ChiTownHero1992 wrote:This should not even be a comparison or discussion...come on...
Why? Mountains of evidence to indicate LeBron was a more impactful defender in his prime.
Moderators: cupcakesnake, bwgood77, zimpy27, infinite11285, Clav, Domejandro, ken6199, bisme37, Dirk, KingDavid
ChiTownHero1992 wrote:This should not even be a comparison or discussion...come on...
fanofthegreats wrote:ChiTownHero1992 wrote:This should not even be a comparison or discussion...come on...
Why? Mountains of evidence to indicate LeBron was a more impactful defender in his prime.
D.Brasco wrote:fanofthegreats wrote:ChiTownHero1992 wrote:This should not even be a comparison or discussion...come on...
Why? Mountains of evidence to indicate LeBron was a more impactful defender in his prime.
Yeah but Jordan has the better documentary. He beat the security guard at gambling.

FarBeyondDriven wrote:Lebron has never been a plus defender. His massive athletic and physical advantage allowed him to get some chase down blocks which are flashy and seemingly impress the casuals but he's never been a particularly good defender on or off ball. MJ was a demon on defense especially before his first retirement due to his relentless motor. When he came back he still had high defensive BBIQ and flashed but he was no longer as quick and his motor had diminished so he was no longer an elite defender but he was better then, than Lebron ever was.

"Overall, who is the superior defender at their best? MJ or LeBron?"
D.Brasco wrote:fanofthegreats wrote:ChiTownHero1992 wrote:This should not even be a comparison or discussion...come on...
Why? Mountains of evidence to indicate LeBron was a more impactful defender in his prime.
Yeah but Jordan has the better documentary. He beat the security guard at gambling.
DuallyNoted wrote:Lebron at his best was an okay defender.
LakerLegend wrote:LeBron was literally more athletic at 35 than he was at 20

Lo Wang wrote:cupcakesnake wrote:Lebron.
He's just a lot bigger and able to do more as a rim protector and help defender. Lebron was a much more disciplined defender as well.
MJ's a better pure point of attack guy with quicker feet and hands, but he also had a bit of lazy gambling in him. MJ liked to go for steals, and while he generated plenty of them, the trade off wasn't always positive because he left the defense in a bad position.
I think Lebron's point of attack defense got overrated after the series against the Bulls where he guarded D.Rose in spots. The rest of his defense though, is probably underrated by some fans. Prime Lebron covered so much ground and was so good at defensive rotations. Even as an old man conserving his effort, Lebron still impresses me sometimes with his ability to be proactive and rotate to the right spot (even if he's pretty bad at contesting shots or guarding the perimeter now).
They're both good defenders, but Lebron is bringing a larger overall impact on that end.
This is the only time disagree with your take. Jordan was all defensive 1st team 9x and recorded 200 steals and 100 blocks in 2 seasons. Lebron only had five 1st teams and one 2nd team. Jordan could not only school the best players of the opposing team, but score on them as well. I disagree with the "lazy" part of Jordan's defense; he was clearly the best defensive player even when he was playing against some of the best defensive players of his era (Hakeem, Mutombo, Shaq, Pippen, Payton, Rodman, etc.).
I can't say the same with Lebron; prime Lebron was a beast on defense, and he had a good 5 prime defensive years, but Jordan was dominant until he retired and went to the Wizards.
LakerLegend wrote:LeBron was literally more athletic at 35 than he was at 20
HMFFL wrote:Jordan's and it's not remotely close.
Stop being silly
LakerLegend wrote:LeBron was literally more athletic at 35 than he was at 20
Bornstellar wrote:I think peak LeBron had the ability to be a more impactful defensive player and was a legit DPOY candidate, but that was only for like 3-4 seasons. However, over the course of their careers, I'd go with Jordan
OhayoKD wrote:Lebron contributes more to all the phases of play than Messi does. And he is of course a defensive anchor unlike messi.
Iwasawitness wrote:HMFFL wrote:Jordan's and it's not remotely close.
Stop being silly
In what regard? MJ could never make the same defensive impact LeBron did at his peak. I find myself questioning anyone who thinks it’s not close between the two.
bledredwine wrote:There were 3 times Jordan won and was considered the underdog
1989 Eastern Conference Finals against the Detroit Pistons, the 1991 NBA Finals against the Magic Johnson-led Los Angeles Lakers, and the 1995 Eastern Conference Finals against the NY Knicks


Pennebaker wrote:Jordan lacks LeBron's mental toughness.
dhsilv2 wrote:Tottery wrote:dhsilv2 wrote:
Lets say we allow them. But then we have to us them with the other statement. That Jordan was CLEARLY the best defender over guys like Hakeem.
Block + Steal
87 Jordan 383 Hakeem 360
88 Jordan 390 Hakeem 376
Why don't I see a CLEAR lead here? I see a small one that's mostly due to Hakeem missing a few games.
If Hakeem hit his averages for the 3 games missed in 87-88, he'd still be down. There's no award for "close to being tied for 1st."
To answer the OP's question, it's Jordan. James had flashes of being great, but ultimately stopped giving that effort.
lol, yeah lets just ignore those rebound thingys....but again. He said it was CLEAR which it wasn't even using that metric.