abark wrote:alebaba wrote:abark wrote:Because he's been measured at 6-5.5 without shoes. But if we use that standard, then we should subtract 2 inches from nearly every player in the league.
I absolutely hate the concept of measuring in shoes, but if we are going to accept it, we should at least be consistent.
Justise Winslow's barefoot measurement was 6-4.5 at the NBA combine, but he's listed at 6-7.
Listed heights in basketball are a joke to begin with, but Zion's "NBA Height" will not be below 6-7.
Maybe because nba players play with shoes on, or do they play bare feet now?
Is shoe wearing exclusive to the NBA? I walked outside today and EVERYONE was wearing shoes. But if I asked any of those people how tall they were and they answered "with or without shoes," they'd be looked at like they were idiots. It's only in the NBA where that wouldn't be viewed as a stupid response.
I'm just over 6 feet tall "barefoot", which is a thing I shouldn't even have to specify. But if I walked around saying I was 6'2 or 6'3 (depending on how much I padded my shoes the last time I was measured) I'd be laughed at.
Other sports dont measure their players in shoes, even though every other sport requires some type of shoe. And what about hockey, where they play not only skates, but helmets too? If they used your logic, players could end up listed at least 5 inches taller than what they really are. Not sure what the real number would be, but it'd be absurd.
The answer you gave is the answer that is always given, but it doesn't make it a good response. It creates unnecessary variability in player heights. Some players are listed almost 3 inches taller than they are, while others are actually listed accurately. Why add that degree of variability?
The players Zion is compared height wise are also listed with measurements wearing shoes. Presumably all with about the same height added with the shoes. The NBA does it different than everyone else, as long as they are consistent, it really doesn't matter.






