Can a case be made that Larry Bird was the GOAT ?

Moderators: Clav, Domejandro, ken6199, bisme37, Dirk, KingDavid, cupcakesnake, bwgood77, zimpy27, infinite11285

User avatar
Sofia
GOTB: Mean Girls
Posts: 30,420
And1: 34,256
Joined: Aug 03, 2008

Re: Can a case be made that Larry Bird was the GOAT ? 

Post#41 » by Sofia » Tue Feb 15, 2022 2:56 am

VanWest82 wrote:
Myth wrote:
VanWest82 wrote:86 round one says otherwise.

28/8/8/1.7/1.3 on 53% (64%TS) while sweeping another GOAT candidate is a pretty weak knock on Bird.

It's not that Bird played poorly. It's that he had one of the greatest teams ever assembled and and they let a guy - the actual GOAT - average 43/6/6 against them despite being the only real offensive threat.

If 91 MJ had been thoroughly outplayed by another GOAT candidate in a playoff series, pre-prime, it'd get brought up again and again in these types of discussions.

There was a thread yesterday saying that Lebron padded his stats through first round playoff series, despite never losing one.

Will that same standard be applied to Jordan in losing a sweep?
lottery is rigged militia
President of the Pharmcat Fanclub
President of the GreatWhiteStiff Fanclub
Free OKCFanSinceSGA
Reddyplayerone = my RealGM bae
a8bil
Analyst
Posts: 3,663
And1: 1,693
Joined: Jan 18, 2007

Re: Can a case be made that Larry Bird was the GOAT ? 

Post#42 » by a8bil » Tue Feb 15, 2022 2:56 am

LAL1947 wrote:
Cavsfansince84 wrote:
NZB2323 wrote:
Magic was better from 87-92, which is why I think most people have Magic ranked ahead of Bird. From 80-86 Bird was better.

For top 5, I think it depends on what you value. Duncan vs. Bird is an interesting debate. Bird's peak from 84-86 is better than any 3 year run from Duncan, but Duncan's got the longevity.


You can definitely make a case for 01-04 Duncan being ahead of Bird. More so as a playoff performer. He was arguably a top 4 offensive and defensive player in the league at that time. Bird really doesn't have much of any argument vs Duncan imo.

Personally, I'd pick Larry over Tim Duncan in a draft 10 times out of 10. Timmy only has longevity over Larry, and that was due to an unfortunate off-court incident with Larry. I'd even go so far as to say that Timmy is on the verge of being knocked out of the All-time Top 10, i.e., if Giannis (the new best PF of all-time?) can continue in the same way that he has been.
Only because the casual fan can't understand in how many ways Duncan impacted the game. Years from now, there will be fanboys saying, Draymond who? That sportcaster? Looks at his numbers...they are garbage...Kevin Willis was better,,,blah, blah, blah.
NZB2323
RealGM
Posts: 14,445
And1: 10,979
Joined: Aug 02, 2008

Re: Can a case be made that Larry Bird was the GOAT ? 

Post#43 » by NZB2323 » Tue Feb 15, 2022 2:59 am

Cavsfansince84 wrote:
NZB2323 wrote:
AussieCeltic wrote:Definitely one of the best peaks and I feel is gets underrated somewhat in comparison to his arch rival Magic. In saying that, he's not the GOAT. The argument is whether he is top 5 or not.


Magic was better from 87-92, which is why I think most people have Magic ranked ahead of Bird. From 80-86 Bird was better.

For top 5, I think it depends on what you value. Duncan vs. Bird is an interesting debate. Bird's peak from 84-86 is better than any 3 year run from Duncan, but Duncan's got the longevity.


You can definitely make a case for 01-04 Duncan being ahead of Bird. More so as a playoff performer. He was arguably a top 4 offensive and defensive player in the league at that time. Bird really doesn't have much of any argument vs Duncan imo.


In 3 years:

3 MVPS, 2 Finals MVPS, 2 championships, the only year he didn't win a championship he lost in game 6 of the Finals, had a 40-1 home record one year and a 15-3 playoff run.

Not the defensive anchor Tim is, but he made all-NBA defensive 2nd team.

Duncan was great from 01-03 though.
Cavsfansince84
RealGM
Posts: 15,170
And1: 11,588
Joined: Jun 13, 2017
   

Re: Can a case be made that Larry Bird was the GOAT ? 

Post#44 » by Cavsfansince84 » Tue Feb 15, 2022 3:08 am

NZB2323 wrote:
In 3 years:

3 MVPS, 2 Finals MVPS, 2 championships, the only year he didn't win a championship he lost in game 6 of the Finals, had a 40-1 home record one year and a 15-3 playoff run.

Not the defensive anchor Tim is, but he made all-NBA defensive 2nd team.

Duncan was great from 01-03 though.


I know all of that, I lived through it. If its based purely on accolades then you can say Bird had the better 3 year peak. If its based on actual stats and other things you can easily argue that Duncan's was slightly better. Duncan also finished 2-1-1-2 in mvp voting from 01-04.
VanWest82
RealGM
Posts: 19,615
And1: 18,117
Joined: Dec 05, 2008

Re: Can a case be made that Larry Bird was the GOAT ? 

Post#45 » by VanWest82 » Tue Feb 15, 2022 3:08 am

Sofia wrote:
VanWest82 wrote:
Myth wrote:28/8/8/1.7/1.3 on 53% (64%TS) while sweeping another GOAT candidate is a pretty weak knock on Bird.

It's not that Bird played poorly. It's that he had one of the greatest teams ever assembled and and they let a guy - the actual GOAT - average 43/6/6 against them despite being the only real offensive threat.

If 91 MJ had been thoroughly outplayed by another GOAT candidate in a playoff series, pre-prime, it'd get brought up again and again in these types of discussions.

There was a thread yesterday saying that Lebron padded his stats through first round playoff series, despite never losing one.

Will that same standard be applied to Jordan in losing a sweep?

MJ was stat padding vs. 86 Celtics?? Lol that's a new one. I guess Lebron was just stat padding vs. 17 Warriors.
LAL1947
Assistant Coach
Posts: 4,383
And1: 2,621
Joined: Dec 28, 2018

Re: Can a case be made that Larry Bird was the GOAT ? 

Post#46 » by LAL1947 » Tue Feb 15, 2022 3:10 am

a8bil wrote:
LAL1947 wrote:
Cavsfansince84 wrote:
You can definitely make a case for 01-04 Duncan being ahead of Bird. More so as a playoff performer. He was arguably a top 4 offensive and defensive player in the league at that time. Bird really doesn't have much of any argument vs Duncan imo.

Personally, I'd pick Larry over Tim Duncan in a draft 10 times out of 10. Timmy only has longevity over Larry, and that was due to an unfortunate off-court incident with Larry. I'd even go so far as to say that Timmy is on the verge of being knocked out of the All-time Top 10, i.e., if Giannis (the new best PF of all-time?) can continue in the same way that he has been.
Only because the casual fan can't understand in how many ways Duncan impacted the game. Years from now, there will be fanboys saying, Draymond who? That sportcaster? Looks at his numbers...they are garbage...Kevin Willis was better,,,blah, blah, blah.

So now I'm a casual fan because I feel that we do not hold Duncan or his career under the same microscope that we do other, better all-time greats... nor do we truthfully state the quality of his teammates (Kawhi, Parker, Ginobili, Robinson, Finley, Bowen, Barry, Malik Rose, Daniels, etc, etc) while we always talk about the stacked Celtics, Lakers, Bulls, Heat, GSW, Nets, etc... nor do we factor in the Front Office excellence and stability he enjoyed at the Spurs compared to others... resulting in him being held up higher than he should be? FWIW, I do think the Bucks are currently quite stacked as a team too. Anyway, I'm taking a jab at Duncan here because there are a few Duncan-fans on this forum who will compare Giannis to Duncan's competitors for a Top-10 spot (like Kobe) to safeguard their dear Timmy... while ignoring the most obvious comparison there is to be made, Power Forward vs Power Forward, Duncan vs Giannis.

And please don't come at me with that gibberish about Draymond. I've been singing his praises as a defender and play-maker from well before it was fashionable. He is an integral part of their movement-oriented offense as well as how good they defend as a team. Intelligence can sometimes make up a lot for a lack of height or athleticism. There are many similarities to be drawn between Draymond and Sergio Busquets, if you also follow soccer.
User avatar
Sofia
GOTB: Mean Girls
Posts: 30,420
And1: 34,256
Joined: Aug 03, 2008

Re: Can a case be made that Larry Bird was the GOAT ? 

Post#47 » by Sofia » Tue Feb 15, 2022 3:15 am

VanWest82 wrote:
Sofia wrote:
VanWest82 wrote:It's not that Bird played poorly. It's that he had one of the greatest teams ever assembled and and they let a guy - the actual GOAT - average 43/6/6 against them despite being the only real offensive threat.

If 91 MJ had been thoroughly outplayed by another GOAT candidate in a playoff series, pre-prime, it'd get brought up again and again in these types of discussions.

There was a thread yesterday saying that Lebron padded his stats through first round playoff series, despite never losing one.

Will that same standard be applied to Jordan in losing a sweep?

MJ was stat padding vs. 86 Celtics?? Lol that's a new one. I guess Lebron was just stat padding vs. 17 Warriors.


I don’t think he was, but I also didn’t think Lebron was stat padding by winning first round series either. Was just curious if those same posters would be consistent… :dontknow:
lottery is rigged militia
President of the Pharmcat Fanclub
President of the GreatWhiteStiff Fanclub
Free OKCFanSinceSGA
Reddyplayerone = my RealGM bae
VanWest82
RealGM
Posts: 19,615
And1: 18,117
Joined: Dec 05, 2008

Re: Can a case be made that Larry Bird was the GOAT ? 

Post#48 » by VanWest82 » Tue Feb 15, 2022 3:19 am

Sofia wrote:
VanWest82 wrote:
Sofia wrote:There was a thread yesterday saying that Lebron padded his stats through first round playoff series, despite never losing one.

Will that same standard be applied to Jordan in losing a sweep?

MJ was stat padding vs. 86 Celtics?? Lol that's a new one. I guess Lebron was just stat padding vs. 17 Warriors.


I don’t think he was, but I also didn’t think Lebron was stat padding by winning first round series either. Was just curious if those same posters would be consistent… :dontknow:

I was not one of those posters and I don't think Lebron is a stat padder.
basketballRob
RealGM
Posts: 37,075
And1: 14,903
Joined: May 05, 2014
     

Re: Can a case be made that Larry Bird was the GOAT ? 

Post#49 » by basketballRob » Tue Feb 15, 2022 3:22 am

Bird played his last few years with back problems. If it wasn't for health problems he'd be right up there.

Sent from my SM-G950U using RealGM Forums mobile app
User avatar
SelfishPlayer
General Manager
Posts: 7,549
And1: 3,368
Joined: May 23, 2014

Re: Can a case be made that Larry Bird was the GOAT ? 

Post#50 » by SelfishPlayer » Tue Feb 15, 2022 3:27 am

Larry Bird could make a case as the GOAT power forward. But not for greatest player or greatest SF.
SelfishPlayer wrote:The Mavs won playoff games without Luka

The Mavs missed the playoffs without Brunson.
1993Playoffs
Assistant Coach
Posts: 4,116
And1: 4,287
Joined: Apr 25, 2017

Re: Can a case be made that Larry Bird was the GOAT ? 

Post#51 » by 1993Playoffs » Tue Feb 15, 2022 3:28 am

Sure. If defense, longevity, and playoff consistency didn’t. Matter
LAL1947
Assistant Coach
Posts: 4,383
And1: 2,621
Joined: Dec 28, 2018

Re: Can a case be made that Larry Bird was the GOAT ? 

Post#52 » by LAL1947 » Tue Feb 15, 2022 3:34 am

Cavsfansince84 wrote:
LAL1947 wrote:Personally, I'd pick Larry over Tim Duncan in a draft 10 times out of 10. Timmy only has longevity over Larry, and that was due to an unfortunate off-court incident with Larry. I'd even go so far as to say that Timmy is on the verge of being knocked out of the All-time Top 10, i.e., if Giannis (the new best PF of all-time?) can continue in the same way that he has been.


Alright well, so long as you realize that's a personal opinion and all. Both are great but I think Timmy's peak was higher and he was the more consistent playoff guy on top of things like longevity and 5 rings. Duncan was a top 5 defender in the league for about 10 years straight and his per 100 scoring is almost equal while being a dominant rebounder and very good passer from like 02 on.

Fair enough, it's your personal opinion. Please don't think that I was coming at you. :thumbsup:

I'll give you that Duncan was a better defender and had the longevity, but that's it. Larry was a better scorer, one of the best passers ever, a better orchestrator of the offense, better 3PT shooter (more transferable to this new era), a better closer (as evidenced by his free-throw %, among other things), and even a better leader (Larry's USA team did not finish with the bronze medal in the Olympics, unlike when Tim Duncan was captain).

Bird vs Duncan:
PPG: 24.3 vs 19.0
3PT%: 38% vs 18%
FT%: 89% vs 70%
AST: 6.3 vs 3.0
REB: 10.0 vs 10.8
STL: 1.7 vs 0.7
BLK: 0.8 vs 2.2
ORTG: 115 vs 110
DRTG: 101 vs 96

If you're open to a small exercise, look up their main teammates and where those players stand in the annals of basketball history. For example, where do guys like Robert Parish, Kevin McHale stand in the list of best players in their position compared to David Robinson, Tony Parker, Manu Ginobili, Michael Finley, Kawhi Leonard. You can then also compare the quality of depth of their squads: Tiny Archibald, Chris Ford, Cedric Maxwell, Dennis Johnson, Danny Ainge, Gerald Henderson, Jerry Sichting, etc vs Brent Barry, Bruce Bowen, Antonio Daniels, Malik Rose, Steve Smith, Stephen Jackson, etc. You could also similarly compare the 1980s Celtics to the 1980s Lakers.

Oh, and Larry is the king of trash-talk too. 8-) :lol:
Cavsfansince84
RealGM
Posts: 15,170
And1: 11,588
Joined: Jun 13, 2017
   

Re: Can a case be made that Larry Bird was the GOAT ? 

Post#53 » by Cavsfansince84 » Tue Feb 15, 2022 4:52 am

LAL1947 wrote:Fair enough, it's your personal opinion. Please don't think that I was coming at you. :thumbsup:

I'll give you that Duncan was a better defender and had the longevity, but that's it. Larry was a better scorer, one of the best passers ever, a better orchestrator of the offense, better 3PT shooter (more transferable to this new era), a better closer (as evidenced by his free-throw %, among other things), and even a better leader (Larry's USA team did not finish with the bronze medal in the Olympics, unlike when Tim Duncan was captain).

Bird vs Duncan:
PPG: 24.3 vs 19.0
3PT%: 38% vs 18%
FT%: 89% vs 70%
AST: 6.3 vs 3.0
REB: 10.0 vs 10.8
STL: 1.7 vs 0.7
BLK: 0.8 vs 2.2
ORTG: 115 vs 110
DRTG: 101 vs 96

If you're open to a small exercise, look up their main teammates and where those players stand in the annals of basketball history. For example, where do guys like Robert Parish, Kevin McHale stand in the list of best players in their position compared to David Robinson, Tony Parker, Manu Ginobili, Michael Finley, Kawhi Leonard. You can then also compare the quality of depth of their squads: Tiny Archibald, Chris Ford, Cedric Maxwell, Dennis Johnson, Danny Ainge, Gerald Henderson, Jerry Sichting, etc vs Brent Barry, Bruce Bowen, Antonio Daniels, Malik Rose, Steve Smith, Stephen Jackson, etc. You could also similarly compare the 1980s Celtics to the 1980s Lakers.

Oh, and Larry is the king of trash-talk too. 8-) :lol:


Career box score stats is sort of an unfair comparison though imo due to Tim playing until he was 40 and playing low mpg after the age of 30. In terms of career per 100 stats it tells a different story even including those seasons. Its 30.3/12.5/5.9 for Bird on career ts+ of 105 to 29.7/16.9/4.7 for Duncan on career ts+ of 104 which doesn't really get into defense where he was 1st team 8 times and 2nd team 6 times.
NZB2323
RealGM
Posts: 14,445
And1: 10,979
Joined: Aug 02, 2008

Re: Can a case be made that Larry Bird was the GOAT ? 

Post#54 » by NZB2323 » Tue Feb 15, 2022 5:22 am

LAL1947 wrote:
a8bil wrote:
LAL1947 wrote:Personally, I'd pick Larry over Tim Duncan in a draft 10 times out of 10. Timmy only has longevity over Larry, and that was due to an unfortunate off-court incident with Larry. I'd even go so far as to say that Timmy is on the verge of being knocked out of the All-time Top 10, i.e., if Giannis (the new best PF of all-time?) can continue in the same way that he has been.
Only because the casual fan can't understand in how many ways Duncan impacted the game. Years from now, there will be fanboys saying, Draymond who? That sportcaster? Looks at his numbers...they are garbage...Kevin Willis was better,,,blah, blah, blah.

So now I'm a casual fan because I feel that we do not hold Duncan or his career under the same microscope that we do other, better all-time greats... nor do we truthfully state the quality of his teammates (Kawhi, Parker, Ginobili, Robinson, Finley, Bowen, Barry, Malik Rose, Daniels, etc, etc) while we always talk about the stacked Celtics, Lakers, Bulls, Heat, GSW, Nets, etc... nor do we factor in the Front Office excellence and stability he enjoyed at the Spurs compared to others... resulting in him being held up higher than he should be? FWIW, I do think the Bucks are currently quite stacked as a team too. Anyway, I'm taking a jab at Duncan here because there are a few Duncan-fans on this forum who will compare Giannis to Duncan's competitors for a Top-10 spot (like Kobe) to safeguard their dear Timmy... while ignoring the most obvious comparison there is to be made, Power Forward vs Power Forward, Duncan vs Giannis.

And please don't come at me with that gibberish about Draymond. I've been singing his praises as a defender and play-maker from well before it was fashionable. He is an integral part of their movement-oriented offense as well as how good they defend as a team. Intelligence can sometimes make up a lot for a lack of height or athleticism. There are many similarities to be drawn between Draymond and Sergio Busquets, if you also follow soccer.


Michael Finley joined the Spurs when he was 32, 5 years removed from his last all-star season. In 27 minutes a game he averaged 10 points, 3 rebounds, 2 assists, and 1 turnover while shooting 41%. He was washed.

Brent Barry had 8 years when he scored 10 or more points in a game. All of them were before he joined the Spurs at the age of 33. Brent Barry had 6 seasons when he had 3 or more assists a game, but all of them were before he joined the Spurs.

Malik Rose's career averages are 6 points, 4 rebounds, and 1 assist per game.

In 99 when the Spurs won the championship Antonio Daniels averaged 1.8 ppg, 0.7 rebounds, 1.1 assists.

Kawhi, Parker, Ginobili, and Robinson were all great players, but the rest not so much. And Duncan in 03 goes down with Dirk in 11, Jordan in 98, and Hakeem in 94 as one of the greatest carry jobs of all time. Robinson was 37, Tony Parker was 20, and Ginobili was a rookie. No other Spur made the all-star team, yet Duncan beat the Shaq and Kobe lakers and was dominant in the playoffs. 25, 15, 5, and 3 while shooting 53% from the field.

I do think that Duncan had much better teammates than KG and Dirk, but he's still better.

And I don't consider Duncan to be a power forward. He played 63% of his career minutes at center during the regular season, and 71% of his playoff minutes at center. They played him at power forward when they had Robinson, just like how Hakeem played power forward when the Rockets had Ralph Sampson.

No matter how you make a top 10 list, some great player is going to be left out, but I don't think I'd ever leave Duncan out.
Mephariel
Sixth Man
Posts: 1,997
And1: 2,104
Joined: Jun 24, 2018
   

Re: Can a case be made that Larry Bird was the GOAT ? 

Post#55 » by Mephariel » Tue Feb 15, 2022 5:23 am

No. The fact that people have to say "take his first 9 years" or "if you only count his peak years" you know he is not goat.
Finchination33
Junior
Posts: 382
And1: 531
Joined: Nov 09, 2015
     

Re: Can a case be made that Larry Bird was the GOAT ? 

Post#56 » by Finchination33 » Tue Feb 15, 2022 5:24 am

If Magic has a claim for the GOAT, then Larry Legend definitely does as he was a better player.
User avatar
MrBigShot
RealGM
Posts: 18,674
And1: 20,264
Joined: Dec 18, 2010
 

Re: Can a case be made that Larry Bird was the GOAT ? 

Post#57 » by MrBigShot » Tue Feb 15, 2022 5:32 am

As incredible as Bird was, MJ was just downright better. Compare their best playoff runs.
"They say you miss 100% of the shots you take" - Mike James
SNPA
General Manager
Posts: 9,206
And1: 8,574
Joined: Apr 15, 2020

Re: Can a case be made that Larry Bird was the GOAT ? 

Post#58 » by SNPA » Tue Feb 15, 2022 5:41 am

Slim Charless wrote:
nzd07 wrote:No.


/thread

We know who to ignore now. Helpful.
LAL1947
Assistant Coach
Posts: 4,383
And1: 2,621
Joined: Dec 28, 2018

Re: Can a case be made that Larry Bird was the GOAT ? 

Post#59 » by LAL1947 » Tue Feb 15, 2022 5:42 am

Cavsfansince84 wrote:
LAL1947 wrote:I don't think Larry Bird can make a case for GOAT (that is MJ). However, he has a strong case to be on the Mount Rushmore of Basketball and is on mine. He is becoming criminally under-rated by fans who are forgetting just how good he was... and are forgetting how stacked the teams were that his team beat. There are even people who now say that the 1980s Celtics were more stacked than the Lakers or 76ers , say what? :-?


The problem is though that he went 1-2 vs those Sixers teams(while not even facing the best Sixer team) and 1-2 vs the Lakers. Having said that, I am higher on Bird than most people and have him at about 7-8 right there with Magic.

Well, why don't we apply the same logic to Tim Duncan too? Magic and Kareem are considered greater than Kobe and Shaq, right? Larry went up against Magic and Kareem and also had inferior depth on his Celtics teams. Duncan went up against Kobe and Shaq but had superior depth on his Spurs teams. After Kobe got rolling in 1999-2000, Duncan was 1-3 against them in the playoffs, only winning in 2002-03 when Shaq become way too fat, started feuding with Kobe and lost his previous mobility after toe surgery (see picture below, I'm not making this up, that is Shaq's toe in 2002-03).

Image

In 2002-03, Derek Fisher was the 3rd most used player on the Lakers. The same Derek Fisher who left LA in 2004-05 to join GSW, where he was the back-up to the Spurs previous back-up PG, Speedy Claxton. In 2002-03, Robert Horry was the 4th most used player on the Lakers. The same Robert Horry who left LA in 2003-04 to join the Spurs, where he was more appropriately their 7th most used player because of the Spurs quality of depth.

How come we gloss over these things and never highlight them with Tim Duncan but nobody else gets free passes?
User avatar
HomoSapien
Senior Mod - Bulls
Senior Mod - Bulls
Posts: 37,314
And1: 30,348
Joined: Aug 17, 2009
 

Re: Can a case be made that Larry Bird was the GOAT ? 

Post#60 » by HomoSapien » Tue Feb 15, 2022 5:54 am

If someone called any of Bird, Magic, Wilt, MJ, Kareem, or Russell the GOAT I wouldn’t have much issue with it.
ThreeYearPlan wrote:Bulls fans defend HomoSapien more than Rose.

Return to The General Board