Washington Wizards: what's your RealGM analysis?

Moderators: Clav, Domejandro, ken6199, bisme37, Dirk, KingDavid, cupcakesnake, bwgood77, zimpy27, infinite11285

Do you like the direction this team is trending?

Yes, a lot
8
6%
Yes, a little
16
13%
So so
25
20%
No, it's bad
27
21%
No, it's very bad
42
33%
I don't know
9
7%
 
Total votes: 127

shi-woo
Veteran
Posts: 2,568
And1: 4,106
Joined: Jun 17, 2018
     

Re: Washington Wizards: what's your RealGM analysis? 

Post#41 » by shi-woo » Fri Aug 16, 2024 6:04 am

I'm really low on this team, and think they are in for a lengthy process. They are doing alright, but this team is still 4 years away

I like their young talent, but none of them are a sure thing, and are all projects more than prospects at this point. That's a lot of basketball that is going to need to be learned at an elite level.

Sarr, Bud, Coulibali are all really young players, and we will see what they turn into. On paper they all have high potential and compliment each other perfectly, but we'll see. This team doesn't really have any young talent outside of those 3 right now, and are in desperate need of adding more. They will be bad this year, and their pick situation is dicey at best for a rebuilding team.

I don't like the vets on this team, and would trade any of them for a player in their early 20's or some picks. Poole, Kuzma, Brogdan, and Val have have had deep playoff runs, Kuz and Poole are proven championship role players. They all take a lot of shots, but are signed to solid deals. Brogdon should be traded or waived.

Wasn't a fan of the Deni trade, thought he was a solid young player, and really coming into his own. Bub looks like he has potential to be a solid PG, but still, I wish it was Kuzma or Kispert that went out instead. This team is committed to contract wise during the rebuild.

Val
Sarr
Kuz- Bey- George
Coulibali- Poole
Carrington

This team needs to add another high level prospect, multiple shooters, and needs some series depth at the guard and big spots. We'll see if they can do it. They are in the position to get both of those with a hopeful Top pick again in a solid draft, and multiple contracts coming off the books at the end of the year.

If they can walk away with a Bailey/Harper in the draft and a Naz Reid or Myles Turner in FA i'll feel much better about this team
doogie_hauser
Head Coach
Posts: 6,048
And1: 7,203
Joined: Feb 04, 2024
         

Re: Washington Wizards: what's your RealGM analysis? 

Post#42 » by doogie_hauser » Fri Aug 16, 2024 11:49 am

As long as they have gotten most/all of their FRPs for the next 5-9 years they will be okay.
They got better value for Beal in that deal with Phoenix (and Indy) than many thought they would get.
Honestly reckon Sarr will be immediately better than expected in his rookie season.

I do honestly feel bad for their long suffering fans (hard pressed to know which fans have suffered more in the last 15 or so years than the Wiz) but there seems to be some light at the end of The Tunnel finally.
User avatar
Optms
RealGM
Posts: 23,703
And1: 20,081
Joined: Jun 11, 2009
 

Re: Washington Wizards: what's your RealGM analysis? 

Post#43 » by Optms » Fri Aug 16, 2024 12:14 pm

LakersSoul wrote:
CP3nthusiast wrote:Didn't love their draft, the Poole trade was and continues to be an unmitigated disaster, they should've traded Kuzma when the market for him was hot. D+ so far for the front office, would be a D- if they didn't get a nice haul for Deni Avdija.


Not so sure. Last few moves have been smart!

Not sure about Sarr but:

Traded picks and picked up Keyshawn George.
Traded Deni for Brogdan plus 2 FRPs and SRP.

Then pickup FAs:
Bey 3/20
Valanciunas 3/30

These looks to me some solid moves with good upside for the team.


They mainly traded Deni to get another lottery pick and its a disservice not to mention who they selected with that pick - Bub Carrington. Who already looks like he's going to be a much better player than Deni. At worst the trade was even, at best, they got back their future starting point guard who could be a top 20 player in terms of ceiling. Potentially higher.
User avatar
GSWFan1994
General Manager
Posts: 8,049
And1: 16,684
Joined: Oct 31, 2006
 

Re: Washington Wizards: what's your RealGM analysis? 

Post#44 » by GSWFan1994 » Fri Aug 16, 2024 12:30 pm

Will Bub Carrington be the starting PG? Can he play PG full time in the NBA level? I thought he was more like a combo guard in college.
Saints14
Assistant Coach
Posts: 4,332
And1: 6,137
Joined: Jul 19, 2013
 

Re: Washington Wizards: what's your RealGM analysis? 

Post#45 » by Saints14 » Fri Aug 16, 2024 12:31 pm

I voted so-so. I don't think they have a future cornerstone on their roster, because I don't think Sarr is that guy (maybe Bub can be, but that's a lot to project for a late lotto pick). But, they made the right decision last offseason to tear it down, and since I think that change in direction was near-universally lauded on here I'm surprised that most people in this poll seem to hate the direction now. They're a top candidate to be the worst team in the NBA next year with two seemingly strong drafts coming up at least at the top, so if they get a bit of lotto luck their cornerstone might be coming soon
User avatar
GSWFan1994
General Manager
Posts: 8,049
And1: 16,684
Joined: Oct 31, 2006
 

Re: Washington Wizards: what's your RealGM analysis? 

Post#46 » by GSWFan1994 » Fri Aug 16, 2024 12:33 pm

Also, really funny that the thread in its 3rd page and yet literally not a single post mentioned Johnny Davis, lol.
User avatar
GSWFan1994
General Manager
Posts: 8,049
And1: 16,684
Joined: Oct 31, 2006
 

Re: Washington Wizards: what's your RealGM analysis? 

Post#47 » by GSWFan1994 » Fri Aug 16, 2024 12:34 pm

Saints14 wrote:I voted so-so. I don't think they have a future cornerstone on their roster, because I don't think Sarr is that guy (maybe Bub can be, but that's a lot to project for a late lotto pick). But, they made the right decision last offseason to tear it down, and since I think that change in direction was near-universally lauded on here I'm surprised that most people in this poll seem to hate the direction now. They're a top candidate to be the worst team in the NBA next year with two seemingly strong drafts coming up at least at the top, so if they get a bit of lotto luck their cornerstone might be coming soon


If you replace the question of the poll by "what do you think of the roster right now?", then the poll results make sense, :lol:
Mavrelous
Forum Mod - Mavericks
Forum Mod - Mavericks
Posts: 19,793
And1: 17,701
Joined: Aug 20, 2020

Re: Washington Wizards: what's your RealGM analysis? 

Post#48 » by Mavrelous » Fri Aug 16, 2024 12:35 pm

They sobered up from their Beal mistake, only to take on a worse player on a more crippling contract...
I liked their Avdija deal, sold extremely high on him.
They drafted 2 raw projects with their tanking picks so the jury is still out.
Defense wins draft lotteries!
User avatar
King4Day
RealGM
Posts: 13,613
And1: 9,822
Joined: Dec 11, 2010
Location: Pandora
         

Re: Washington Wizards: what's your RealGM analysis? 

Post#49 » by King4Day » Fri Aug 16, 2024 12:39 pm

A lot will change if they land Cooper Flagg
"Sometimes, the dragon wins" #RallyTheValley
Saints14
Assistant Coach
Posts: 4,332
And1: 6,137
Joined: Jul 19, 2013
 

Re: Washington Wizards: what's your RealGM analysis? 

Post#50 » by Saints14 » Fri Aug 16, 2024 12:47 pm

GSWFan1994 wrote:
Saints14 wrote:I voted so-so. I don't think they have a future cornerstone on their roster, because I don't think Sarr is that guy (maybe Bub can be, but that's a lot to project for a late lotto pick). But, they made the right decision last offseason to tear it down, and since I think that change in direction was near-universally lauded on here I'm surprised that most people in this poll seem to hate the direction now. They're a top candidate to be the worst team in the NBA next year with two seemingly strong drafts coming up at least at the top, so if they get a bit of lotto luck their cornerstone might be coming soon


If you replace the question of the poll by "what do you think of the roster right now?", then the poll results make sense, :lol:


Yeah another case of the thread title not matching the poll title
User avatar
GSWFan1994
General Manager
Posts: 8,049
And1: 16,684
Joined: Oct 31, 2006
 

Re: Washington Wizards: what's your RealGM analysis? 

Post#51 » by GSWFan1994 » Fri Aug 16, 2024 12:51 pm

Saints14 wrote:Yeah another case of the thread title not matching the poll title


Hey, it was me who created the thread! :lol:

I'm not to blame if people can't read properly then vote... :dontknow:
User avatar
PhilBlackson
RealGM
Posts: 31,781
And1: 46,527
Joined: May 02, 2017
Location: No Wastemans Land
     

Re: Washington Wizards: what's your RealGM analysis? 

Post#52 » by PhilBlackson » Fri Aug 16, 2024 1:08 pm

I upgraded them from “no it’s very bad “ to “no it’s bad” lol just based solely on the fact I don’t mind a few of their recent picks (ie/ Bilal, Bub, Sarr, George) they’re not stars which is why it’s still had them as “no it’s bad” lol but not very because I think once they get an inevitable top in 5 in 25’ they’ll likely get an all star level player with some ok/solid young players in place. Then they move up to being pretty bad & eventually once they get a 2nd high pick in 26’ it should hopefully start turning around.

All that said out of every franchise I feel like they’re the furthest away from competing in the league.
>>>THENOTORIOUSBI3<<< :guitar: *INGRAM*ALLSTARSEASON* JaKobe Starter
Image
Names of who OG will be better than Shaedon: DelAbbott, ThaCynic, pingpongrac, Los_29, OakleyDokley
dhsilv2
RealGM
Posts: 50,438
And1: 27,242
Joined: Oct 04, 2015

Re: Washington Wizards: what's your RealGM analysis? 

Post#53 » by dhsilv2 » Fri Aug 16, 2024 1:19 pm

59 votes and 3 "I don't knows"? I mean sure...seems bad, but who's really following them close enough to know if they're starting to make improvements? I'm sure wizards fans but the rest of us. Come on people.
DreamTeam09
RealGM
Posts: 17,487
And1: 10,847
Joined: Jan 06, 2009
Location: Scarborough
 

Re: Washington Wizards: what's your RealGM analysis? 

Post#54 » by DreamTeam09 » Fri Aug 16, 2024 1:56 pm

I don't like that Bilal kid that's for sure
Image

In Raptor Ball I Trust
LakersSoul
Head Coach
Posts: 7,100
And1: 4,968
Joined: Jul 03, 2016

Re: Washington Wizards: what's your RealGM analysis? 

Post#55 » by LakersSoul » Fri Aug 16, 2024 2:11 pm

Optms wrote:
LakersSoul wrote:
CP3nthusiast wrote:Didn't love their draft, the Poole trade was and continues to be an unmitigated disaster, they should've traded Kuzma when the market for him was hot. D+ so far for the front office, would be a D- if they didn't get a nice haul for Deni Avdija.


Not so sure. Last few moves have been smart!

Not sure about Sarr but:

Traded picks and picked up Keyshawn George.
Traded Deni for Brogdan plus 2 FRPs and SRP.

Then pickup FAs:
Bey 3/20
Valanciunas 3/30

These looks to me some solid moves with good upside for the team.


They mainly traded Deni to get another lottery pick and its a disservice not to mention who they selected with that pick - Bub Carrington. Who already looks like he's going to be a much better player than Deni. At worst the trade was even, at best, they got back their future starting point guard who could be a top 20 player in terms of ceiling. Potentially higher.


Yeah, looks like a solid pick. I just didnt mention him because I didnt know too much about the kid. After a quick review, 6'5" cg with 6'8" wspan and a youngster with energy. He could be a guard that they build around or trade after a few years for better draft picks haul.

Think the new FO is doing a solid job of picking up good picks, adding draft picks, and adding solid vets that could be traded in the future for more picks.

I really like George that they picked up. Big CG at 6'8.5" that is athletic and can shoot! He will be a hidden gem as I kind of wanted the Lakers to trade down and pick him up.

Not Yo Ham Lakers!

The Don and The King!
Saints14
Assistant Coach
Posts: 4,332
And1: 6,137
Joined: Jul 19, 2013
 

Re: Washington Wizards: what's your RealGM analysis? 

Post#56 » by Saints14 » Fri Aug 16, 2024 3:15 pm

GSWFan1994 wrote:
Saints14 wrote:Yeah another case of the thread title not matching the poll title


Hey, it was me who created the thread! :lol:

I'm not to blame if people can't read properly then vote... :dontknow:


Didn't notice that, my bad :lol:
User avatar
nate33
Forum Mod - Wizards
Forum Mod - Wizards
Posts: 70,117
And1: 22,546
Joined: Oct 28, 2002

Re: Washington Wizards: what's your RealGM analysis? 

Post#57 » by nate33 » Fri Aug 16, 2024 3:52 pm

They always wait too long to commit to a rebuild. The writing was on the wall with Beal 3 years ago. He was averaging 30 a game but the Wizards couldn't even play .500 ball with him. They obviously should have traded him when he had real value and then committed to tanking. Instead, they traded for Westbrook and then for Porzingis in a desperate attempt to stay relevant. All it did was lead to a few 35-win seasons and late lotto picks while Beal's trade value steadily declined.

The Wizards finally figured it out last summer and committed to properly rebuilding through the draft. But Rome wasn't built in a day. It's going to take a couple of years and some luck, but at least they have the right strategic vision. And since they didn't start the process by trading good vets for draft picks, it's going to take longer.

We can quibble about how the rebuild is going. I hated the Deni trade, for example. But the bottom line is that we're not really going to know until we see how these guys pan out. Their future depends on Sarr, Bilal and Carrington.
LakersSoul
Head Coach
Posts: 7,100
And1: 4,968
Joined: Jul 03, 2016

Re: Washington Wizards: what's your RealGM analysis? 

Post#58 » by LakersSoul » Fri Aug 16, 2024 3:58 pm

nate33 wrote:They always wait too long to commit to a rebuild. The writing was on the wall with Beal 3 years ago. He was averaging 30 a game but the Wizards couldn't even play .500 ball with him. They obviously should have traded him when he had real value and then committed to tanking. Instead, they traded for Westbrook and then for Porzingis in a desperate attempt to stay relevant. All it did was lead to a few 35-win seasons and late lotto picks while Beal's trade value steadily declined.

The Wizards finally figured it out last summer and committed to properly rebuilding through the draft. But Rome wasn't built in a day. It's going to take a couple of years and some luck, but at least they have the right strategic vision. And since they didn't start the process by trading good vets for draft picks, it's going to take longer.

We can quibble about how the rebuild is going. I hated the Deni trade, for example. But the bottom line is that we're not really going to know until we see how these guys pan out. Their future depends on Sarr, Bilal and Carrington.


Are the wizard fans really bullish on Sarr? He will be a big factor on how quickly they turn the organization around but agree that either way, its going to take 2-4 years at a minimum to become relevant.

Not Yo Ham Lakers!

The Don and The King!
jokeboy86
RealGM
Posts: 10,317
And1: 7,321
Joined: May 08, 2007

Re: Washington Wizards: what's your RealGM analysis? 

Post#59 » by jokeboy86 » Fri Aug 16, 2024 5:34 pm

I said no because Leonsis seems just as clueless as Pollin was near the end. They have a tendency to also overpay people even when all signs point to dont(Arenas, Wall, Beal) and it then hampers their franchise.
hippesthippo
Lead Assistant
Posts: 4,795
And1: 3,742
Joined: Sep 20, 2013
     

Re: Washington Wizards: what's your RealGM analysis? 

Post#60 » by hippesthippo » Fri Aug 16, 2024 5:51 pm

Compared to last year and the year before? Yes, at least they've finally picked a direction and decided to do a full rebuild. I didn't like the return for Deni and thought it was a bad draft to go all in on, but it was good to see them commit to something.

Of course, then I read on the Wiretap that they want to use Sarr on the ball running plays on offense and all I could think of was his 0-13 Summer League performance.

Final answer? Yes, a lil' bit. They picked a direction, but Bub and Sarr do not inspire any confidence in me that things will turn around quickly.

Return to The General Board