Cade Cunningham should be an all star

Moderators: Clav, Domejandro, ken6199, bisme37, Dirk, KingDavid, cupcakesnake, bwgood77, zimpy27, infinite11285

JujitsuFlip
RealGM
Posts: 14,822
And1: 9,174
Joined: Sep 10, 2021

Re: Cade Cunningham should be a all star 

Post#41 » by JujitsuFlip » Fri Dec 20, 2024 7:45 pm

Chokic wrote:
JujitsuFlip wrote:
Chokic wrote:I think he should but I don't think he will. Unless he gets in as an injury replacement.

Locks

Giannis
Mitchell
Tatum
Kat
Trae
Banchero

Almost a lock
Lamelo
Brunson

Good chance
Mobley
Wagner
Lillard
Brown
Adebayo

Chance
Embiid
Garland
Cunningham
Allen
Banchero with 5 games played should NOT be an All-Star... I know the NBA app mysteriously leaves that important stat out.

I also find it very hard to make a case for Franz who will have missed probably half the possible games played by the time the rosters are announced.





I don't think anybody had Orlando magic as a top 4 seed coming into the season on their bingo card. I would be shocked if they don't have at least one rep.
Well then it can't be the guy who played 5 games lol

Give it to the guy who will have only missed half the games (Franz) then.

Or if a 3rd guy thrives in that #1 option role on the Magic and they keep winning, reward him.
tsherkin
Forum Mod - Raptors
Forum Mod - Raptors
Posts: 92,289
And1: 31,869
Joined: Oct 14, 2003
 

Re: Cade Cunningham should be a all star 

Post#42 » by tsherkin » Fri Dec 20, 2024 7:47 pm

UcanUwill wrote:Yeah, I just noticed he turns it a lot. I honestly never liked assist to TO ratio stat, to me, it doesn't necessarily say anything. In contrary, when point guard has great A:TO, I am instantly suspect on the guy. Have seen players with flawless A:TO who sucked at playmaking. Calderon was poster child of this, brilliant A:TO ratio, but thats because he never really was creating much, just pounding the ball and then making a simple pass. Best passers make and try different and creative passes, sometimes they will turn it over, thats just the game. Like compare what Calderon was creating to what Rubio was creating, too Spaniards, Rubio turned it over far more, but man he created some open shots from complete a** possessions, Calderon just wasn't doing that at all, give me a guy with 1.5 more TOs but who sees the floor like a hawk.


AST:TOV is fairly limited, since it doesn't differentiate scoring turnovers from passing turnovers, to be sure.

My point was more that his AST% and his TOV% are not far off from what a lot of pretty good playmakers post, so it's no real kind of problem.

Not counting his last game, he's posting:

13.8 Box Creation, 8.4 Passer Rating, 11% cTOV (creation-adjusted TOV), and 3.8% Handle TOV.

His Box Creation is 8th in the league right now, and his Passer Rating is 11th.

All of those are absent his last game, though; that's only through 23 games. But still, that's actually quite impressive stuff, especially on a team without a ton of great finishers.
User avatar
UcanUwill
RealGM
Posts: 32,885
And1: 36,321
Joined: Aug 07, 2011
 

Re: Cade Cunningham should be a all star 

Post#43 » by UcanUwill » Fri Dec 20, 2024 7:55 pm

tsherkin wrote:
UcanUwill wrote:Yeah, I just noticed he turns it a lot. I honestly never liked assist to TO ratio stat, to me, it doesn't necessarily say anything. In contrary, when point guard has great A:TO, I am instantly suspect on the guy. Have seen players with flawless A:TO who sucked at playmaking. Calderon was poster child of this, brilliant A:TO ratio, but thats because he never really was creating much, just pounding the ball and then making a simple pass. Best passers make and try different and creative passes, sometimes they will turn it over, thats just the game. Like compare what Calderon was creating to what Rubio was creating, too Spaniards, Rubio turned it over far more, but man he created some open shots from complete a** possessions, Calderon just wasn't doing that at all, give me a guy with 1.5 more TOs but who sees the floor like a hawk.


AST:TOV is fairly limited, since it doesn't differentiate scoring turnovers from passing turnovers, to be sure.

My point was more that his AST% and his TOV% are not far off from what a lot of pretty good playmakers post, so it's no real kind of problem.

Not counting his last game, he's posting:

13.8 Box Creation, 8.4 Passer Rating, 11% cTOV (creation-adjusted TOV), and 3.8% Handle TOV.

His Box Creation is 8th in the league right now, and his Passer Rating is 11th.

All of those are absent his last game, though; that's only through 23 games. But still, that's actually quite impressive stuff, especially on a team without a ton of great finishers.


Yeah, I do not have a real problem with him or anything, if his efficiency percentages where a little bit better, his stats would be great.
User avatar
tooler
General Manager
Posts: 9,498
And1: 5,618
Joined: Feb 26, 2014

Re: Cade Cunningham should be a all star 

Post#44 » by tooler » Fri Dec 20, 2024 7:58 pm

JujitsuFlip wrote:
Chokic wrote:
JujitsuFlip wrote:Banchero with 5 games played should NOT be an All-Star... I know the NBA app mysteriously leaves that important stat out.

I also find it very hard to make a case for Franz who will have missed probably half the possible games played by the time the rosters are announced.


I don't think anybody had Orlando magic as a top 4 seed coming into the season on their bingo card. I would be shocked if they don't have at least one rep.
Well then it can't be the guy who played 5 games lol

Give it to the guy who will have only missed half the games (Franz) then.

Or if a 3rd guy thrives in that #1 option role on the Magic and they keep winning, reward him.

Franz is already making noise about coming back early. His tear might not be as bad as Banchero's.

Want to know something really funny? Franz has still played more games than Cade, LaMelo, Lillard, and probably more people on the list. The Magic played a TON of games early in the season and still lead the league.
ValvPiti
Sophomore
Posts: 177
And1: 142
Joined: Oct 20, 2017
 

Re: Cade Cunningham should be a all star 

Post#45 » by ValvPiti » Fri Dec 20, 2024 8:00 pm

The finishers would be Duren, Ausar and Holland. Duren is playing like an absolute bum this year, and Ausar just recently began to see minutes due to injuries and Ron aint playing much. I really like those two guys though, great energy, defence and athleticism, but hard to play them at the same time for now. If they develop a shot, they will be incredible next to Cade. Because I don't really rely on Ivey and Duren no more - I think both are very limited despite great athleticism.. pretty much given up.

I think Cade, without a doubt, is playing a better season than Melo. And I love Melo. So if you are gonna reward one of him and Melo, it should be Cade - more games played, better record and better overall season IMO. Some of these games, Cade is honestly just picking teams apart singlehandedly and looking like Doncic out there controlling the game from the start to (almost) the finish. The one big point against Cade is his 4th quarter execution which for some reason is really bad, but I don't think thats enough to knock him. Team really zones in in the 4th, and Pistons dont have that much going for them outside of him.
tsherkin
Forum Mod - Raptors
Forum Mod - Raptors
Posts: 92,289
And1: 31,869
Joined: Oct 14, 2003
 

Re: Cade Cunningham should be a all star 

Post#46 » by tsherkin » Fri Dec 20, 2024 8:11 pm

UcanUwill wrote:
tsherkin wrote:
UcanUwill wrote:Yeah, I just noticed he turns it a lot. I honestly never liked assist to TO ratio stat, to me, it doesn't necessarily say anything. In contrary, when point guard has great A:TO, I am instantly suspect on the guy. Have seen players with flawless A:TO who sucked at playmaking. Calderon was poster child of this, brilliant A:TO ratio, but thats because he never really was creating much, just pounding the ball and then making a simple pass. Best passers make and try different and creative passes, sometimes they will turn it over, thats just the game. Like compare what Calderon was creating to what Rubio was creating, too Spaniards, Rubio turned it over far more, but man he created some open shots from complete a** possessions, Calderon just wasn't doing that at all, give me a guy with 1.5 more TOs but who sees the floor like a hawk.


AST:TOV is fairly limited, since it doesn't differentiate scoring turnovers from passing turnovers, to be sure.

My point was more that his AST% and his TOV% are not far off from what a lot of pretty good playmakers post, so it's no real kind of problem.

Not counting his last game, he's posting:

13.8 Box Creation, 8.4 Passer Rating, 11% cTOV (creation-adjusted TOV), and 3.8% Handle TOV.

His Box Creation is 8th in the league right now, and his Passer Rating is 11th.

All of those are absent his last game, though; that's only through 23 games. But still, that's actually quite impressive stuff, especially on a team without a ton of great finishers.


Yeah, I do not have a real problem with him or anything, if his efficiency percentages where a little bit better, his stats would be great.


Yeah, for sure.

I just wanted to flesh out the playmaking numbers we do have, you know? This year, he's been looking really good at setting the table, despite a fairly talent-poor environment around him. That's impressive. His scoring needs a ton of work, mostly relating to getting in close and getting it done around the rim. None of that is new, he hasn't shown any real improvement there to date (yet) and it holds back his efficiency quite a bit. But he seems to be on a rising track as a playmaker, and that has a lot of promise.
SpurNani
Pro Prospect
Posts: 754
And1: 837
Joined: Jul 03, 2019

Re: Cade Cunningham should be a all star 

Post#47 » by SpurNani » Fri Dec 20, 2024 8:21 pm

Cade is better then Morant. I said it
tsherkin
Forum Mod - Raptors
Forum Mod - Raptors
Posts: 92,289
And1: 31,869
Joined: Oct 14, 2003
 

Re: Cade Cunningham should be a all star 

Post#48 » by tsherkin » Fri Dec 20, 2024 8:26 pm

SpurNani wrote:Cade is better then Morant. I said it


Is he?

He's a worse defender, isn't a better scorer and isn't a better playmaker.

He's definitely a better shooter, but does that really overcome those other things?
SpurNani
Pro Prospect
Posts: 754
And1: 837
Joined: Jul 03, 2019

Re: Cade Cunningham should be a all star 

Post#49 » by SpurNani » Fri Dec 20, 2024 8:40 pm

tsherkin wrote:
SpurNani wrote:Cade is better then Morant. I said it


Is he?

He's a worse defender, isn't a better scorer and isn't a better playmaker.

He's definitely a better shooter, but does that really overcome those other things?


Better defender ill give u. Ill take Cades rebounding and scoring, he is a 3 level scorer now that his 3 is falling close to 39% last time I checked. Better playmaker is debatable. Ja is more dynamic but Cade will probably average 10 assist this year and his second most reliable offensive player on the team is probably Malik Beasley.
ValvPiti
Sophomore
Posts: 177
And1: 142
Joined: Oct 20, 2017
 

Re: Cade Cunningham should be a all star 

Post#50 » by ValvPiti » Fri Dec 20, 2024 8:44 pm

tsherkin wrote:Cade Cunnigham.

Passing looks great. Right at the moment, the 3 is falling at a previously-unmatched level on a career-high volume. Still scoring at -2.3% rTS, which is pretty trash. He doesn't draw fouls, he isn't any better at getting to the rim, he finishes poorly when he gets into the RA. Has a pretty nice short and middle game. In short, he's about as crap inside the arc as he has typically been to date. No improvement there, and so the volume increase to nearly 24 ppg means only so much past "he's shooting more."

He's scoring more. That... isn't really impressive. He's taking a career-high FGA/g, so the increase in volume is expected. The efficiency is trash, as per his usual. There's some tolerance for mediocre efficiency when you're playing on a team absent help as is he doing, but not this poor level.

That said, scoring is not the only aspect of his game. And especially given the team around him, for him to be hovering near 10 apg is pretty impressive. It's a quarter of the season and all that, but he's always been a pretty good playmaker.

Is that worth being an All-Star?

He's just outside the top 50 in O-EPM. He's a +3.2 OBPM guy, which isn't top 30. He isn't any kind of special defender. The Pistons are a lot better than they were last year, FWIW. They won 14 games last season and already have 11 right now. They appear to have mostly improved on defense, more so than on O, though. The team-wide improvement in 3pt shooting is helping.

It doesn't really make sense that Cade would be an All-Star this season, IMHO. There are too many other guys in conference who are visibly and statistically superior. But it's nice to see him looking better as a playmaker and connecting more from 3. He's making progress. The Pistons are better, which is a nice moral victory (they're under 40% W/L, so it's only so much of a real one, but it's much better than a 14 W season, for sure).

But none of what he's doing really cooks like an AS season.


Just out of curiosity how many games do you actually watch Cade? No shots taken, but its literally all advanced analytics. What do you see? I see a player, like against the NY Knicks, completely taking the game over singlehandedly with his scoring and especially playmaking on a very bad team. Same thing against Miami minus the 4th. Cade is having more and more of these Doncic-type nights where he looks like the by far best player out there and a true maestro.
Dennis 37
RealGM
Posts: 15,724
And1: 18,447
Joined: Feb 24, 2007
Location: Ontario, Canada
 

Re: Cade Cunningham should be a all star 

Post#51 » by Dennis 37 » Fri Dec 20, 2024 10:22 pm

I'd support any player willing to play defense in the All-Star game. It's time we get commitment from players on playing defense before the voting starts.
Maxpainmedia:
"NYC has the **** most Two Faced fans, but we ALL loved IQ,, and that is super rare, I've been a Knicks fan for 37 years, this kid is a star and he will snap in Toronto"
tsherkin
Forum Mod - Raptors
Forum Mod - Raptors
Posts: 92,289
And1: 31,869
Joined: Oct 14, 2003
 

Re: Cade Cunningham should be a all star 

Post#52 » by tsherkin » Fri Dec 20, 2024 10:41 pm

SpurNani wrote:Better defender ill give u. Ill take Cades rebounding and scoring, he is a 3 level scorer now that his 3 is falling close to 39% last time I checked.


Yup, definitely a better shooter. Still not a better scorer overall. Also creates considerably less north-south pressure. It isn't an overall area of advantage, even if they are in the same neighborhood.

ValvPiti wrote:
Just out of curiosity how many games do you actually watch Cade? No shots taken, but its literally all advanced analytics. What do you see? I see a player, like against the NY Knicks, completely taking the game over singlehandedly with his scoring and especially playmaking on a very bad team. Same thing against Miami minus the 4th. Cade is having more and more of these Doncic-type nights where he looks like the by far best player out there and a true maestro.


I've seen maybe a half dozen Pistons games so far this season. His middle game is decent, and it's nice that his shot is falling. I don't really care overall because he has established his quality as a scorer (to this point, and minding that he's quite young and has no help) at this point. The really good scorers out there get it done regardless of what's around them, and it's more the degree of dominance which changes with surrounding quality. He isn't that. He doesn't have the physical tools to do that. Obviously, the fact that he's creating for himself and doesn't have incredible spacing or the luxury of working off-ball impacts the specific numbers, but when you're a -2% rTS guy who can't get to the rim much and finishes poorly when he does, there's a limit to how much credit I'll give you as a scorer. That's a formula that doesn't end with elite quality regardless of what's around a guy. 100%, he would look much better in a more appropriate environment, though.

As a playmaker? That's different. He's looked very impressive as a shot creator and playmaker this year. And he's, what, 23? That is a promising thing as well.

I don't think he's an AS THIS year, but if he can maintain that shot creation, that'll eventually change, particularly as the team around him improves.


EDIT: Oh, I missed a point you made. You talked about the Knicks game and the Miami game, and like, I don't really care about single games.

I imagine you're talking about the win over the Knicks. He was 5/8 from 3. Everyone grabs a hot streak now and again. His PASSING in that game was phenomenal, but he did all his relevant damage as a scorer n the 2nd when he was just banging away from 3. Was real quiet and unimpressive in the 4th as a scorer, for what it's worth.

That said, in general, he's been shooting better from 3 this season, and that IS helping him have more relevance as a scoring threat. Not a ton, but it's a nice development. He has a nice shot away from the rim and he's clearly quite capable at the line (this year to date notwithstanding, of course), so it's nice to see the 3 starting to catch up.

With Miami, they've won 2. In the November game, he was ass in the first half, hot in the second and pretty decent in the OT. In the December game, he was profoundly awful in the second half and that carried into the OT (remember, he was 3/13 after the first half). So I'm not really sure what to take away from that (again, strictly focusing on scoring).
JujitsuFlip
RealGM
Posts: 14,822
And1: 9,174
Joined: Sep 10, 2021

Re: Cade Cunningham should be a all star 

Post#53 » by JujitsuFlip » Fri Dec 20, 2024 10:48 pm

tooler wrote:
JujitsuFlip wrote:
Chokic wrote:
I don't think anybody had Orlando magic as a top 4 seed coming into the season on their bingo card. I would be shocked if they don't have at least one rep.
Well then it can't be the guy who played 5 games lol

Give it to the guy who will have only missed half the games (Franz) then.

Or if a 3rd guy thrives in that #1 option role on the Magic and they keep winning, reward him.

Franz is already making noise about coming back early. His tear might not be as bad as Banchero's.

Want to know something really funny? Franz has still played more games than Cade, LaMelo, Lillard, and probably more people on the list. The Magic played a TON of games early in the season and still lead the league.

He's played 1 more than Cade, 3 more than Dame, and 5 more than LaMelo... Hardly substantial.

He's going to be 15 and 20 games behind people towards the conclusion of this voting cycle.
basketballRob
RealGM
Posts: 36,994
And1: 14,874
Joined: May 05, 2014
     

Re: Cade Cunningham should be a all star 

Post#54 » by basketballRob » Sat Dec 21, 2024 12:31 am

JujitsuFlip wrote:
tooler wrote:
JujitsuFlip wrote:Well then it can't be the guy who played 5 games lol

Give it to the guy who will have only missed half the games (Franz) then.

Or if a 3rd guy thrives in that #1 option role on the Magic and they keep winning, reward him.

Franz is already making noise about coming back early. His tear might not be as bad as Banchero's.

Want to know something really funny? Franz has still played more games than Cade, LaMelo, Lillard, and probably more people on the list. The Magic played a TON of games early in the season and still lead the league.

He's played 1 more than Cade, 3 more than Dame, and 5 more than LaMelo... Hardly substantial.

He's going to be 15 and 20 games behind people towards the conclusion obf this voting cycle.
Wagner might come back in 1-2 weeks. He's already played 25 games. I'm not sure if they have 45 games before the all-star break.

Sent from my SM-G781U using RealGM mobile app
7seventynine9
Senior
Posts: 722
And1: 374
Joined: Jul 06, 2006

Re: Cade Cunningham should be a all star 

Post#55 » by 7seventynine9 » Sat Dec 21, 2024 12:46 am

basketballRob wrote:
JujitsuFlip wrote:
tooler wrote:Franz is already making noise about coming back early. His tear might not be as bad as Banchero's.

Want to know something really funny? Franz has still played more games than Cade, LaMelo, Lillard, and probably more people on the list. The Magic played a TON of games early in the season and still lead the league.

He's played 1 more than Cade, 3 more than Dame, and 5 more than LaMelo... Hardly substantial.

He's going to be 15 and 20 games behind people towards the conclusion obf this voting cycle.
Wagner might come back in 1-2 weeks. He's already played 25 games. I'm not sure if they have 45 games before the all-star break.

Sent from my SM-G781U using RealGM mobile app


The Magic have 27 more games to play before the all star break.
User avatar
Mr Peanut
Analyst
Posts: 3,327
And1: 3,947
Joined: Jan 29, 2012
Location: New Zealand
 

Re: Cade Cunningham should be a all star 

Post#56 » by Mr Peanut » Sat Dec 21, 2024 4:03 am

I think the overarching issue here is that a lot of posters in this thread don't watch him play very much. Which I don't blame them - the Pistons are not exactly box office viewing even at the best of times.

But if you do watch most (or all) of his games you realize his impact goes beyond what the stats will tell you. He commands an enormous amount of defensive attention from opposing teams, which makes it impressive he can still average 24 points and almost 10 assists despite being constantly hounded and double teamed. He consistently looks like the most dominant player on the floor, and this includes recent examples of going up against guys like Hailburton and Brunson on their home courts and thoroughly outplaying them.

And even though the Pistons have added some vets to the roster, outside of Cade the squad is still very subpar. If it wasn't for him I think the Pistons likely have a record similar to the Wizards, but he has been dragging the team to win a lot of games they haven't been projected to.

If posters want to come into the thread and post about LEBRON, BPM and EPMs and think they trump everything else, instead of being complementary, then that's quite shortsighted. Just watch the games.
tmorgan
RealGM
Posts: 14,294
And1: 9,793
Joined: Feb 04, 2005
Location: San Francisco, CA
   

Re: Cade Cunningham should be a all star 

Post#57 » by tmorgan » Sat Dec 21, 2024 6:14 am

I’m a known huge Cade stan… and I dunno if he makes it this year. Just depends on what the voters focus on. Raw numbers are clearly AS quality, efficiency is not. He has improved as a defender, from routinely bad to matchup-based decent. He can’t guard elite quickness, but has learned enough now to be solid vs guile — meaning he can now hold his own against the Brunsons and Halis, but is still toast against Ja and Fox types.

His assists are up because he has shooters to pass to and he’s shooting better primarily because of less doubles and triples. This is always the case — individual stats are always teammate dependent.

He’s gotten better for sure. Still has a lot of work to do on his stamina (poor 4th quarters), handle (sloppy at times), and finishing (someone his size should not suck this bad inside).

Maybe an injury replacement this year. But the trajectory is promising.
breezypeezy
Pro Prospect
Posts: 834
And1: 529
Joined: Dec 30, 2014
       

Re: Cade Cunningham should be a all star 

Post#58 » by breezypeezy » Sat Dec 21, 2024 10:36 am

If he isnt in this year, it"ll be next.
He's still elevating his game and isnt in his peak yrs yet.
tsherkin
Forum Mod - Raptors
Forum Mod - Raptors
Posts: 92,289
And1: 31,869
Joined: Oct 14, 2003
 

Re: Cade Cunningham should be a all star 

Post#59 » by tsherkin » Sat Dec 21, 2024 1:02 pm

Mr Peanut wrote:But if you do watch most (or all) of his games you realize his impact goes beyond what the stats will tell you. He commands an enormous amount of defensive attention from opposing teams, which makes it impressive he can still average 24 points and almost 10 assists despite being constantly hounded and double teamed. He consistently looks like the most dominant player on the floor, and this includes recent examples of going up against guys like Hailburton and Brunson on their home courts and thoroughly outplaying them.


This isn't an effective counterpoint, though. He's got a bunch of evident skill, this is true, but remarking on his volume is irrelevant. And the stats do fairly specifically show that he's been doing an excellent job as a playmaker, and supporting the bulk of his impact there through. And stating that he "thoroughly outplayed" Jalen Brunson seems a little odd. Brunson put 31/10 and 29/8 on him, averaging 68.8% TS across those two games so far. Cade was very good in that first half of the first game, and played very well opposite Brunson, but that's not the same thing (particularly given how rough he was in the second half). In the second game, Cade played well, but Brunson also shot almost 64% from the field and was clearly much better, and all that while Cunningham was much quieter in the second half. Hyperbole isn't going to do anyone any favors here.

And even though the Pistons have added some vets to the roster, outside of Cade the squad is still very subpar. If it wasn't for him I think the Pistons likely have a record similar to the Wizards, but he has been dragging the team to win a lot of games they haven't been projected to.


That seems quite likely, yes.

If posters want to come into the thread and post about LEBRON, BPM and EPMs and think they trump everything else, instead of being complementary, then that's quite shortsighted. Just watch the games.


No, that's not really the way this works. You don't have to like the numbers, but even setting those aside, this is a discussion about whether or not he should be an All-Star. And all the information goes into that. There are only so many spots on an AS team, after all.
User avatar
Mr Peanut
Analyst
Posts: 3,327
And1: 3,947
Joined: Jan 29, 2012
Location: New Zealand
 

Re: Cade Cunningham should be a all star 

Post#60 » by Mr Peanut » Sat Dec 21, 2024 7:43 pm

tsherkin wrote:
Mr Peanut wrote:But if you do watch most (or all) of his games you realize his impact goes beyond what the stats will tell you. He commands an enormous amount of defensive attention from opposing teams, which makes it impressive he can still average 24 points and almost 10 assists despite being constantly hounded and double teamed. He consistently looks like the most dominant player on the floor, and this includes recent examples of going up against guys like Hailburton and Brunson on their home courts and thoroughly outplaying them.


This isn't an effective counterpoint, though. He's got a bunch of evident skill, this is true, but remarking on his volume is irrelevant. And the stats do fairly specifically show that he's been doing an excellent job as a playmaker, and supporting the bulk of his impact there through. And stating that he "thoroughly outplayed" Jalen Brunson seems a little odd. Brunson put 31/10 and 29/8 on him, averaging 68.8% TS across those two games so far. Cade was very good in that first half of the first game, and played very well opposite Brunson, but that's not the same thing (particularly given how rough he was in the second half). In the second game, Cade played well, but Brunson also shot almost 64% from the field and was clearly much better, and all that while Cunningham was much quieter in the second half. Hyperbole isn't going to do anyone any favors here.

And even though the Pistons have added some vets to the roster, outside of Cade the squad is still very subpar. If it wasn't for him I think the Pistons likely have a record similar to the Wizards, but he has been dragging the team to win a lot of games they haven't been projected to.


That seems quite likely, yes.

If posters want to come into the thread and post about LEBRON, BPM and EPMs and think they trump everything else, instead of being complementary, then that's quite shortsighted. Just watch the games.


No, that's not really the way this works. You don't have to like the numbers, but even setting those aside, this is a discussion about whether or not he should be an All-Star. And all the information goes into that. There are only so many spots on an AS team, after all.


With respect, you've admitted to watching only 6 out of Cade's 24 games this season so I'm not certain I have much faith in your opinion here. In the second game against the Knicks Cade dropped a 29 point 15 assist triple double and led the Pistons to a win, and you think Brunson outplayed him? And I'm the one being hyperbolic? I'm just going to assume you missed that game too.

It's not that I don't like the advanced stats, it's that posters are using them as the sole measuring stick rather than as complementary data, which is what they should be. All the individual metrics are flawed to some extent, so someone saying "the EPM is X and therefore he's not an All-Star" is just incredibly close minded.

Return to The General Board