Is there video of the LA-Sac 2002 game 6 online?

Moderators: bwgood77, Dirk, Domejandro, zimpy27, ken6199, cupcakesnake, infinite11285, KingDavid, bisme37, Clav

User avatar
farzi
RealGM
Posts: 12,485
And1: 5
Joined: Dec 20, 2007

 

Post#41 » by farzi » Wed Jun 11, 2008 8:09 am

rewill17 wrote:Shoula been champs


1997 Bulls
1998 Jazz
1999 Spurs
2000 Blazers
2001 Lakers
2002 Kings
2003 Spurs
2004 Pistons
2005 Spurs
2006 Mavs
2007 Suns
2008 Jazz/Spurs


While the officiating was terrible in that game 7, I wouldn't blame it on that. Portland was still up 15 in the 4th, and went just god awful from the field.
Fola314
Sophomore
Posts: 242
And1: 25
Joined: Nov 15, 2005
Location: Napa, CA
   

 

Post#42 » by Fola314 » Wed Jun 11, 2008 8:49 am

Tired of hearing the Game 5 argument. If people are saying that Game 5 was suspect than I'll say Game 4 was suspect. Samaki Walker for 3 at the buzzer (halftime buzzer)? You can have Game 5, we'll take Games 4 and 6.

The Samaki Walker shot was an example of referees making a mistake, the out of bounds call that led to the Bibby gm winner was another example of referees making a mistake. There was no intent. Some of the other games in that series may have been poorly reffed one way or the other, many games in many different series have been poorly reffed that favored someone. That's entirely different from having a game FIXED one way or the other.
User avatar
LakerLegend
RealGM
Posts: 13,842
And1: 8,146
Joined: Jun 15, 2002
Location: SoCal

 

Post#43 » by LakerLegend » Wed Jun 11, 2008 8:54 am

Don't forget Game 3, the biggest FT differential in the series(20) in favor of the Kings.
User avatar
Lazy Faizy
Veteran
Posts: 2,838
And1: 1,906
Joined: Aug 09, 2005
   

 

Post#44 » by Lazy Faizy » Wed Jun 11, 2008 9:53 am

NyKnicks1714 wrote:Lakers/Timberwolves, First round, game 3 in 2002 I think.

THE worst officiating I have ever seen in a sporting event, a game which the Wolves thankfully and miraculously won. Anyone have video of it?



Wasn't this the game where Garnett fouled out in the 4th qtr and it went to OT right? Wow, I thought I was the only one who remembers that game and was disgusted at the officiating down the stretch. I'm gonna search for the video...
Jordan23Forever
General Manager
Posts: 8,261
And1: 54
Joined: Apr 25, 2005

 

Post#45 » by Jordan23Forever » Wed Jun 11, 2008 10:10 am

NyKnicks1714 wrote:Lakers/Timberwolves, First round, game 3 in 2002 I think.

THE worst officiating I have ever seen in a sporting event, a game which the Wolves thankfully and miraculously won. Anyone have video of it?


Is this the game where Sczczczczzczcerbiak fouled Kobe on the break s Kobe layed it up despite the fact that Wally was at the 3-point line when it happened? :lol:
User avatar
Lazy Faizy
Veteran
Posts: 2,838
And1: 1,906
Joined: Aug 09, 2005
   

 

Post#46 » by Lazy Faizy » Wed Jun 11, 2008 10:26 am

Jordan23Forever wrote:-= original quote snipped =-



Is this the game where Sczczczczzczcerbiak fouled Kobe on the break s Kobe layed it up despite the fact that Wally was at the 3-point line when it happened? :lol:



:rofl: :nod: hahah I remember that play.. terrible...
User avatar
bullzman23
RealGM
Posts: 14,558
And1: 6
Joined: May 23, 2001
Location: Evanston

 

Post#47 » by bullzman23 » Wed Jun 11, 2008 10:34 am

http://cbs13.com/sports/nba.ref.tim.2.745336.html

There's footage of game six in that article.
girlygirl wrote:Sorry, I just don't think MJ changed the game all that much.


www.theslickscript.com
rayofsunshine
Sixth Man
Posts: 1,822
And1: 460
Joined: Oct 20, 2004
 

 

Post#48 » by rayofsunshine » Wed Jun 11, 2008 11:36 am

Also look at this series between the lakers and celtics. In game one KG set about 25 moving screens none were called, I was counting. Then in game two, there are about 15 moving screens by KG and only one was called. As soon as the lakers need a win in game three down the stretch what play is called? KG for an illegal screen. You can't tell me they don't see those screens are illegal. It's almost like they let him do it, then when they need to make a call, they call it.
Bgil
Assistant Coach
Posts: 3,812
And1: 1
Joined: Dec 16, 2005

 

Post#49 » by Bgil » Wed Jun 11, 2008 12:48 pm

rewill17 wrote:Shoula been champs


1997 Bulls
1998 Jazz
1999 Spurs
2000 Blazers
2001 Lakers
2002 Kings
2003 Spurs
2004 Pistons
2005 Spurs
2006 Mavs
2007 Suns
2008 Jazz/Spurs


Hater. The RIDICULOUS level of contact the refs allowed for the Pistons and against the Lakers was the reason for the "handcheck rule". That was obviously the worst officiating ever.

Dounghy said the NBA made the series go 7 games. you guys are just assuming that means they allowed the Lakers to win game 6 when it probably refers to how Sactown was given game 3 and 5 to extend the series. They also allowed Vlade to flop instead of playing defense. No way the Kings should have taken one more than one or two games with fricken Vlade Divac guarding Shaq straight up.
"I'm sure they'll jump off the bandwagon. Then when we do get back on top, they're going to want to jump back on, and we're going to tell them there's no more room." - Kobe in March of 2005
Bgil
Assistant Coach
Posts: 3,812
And1: 1
Joined: Dec 16, 2005

 

Post#50 » by Bgil » Wed Jun 11, 2008 12:53 pm

Oh yeah, stop hating on the Lakers this year. The Jazz got the series called their way (extremely physical) and couldn't stop with the loose ball fouls. Boozer also bitched up.

The Spurs have no argument either. Yes, Barry was fouled. It was a TWO SHOT FOUL and they were down by three. They let Duncan travel and missed Fisher's shot hitting the rim.
That one call going their way doesn't change the series much at all. Even if they were able to hit the first free-throw, miss the second, get the rebound and put it back in... they still needed to win that game in overtime AND the next two games.

they would have lost either either way.
"I'm sure they'll jump off the bandwagon. Then when we do get back on top, they're going to want to jump back on, and we're going to tell them there's no more room." - Kobe in March of 2005
User avatar
FakeScreenName123
RealGM
Posts: 14,176
And1: 5,113
Joined: Jul 09, 2003
Location: Town

 

Post#51 » by FakeScreenName123 » Wed Jun 11, 2008 1:04 pm

Who were the refs in this game?
Blame Rasho
On Leave
Posts: 42,377
And1: 10,157
Joined: Apr 25, 2002

 

Post#52 » by Blame Rasho » Wed Jun 11, 2008 3:06 pm

Bgil wrote:Oh yeah, stop hating on the Lakers this year. The Jazz got the series called their way (extremely physical) and couldn't stop with the loose ball fouls. Boozer also bitched up.

The Spurs have no argument either. Yes, Barry was fouled. It was a TWO SHOT FOUL and they were down by three. They let Duncan travel and missed Fisher's shot hitting the rim.
That one call going their way doesn't change the series much at all. Even if they were able to hit the first free-throw, miss the second, get the rebound and put it back in... they still needed to win that game in overtime AND the next two games.

they would have lost either either way.


Um... trust me they were down 2. :D
magicfan4life05
RealGM
Posts: 23,617
And1: 198
Joined: Jun 29, 2005
Location: Welcome back the Comeback King !

 

Post#53 » by magicfan4life05 » Wed Jun 11, 2008 3:37 pm

FakeScreenName123 wrote:Who were the refs in this game?



ORL wrote:FYI, refs for game 6 of Lakers-Kings in 2002 were #27 Dick Bavetta, #16 Ted Bernhardt, #26 Bob Delaney. Would anyone be surprised if Bavetta and Delaney were not NBA's "company men"?

The two players that were ejected were Divac and Pollard, i.e. the two guys primarily on Shaq, who had 41 and 17 that game.

http://www.nba.com/games/20020531/SACLAL/boxscore.html
Dwight Howard on his FT struggles:

"I just think everybody needs to stop talking about it," Howard said. "There's more to life than free throws."
User avatar
20MexicanosIn1Van
Veteran
Posts: 2,985
And1: 321
Joined: May 15, 2004
 

 

Post#54 » by 20MexicanosIn1Van » Wed Jun 11, 2008 4:17 pm

Free throw discrepencay doesn't mean that the game was poorly reffed. Often, one team is driving or cutting to the hoop much more frequently than the other team. Thus, resulting in more fouls. It does not necessarily mean the game was poorly officiated.

Although, free throw discrepencay is often a result of biased officiating. For example, the Kings/Lakers Game 6. That was clearly bias. Clearly. And it angers me to think that anyone else, besides the players, can decide a game. In fact, f*ck the NBA and their tactics. Us fans watch our teams all year, just to see them get screwed by the NBA? That's utter bull. No other sports league has this much controversy over the reffing, not even college basketball. But the NBA can't ref properly? And people are telling me that the officiating is not bias? Give me a break.

One more thing, I officialy hate Phil Jackson. For someone whose teams have historically gotten all the calls, he sure does whine about the reffing every chance he gets.
magicfan4life05
RealGM
Posts: 23,617
And1: 198
Joined: Jun 29, 2005
Location: Welcome back the Comeback King !

 

Post#55 » by magicfan4life05 » Wed Jun 11, 2008 4:21 pm

NBATV is going to show game 6 of the 2002 western conference finals right now on tv, so now we can all get a chance to watch it again, and judge for ourselves if anything was going on















:lol: c'mon would stern ever let that happen...no way that game will be shown as hardwood classic....
Dwight Howard on his FT struggles:

"I just think everybody needs to stop talking about it," Howard said. "There's more to life than free throws."
Celtsfan1980
Assistant Coach
Posts: 3,853
And1: 192
Joined: Mar 25, 2008

 

Post#56 » by Celtsfan1980 » Wed Jun 11, 2008 4:53 pm

rewill17 wrote:Shoula been champs


1997 Bulls
1998 Jazz
1999 Spurs
2000 Blazers
2001 Lakers
2002 Kings
2003 Spurs
2004 Pistons
2005 Spurs
2006 Mavs
2007 Suns
2008 Jazz/Spurs

So, you know the 66-win Celtics would have lost to Utah or San Antonio? The Pacers were certainly good enough to defeat the Blazers. It doesn't look like you're giving the East much credit.
HarlemHeat37
Banned User
Posts: 6,570
And1: 7
Joined: Sep 14, 2006

 

Post#57 » by HarlemHeat37 » Wed Jun 11, 2008 4:57 pm

LOL some of you guys are ridiculous..

game 5 was nothing..it was just a poorly reffed game, like we see all the time..

game 6 was a disgrace to basketball, and was most likely rigged..*..

LOL @ the homer bgil, blaming the Pistons handchecking for LA losing..maybe if you weren't such a blind homer, you'd realize how Kobe played in that series..taking 30 more shots than a single-covered Shaq and shooting 20+% less from the field..
User avatar
FakeScreenName123
RealGM
Posts: 14,176
And1: 5,113
Joined: Jul 09, 2003
Location: Town

 

Post#58 » by FakeScreenName123 » Wed Jun 11, 2008 5:14 pm

magicfan4life05 wrote:-= original quote snipped =-

]


Delany is one of the worst refs in the league. I always thought he was up to something sketchy.
User avatar
TonyMontana
RealGM
Posts: 11,726
And1: 398
Joined: Apr 27, 2006
Location: Loungin in the Cali sun.
     

Re: Is there video of the LA-Sac 2002 game 6 online? 

Post#59 » by TonyMontana » Wed Jun 11, 2008 5:36 pm

GonzoLays wrote:The game that doughnagy said was fixed by the NBA. I can't find it on youtube.

Specifically the 4th quarter in which the Lakers shot 27 free throws and the Kings 9. Wow, 27 free throws in one quarter!!


No Gozno its not, but last nights game is available if you want to see Jordan Farmar PUNKING out P.J Brown.
User avatar
TonyMontana
RealGM
Posts: 11,726
And1: 398
Joined: Apr 27, 2006
Location: Loungin in the Cali sun.
     

 

Post#60 » by TonyMontana » Wed Jun 11, 2008 5:40 pm

Blame Rasho wrote:-= original quote snipped =-



Um... trust me they were down 2. :D
:nod:

Return to The General Board