He can shoot, but the release isn't quick. He has a high center of gravity and weak, inflexible legs, so he gets knocked around the paint. He very much is a role player. A valuable role player yes, but I'm not sure what Turner thinks he could do on another roster.