HotelVitale wrote:wemby wrote:Cherry picking. Season so far: 16.5 pts 2.7 ast 2.4 reb on 44.9% fg and 37.4% 3p. Good for a rookie for sure, but when scoring efficiency is supposed to be his main selling point those numbers don't look crazy impressive.
Also just realized--is this the start of the annual insufferable rookie thread argument between two fanbases? This time Spurs-Sixers fans slitting each other's throats about Castle vs McCain for ROY. If so, I know it's probably pointless but can we ward that off as long as possible? ROY is a dumb and arbitrary award that has nothing to do with which player will be better long-term, and it really doens't help make your rookie better to post 3 times a week about why some other 20 year old from a different conference or whatever is a fraud. Not trying to soapbox but it really does happen every year and starts to talk up like 50% of the posts on these thread.
To some degree I agree with you, but on the other hand, your team winning Rookie of the Year would be a pretty cool award for your team to win, esp if your team.is having a nightmare of a season like Philly has.
It's human nature for fans to root for their young studs and hope they do well/ be successful
I personally think McCain will win Rookie of the Year., yet I feel like Steph Castle will be the better/more well rounded player going forwards (a true two way stud)
Regardless this rookie class seems to have a lot more talent/upside than many experts and fans predicted, and that can only be a good thing
Zac Risacher is going to be an multiple all star talent one day too, make no mistake. He has all the tools and instincts to be an elite NBA player