phanman wrote:I grew up Nike Blazers and Cortez.
I had a pair of all white Cortez back in the day. Or, as in the 90's, they called them "dope mans".
For what it's worth, Devin Booker is about to release these in his Book 1:

Moderators: Clav, Domejandro, ken6199, bisme37, Dirk, KingDavid, cupcakesnake, bwgood77, zimpy27, infinite11285
phanman wrote:I grew up Nike Blazers and Cortez.
SweaterBae wrote:It's the perfect trade when nobody is happy.
SkyBill40 wrote:phanman wrote:I grew up Nike Blazers and Cortez.
I had a pair of all white Cortez back in the day. Or, as in the 90's, they called them "dope mans".
For what it's worth, Devin Booker is about to release these in his Book 1:
TwitterFingers wrote:AleksandarN wrote:TwitterFingers wrote: Great gimmick
They were comfortable and not a gimmick.
I don’t mean it in a bad way, but they certainly were gimmicky. The pump did nothing, it was a gimmick, but a cool one.
prolific passer wrote:What kind of sneaker do you prefer to wear between low, mid, or hi?
CobraCommander wrote:prolific passer wrote:What kind of sneaker do you prefer to wear between low, mid, or hi?
Depends on the occasion-
Also the definition of mids vs hi is tough—.
Like are dunk hi’s mid or high?
Depends on whether I'm wearing my neoprene ankle braces or not. Thinner if I am, thicker if not. Socks change that up a bit as well. I suppose it depends on how tight you like your shoes to fit.prolific passer wrote:Do you all prefer thinner or thicker insoles?
SweaterBae wrote:It's the perfect trade when nobody is happy.
prolific passer wrote:CobraCommander wrote:prolific passer wrote:What kind of sneaker do you prefer to wear between low, mid, or hi?
Depends on the occasion-
Also the definition of mids vs hi is tough—.
Like are dunk hi’s mid or high?
Converse trying to sell the new weapons as mids but people say they are really highs. When you look at highs and mids together. Not much of a size difference.
CobraCommander wrote:prolific passer wrote:CobraCommander wrote:Depends on the occasion-
Also the definition of mids vs hi is tough—.
Like are dunk hi’s mid or high?
Converse trying to sell the new weapons as mids but people say they are really highs. When you look at highs and mids together. Not much of a size difference.
I loved converse as a kid - the chucks iconic but man there just isn’t enough space to have converse in the rotation lol
prolific passer wrote:CobraCommander wrote:prolific passer wrote:Converse trying to sell the new weapons as mids but people say they are really highs. When you look at highs and mids together. Not much of a size difference.
I loved converse as a kid - the chucks iconic but man there just isn’t enough space to have converse in the rotation lol
Idk. The new weapons are comfortable and affordable. Cheaper than most regular shoes. Bird and Magic weapons can cost at the least $84 combined with a little bit of taxes. Cheaper than any Jordan shoe right now.
SweaterBae wrote:It's the perfect trade when nobody is happy.
SkyBill40 wrote:prolific passer wrote:CobraCommander wrote:I loved converse as a kid - the chucks iconic but man there just isn’t enough space to have converse in the rotation lol
Idk. The new weapons are comfortable and affordable. Cheaper than most regular shoes. Bird and Magic weapons can cost at the least $84 combined with a little bit of taxes. Cheaper than any Jordan shoe right now.
Nike getting that money regardless seeing they own Converse.
prolific passer wrote:CobraCommander wrote:prolific passer wrote:Converse trying to sell the new weapons as mids but people say they are really highs. When you look at highs and mids together. Not much of a size difference.
I loved converse as a kid - the chucks iconic but man there just isn’t enough space to have converse in the rotation lol
Idk. The new weapons are comfortable and affordable. Cheaper than most regular shoes. Bird and Magic weapons can cost at the least $84 combined with a little bit of taxes. Cheaper than any Jordan shoe right now.
prolific passer wrote:SkyBill40 wrote:prolific passer wrote:Idk. The new weapons are comfortable and affordable. Cheaper than most regular shoes. Bird and Magic weapons can cost at the least $84 combined with a little bit of taxes. Cheaper than any Jordan shoe right now.
Nike getting that money regardless seeing they own Converse.
Yeah that sucks and they are still making a good amount of money due to all the hardcore collectors of just nike shoes in general. Especially Jordans.
CobraCommander wrote:prolific passer wrote:CobraCommander wrote:I loved converse as a kid - the chucks iconic but man there just isn’t enough space to have converse in the rotation lol
Idk. The new weapons are comfortable and affordable. Cheaper than most regular shoes. Bird and Magic weapons can cost at the least $84 combined with a little bit of taxes. Cheaper than any Jordan shoe right now.
But I’m a older dude that’s been stacking cake for years...I did the cheap sneakers for ever - now I just buy and wear what I want... it’s New Years so it’s red lobster dunks and a red sweater jeans and some goofy head gear tonight
prolific passer wrote:CobraCommander wrote:prolific passer wrote:Idk. The new weapons are comfortable and affordable. Cheaper than most regular shoes. Bird and Magic weapons can cost at the least $84 combined with a little bit of taxes. Cheaper than any Jordan shoe right now.
But I’m a older dude that’s been stacking cake for years...I did the cheap sneakers for ever - now I just buy and wear what I want... it’s New Years so it’s red lobster dunks and a red sweater jeans and some goofy head gear tonight
Did you eat some read lobster with those red lobster dunks?
SweaterBae wrote:It's the perfect trade when nobody is happy.