ambiglight wrote:I too have the tape.
Unless you like Kobe, and game-changing, solid defense on a star scorer - just tape over the 4th qtr since you kept the tape of the game

.
ambiglight wrote:Denver simply went away from AI. If you actually watch the tape you will see that Kobe was in foul trouble due to 3 fouls that he got guarding AI. Fourth quarter came, the very first possession JR loses the ball. The possessions after that Melo shot twice and Najera once. AI doesn't receive the ball for the first two minutes of the quarter. In that time Kobe takes 3 shots and makes one. AI takes one shot and misses. JR fouls Kobe sending him to the line, JR takes the next shot driving to the lane and misses. JR takes another long three and misses. Kobe takes another shot and misses. Kenyon martin misses some free throws. Kobe misses another jumper. Carmelo misses a shot and then JR finally hits a shot. AI FINALLY gets the ball and misses. Kenyon martin scores and najera scores. JR hits some free throws. AI makes a layup. AI shoots a three pointer, kobe "blocks" the shot, no call on wrist contact. AI doesnt see the ball for the rest of the quarter, either passing to melo or JR.
The point is that Kobe took 9 shots that quarter and missed 5 of them. AI took 4 shots hitting one and getting fouled another with no call.
Clearly anyone watching that game can see that AI was not the main option and in fact JR smith and melo were given the green-light as the primary options on offense.
Thats a coaching issue.
One guy plays like crap and the coach has faith in him to win the game.
Another guy plays phenomenal and gets relegated to being the third option behind JR smith.
That's not defense that's coaching.
Yes, and it was partially coaching.
Doesn't make sense for AI to stop being scoring-minded or be more balanced offensively, going as he was with 49 pts, into the 4th qtr - rather than then be pass-first (which relates to other guys getting shots), as he was for the 4th qtr. Which was significantly because of the defense, and to a lesser degree, Karl making a change. The Lakers half-court game on both ends of the court dictated things. Thus why they won that game.
That's what I came away with from that 4th qtr, like I said earlier in my posts. Along with several others in similar fashion here and back around when the game happened.
I just can't deny, though, that in the future for a possible playoff series, the defensive ability is there from the Lakers (perimeter and interior) as favorment to effectively defend AI. Along with the half-court offensive ability (as well as ability to run), to dicate the tempo of the game.
ambiglight wrote:Whereas Kobe was given the greenlight to score at will in spite of shooting like crap.
Nothing wrong with that. Especially with how he played offensively in that 4th qtr.
ambiglight wrote:But hey like i said winners get bragging rights regardless of how ridiculous their claims may be.
The play of the Lakers on both ends can't be dismissed. Specifically defensively. What actually happened isn't a ridiculous claim. If it was so ridiculous, there'd be more of a balance in the feelings of people who saw that game. From what I remember in threads relating to that game (there were at least two), and from this thread, the consensus doesn't side with what you're saying.
Need to realize the full perspective, rather than mostly one side of things that happened.